scholarly journals Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Tripterygium wilfordii Polyglycosides Tablets in the Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
Yan-Li Guo ◽  
Feng Gao ◽  
Tai-Wei Dong ◽  
Yang Bai ◽  
Qiao Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Nephrotic Syndrome ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Computer Search ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Tripterygium Wilfordii

Objective. Tripterygium wilfordii polyglycosides tablet (TGt) is an oral preparation extracted from plant Tripterygium wilfordii. It has the effects of anti-inflammation and inhibition of cellular and humoral immunity. However, many reports of adverse reactions caused by TGt have limited its application. In this paper, the clinical efficacy and safety of TGt in the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) were verified by data mining and analysis, so as to provide theoretical data support for the application and development of TGt. Methods. A computer search of the following databases was conducted: PubMed, Web of Science, CBM, VIP, Wanfang Data, and CNKI. The search time limit is from the establishment of the database to September 2020. We searched for clinical randomized controlled trials of TGt in the treatment of CKD. The main types of CKD involved are nephrotic syndrome (NS), primary nephrotic syndrome (PNS), refractory nephrotic syndrome (RNS), and IgA nephropathy (IgAN). RevMan 5.2 and Stata 12.0 software were used to evaluate the literature quality and analyze the data. Finally, GRADEpro software was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. Results. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 75 articles with a total of 6418 subjects were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that TGt could reduce 24-hour urinary protein, increase serum albumin, improve clinical efficacy, and reduce disease recurrence rate in patients ( P < 0.05 ) with CKD compared with adrenocortical hormones or immunosuppressants. TGt could significantly reduce the level of serum creatinine (Scr) in patients with CKD ( P < 0.05 ), but it was not significant in reducing the level of blood urea nitrogen ( P > 0.05 ). In terms of safety evaluation, in patients with CKD, it could significantly reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions and neurogenic dizziness and headache ( P < 0.05 ). However, in terms of adverse reactions such as liver injury, respiratory infection, and leukopenia, TGt was as harmful as corticosteroids or immunosuppressants ( P < 0.05 ). The quality of the evidence was evaluated with GRADEpro software, and the results showed that TGt was strongly recommended for the treatment of CKD. Conclusion. TGt has certain efficacy in the treatment of CKD and has fewer side effects in certain types of diseases. The effect of TGt combined with other drugs is better than that of single use. This paper also has some limitations. Due to the limited number of the included studies, with all being from China, there may be methodological differences. Therefore, more high-quality literature data from different countries are needed.

Efficacy and safety of endovascular arteriovenous fistula creation with comparison to surgically created fistulas: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol v2

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshinosuke Shimamura ◽  
Hajime Yamazaki ◽  
Takamasa Miyauchi ◽  
Hiroshi Ueta ◽  
Yasutaka Kuniyoshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistula ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Analysis Protocol

This systemic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluated existing evidence on the clinical efficacy and safety of endovascular arteriovenous fistula creation by directly comparing it with surgical arteriovenous fistula creation among patients with chronic kidney disease requiring hemodialysis.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Veverimer in the Treatment of Metabolic Acidosis Caused by Chronic Kidney Disease: A Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenlin Liu ◽  
Lili Li ◽  
Xuemei Zhang ◽  
Haonan Dong ◽  
Miaomiao Lu
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Metabolic Acidosis ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
High Capacity ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Efficacy And Safety

Metabolic acidosis is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Veverimer is an orally administrated, free amine polymer with high capacity and binding selectivity to hydrochloric acid from the gastrointestinal tract. This study pooled the current evidence of the efficacy and safety of veverimer for the treatment of metabolic acidosis associated with CKD. We conducted a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in June 2020. In this study, three RCTs with 548 patients were included in our analysis. The analysis revealed that veverimer was associated with increased bicarbonate level of patients (weight mean difference [WMD] 3.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] [2.40, 3.77], p &lt; 0.001) and improved physical function compared with placebo measured by Kidney Disease and Quality of Life Short Form 36, question 3 (physical functioning domain) (KDQoL-PFD) score (WMD 5.25, 95% CI [1.58, 8.92], p = 0.005). For safety outcomes, both groups exhibited similar risks for developing headache, diarrhea, flatulence, and hyperkalemia. In conclusion, current clinical evidence indicates that veverimer is efficacious and safe against metabolic acidosis related to CKD compared with placebo. Further research comparing long-term veverimer use with traditional alkali therapy is needed.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Tanshinone for Chronic Kidney Disease: A Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Yao Zhou ◽  
Shi-min Jiang ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Lei Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Protein Level ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Urine Protein

Objective. To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of tanshinone for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of CKD using tanshinone were searched using 4 Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Value In Paper (VIP), Wanfang, and Chinese Biology Medicine (CBM)) and 3 English databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Excerpta Medica Database (Embase)). The results included data on blood urine nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine (Scr), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), 24 h urine protein, microalbuminuria (mALB), β2-macroglobulin (β2-MG), cystatin C (CysC), and safety events. The data were analyzed using Revman 5.3 and Stata 12.0 software. Results. Twenty-one studies were entered into this meta-analysis, which involved 1857 patients including 954 cases from the tanshinone treatment group and 903 cases from the control group. BUN levels in the tanshinone treatment group were significantly reduced compared with the control (standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.81 to −0.49, p<0.01). In addition, subgroup analysis indicated that tanshinone had a significant effect in reducing Scr levels at 14, 21, and 28 days. Scr levels in the tanshinone treatment group were significantly reduced compared with the control group (SMD = −1.40, 95% CI: −2.09 to −0.71, p<0.01); subgroup analysis based on treatment time also yielded the same results. GFR in the tanshinone treatment group was better than that in the control group (SMD = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.59 to 1.07, p<0.01). In terms of urine protein levels, 24 h urine protein level, mALB, and β2-MG of CKD patients were reduced to some degree compared with controls, and CysC levels in the tanshinone treatment group were also significantly reduced compared with the control group (SMD = −0.24, 95% CI: −0.44 to −0.03, p<0.05). Safety in the tanshinone treatment group did not differ significantly from that of the control group (risk ratio (RR) = 7.78, 95% CI: 0.99 to 61.05, p>0.05). Conclusion. This meta-analysis showed that tanshinone could control urine protein level in CKD patients, improve kidney function, and delay the evolution of CKD without significant side effects. However, the results were limited and should be interpreted with caution because of the low quality of the included studies. In the future, more rigorous clinical trials need to be conducted to provide sufficient and accurate evidence.

The efficacy and safety of roxadustat for anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiyan Zheng ◽  
Huisheng Yang ◽  
Xinwen Fu ◽  
Yishan Huang ◽  
Ruojun Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Transferrin Saturation ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Epoetin Alfa ◽  
Electronic Resource ◽  
Quality Evidence

Abstract Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an increasing public health issue. Anemia, which is a complication of CKD, is associated with reduced quality of life and increased morbidity and mortality. Currently quite a few clinical studies have been conducted to compare roxadustat with epoetin alfa [all for dialysis-dependent (DD) patients] or placebo [all for nondialysis-dependent (NDD) patients]. Our meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of roxadustat for anemia in patients with CKD. Methods We thoroughly searched eight electronic resource databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety between roxadustat versus epoetin alfa or placebo for the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD. Results Four Phase 2 and two Phase 3 studies with 1010 participants were included. Hemoglobin (Hb) and transferrin levels were increased significantly in the roxadustat group versus those in the placebo {standard mean difference [SMD] 1.57 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17–1.98]; SMD 1.81 [95% CI 1.53–2.08]; respectively, both low-quality evidence} or epoetin alfa group [SMD 0.47 (95% CI 0.02–0.93), very low-quality evidence; SMD 1.05 (95% CI 0.81–1.29), low-quality evidence; respectively]. Hepcidin levels were reduced significantly in the roxadustat group versus those in the placebo [SMD −1.72 (95% CI −3.03 to −0.41), very low-quality evidence] or epoetin alfa group [SMD −0.23 (95% CI −0.43 to −0.02), low-quality evidence]. Ferritin and serum transferrin saturation (TSAT) levels were reduced significantly in the roxadustat group versus those in the placebo group [SMD −0.82 (95% CI −1.31 to −0.33); SMD −0.54 (95% CI −0.76 to −0.32), respectively; both low-quality evidence] and ferritin and TSAT levels in the roxadustat group were comparable to those in the epoetin alfa group [SMD 0.02 (95% CI −0.18–0.21); SMD 0.15 (95% CI −0.04–0.35), respectively, both low-quality evidence]. As for safety, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) in the roxadustat group was insignificantly different from that of the placebo group [risk ratio (RR) 0.99 (95% CI 0.83–1.18); P = 0.89, very low-quality evidence]. But the incidence of AEs in the roxadustat group was significantly higher than that in the epoetin alfa group [RR 1.25 (95% CI 1.01–1.54); P = 0.04, low-quality evidence]. There was no significant association between roxadustat and the incidence of serious AEs (SAEs) for both NDD and DD patients [RR 1.08 (95% CI 0.51–2.28) and RR 1.43 (95% CI 0.85–2.40), respectively, both very low-quality evidence]. Conclusion In this meta-analysis of RCTs, we found evidence that after the oral administration of roxadustat, NDD patients’ Hb levels were increased effectively and DD patients’ Hb levels were maintained effectively. The risk of SAEs was not observed with the short-term use of roxadustat. These findings support roxadustat for the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD.

Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis in chronic kidney disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis compared with planned peritoneal dialysis and with urgent-start hemodialysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 089686082091871
Author(s):  
Guo Xieyi ◽  
Tang Xiaohong ◽  
Wu Xiaofang ◽  
Li Zi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Exit Site Infection ◽  
Quality Of Evidence ◽  
Significant Difference

An increasing number of studies have focused on whether peritoneal dialysis (PD) can be used for the urgent initiation of dialysis in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the feasibility and safety of urgent-start PD compared with those of planned PD and urgent-start hemodialysis (HD) in this population. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), clinicaltrials.gov , and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched for relevant studies. Conference abstracts were also searched in relevant websites. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. A total of 15 trials involving 2426 participants were identified. The quality of the included studies was fair, but the quality of evidence was very low. Unadjusted meta-analysis showed that urgent-start PD had significantly higher mortality than planned PD, while adjusted meta-analysis did not show a significant difference. Higher incident of leakage and catheter mechanical dysfunction were observed in urgent-start PD. However, peritonitis, exit-site infection, or PD technique survival were comparable between urgent-start and planned PD. The all-cause mortality was comparable in urgent-start PD and urgent-start HD. Bacteremia was significantly lower in the urgent-start PD group than with urgent-start HD. Based on limited evidences, PD may be a viable alternative to HD for CKD patients requiring urgent-start dialysis. Because of the inconsistent results and the low quality of evidence, a definitive conclusion could not be drawn for whether urgent-start PD was comparable with planned PD. Therefore, high-quality and large-scale studies are needed in the future.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document