scholarly journals p73 and p63 Sustain Cellular Growth by Transcriptional Activation of Cell Cycle Progression Genes

2009 ◽  
Vol 69 (22) ◽  
pp. 8563-8571 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Lefkimmiatis ◽  
M. F. Caratozzolo ◽  
P. Merlo ◽  
A. M. D'Erchia ◽  
B. Navarro ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (7) ◽  
pp. 1611-1611
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Lefkimmiatis ◽  
Mariano Francesco Caratozzolo ◽  
Paola Merlo ◽  
Anna Maria D'Erchia ◽  
Beatriz Navarro ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (23) ◽  
pp. 8364-8373 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Veis ◽  
H. Klug ◽  
M. Koranda ◽  
G. Ammerer

ABSTRACT In budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), the periodic expression of the G2/M-specific gene CLB2 depends on a DNA binding complex that mediates its repression during G1 and activation from the S phase to the exit of mitosis. The switch from low to high expression levels depends on the transcriptional activator Ndd1. We show that the inactivation of the Sin3 histone deacetylase complex bypasses the essential role of Ndd1 in cell cycle progression. Sin3 and its catalytic subunit Rpd3 associate with the CLB2 promoter during the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Both proteins dissociate from the promoter at the onset of the S phase and reassociate during G2 phase. Sin3 removal coincides with a transient increase in histone H4 acetylation followed by the expulsion of at least one nucleosome from the promoter region. Whereas the first step depends on Cdc28/Cln1 activity, Ndd1 function is required for the second step. Since the removal of Sin3 is independent of Ndd1 recruitment and Cdc28/Clb activity it represents a unique regulatory step which is distinct from transcriptional activation.


1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 3163-3172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muthupalaniappan Meyyappan ◽  
Howard Wong ◽  
Christopher Hull ◽  
Karl T. Riabowol

ABSTRACT Cyclin D2 is a member of the family of D-type cyclins that is implicated in cell cycle regulation, differentiation, and oncogenic transformation. To better understand the role of this cyclin in the control of cell proliferation, cyclin D2 expression was monitored under various growth conditions in primary human and established murine fibroblasts. In different states of cellular growth arrest initiated by contact inhibition, serum starvation, or cellular senescence, marked increases (5- to 20-fold) were seen in the expression levels of cyclin D2 mRNA and protein. Indirect immunofluorescence studies showed that cyclin D2 protein localized to the nucleus in G0, suggesting a nuclear function for cyclin D2 in quiescent cells. Cyclin D2 was also found to be associated with the cyclin-dependent kinases CDK2 and CDK4 but not CDK6 during growth arrest. Cyclin D2-CDK2 complexes increased in amounts but were inactive as histone H1 kinases in quiescent cells. Transient transfection and needle microinjection of cyclin D2 expression constructs demonstrated that overexpression of cyclin D2 protein efficiently inhibited cell cycle progression and DNA synthesis. These data suggest that in addition to a role in promoting cell cycle progression through phosphorylation of retinoblastoma family proteins in some cell systems, cyclin D2 may contribute to the induction and/or maintenance of a nonproliferative state, possibly through sequestration of the CDK2 catalytic subunit.


1996 ◽  
Vol 314 (3) ◽  
pp. 713-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin M. RYAN ◽  
George D. BIRNIE

The myc family of proto-oncogenes is believed to be involved in the establishment of many types of human malignancy. The members of this family have been shown to function as transcription factors, and through a designated target sequence bring about continued cell-cycle progression, cellular immortalization and blockages to differentiation in many lineages. However, while much of the recent work focusing on the c-myc oncogene has provided some very important advances, it has also brought to light a large amount of conflicting data as to the mechanism of action of the gene product. In this regard, it has now been shown that c-myc is effective in transcriptional repression as well as transcriptional activation and, perhaps more paradoxically, that it has a role in programmed cell death (apoptosis) as well as in processes of cell-cycle progression. In addition, particular interest has surrounded the distinct roles of the two alternative translation products of the c-myc gene, c-Myc 1 and c-Myc 2. The intriguing observation that the ratio of c-Myc 1 to c-Myc 2 increases markedly upon cellular quiescence led to the discovery that the enforced expression of the two proteins individually showed that c-Myc 2 stimulates cell growth, whereas c-Myc 1 appears to be growth suppressing. Clearly, the disparities in the activities of c-Myc, together with the consistent occurrence of mutations of c-myc in human malignancies, means that, although reaching an understanding of the functions of the myc gene family might not be simple, it remains well worthy of pursuit.


2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 1314-1322 ◽  
Author(s):  
WEI-HUA REN ◽  
CHEN-YI YANG ◽  
XIAN-MEI YANG ◽  
LONG YU

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 2240-2252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter S. Linsley ◽  
Janell Schelter ◽  
Julja Burchard ◽  
Miho Kibukawa ◽  
Melissa M. Martin ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT microRNAs (miRNAs) are abundant, ∼21-nucleotide, noncoding regulatory RNAs. Each miRNA may regulate hundreds of mRNA targets, but the identities of these targets and the processes they regulate are poorly understood. Here we have explored the use of microarray profiling and functional screening to identify targets and biological processes triggered by the transfection of human cells with miRNAs. We demonstrate that a family of miRNAs sharing sequence identity with miRNA-16 (miR-16) negatively regulates cellular growth and cell cycle progression. miR-16-down-regulated transcripts were enriched with genes whose silencing by small interfering RNAs causes an accumulation of cells in G0/G1. Simultaneous silencing of these genes was more effective at blocking cell cycle progression than disruption of the individual genes. Thus, miR-16 coordinately regulates targets that may act in concert to control cell cycle progression.


2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 4066-4077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihe Zhao ◽  
Richard Pestell ◽  
Jun-Lin Guan

Integrin-mediated cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix is required for normal cell growth. Cyclin D1 is a key regulator of G1-to-S phase progression of the cell cycle. Our previous studies have demonstrated that integrin signaling through focal adhesion kinase (FAK) plays a role in the regulation of cell cycle progression, which correlates with changes in the expression of cyclin D1 and the cdk inhibitor, p21, induced by FAK. In this report, we first investigated the roles of both cyclin D1 and p21 in the regulation of cell cycle progression by FAK. We found that overexpression of a dominant-negative FAK mutant ΔC14 suppressed cell cycle progression in p21−/− cells as effectively as in the control p21+/+ cells. Furthermore, we found that overexpression of ectopic cyclin D1 could rescue cell cycle inhibition by ΔC14. These results suggested that cyclin D1, but not p21, was the primary functional target of FAK signaling pathways in cell cycle regulation. We then investigated the mechanisms underlying the regulation of cyclin D1 expression by FAK signaling. Using Northern blotting and cyclin D1 promoter/luciferase assays, we showed that FAK signaling regulated cyclin D1 expression at the transcriptional level. Using a series of cyclin D1 promoter mutants in luciferase assays as well as electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA), we showed that the EtsB binding site mediated cyclin D1 promoter regulation by FAK. Finally, we showed that FAK regulation of cyclin D1 depends on integrin-mediated cell adhesion and is likely through its activation of the Erk signaling pathway. Together, these studies demonstrate that transcriptional regulation of cyclin D1 by FAK signaling pathways contributes to the regulation of cell cycle progression in cell adhesion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document