Abstract P3-05-07: Poor prognosis early breast cancer: pathological characteristics of the Unicancer-PACS08 trial including patients treated with docetaxel or ixabepilone in adjuvant setting

Author(s):  
M Lacroix-Triki ◽  
P Delrée ◽  
T Filleron ◽  
F Penault-Llorca ◽  
C Bor ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Tilman D. Rachner ◽  
Sabine Kasimir-Bauer ◽  
Andy Goebel ◽  
Kati Erdmann ◽  
Oliver Hoffmann ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Neuropilin-1 (NRP-1) is a transmembrane protein that acts as a multifunctional non-tyrosine kinase receptor with an established role in development and immunity. NRP-1 also regulates tumor biology, and high expression levels of tissue NRP-1 have been associated with a poor prognosis. Recently, ELISA-based quantification of soluble NRP-1 (sNRP-1) has become available, but little is known about the prognostic value of sNRP-1 in malignancies. Materials and methods We measured sNRP-1 in the serum of 509 patients with primary early breast cancer (BC) at the time of diagnosis using ELISA. Results Mean serum values of sNRP-1 were 1.88 ± 0.52 nmol/l (= 130.83 ± 36.24 ng/ml). SNRP-1 levels weakly correlated with age, and were higher in peri- and postmenopausal patients compared to premenopausal patients, respectively (p < 0.0001). Low levels of sNRP-1 were associated with a significant survival benefit compared to high sNRP-1 levels at baseline (p = 0.005; HR 1.94; 95%CI 1.23–3.06). These findings remained significant after adjustment for tumor stage including lymph node involvement, grading, hormone receptor, HER2 status, and age (p = 0.022; HR 1.78; 95%CI 1.09–2.91). Conclusion Our findings warrant further investigations into the prognostic and therapeutic potential of sNRP-1 in BC.


Oncotarget ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (22) ◽  
pp. 32731-32753 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Fountzilas ◽  
Eleni Giannoulatou ◽  
Zoi Alexopoulou ◽  
Flora Zagouri ◽  
Eleni Timotheadou ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack J. Chan ◽  
Tira J.Y. Tan ◽  
Rebecca A. Dent

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 281-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taryn Bessen ◽  
Dorothy M.K. Keefe ◽  
Jonathan Karnon

Objectives: International guidelines recommend annual mammography after early breast cancer, but there is no randomized controlled trial evidence to support this schedule over any other. Given that not all women have the same risk of recurrence, it is possible that, by defining different risk profiles, we could tailor mammographic schedules that are more effective and efficient.Methods: A discrete event simulation model was developed to describe the progression of early breast cancer after completion of primary treatment. Retrospective data for 1,100 postmenopausal women diagnosed with early breast cancer in South Australia from 2000 to 2008 were used to calibrate the model. Women were divided into four prognostic subgroups based on the Nottingham Prognostic Index of their primary tumor. For each subgroup, we compared the cost-effectiveness of three different mammographic schedules for two different age groups.Results: Annual mammographic follow-up was not cost-effective for most postmenopausal women. Two yearly mammography was cost-effective for all women with excellent prognosis tumors; and for women with good prognosis tumors if high compliance rates can be achieved. Annual mammography for 5 years and 2 yearly surveillance thereafter (a mixed schedule) may be cost-effective for 50- to 69-year-old women with moderate prognosis tumors, and for women aged 70–79 years with poor prognosis tumors. For younger women with poor prognosis tumors, annual mammography is potentially cost-effective.Conclusions: Our results suggest that mammographic follow-up could be tailored according to risk of recurrence. If validated with larger datasets, this could potentially set the stage for personalized mammographic follow-up after breast cancer.


PeerJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. e12506
Author(s):  
Yue Zhong ◽  
Zhenjie Zhuang ◽  
Peiju Mo ◽  
Mandi Lin ◽  
Jiaqian Gong ◽  
...  

Background Spindle and kinetochore associated complex subunit 3 (SKA3) plays an important role in tumorigenesis and the progression of various tumors. But the relationship between SKA3 and early breast cancer remains unclear. The study aimed to explore the prognostic significance of SKA3 in breast cancer. Methods In the study, SKA3 expression was initially assessed using the Oncomine database and The Cancer Genome Atlas database (TCGA). Then, we presented validation results for RT-qPCR (quantitative reverse transcription PCR) and ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). The relationship between clinical characteristics and SKA3 expression was assessed by Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis were conducted to evaluate the prognostic value of SKA3. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed to screen biological pathways using the TCGA dataset. Besides, single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was utilized to identify immune infiltration cells about SKA3. Results SKA3 mRNA was expressed at high levels in breast cancer tissues compared with normal tissues. Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test showed SKA3 expression was related to age, tumor (T) classification, node (N) classification, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), molecular subtype, and race. RT-qPCR results showed that SKA3 expression was overexpressed in ER, PR status, and molecular subtype in Chinese people. Kaplan–Meier curves implicated that high SKA3 expression was related to a poor prognosis in female early breast cancer patients. Cox regression models showed that high SKA3 expression could be used as an independent risk factor for female early breast cancer. Four signaling pathways were enriched in the high SKA3 expression group, including mTORC1 signaling pathway, MYC targets v1, mitotic spindle, estrogen response early. Besides, the SKA3 expression level was associate with infiltrating levels of activated CD4 T cells and eosinophils in breast cancer. Conclusion High SKA3 expression correlates with poor prognosis and immune infiltrates in breast cancer. SKA3 may become a biomarker for the prognosis of breast cancer.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11104-11104
Author(s):  
A. I. Jagiello-Gruszfeld ◽  
A. Lowczak ◽  
J. Zbrzezniak-Smilgiewicz ◽  
S. Szablowska-Siwik ◽  
G. Licznerska ◽  
...  

11104 Background: The anthracycline-containing regimens is considered to be more beneficial to patients (pts) with early breast cancer (EBC). However at this moment is not clear which kind of regimen should be used in adjuvant setting. Methods: In our center, from Jan 2004 to Sep 2006, 248 breast cancer pts, who were qualified to the adjuvant chemotherapy received FEC100 (104 pts), AC (126 pts). or sequentially AC- taxans (18). Pts with many poor prognostic factors (N+, T3, G3, HER2/neu 3+) received 6 cycles of FEC100 or AC-taxans. Pts with better prognosis (Intermediate Risk Group according St.Gallen’s guidelines for 2005) received usually 4 cycles of AC. Besides, in most cases, internet access to the adjuvantonline! program was used during making decision. ER-ve or PR-ve positive pts received sequentially hormonal treatment. The radiotherapy (if needed) was delivered at the end of the chemotherapy. Results: During the treatment, toxicity of the chemotherapy was evaluated by NCI CTC v. 3. There was no toxic deaths. Median follow-up period was 19 months (range: 6–36). The febrile neutropenia was observed in 4 pts in FEC100 and in 5 pts in AC group. There was also no significant differences in the grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia and alopecia. In 3 pts treated with FEC100 and 1 with AC, cardiotoxicity grade 2 or 3 was diagnosed. Grade 2 or 3 asthenia was frequent in FEC100 group (44% vs 21% vs11%). In all pts prophylaxis of nausea/vomiting was used. However pts treated with FEC100 needed more 5HT3. Vomiting grade 2 or 3 were observed significantly more often in pts who received FEC100 (58% vs 26% vs 23%). Only at 1 pts in each group the chemotherapy was interrupted due to toxicity (asthenia gr 3, vomiting gr 3 and weight loss gr 2). The relative dose intensities of FEC100 and AC were 87% and 96% of planned doses, respectively. Conclusions: The acute symptoms of toxicity were important for breast cancer pts who received the adjuvant chemotherapy. According the adjuvantonline! 6 cycles of FEC100 were more effective than 4 cycles of AC. Nevertheless tolerability of AC is better. Many pts prefer only the hormonal treatment, even if it is not the optimal option, in fear of nausea or vomiting. The ongoing clinical trials should further define the best choice of anthracycline-containing regimen in the adjuvant setting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 2686-2693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques Bonneterre ◽  
Henri Roché ◽  
Pierre Kerbrat ◽  
Alain Brémond ◽  
Pierre Fumoleau ◽  
...  

Purpose The French Adjuvant Study Group 05 (FASG-05) showed that fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, and epirubicin 100 mg/m2 (FEC 100) was superior to the same regimen with epirubicin 50 mg/m2 (FEC 50) in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. We report 10-year data on efficacy, and long-term side effects for FASG-05. Patients and Methods We randomly assigned 565 patients to treatment with FEC 50 or FEC 100 after surgery. Postmenopausal patients also received tamoxifen for 3 years, and almost all patients (96%) also received radiotherapy. Results Median follow-up was 110 months. The 10-year DFS was 45.3% (95% CI, 41.9% to 48.7%) with FEC 50 and 50.7% (95% CI, 47.3% to 54.1%) with FEC 100 (Wilcoxon P = .036; log-rank P = .08). The 10-year OS was 50.0% (95% CI, 46.7% to 53.3%) with FEC 50 and 54.8% (95% CI, 51.3% to 58.3%) with FEC 100 (Wilcoxon P = .038; log-rank P = .05). Delayed cardiac toxicity (before relapse) occurred in four patients (1.5%) in the FEC 50 arm and three patients (1.1%) in the FEC 100 arm. Cardiac toxicity after relapse occurred in six (4.3%) and five (4.1%) patients treated with FEC 50 and FEC 100, respectively. Conclusion Treatment with adjuvant FEC 100 demonstrated superior DFS and OS versus FEC 50 at 10 years of follow-up. This survival advantage was not offset by long-term complications such as cardiac toxicity and second malignancy. Given the risk-benefit ratio, FEC 100 is a more optimal regimen for long-term survival in patients with poor prognosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document