scholarly journals A Geophysical Review of the Seabed Methane Seepage Features and Their Relationship with Gas Hydrate Systems

Geofluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Jinxiu Yang ◽  
Mingyue Lu ◽  
Zhiguang Yao ◽  
Min Wang ◽  
Shuangfang Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Gas Hydrate ◽  
Greenhouse Gas Emission ◽  
Spatial Relationship ◽  
Methane Flux ◽  
Fluid Migration ◽  
Stability Zone ◽  
Methane Seepage ◽  
Migration Pathways ◽  
Hydrate Stability

Seabed methane seepage has gained attention from all over the world in recent years as an important source of greenhouse gas emission, and gas hydrates are also regarded as a key factor affecting climate change or even global warming due to their shallow burial and poor stability. However, the relationship between seabed methane seepage and gas hydrate systems is not clear although they often coexist in continental margins. It is of significance to clarify their relationship and better understand the contribution of gas hydrate systems or the deeper hydrocarbon reservoirs for methane flux leaking to the seawater or even the atmosphere by natural seepages at the seabed. In this paper, a geophysical examination of the global seabed methane seepage events has been conducted, and nearby gas hydrate stability zone and relevant fluid migration pathways have been interpreted or modelled using seismic data, multibeam data, or underwater photos. Results show that seabed methane seepage sites are often manifested as methane flares, pockmarks, deep-water corals, authigenic carbonates, and gas hydrate pingoes at the seabed, most of which are closely related to vertical fluid migration structures like faults, gas chimneys, mud volcanoes, and unconformity surfaces or are located in the landward limit of gas hydrate stability zone (LLGHSZ) where hydrate dissociation may have released a great volume of methane. Based on a comprehensive analysis of these features, three major types of seabed methane seepage are classified according to their spatial relationship with the location of LLGHSZ, deeper than the LLGHSZ (A), around the LLGHSZ (B), and shallower than LLGHSZ (C). These three seabed methane seepage types can be further divided into five subtypes considering whether the gas source of seabed methane seepage is from the gas hydrate systems or not. We propose subtype B2 represents the most important seabed methane seepage type due to the high density of seepage sites and large volume of released methane from massive focused vigorous methane seepage sites around the LLGHSZ. Based on the classification result of this research, more measures should be taken for subtype B2 seabed methane seepage to predict or even prevent ocean warming or climate change.

Time Constraints on Seepage Through Fractured Regions on the Vestnesa Ridge off the W-Svalbard Coast

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hariharan Ramachandran ◽  
Andreia Plaza-Faverola ◽  
Hugh Daigle ◽  
Stefan Buenz
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Effective Stress ◽  
Gas Hydrate ◽  
Fluid Pressure ◽  
Fracture Network ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Stability Zone ◽  
Methane Seepage ◽  
Carbonate Formation ◽  
Hydrate Stability

<p>Evidences of subsurface fluid flow-driven fractures (from seismic interpretation) are quite common at Vestnesa Ridge (around 79ºN in the Arctic Ocean), W-Svalbard margin. Ultimately, the fractured systems have led to the formation of pockmarks on the seafloor. At present day, the eastern segment of the ridge has active pockmarks with continuous methane seep observations in sonar data. The pockmarks in the western segment are considered inactive or to seep at a rate that is harder to identify. The ridge is at ~1200m water depth with the base of the gas hydrate stability zone (GHSZ) at ~200m below the seafloor. Considerable free gas zone is present below the hydrates. Besides the obvious concern of amount and rates of historic methane seeping into the ocean biosphere and its associated effects, significant gaps exist in the ability to model the processes of flow of methane through this faulted and fractured region. Our aim is to highlight the interactions between physical flow, geomechanics and geological control processes that govern the rates and timing of methane seepage.</p><p>For this purpose, we performed numerical fluid flow simulations. We integrate fundamental mass and component conservation equations with a phase equilibrium approach accounting for hydrate phase boundary effects to simulate the transport of gas from the base of the GHSZ through rock matrix and interconnected fractures until the seafloor. The relation between effective stress and fluid pressure is considered and fractures are activated once the effective stress exceeds the tensile limit. We use field data (seismic, oedometer tests on calypso cores, pore fluid pressure and temperature) to constrain the range of validity of various flow and geomechanical parameters in the simulation (such as vertical stress, porosity, permeability, saturations).</p><p>Preliminary results indicate fluid overpressure greater than 1.5 MPa is required to initiate fractures at the base of the gas hydrate stability zone for the investigated system. Focused fluid flow occurs through the narrow fracture networks and the gas reaches the seafloor within 1 day. The surrounding regions near the fracture network exhibit slower seepage towards the seafloor, but over a wider area. Advective flux through the less fractured surrounding regions, reaches the seafloor within 15 years and a diffusive flux reaches within 1200 years. These times are controlled by the permeability of the sediments and are retarded further due to considerable hydrate/carbonate formation during vertical migration. Next course of action includes constraining the methane availability at the base of the GHSZ and estimating its impact on seepage behavior.</p>

scholarly journals Thermal State of the Blake Ridge Gas Hydrate Stability Zone (GHSZ)—Insights on Gas Hydrate Dynamics from a New Multi-Phase Numerical Model

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (17) ◽  
pp. 3403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burwicz ◽  
Rüpke
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Model ◽  
Gas Hydrate ◽  
Methane Flux ◽  
Stability Zone ◽  
Free Gas ◽  
Blake Ridge ◽  
Geochemical Profiles ◽  
Multi Phase ◽  
Hydrate Stability

Marine sediments of the Blake Ridge province exhibit clearly defined geophysical indications for the presence of gas hydrates and a free gas phase. Despite being one of the world’s best-studied gas hydrate provinces and having been drilled during Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Leg 164, discrepancies between previous model predictions and reported chemical profiles as well as hydrate concentrations result in uncertainty regarding methane sources and a possible co-existence between hydrates and free gas near the base of the gas hydrate stability zone (GHSZ). Here, by using a new multi-phase finite element (FE) numerical model, we investigate different scenarios of gas hydrate formation from both single and mixed methane sources (in-situ biogenic formation and a deep methane flux). Moreover, we explore the evolution of the GHSZ base for the past 10 Myr using reconstructed sedimentation rates and non-steady-state P-T solutions. We conclude that (1) the present-day base of the GHSZ predicted by our model is located at the depth of ~450 mbsf, thereby resolving a previously reported inconsistency between the location of the BSR at ODP Site 997 and the theoretical base of the GHSZ in the Blake Ridge region, (2) a single in-situ methane source results in a good fit between the simulated and measured geochemical profiles including the anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) zone, and (3) previously suggested 4 vol.%–7 vol.% gas hydrate concentrations would require a deep methane flux of ~170 mM (corresponds to the mass of methane flux of 1.6 × 10−11 kg s−1 m−2) in addition to methane generated in-situ by organic carbon (POC) degradation at the cost of deteriorating the fit between observed and modelled geochemical profiles.

The Double (or Multiple) BSRs Observations and their Tentative Interpretations

2013 ◽  
Vol 734-737 ◽  
pp. 467-475
Author(s):  
Yi Luo ◽  
Xin Su
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Marine Environment ◽  
Gas Hydrate ◽  
Seismic Reflection ◽  
Continental Margins ◽  
Tectonic Movement ◽  
Stability Zone ◽  
Bottom Simulating Reflector ◽  
Seismic Reflection Profiles ◽  
Hydrate Stability

Gas hydrate is a solid ice-like compound and is stable at low temperature and high pressure conditions found beneath permafrost and in marine sediments on continental margins offshore. In the marine environment, the bottom-simulating reflector (BSR) in seismic reflection profiles is interpreted to indicate the base of the gas hydrate stability zone (GHSZ).In many locations two or more sub-parallel BSRs have been reported. We not only compared the BSRs characteristics from reported areas but also discussed the mechanism of GHSZ shifts by climate change, sedimentation process and tectonic movement. We also considered the mix gases composition hydrate stability in certain marine environment and gave a simple model for the BSR differences on water depth.

scholarly journals Arctic megaslide at presumed rest

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfram H. Geissler ◽  
A. Catalina Gebhardt ◽  
Felix Gross ◽  
Jutta Wollenburg ◽  
Laura Jensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gas Hydrates ◽  
Gas Hydrate ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Slope Failure ◽  
Slope Instability ◽  
Stability Zone ◽  
Gas Reservoir ◽  
Methane Seepage ◽  
Failure Event ◽  
Hydrate Stability

Abstract Slope failure like in the Hinlopen/Yermak Megaslide is one of the major geohazards in a changing Arctic environment. We analysed hydroacoustic and 2D high-resolution seismic data from the apparently intact continental slope immediately north of the Hinlopen/Yermak Megaslide for signs of past and future instabilities. Our new bathymetry and seismic data show clear evidence for incipient slope instability. Minor slide deposits and an internally-deformed sedimentary layer near the base of the gas hydrate stability zone imply an incomplete failure event, most probably about 30000 years ago, contemporaneous to or shortly after the Hinlopen/Yermak Megaslide. An active gas reservoir at the base of the gas hydrate stability zone demonstrate that over-pressured fluids might have played a key role in the initiation of slope failure at the studied slope, but more importantly also for the giant HYM slope failure. To date, it is not clear, if the studied slope is fully preconditioned to fail completely in future or if it might be slowly deforming and creeping at present. We detected widespread methane seepage on the adjacent shallow shelf areas not sealed by gas hydrates.

The link between bottom-simulating reflections and methane flux into the gas hydrate stability zone – new evidence from Lima Basin, Peru Margin

2001 ◽  
Vol 185 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 343-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingo A. Pecher ◽  
Nina Kukowski ◽  
Christian Huebscher ◽  
Jens Greinert ◽  
Joerg Bialas
Keyword(s):  
Gas Hydrate ◽  
Methane Flux ◽  
Stability Zone ◽  
New Evidence ◽  
Hydrate Stability

Seasonal variability of natural methane seepage offshore Western Svalbard

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Moser ◽  
Knut Ola Dølven ◽  
Bénédicte Ferré
Keyword(s):  
Gas Hydrate ◽  
Bottom Water ◽  
Methane Flux ◽  
Mixing Rate ◽  
Bottom Water Temperature ◽  
Acoustic Data ◽  
Methane Seepage ◽  
Continental Shelves ◽  
Water Conditions ◽  
Methane Fluxes

<p>Natural methane seepage from the seafloor to the water column occurs worldwide in marine environments, from continental shelves to deep-sea basins. Depending on water depth, methane fluxes, and mixing rate of the seawater, methane may partially reach the atmosphere, where it could contribute to the global greenhouse effect. Estimates of annual marine methane fluxes are commonly calculated from hydro-acoustic data collected during single research surveys. These snapshot estimates neglect short (i.e., tide) and long (seasonal) variations.</p><p>Here we compare the seepage activity along the upper limit of the gas hydrate stability zone offshore Western Svalbard in August 2017 (bottom water temperature (BT) ~3.46°C), June 2020 (BT ~1.75°C), and November 2020 (BT ~3.96°C) using high-resolution vessel-based multibeam data. Our results complete annual methane flux estimates by Ferré et al. (2020) and confirm a significantly reduced seepage activity during the cold bottom-water conditions. We investigate short-term variation by comparing a 7.5 km long multibeam section at three phases of the lunar semidiurnal (M2) tide. We will discuss how these processes affect annual methane fluxes estimates offshore Svalbard and further Arctic methane fluxes estimates.</p><p>The research is part of the Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate (CAGE) and is supported by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme grant No. 223259 and UiT.</p><p> </p><p>Ferré, B., Jansson, P. G., Moser, M., Serov, P., Portnov, A., Graves, C. A., et al. (2020). Reduced methane seepage from Arctic sediments during cold bottom-water conditions. Nat. Geosci. 13, 144–148. DOI: 10.1038/s41561-019-0515-3</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document