scholarly journals The Number of Blocks of a Graph with Given Minimum Degree

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Lei Li ◽  
Baoyindureng Wu

A block of a graph is a nonseparable maximal subgraph of the graph. We denote by b G the number of block of a graph G . We show that, for a connected graph G of order n with minimum degree k ≥ 1 , b G < 2 k − 3 / k 2 − k − 1 n . The bound is asymptotically tight. In addition, for a connected cubic graph G of order n ≥ 14 , b G ≤ n / 2 − 2 . The bound is tight.

2014 ◽  
Vol Vol. 16 no. 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic Havet ◽  
Nagarajan Paramaguru ◽  
Rathinaswamy Sampathkumar

International audience For a connected graph G of order |V(G)| ≥3 and a k-labelling c : E(G) →{1,2,…,k} of the edges of G, the code of a vertex v of G is the ordered k-tuple (ℓ1,ℓ2,…,ℓk), where ℓi is the number of edges incident with v that are labelled i. The k-labelling c is detectable if every two adjacent vertices of G have distinct codes. The minimum positive integer k for which G has a detectable k-labelling is the detection number det(G) of G. In this paper, we show that it is NP-complete to decide if the detection number of a cubic graph is 2. We also show that the detection number of every bipartite graph of minimum degree at least 3 is at most 2. Finally, we give some sufficient condition for a cubic graph to have detection number 3.


10.37236/499 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Henning ◽  
Ingo Schiermeyer ◽  
Anders Yeo

For a graph $G$, let $\gamma(G)$ denote the domination number of $G$ and let $\delta(G)$ denote the minimum degree among the vertices of $G$. A vertex $x$ is called a bad-cut-vertex of $G$ if $G-x$ contains a component, $C_x$, which is an induced $4$-cycle and $x$ is adjacent to at least one but at most three vertices on $C_x$. A cycle $C$ is called a special-cycle if $C$ is a $5$-cycle in $G$ such that if $u$ and $v$ are consecutive vertices on $C$, then at least one of $u$ and $v$ has degree $2$ in $G$. We let ${\rm bc}(G)$ denote the number of bad-cut-vertices in $G$, and ${\rm sc}(G)$ the maximum number of vertex disjoint special-cycles in $G$ that contain no bad-cut-vertices. We say that a graph is $(C_4,C_5)$-free if it has no induced $4$-cycle or $5$-cycle. Bruce Reed [Paths, stars and the number three. Combin. Probab. Comput. 5 (1996), 277–295] showed that if $G$ is a graph of order $n$ with $\delta(G) \ge 3$, then $\gamma(G) \le 3n/8$. In this paper, we relax the minimum degree condition from three to two. Let $G$ be a connected graph of order $n \ge 14$ with $\delta(G) \ge 2$. As an application of Reed's result, we show that $\gamma(G) \le \frac{1}{8} ( 3n + {\rm sc}(G) + {\rm bc}(G))$. As a consequence of this result, we have that (i) $\gamma(G) \le 2n/5$; (ii) if $G$ contains no special-cycle and no bad-cut-vertex, then $\gamma(G) \le 3n/8$; (iii) if $G$ is $(C_4,C_5)$-free, then $\gamma(G) \le 3n/8$; (iv) if $G$ is $2$-connected and $d_G(u) + d_G(v) \ge 5$ for every two adjacent vertices $u$ and $v$, then $\gamma(G) \le 3n/8$. All bounds are sharp.


10.37236/5173 ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakub Przybyło

A locally irregular graph is a graph whose adjacent vertices have distinct degrees. We say that a graph G can be decomposed into k locally irregular subgraphs if its edge set may be partitioned into k subsets each of which induces a locally irregular subgraph in G. It has been conjectured that apart from the family of exceptions which admit no such decompositions, i.e., odd paths, odd cycles and a special class of graphs of maximum degree 3, every connected graph can be decomposed into 3 locally irregular subgraphs. Using a combination of a probabilistic approach and some known theorems on degree constrained subgraphs of a given graph, we prove this to hold for graphs of minimum degree at least $10^{10}$. This problem is strongly related to edge colourings distinguishing neighbours by the pallets of their incident colours and to the 1-2-3 Conjecture. In particular, the contribution of this paper constitutes a strengthening of a result of Addario-Berry, Aldred, Dalal and Reed [J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 94 (2005) 237-244].


Author(s):  
Gary Chartrand ◽  
Sergio Ruiz ◽  
Curtiss E. Wall

AbstractA near 1-factor of a graph of order 2n ≧ 4 is a subgraph isomorphic to (n − 2) K2 ∪ P3 ∪ K1. Wallis determined, for each r ≥ 3, the order of a smallest r-regular graph of even order without a 1-factor; while for each r ≧ 3, Chartrand, Goldsmith and Schuster determined the order of a smallest r-regular, (r − 2)-edge-connected graph of even order without a 1-factor. These results are extended to graphs without near 1-factors. It is known that every connected, cubic graph with less than six bridges has a near 1-factor. The order of a smallest connected, cubic graph with exactly six bridges and no near 1-factor is determined.


2017 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 438-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Li ◽  
Guoping Wang ◽  
Jixiang Meng

Let \eta(G) denote the distance signless Laplacian spectral radius of a connected graph G. In this paper,bounds for the distance signless Laplacian spectral radius of connected graphs are given, and the extremal graph with the minimal distance signless Laplacian spectral radius among the graphs with given vertex connectivity and minimum degree is determined. Furthermore, the digraph that minimizes the distance signless Laplacian spectral radius with given vertex connectivity is characterized.


Filomat ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 683-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kinkar Das ◽  
Marjan Matejic ◽  
Emina Milovanovic ◽  
Igor Milovanovic

LetG = (V,E) be a simple connected graph of order n (?2) and size m, where V(G) = {1, 2,..., n}. Also let ? = d1 ? d2 ?... ? dn = ? > 0, di = d(i), be a sequence of its vertex degrees with maximum degree ? and minimum degree ?. The symmetric division deg index, SDD, was defined in [D. Vukicevic, Bond additive modeling 2. Mathematical properties of max-min rodeg index, Croat. Chem. Acta 83 (2010) 261- 273] as SDD = SDD(G) = ?i~j d2i+d2j/didj, where i~j means that vertices i and j are adjacent. In this paper we give some new bounds for this topological index. Moreover, we present a relation between topological indices of graph.


2013 ◽  
Vol Vol. 15 no. 1 (Graph Theory) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Seamone ◽  
Brett Stevens

Graph Theory International audience Karonski, Luczak, and Thomason (2004) conjecture that, for any connected graph G on at least three vertices, there exists an edge weighting from 1, 2, 3 such that adjacent vertices receive different sums of incident edge weights. Bartnicki, Grytczuk, and Niwcyk (2009) make a stronger conjecture, that each edge's weight may be chosen from an arbitrary list of size 3 rather than 1, 2, 3. We examine a variation of these conjectures, where each vertex is coloured with a sequence of edge weights. Such a colouring relies on an ordering of E(G), and so two variations arise - one where we may choose any ordering of E(G) and one where the ordering is fixed. In the former case, we bound the list size required for any graph. In the latter, we obtain a bound on list sizes for graphs with sufficiently large minimum degree. We also extend our methods to a list variation of irregularity strength, where each vertex receives a distinct sequence of edge weights.


1980 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1325-1332 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Bondy ◽  
R. C. Entringer

The relationship between the lengths of cycles in a graph and the degrees of its vertices was first studied in a general context by G. A. Dirac. In [5], he proved that every 2-connected simple graph on n vertices with minimum degree d contains a cycle of length at least min{2d, n};. Dirac's theorem was subsequently strengthened in various directions in [7], [6], [13], [12], [2], [1], [11], [8], [14], [15] and [16].Our aim here is to investigate another aspect of this relationship, namely how the lengths of the cycles in a 2-connected graph depend on the maximum degree. Let us denote by ƒ(n, d) the largest integer k such that every 2-connected simple graph on n vertices with maximum degree d contains a cycle of length at least k. We prove in Section 2 that, for d ≧ 3 and n ≧ d + 2,


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Ning ◽  
Xing Peng

AbstractThe famous Erdős–Gallai theorem on the Turán number of paths states that every graph with n vertices and m edges contains a path with at least (2m)/n edges. In this note, we first establish a simple but novel extension of the Erdős–Gallai theorem by proving that every graph G contains a path with at least $${{(s + 1){N_{s + 1}}(G)} \over {{N_s}(G)}} + s - 1$$ edges, where Nj(G) denotes the number of j-cliques in G for 1≤ j ≤ ω(G). We also construct a family of graphs which shows our extension improves the estimate given by the Erdős–Gallai theorem. Among applications, we show, for example, that the main results of [20], which are on the maximum possible number of s-cliques in an n-vertex graph without a path with ℓ vertices (and without cycles of length at least c), can be easily deduced from this extension. Indeed, to prove these results, Luo [20] generalized a classical theorem of Kopylov and established a tight upper bound on the number of s-cliques in an n-vertex 2-connected graph with circumference less than c. We prove a similar result for an n-vertex 2-connected graph with circumference less than c and large minimum degree. We conclude this paper with an application of our results to a problem from spectral extremal graph theory on consecutive lengths of cycles in graphs.


2021 ◽  
pp. 2150014
Author(s):  
Shuai Kou ◽  
Chengfu Qin ◽  
Weihua Yang

An edge [Formula: see text] in a 3-connected graph [Formula: see text] is contractible if the contraction [Formula: see text] is still [Formula: see text]-connected. Let [Formula: see text] be the set of contractible edges of [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] be the set of vertices adjacent to three vertices of a triangle △. It has been proved that [Formula: see text] in a 3-connected graph [Formula: see text] of order at least 5. In this note [Formula: see text] is a 3-connected cubic graph containing [Formula: see text] triangles, at least [Formula: see text] vertices and with every [Formula: see text] an independent set. Then [Formula: see text]. This is a bound better than [Formula: see text] under some conditions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document