scholarly journals The Emotional Status, Attitudes in Decision-Making Process, and Their Impact on Surgical Choices in Korean Breast Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Sook Young Jeon ◽  
Kyoung-Eun Kim ◽  
Eun-Kyu Kim ◽  
Hyunhee Han ◽  
Han-Byoel Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Emotional Distress ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Surgical Method ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Surgical Choices

Purpose. We examined the incidence of emotional distress in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer to determine whether the degree of emotional distress affected their choice of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy and evaluated how the patient’s preferred role in decision-making influenced her choice of surgical method. Methods. This prospective study included 85 patients newly diagnosed with in situ or invasive breast cancer eligible for BCS. Their degree of depression/anxiety and attitude toward the decision-making process were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Control Preference Scale (CPS), respectively. After receiving information on both surgical methods, the patients indicated their preferred surgical method and completed the CPS at their initial and second visits before surgery. Results. After the diagnosis of breast cancer, 75.3% of patients showed abnormal or borderline HADS scores for depression and 41.2% for anxiety. Patients with borderline or abnormal degrees of depression were more likely to have coexisting abnormal degrees of anxiety ( p < 0.001 ). However, the presence of depression or anxiety was not associated with patients’ surgical choices ( p = 0.394 and 0.530, respectively). Patients who preferred a more active role in the decision-making process were more likely to choose mastectomy over BCS, while those who were passive or collaborative chose BCS more frequently ( p = 0.001 ). Conclusion. Although many patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer experience depression and anxiety before surgery, these do not affect the choice of surgical method; however, their attitudes toward the decision-making process do.

The G8 frailty screening tool and the decision‐making process in older breast cancer patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen R. M. Scheepers ◽  
Loes F. Molen ◽  
Frederiek Bos ◽  
Josephine P. Burgmans ◽  
Lieke H. Huis‐Tanja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

scholarly journals Relationship Between Decision Conflict and Decision Regret Among Postoperative Breast Cancer Patients in China: The Regulating Role of Decision-Making Preparation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Wang ◽  
Qingyue Zhang ◽  
Jianmei Pang ◽  
Liyuan Shi ◽  
Xiaoyuan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Information Support ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Decision Conflict ◽  
Decision Regret ◽  
Surgical Methods

Abstract Objective: Different surgical methods have different risks and benefits. The Chinese breast cancer(BC) patients’ decision-making of surgical treatment become a critical research question. Patients are often offered several options before surgery, and decision preparation play an important role in decision process. However some patients regret the original decision afterward. To understand the current situation, this study explore mainly explores the status of decision regret among newly diagnosed BC patients,and tests the relationship between decision conflicts, decision-making preparation, and decision regrets. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted. Totally 320 postoperative BC patients were studied using a self-made general data scale, Decision Regret Scale, Decision Conflict Scale, and Preparation for Decision Making Scale. Basic descriptive analyses, Pearson’s correlation analyses and regression analyses were performed. Results: The average score of decision regret among BC patients after surgery was 34.28. Decision regret was positively associated with decision conflict (r=0.853, p<0.01), and negatively associated decision preparation (r=-0.404, p<0.01). Decision-making preparation plays a regulatory role for the emergence of decision conflicts and regrets. The correlation between decision conflicts and decision regrets increases with the increase of decision-making preparation. Conclusion: The adverse effects of decision conflicts on decision regrets gradually increase with the increase of decision-making preparation. Results indicate that reducing decision preparation can be expected to improve the level of decision regret among Chinese BC patients.Thus, Clinical staffs should encourage patients to actively participate in decision-making, provide specialized information support, and improve the level of decision regret among Chinese BCpatients after surgery.

Patient Satisfaction With Treatment of Breast Cancer: Does Surgeon Specialization Matter?

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (24) ◽  
pp. 3694-3698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer F. Waljee ◽  
Sarah Hawley ◽  
Amy K. Alderman ◽  
Monica Morrow ◽  
Steven J. Katz
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Breast Disease ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Patient Relationship ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Low Volume

Purpose Experience and practice setting vary greatly among surgeons who treat breast cancer patients. However, less is known about how these factors influence patient satisfaction with their care. Patients and Methods We surveyed all ductal carcinoma in situ patients and a 20% random sample of invasive breast cancer patients diagnosed in 2002 reported to the Detroit, MI, and Los Angeles, CA, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. Attending surgeons were surveyed, yielding dyad information for 64.6% of patients (n = 1,539) and 69.7% of surgeons (n = 318). Logistic regression was used to examine the associations between surgeon specialization (percentage of practice devoted to breast disease) and hospital cancer program status, with four domains of patient satisfaction: (1) the surgical decision, (2) decision-making process, (3) surgeon-patient relationship, and (4) surgeon-patient communication, adjusting for patient and surgeon demographics and disease stage. Results In this sample, 34.5% of patients were treated by surgeons who devoted less than 30% (low volume) of their practice to breast disease, 32.5% by surgeons who devoted 30% to 60% (medium volume) of their practice to breast disease, and 33.0% by surgeons who devoted more than 60% (high volume) of their practice to breast disease. Compared to patients treated by low-volume surgeons, patients treated by higher volume surgeons were more satisfied with the decision-making process (medium volume, odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.67; high volume: OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.80) and with the surgeon-patient relationship (medium volume: OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.76; high volume: OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.08 to 3.61). Treatment setting was not associated with patient satisfaction after controlling for other factors. Conclusion Surgeon specialization is correlated with patient satisfaction. Examining the processes underlying these associations can inform strategies to improve breast cancer care.

Primary care provider-reported participation in breast cancer treatment decision making.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 78-78
Author(s):  
Lauren P. Wallner ◽  
Yun Li ◽  
Chandler McLeod ◽  
Archana Radhakrishnan ◽  
Sarah T. Hawley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Breast Cancer Treatment ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Treatment Decision Making

78 Background: Surgical treatment decisions for early-stage breast cancer patients are complex and often involve discussions with multiple oncology providers. However, with the increasing adoption of team-based cancer care models, it remains unknown to what extent primary care providers (PCPs) are participating in breast cancer treatment decisions and whether they feel they have enough knowledge to participate in these decisions effectively. Methods: A stratified random sample of PCPs identified by newly diagnosed early-stage breast cancer patients who participated in iCanCare Study (Georgia and Los Angeles SEER registries) were surveyed about their experiences caring for cancer patients (N = 519, 58% current response rate). PCPs were asked how frequently they discussed which surgery a patient should have, how comfortable they were with these discussions, whether they had the necessary knowledge to participate in treatment decision making and their confidence in their ability to help with treatment decision making (5-item likert-type scales). The individual items were then categorized as somewhat/often/always vs. never/rarely for analyses. Results: In this preliminary sample, 62% of PCPs were not comfortable having a discussion about surgery options with a patient newly diagnosed with breast cancer, 41% did not feel that they had the necessary knowledge to participate in treatment decision-making, and 34% were not confident in the ability to help with treatment decision-making. One third (32%) of PCPs reported discussing surgical treatment options with their newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, but 22% of these PCPs also reported that they were not comfortable having these discussions and 16% reported they did not have necessary knowledge to participate in decision-making. Conclusions: A minority of PCPs participate in breast cancer treatment decision-making and there are notable gaps in their self-reported knowledge about decision-making and confidence in their ability to help with these decisions. Efforts to increase PCP knowledge about the specifics of cancer treatments may be warranted, but further research is needed to assess the impact of PCP participation on treatment decision-making outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document