scholarly journals Comparison of clinicopathological features and survival status between patients with residual and primary gastric cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 618-623
Author(s):  
Xiao-Yu Zhu ◽  
Fei Zhu ◽  
Zhao-Hui Xu ◽  
Liang-Liang Zhao
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-Yi Zhou ◽  
Jie Sun ◽  
Qing Guo ◽  
Hai-Bin Zhao ◽  
Zhi-Hua Zhou

Abstract Background Certain gastric cancers exhibit some primitive phenotypes, which may indicate a high malignancy. In histologically differentiated early gastric cancer (EGC), the presence and the clinicopathological significance of the primitive phenotype remain unclear. Methods Using immunohistochemical staining we detected the expression of three primitive phenotypic markers SALL4, Glypican-3(GPC3), and AFP in whole tissue sections of differentiated EGC (gastrectomy specimens, n = 302). For those cases with primitive phenotypes, we analyzed their clinicopathological features and evaluated whether the criteria for endoscopic resection were met. Results We found that 9.3% (28/302) of all differentiated EGC cases have primitive phenotypes, and most of these cases (25/28) exhibit a histomorphology similar to conventional differentiated EGC. Patients with primitive phenotypes had a deeper invasion, a higher rate of ulcer and lymphatic invasion than cases without primitive phenotype. Moreover, patients with primitive phenotypes displayed a significantly higher frequency of LNM than those without (57.1% vs 8.8%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that presence of primitive phenotypes was an independent risk factor for LNM (P = 0.001, HR 6.977, 95% CI: 2.199–22.138). Interestingly, we found 2 cases with primitive phenotypes developed LNM, and they both met the expanded indications of endoscopic resection for differentiated EGC. Conclusions A small number of differentiated EGC have primitive phenotypes, which were closely related to LNM and were an independent risk factor for LNM. Given its highly aggressive behavior, differentiated EGC with primitive phenotypes should be evaluated with stricter criteria before endoscopic resection, or considered to give an additional surgical operation after endoscopic resection.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutaka Okagawa ◽  
Tetsuya Sumiyoshi ◽  
Hitoshi Kondo ◽  
Yusuke Tomita ◽  
Takeshi Uozumi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Recent studies have shown that mixed predominantly differentiated-type (MD) early gastric cancer (EGC) might have more malignant potential than pure differentiated-type (PD) EGC. However, no study has analyzed all differentiated-type EGC cases treated endoscopically and surgically. This study aimed to compare the differences in clinicopathological features and long-term prognosis between MD- and PD-EGC. Methods We evaluated all patients with differentiated-type EGCs who were treated endoscopically and surgically in our hospital between January 2010 and October 2014. The clinicopathological features and long-term prognosis of MD-EGC were compared with those of PD-EGC. Results A total of 459 patients with 459 lesions were evaluated in this study; of them, 409 (89.1%) and 50 (10.9%) were classified into the PD and MD groups, respectively. Submucosal invasion was found in 96 (23.5%) patients of the PD group and in 33 (66.0%) patients of the MD group (p < 0.01). The rates of positive lymphatic and vascular invasion and ulceration were significantly higher in the MD group than in the PD group (p < 0.01). The proportion of patients with lymph node metastasis was also significantly higher in the MD group than in the PD group (5 (10%) vs 6 (1.5%), p < 0.01). The 5-year overall and EGC-specific survival rates in the PD group were 88.3 and 99.5%, respectively, while they were 94.0 and 98.0% in the MD group, respectively. Conclusions MD-EGC has more malignant potential than PD-EGC. However, the long-term prognosis of MD-EGC is good and is not significantly different from that of PD-EGC when treated appropriately.


2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (8) ◽  
pp. 1757-1763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corrado Pedrazzani ◽  
Daniele Marrelli ◽  
Bernardino Rampone ◽  
Alfonso De Stefano ◽  
Giovanni Corso ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. iii47
Author(s):  
Changming Huang ◽  
Jun Lu ◽  
Chao-Hui Zheng ◽  
Ping Li ◽  
Jian-Wei Xie

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document