scholarly journals Myc oncogenes: the enigmatic family

1996 ◽  
Vol 314 (3) ◽  
pp. 713-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin M. RYAN ◽  
George D. BIRNIE

The myc family of proto-oncogenes is believed to be involved in the establishment of many types of human malignancy. The members of this family have been shown to function as transcription factors, and through a designated target sequence bring about continued cell-cycle progression, cellular immortalization and blockages to differentiation in many lineages. However, while much of the recent work focusing on the c-myc oncogene has provided some very important advances, it has also brought to light a large amount of conflicting data as to the mechanism of action of the gene product. In this regard, it has now been shown that c-myc is effective in transcriptional repression as well as transcriptional activation and, perhaps more paradoxically, that it has a role in programmed cell death (apoptosis) as well as in processes of cell-cycle progression. In addition, particular interest has surrounded the distinct roles of the two alternative translation products of the c-myc gene, c-Myc 1 and c-Myc 2. The intriguing observation that the ratio of c-Myc 1 to c-Myc 2 increases markedly upon cellular quiescence led to the discovery that the enforced expression of the two proteins individually showed that c-Myc 2 stimulates cell growth, whereas c-Myc 1 appears to be growth suppressing. Clearly, the disparities in the activities of c-Myc, together with the consistent occurrence of mutations of c-myc in human malignancies, means that, although reaching an understanding of the functions of the myc gene family might not be simple, it remains well worthy of pursuit.

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 3535-3542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phang-Lang Chen ◽  
Feng Liu ◽  
Suna Cai ◽  
Xiaoqin Lin ◽  
Aihua Li ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT CtIP interacts with a group of tumor suppressor proteins including RB (retinoblastoma protein), BRCA1, Ikaros, and CtBP, which regulate cell cycle progression through transcriptional repression as well as chromatin remodeling. However, how CtIP exerts its biological function in cell cycle progression remains elusive. To address this issue, we generated an inactivated Ctip allele in mice by inserting a neo gene into exon 5. The corresponding Ctip − / − embryos died at embryonic day 4.0 (E4.0), and the blastocysts failed to enter S phase but accumulated in G1, leading to a slightly elevated cell death. Mouse NIH 3T3 cells depleted of Ctip were arrested at G1 with the concomitant increase in hypophosphorylated Rb and Cdk inhibitors, p21. However, depletion of Ctip failed to arrest Rb − / − mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) or human osteosarcoma Saos-2 cells at G1, suggesting that this arrest is RB dependent. Importantly, the life span of Ctip +/ − heterozygotes was shortened by the development of multiple types of tumors, predominantly, large lymphomas. The wild-type Ctip allele and protein remained detectable in these tumors, suggesting that haploid insufficiency of Ctip leads to tumorigenesis. Taken together, this finding uncovers a novel G1/S regulation in that CtIP counteracts Rb-mediated G1 restraint. Deregulation of this function leads to a defect in early embryogenesis and contributes, in part, to tumor formation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 1249-1257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario Antonini ◽  
Monia T. Russo ◽  
Laura De Rosa ◽  
Marisa Gorrese ◽  
Luigi Del Vecchio ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (23) ◽  
pp. 8364-8373 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Veis ◽  
H. Klug ◽  
M. Koranda ◽  
G. Ammerer

ABSTRACT In budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), the periodic expression of the G2/M-specific gene CLB2 depends on a DNA binding complex that mediates its repression during G1 and activation from the S phase to the exit of mitosis. The switch from low to high expression levels depends on the transcriptional activator Ndd1. We show that the inactivation of the Sin3 histone deacetylase complex bypasses the essential role of Ndd1 in cell cycle progression. Sin3 and its catalytic subunit Rpd3 associate with the CLB2 promoter during the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Both proteins dissociate from the promoter at the onset of the S phase and reassociate during G2 phase. Sin3 removal coincides with a transient increase in histone H4 acetylation followed by the expulsion of at least one nucleosome from the promoter region. Whereas the first step depends on Cdc28/Cln1 activity, Ndd1 function is required for the second step. Since the removal of Sin3 is independent of Ndd1 recruitment and Cdc28/Clb activity it represents a unique regulatory step which is distinct from transcriptional activation.


2009 ◽  
Vol 69 (22) ◽  
pp. 8563-8571 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Lefkimmiatis ◽  
M. F. Caratozzolo ◽  
P. Merlo ◽  
A. M. D'Erchia ◽  
B. Navarro ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 734-734
Author(s):  
Wendy Béguelin ◽  
Martin A Rivas ◽  
María Teresa Calvo Fernández ◽  
Ari Melnick

Abstract Many B cell lymphomas arise from germinal center (GC) B cells of the humoral immune system, which are unique in their ability to replicate at an accelerated rate, which requires attenuation of replication checkpoints. Upon activation, GC B cells upregulate EZH2, a Polycomb protein that mediates transcriptional repression by trimethylating histone 3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3). Conditional deletion of EZH2 results in failure to form GCs. EZH2 is often highly expressed or affected by somatic gain of function mutations in GC B cell-derived diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and is required to maintain lymphoma cell proliferation and survival. Our previous research identified CDKN1A (p21 Cip1) as a direct target of EZH2 in GC B cells and DLBCLs. EZH2 causes promoter H3K27 trimethylation and transcriptional repression of CDKN1A in GC B cells and DLBCL cells. Treatment of DLBCLs with a specific EZH2 inhibitor (GSK343) or EZH2 shRNA caused CDKN1A H3K27me3 demethylation and derepression. Based on these considerations we hypothesized that silencing of CDKN1Athrough H3K27me3 might explain the proliferative GC and DLBCL phenotype. To test this notion, we crossed GC-specific conditional Cg1Cre;Ezh2fl/fl mice with Cdkn1a-/- mice. We assessed GC formation after T cell-dependent immunization in double vs. single Cdkn1a or Ezh2 KO mice. Cdkn1a-/- mice manifested perfectly normal GC formation, whereas there was complete absence of GCs in Cg1Cre-Ezh2fl/fl mice. In contrast, Cg1Cre;Ezh2fl/fl;Cdkn1a-/- double KO mice exhibited normal GC formation as measured by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. While conditional deletion of Ezh2 in GCs abrogates immunoglobulin affinity maturation, the double KO mice manifested normal development of high affinity antibodies after specific antigen exposure (NP-KLH). Cell cycle analysis of double KO mice showed a similar proportion of GC B cells in S phase as WT or Cdkn1a-/- controls, as measured by BrdU incorporation, indicating that loss of p21 allows progression of cell cycle. These effects were linked to the methyltransferase function of EZH2 since Cdkn1a-/- also rescued the loss of GCs driven by administration of EZH2 inhibitor observed in WT mice. We observed a similar phenomenon in DLBCL cells since shRNA-mediated depletion of CDKN1A rescued the growth suppressive effect of EZH2 shRNA or specific EZH2 inhibitors. Therefore H3K27me3 and repression of CDKN1Aexplains to a large extent how EZH2 enables GC formation and maintains growth of DLBCL cells. To further understand the role of EZH2 as a driver of the cell cycle we explored its relation to the G1/2 checkpoint regulated by p21Cip1. We found that GC B cells from Cg1Cre;Ezh2fl/fl;Cdkn1a-/- double KO mice exhibited high levels of phospho Rb by IHC, similar to the levels found in WT or Cdkn1a-/- control mice. Hyperphosphorylation of Rb induces its inactivation, allowing the release of E2F transcription factors and cell cycle progression. EZH2 was previously shown to be a direct target of E2F1, E2F2 and, to a lesser extent E2F3. Among these we found that E2F1 mRNA and protein expression are especially highly expressed and upregulated in GC B cells vs. naïve B cells. By qChIP we show that E2F1 is bound to the EZH2 promoter in GC-derived DLBCL cell lines. Moreover, E2F1 gene expression is positively correlated with EZH2 (R=0.35, p<0.0001) and moderately inversely correlates with CDKN1A (R=-0.22, p<0.0001) in a cohort of 757 DLBCL patient samples. Therefore, we explored the function of E2F1 in GC formation. We found that E2f1-/- mice developed reduced number and size of GCs as compared to control mice (E2f1-/- vs. WT, p<0.01). To determine if this phenotype was due to a lack of induction of EZH2 by E2F1, we transduced bone marrow of E2f1-/- or WT donor mice with retrovirus encoding EZH2-GFP or GFP alone, transplanted them into lethally irradiated recipients and assessed the GC reaction after immunization. Notably, EZH2 expression successfully rescued E2f1-/- phenotype (E2f1-/-+GFP vs.E2f1-/-+EZH2, p<0.001), indicating that the pRb-E2F1 pathway drives the GC reaction by inducing EZH2. In summary we identified a positive feedback loop required for GC formation and DLBCL whereby EZH2 controls GC B cell proliferation by suppressing the critical cell cycle checkpoint gene CDKN1A, allowing cell cycle progression with a concomitant phosphorylation of Rb. This causes the release of E2F1, which positively regulates the expression of EZH2. Disclosures Melnick: Janssen: Research Funding.


2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 1314-1322 ◽  
Author(s):  
WEI-HUA REN ◽  
CHEN-YI YANG ◽  
XIAN-MEI YANG ◽  
LONG YU

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3571-3571
Author(s):  
Sunil Muthusami ◽  
Chunhua Song ◽  
Xiaokang Pan ◽  
Chandrika S. Gowda ◽  
Kimberly J Payne ◽  
...  

Abstract B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is the most common childhood leukemia. Expression profiling has identified IKZF1 (Ikaros) as a major tumor suppressor in B-ALL and established reduced Ikaros function as a poor prognostic marker for this disease. Ikaros regulates expression of its target genes via chromatin remodeling. In vivo, Ikaros can form a complex with histone deacetylases HDAC1 and/or HDAC2 as well as the NuRD chromatin remodeling complex. The mechanisms by which Ikaros exerts its tumor suppressor function and regulates gene expression in B-ALL are unknown. Here we report the use of chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with next generation sequencing (ChIP-SEQ) to identify genes that are regulated by Ikaros in vivo and to determine the role of Ikaros in chromatin remodeling in B-ALL. Results reveal that Ikaros binds to the promoter regions of a large number of genes that are critical for cell cycle progression. These include CDC2, CDC16, CDC25A, ANAPC1, and ANAPC7. Overexpression of Ikaros in leukemia cells resulted in transcriptional repression of Ikaros target genes. Results from luciferase reporter assays performed using the respective promoters of Ikaros target genes support a role for Ikaros as a transcriptional repressor of these genes. Downregulation of Ikaros by siRNA resulted in increased expression of Ikaros target genes that control cell cycle progression. These results suggest that Ikaros functions as a negative regulator of cell cycle progression by repressing transcription of cell cycle-promoting genes. Next, we studied how Ikaros binding affects the epigenetic signature at promoters of Ikaros target genes. Global epigenetic mapping showed that Ikaros binding at the promoter region of cell cycle-promoting genes is associated with the formation of one of two types of repressive epigenetic marks – either H3K27me3 or H3K9me3. While these epigenetic marks were mutually exclusive, they were both associated with the loss of H3K9 acetylation and transcriptional repression. Serial qChIP assays spanning promoters of the Ikaros target genes revealed that the presence of H3K27me3 is associated with Ikaros and HDAC1 binding, while the H3K9me3 modification is associated with Ikaros binding and the absence of HDAC1. ChIP-SEQ analysis of HDAC1 global genomic binding demonstrated that over 80% of H3K27me3 modifications at promoter regions are associated with HDAC1 binding at surrounding sites. The treatment of leukemia cells with the histone deacetylase inhibitor – trichostatin (TSA) resulted in a severe reduction of global levels of H3K27me3, as evidenced by Wesern blot. These data suggest that HDAC1 activity in leukemia is essential for the formation of repressive chromatin that is characterized by the presence of H3K27me3. Our data suggest that Ikaros binding at the promoters of its target genes can result in the formation of repressive chromatin by two distinct mechanisms: 1) direct Ikaros binding resulting in increased H3K9me3 or 2) Ikaros recruitment of HDAC1 with increased H3K27me3 modifications. These data suggest distinct mechanisms for the regulation of chromatin remodeling and target gene expression by Ikaros alone, and Ikaros in complex with HDAC1. In conclusion, the presented data suggest that HDAC1 has a key role in regulating cell cycle progression and proliferation in B-ALL. Our results identify novel, Ikaros-mediated mechanisms of epigenetic regulation that contribute to tumor suppression in leukemia. Supported by National Institutes of Health R01 HL095120, and the Four Diamonds Fund Endowment. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (16) ◽  
pp. 9067-9081
Author(s):  
Jonathan M Geisinger ◽  
Tim Stearns

Abstract While the mechanism of CRISPR/Cas9 cleavage is understood, the basis for the large variation in mutant recovery for a given target sequence between cell lines is much less clear. We hypothesized that this variation may be due to differences in how the DNA damage response affects cell cycle progression. We used incorporation of EdU as a marker of cell cycle progression to analyze the response of several human cell lines to CRISPR/Cas9 treatment with a single guide directed to a unique locus. Cell lines with functionally wild-type TP53 exhibited higher levels of cell cycle arrest compared to lines without. Chemical inhibition of TP53 protein combined with TP53 and RB1 transcript silencing alleviated induced arrest in TP53+/+ cells. Using dCas9, we determined this arrest is driven in part by Cas9 binding to DNA. Additionally, wild-type Cas9 induced fewer 53BP1 foci in TP53+/+ cells compared to TP53−/− cells and DD-Cas9, suggesting that differences in break sensing are responsible for cell cycle arrest variation. We conclude that CRISPR/Cas9 treatment induces a cell cycle arrest dependent on functional TP53 as well as Cas9 DNA binding and cleavage. Our findings suggest that transient inhibition of TP53 may increase genome editing recovery in primary and TP53+/+ cell lines.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document