scholarly journals Appendiceal Intraluminal Gas: A CT Marker for Gangrenous Appendicitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Chantelle Ip ◽  
Edward H. Wang ◽  
Michael Croft ◽  
Wanyin Lim

Introduction. This manuscript aims to investigate the amount of intraluminal gas in acute, nonperforated appendicitis identified on computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing gangrenous appendicitis. Methods. This is a retrospective observational, case-control study with consecutive data collected at a tertiary institution over a two-year period, of patients with CT-diagnosed acute appendicitis who subsequently went on for surgery within 48 hours. Patients who were less than 16 years old, who had an interval between CT and surgery of more than 48 hours, or with CT evidence of appendiceal perforation were excluded. Images were independently assessed by 3 radiologists for intraluminal gas, and the results were then correlated with reference standards obtained from surgical and histopathology reports for the diagnosis of nongangrenous versus gangrenous appendicitis. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of CT intraluminal gas in gangrenous appendicitis were calculated. Results. Our study identified 93 patients with nonperforated acute appendicitis who underwent surgery within the stated timeframe. Intraluminal gas in the appendix was identified in 26 patients (28%), of which 54% had macroscopic and/or microscopic evidence of gangrenous appendicitis. This is in contrast to the subgroup of patients who did not have intraluminal gas (72%), of which only 33% had gangrenous appendicitis. The specificity of intraluminal gas for gangrenous appendicitis is 79%, with a negative predictive value of 86% and likelihood ratio of 1.85. Conclusion. In cases of established acute appendicitis, the presence of intraluminal gas is a moderately specific sign for gangrenous complication. This is worth reporting as it can help prognosticate and triage patients accordingly, for a timelier surgical management and a better outcome.

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 2870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe La Torre ◽  
Anna Paola Massetti ◽  
Guido Antonelli ◽  
Caterina Fimiani ◽  
Mauro Fantini ◽  
...  

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms and signs in healthcare workers (HCW) with Sars-CoV-2. Methods: This was a case-control study. Cases consisted of symptomatic healthcare workers who had a positive SARS-CoV-2 real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test, while controls were symptomatic healthcare workers with a negative RT-PCR test. For each symptom, ROCs were plotted. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated using the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. A logistic regression analysis was carried out for calculating the OR (95% CI) for each symptom associated to the SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Results: We recruited 30 cases and 75 controls. Fever had the best sensitivity while dyspnea, anosmia, and ageusia had the highest specificity. The highest PPVs were found again for dyspnea (75%), anosmia (73.7%), and ageusia (66.7%). Lastly, the highest NPVs were related to anosmia (81.4%) and ageusia (79.3%). Anosmia (OR = 14.75; 95% CI: 4.27–50.87), ageusia (OR = 9.18; 95% CI: 2.80–30.15), and headache (OR = 3.92; 95% CI: 1.45–10.56) are significantly associated to SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Conclusions: Anosmia and ageusia should be considered in addition to the well-established fever, cough, and dyspnea. In a resource-limited setting, this method could save time and money.


Author(s):  
K. S. Vaidya ◽  
A. MacGregor ◽  
J. M. M. Evans ◽  
A. D. McMahon ◽  
M. M. McGilchrist ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 1393-1402
Author(s):  
Yosuke Sasaki ◽  
Fumiya Komatsu ◽  
Naoyasu Kashima ◽  
Takahiro Sato ◽  
Ikutaka Takemoto ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 316-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Nelson ◽  
J Morris ◽  
D J Barker ◽  
S Simmonds

2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Guilherme Bezerra Alves ◽  
José Natal Figueiroa ◽  
Isabela Barros

Breast feeding stimulates a more tolerant lymphoid tissue at the base of the appendix and this could provide protection against acute appendicitis. Two studies reported that children and adolescents with appendicitis were less likely to have been breast fed. In a case-control study of 200 children with histologically confirmed acute appendicitis matched by 200 siblings with the same sex and difference age – up to three-year-old – we found breast feeding in at least the first two months of life and for more than four months provides protection against acute appendicitis. These findings suggesting that breast feeding may possibly give protection against the development of appendicitis.


2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Raahave ◽  
Elsebeth Christensen ◽  
Henrik Moeller ◽  
Lene T. Kirkeby ◽  
Franck B. Loud ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 118 (10) ◽  
pp. 1823-1831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Banne Nemeth ◽  
Raymond van Adrichem ◽  
Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg ◽  
Trevor Baglin ◽  
Frits Rosendaal ◽  
...  

AbstractPatients at high risk for venous thrombosis (VT) following knee arthroscopy could potentially benefit from thromboprophylaxis. We explored the predictive values of environmental, genetic risk factors and levels of coagulation markers to integrate these into a prediction model. Using a population-based case–control study into the aetiology of VT, we developed a Complete (all variables), Screening (easy to use in clinical practice) and Clinical (only environmental risk factors) model. The Clinical model was transformed into the Leiden-Thrombosis Risk Prediction (arthroscopy) score [L-TRiP(ascopy) score]. Model validation was performed both internally and externally in another case–control study. A total of 4,943 cases and 6,294 controls were maintained in the analyses, 107 cases and 26 controls had undergone knee arthroscopy. Twelve predictor variables (8 environmental, 3 haemorheological and 1 genetic) were selected from 52 candidates and incorporated into the Complete model (area under the curve [AUC] of 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76–0.86). The Screening model (9 predictors: environmental factors plus factor VIII activity) reached an AUC of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.64–0.88) and the Clinical (and corresponding L-TRiP(ascopy)) model an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.60–0.83). In the internal and external validation, the Complete model reached an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.52–0.98) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.42–1.00), respectively, while the other models performed slightly less well.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document