Comparison of Topical Dorzolamide and Ketorolac Treatment for Cystoid Macular Edema in Retinitis Pigmentosa and Usher's Syndrome

2014 ◽  
Vol 233 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Filipe Lemos Reis ◽  
Nuno Moreira-Gonçalves ◽  
Sérgio E. Estrela Silva ◽  
Elisete M. Brandão ◽  
Fernando M. Falcão-Reis
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Retinitis Pigmentosa ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Daily Regimen ◽  
Foveal Thickness ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Dorzolamide Hydrochloride ◽  
Topical Dorzolamide ◽  
Usher’S Syndrome

Purpose: To investigate the topical effect of dorzolamide versus ketorolac on retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and Usher's syndrome (US) macular edema. Methods: Prospective, randomized and interventional study. A total of 28 eyes of 18 patients were included. Five eyes had US, 23 had RP. Fifteen eyes were allocated to ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% (4 drops daily regimen) and 13 eyes to dorzolamide hydrochloride 2% (3 drops daily regimen) treatment groups. Snellen's best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), foveal thickness (FT) and foveal zone thickness (FZT) measured by Stratus® optical coherence tomography (OCT) were evaluated at baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Results: Patients assigned to ketorolac had a baseline BCVA of 0.37 ± 0.17 logMAR which improved at the end of 1 year to 0.28 ± 0.16 (p = 0.02). Three eyes (20%) of 2 patients improved by 7 letters or more. Mean FT and FZT did not change significantly during the study follow-up. After 1 year of treatment, 4 eyes (27%) of 3 patients showed an improvement of at least 16% of FT and 11% of FZT. Patients assigned to dorzolamide had a baseline BCVA of 0.48 ± 0.34 logMAR which improved in the first 6 months (0.40 ± 0.30; p = 0.01), with a decrease at 1 year (0.42 ± 0.27; p = 0.20). Seven eyes (54%) of 5 patients had an improvement of 7 letters or more. Mean FT and FZT did not change significantly either. After 1 year of treatment, 3 eyes (23%) of 2 patients showed an improvement of at least 16% on FT and 11% on FZT. Conclusions: Results suggest that dorzolamide and ketorolac might improve visual acuity and therefore be of interest in selected cases. No relationship between retinal thickness fluctuation and visual acuity was found. Sample size was a limitation to the study.

scholarly journals Vitrectomized versus non-vitrectomized eyes in diabetic macular edema response to ranibizumab—retinal layers thickness as prognostic biomarkers

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernardete Pessoa ◽  
João Leite ◽  
João Heitor ◽  
João Coelho ◽  
Sérgio Monteiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Nerve Fiber ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Injections ◽  
Final Visual Acuity ◽  
Foveal Thickness ◽  
Retinal Layers ◽  
Retinal Nerve Fiber

AbstractTo evaluate the role of the vitreous in the management of diabetic macular edema with ranibizumab intravitreal injections in a pro re nata regimen. Prospective study of 50 consecutive eyes with diabetic macular edema treated with ranibizumab and 12 months of follow-up. Primary endpoint: to assess differences between non-vitrectomized and vitrectomized eyes in the number injections needed to control the edema. Secondary endpoints: comparison of groups regarding best corrected visual acuity, central foveal thickness and thickness of seven retinal layers. 46 eyes from 38 patients, 10 vitrectomized and 36 non-vitrectomized, completed the follow-up. At month 12, the two groups achieved an equivalent anatomical outcome and needed a similar number of ranibizumab intravitreal injections. In vitrectomized eyes final visual acuity was worse when baseline retinal nerve fiber layers in the central foveal subfield were thicker, showing a strong correlation (r = − 0.942, p < 0.001). A similar, albeit moderate correlation was observed in non-vitrectomized eyes (r = − 0.504, p = 0.002). A decrease of retinal nerve fiber layers inner ring thickness was correlated with a better final visual acuity only in vitrectomized eyes (r = 0.734, p = 0.016). The effect of diabetic macular edema seems to be worse in vitrectomized eyes, with a thinner inner retina reservoir.Clinicaltrials.govNCT04387604.

scholarly journals Twelve-Month Results of a Single or Multiple Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Macular Edema following Uncomplicated Phacoemulsification

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solmaz Abdolrahimzadeh ◽  
Vito Fenicia ◽  
Maurizio Maurizi Enrici ◽  
Pasquale Plateroti ◽  
Dora Cianfrone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Topical Therapy ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Ophthalmological Examination ◽  
Foveal Thickness ◽  
Central Foveal Thickness ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Best Corrected Visual Acuity

The clinical efficacy of one or two intravitreal injections of a continued deliverance dexamethasone 700 μg implant in ten patients with persistent macular edema following uncomplicated phacoemulsification was evaluated. Complete ophthalmological examination and spectral domain optical coherence tomography were carried out. Follow-up was at day 7 and months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12. At baseline mean best corrected visual acuity was 62 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Chart letters, which showed statistically significant improvement at each follow-up, except at month 6, to reach 79 letters at month 12 (P=0.018). Prior to treatment mean central foveal thickness was 622 μm, which showed statistically significant improvement at each follow-up to reach a mean value of 282 μm (P=0.012) at month 12. Five patients received a second dexamethasone implant at month 7. Two patients were excluded from the study at months 4 and 8. Intraocular pressure remained stable during the study period with the exception of mild increase in two patients requiring topical therapy. In conclusion there was statistically significant improvement of best corrected visual acuity and mean central foveal thickness with one or two intravitreal dexamethasone implants over 12 months.

scholarly journals The effectiveness of subtenon triamcinolone injection for the treatment of macular edema in children with retinitis pigmentosa

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-12
Author(s):  
Lyudmila A. Katargina ◽  
Ekaterina V. Denisova ◽  
Maria A. Khrabrova ◽  
Natalia A. Osipova
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Carbonic Anhydrase ◽  
Retinitis Pigmentosa ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Repeated Injection ◽  
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Subtenon Injection ◽  
Observation Period

Aim: This study aimed to assess the functional and anatomical results of subtenon triamcinolone injections in children with retinitis pigmentosa (PR) and cystic macular edema (CME), refractory to local carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Material and methods: We examined 11 children (9 girls, 2 boys) aged 9 to 17 years who underwent subtenon injections of triamcinolone (22 eyes). The follow-up period ranged from 1.6 to 33.1 months (average 9.711.6 months), the number of triamcinalone injections ranged from 1 to 11, averaging 3. Before and after injection, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the thickness and structure of the retina in the macular zone (optical coherence tomography [OCT] was performed by using the NIDEK RS-3000, Japan or the Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering, Germany), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were assessed. Results: The CME height at the end of the observation period decreased in 10 cases (45.5%), and the average central retinal thickness decreased from 70 to 594 m (on average, 219.1183.4 m). In 12 eyes (54.5%), the CME height at the end of the observation period did not change significantly. BCVA improved in two eyes (9.1%) and did not change in the other cases. Two children (18%) developed ophthalmic hypertension in both eyes after two injections of triamcinalone. In one child, IOP returned to normal on the background of hypothetical therapy. In another child, due to non-compensation of IOP at the maximum hypotensive mode, sinus trabeculectomy was performed in both eyes, and IOP normalization was achieved. Conclusion: Subtenon injection of triamcinolone in children with CME against a background of PR is in most cases is an effective and safe method of treatment and can be recommended if carbonic anhydrase inhibitors are ineffective at reducing/ resorbing edema and maintaining or improving visual function. Considering that the action of triamcinolone is short lived, and its repeated injection is required, and the resorption of CME and an increase in visual acuity are not always achievable, it is necessary to continue the search for more effective treatment methods.

scholarly journals Diabetic macular edema: Safe and effective treatment with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (Taioftal)

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e0257695
Author(s):  
Francesco Saverio Sorrentino ◽  
Claudio Bonifazzi ◽  
Francesco Parmeggiani
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Injection ◽  
Triamcinolone Acetonide ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Foveal Thickness ◽  
Intravitreal Triamcinolone ◽  
Central Foveal Thickness ◽  
Preservative Free

Purpose To suggest the safety and efficacy of preservative-free triamcinolone acetonide intravitreal injectable suspension (Taioftal) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Methods A prospective clinical study involved 49 patients (49 eyes), that were treated with Taioftal and followed-up for six months. Complete ophthalmic examination, including spectral domain optical coherence tomography, was performed at baseline, and at month 1, 3, 6 after the intravitreal injection. Accurate collection and analysis of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), intraocular pressure (IOP), and adverse events (AEs) were carried out in order to evaluate visual function and macular morphology before and after treatment Results Median BCVA value chosen as comparing statistics was significantly improved at every follow-up time points (gain of 6 letters at month 1, 12 at month 3 –improvement up to 24% at month 3 with stabilization until month 6) compared to baseline, as certified by Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test (P<0.05). Median CFT significantly waned at each follow-up times (decrease of about 65 μm at month 1, 155 at month 3 –reduction up to 28% at month 3 keeping good outcome until month 6) compared to baseline (P<0.05). IOP elevation, with no severe increases, was the most common among spotted AEs (median of 23 mmHg at month 1, 20 at month 3). Conclusion Intravitreal injection of preservative-free triamcinolone (Taioftal) is an effective, safe and inexpensive drug used to improve visual acuity and reduce central foveal thickness in eyes affected by diabetic macular edema during an average time of 6 months. Temporary, never severe, elevation of IOP is totally manageable with topical medications. No serious vision-threatening complications are related to the use of intravitreal triamcinolone injections.

scholarly journals Comparison of Perioperative Ranibizumab Injections for Diabetic Macular Edema in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erhan Yumuşak ◽  
Kemal Örnek
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Ranibizumab ◽  
Foveal Thickness ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Baseline Visual Acuity

Purpose. To compare the efficacy of perioperative ranibizumab injections on diabetic macular edema (DME) in patients undergoing cataract surgery.Methods. This study included 59 eyes of 59 patients. All patients had advanced cataract with DME and underwent an uneventful phacoemulsification surgery. There were 3 subgroups. The first group received intravitreal ranibizumab injection 2 weeks preoperatively, the second group received intraoperatively, and the third group received 2 weeks postoperatively. Follow-up examinations were performed at 1 week as well as at 1 and 3 months.Results. Baseline visual acuity showed a significant increase in all groups at 1 month. In group 1, compared to baseline value, foveal thickness (FT) increased significantly at 1 month and showed a significant decrease up to month 3. In group 2, FT increased at month 1 and this continued up to month 3. In group 3, FT increased at month 1 and was almost stable up to month 3. There were not any significant differences for visual acuity and FT between the groups.Conclusions. Although intrapostoperative ranibizumab injection for DME seems to be more effective than preoperative injections in patients undergoing cataract surgery, the treatment still needs to be continued following surgery.

Retinal Vasculitis Associated With Dermatomyositis Treated With Intravenous Steroids

2021 ◽  
pp. 247412642110189
Author(s):  
Austen N. Knapp ◽  
Jawad I. Arshad ◽  
Daniel F. Martin ◽  
Rula Hajj-Ali ◽  
Kimberly Baynes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Retinal Vasculitis ◽  
Subretinal Fluid ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Hand Motion ◽  
Frosted Branch Angiitis ◽  
Intravenous Steroids

Purpose: This work aims to present treatment and long-term follow-up of a 31-year-old woman with dermatomyositis who presented with hemorrhagic retinal vasculitis and macular edema. Methods: A retrospective case report is presented. Results: A 31-year-old woman with dermatomyositis treated with systemic immunosuppression was evaluated for acute, reduced vision. Best-corrected visual acuity was hand motion in the right eye and 20/200 in the left eye. Fundus examination revealed diffuse intraretinal hemorrhages, cotton-wool spots, and vascular sheathing with a frosted branch angiitis–like appearance. Optical coherence tomography revealed significant macular edema and subretinal fluid that quickly resolved after admission and treatment with intravenous steroids. Multimodal imaging at 7-year follow-up disclosed long-term sequelae including peripheral nonperfusion and retinal neovascularization. Conclusions: When vasculitis associated with dermatomyositis is treated aggressively with intravenous steroids at initial presentation, good visual acuity outcomes can be achieved, but long-term consequences of retinal nonperfusion and neovascularization persist.

scholarly journals Clinical outcomes of pediatric macular edema associated with non-infectious uveitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anh Hong Nguyen ◽  
Bethlehem Mekonnen ◽  
Eric Kim ◽  
Nisha R. Acharya
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
San Francisco ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Common Diagnosis ◽  
Corticosteroid Injections

Abstract Background Macular edema (ME) is the most frequent cause of irreversible visual impairment in patients with uveitis. To date, little data exists about the clinical course of ME in pediatric patients. A retrospective, observational study was performed to examine the visual and macular thickness outcomes of ME associated with chronic, noninfectious uveitis in pediatric patients. Methods Pediatric patients with noninfectious uveitis complicated by ME seen in the University of California San Francisco Health System from 2012 to 2018 were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Data were collected from medical records including demographics, diagnoses, ocular history, OCT imaging findings, complications, and treatments at first encounter and at 3, 6, 9, and 12-month follow-up visits. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to investigate the association between different classes of treatment (steroid drops, steroid injections, oral steroids and other immunosuppressive therapies) and resolution of macular edema. Results The cohort comprised of 21 children (26 eyes) with a mean age of 10.5 years (SD 3.3). Undifferentiated uveitis was the most common diagnosis, affecting 19 eyes (73.1%). The majority of observed macular edema was unilateral (16 patients, 76.2%) and 5 patients had bilateral macular edema. The mean duration of follow-up at UCSF was 35.3 months (SD 25.7). By 12 months, 18 eyes (69.2%) had achieved resolution of ME. The median time to resolution was 3 months (IQR 3–6 months). Median best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at baseline was 0.54 logMAR (Snellen 20/69, IQR 20/40 to 20/200). Median BCVA at 12 months was 0.1 logMAR (Snellen 20/25, IQR 20/20 to 20/50) Corticosteroid injections were associated with a 4.0-fold higher rate of macular edema resolution (95% CI 1.3–12.2, P = 0.01). Conclusions Although only 15% of the pediatric patients with uveitis in the study cohort had ME, it is clinically important to conduct OCTs to detect ME in this population. Treatment resulted in 69% of eyes achieving resolution of ME by 12 months, accompanied with improvement in visual acuity. Corticosteroid injections were significantly associated with resolution of macular edema.

scholarly journals EFFICACY OF INTRAVITREAL TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-34
Author(s):  
Prachand Gautam ◽  
Koshal Shrestha ◽  
Gyanendra Lamichhane ◽  
Sushila Patel
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Triamcinolone Acetonide ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Triamcinolone ◽  
Hard Exudates ◽  
Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide ◽  
Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic retionopathy is a microangilpathy. The present study was done to investigate results of Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide injection for the treatment diffuse diabetic macular edema. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 40 eyes of 40 patients with clinically significant diffuse diabetic macular edema. Eyes were diagnosed with diabetic macular edema according to Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study guidelines. An Intravitreal injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide at the dose of 4 mg/0.2 ml was administered. Best corrected visual acuity was measured as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and snellen vision drum and size of macular edema (hard exudates) was obtained by slit lamp biomicroscopy using +90 D Volk lens at each visit. Intraocular pressure (IOP) and other complications related with steroid and injection related complications were also evaluated. Subsequently patients were followed up on 1st day, 2nd week and 3rd month. RESULTS: All patients were completed second follow up at 3 months. The mean size of macular edema, which obtained at 3 months postoperatively, was significantly different from the baseline measurement from 1.4125 to 0.9474 DD. Mean visual acuity improved significantly from baseline at 3 months of follow up was 0.7421 LogMAR (≈ 6/30 in Snellen chart). Eleven eyes developed intraocular pressure higher than 21 mmHg at 2nd week postoperatively. Other drug and injection related complications were not developed. Increased IOP were controlled with anti glaucoma drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal Triamcinolone was a promising therapeutic method for diabetic macular edema. TriamcinoloneAcetonide effectively reduces size of macular edema and improves visual acuity in the short term.Journal of Universal College of Medical Sciences (2015) Vol.03 No.02 Issue 10 Page: 30-34

scholarly journals Pharmacological Management of Diabetic Macular Edema in Real-Life Observational Studies

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Kodjikian ◽  
David Bellocq ◽  
Thibaud Mathis
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Pharmacological Management ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Pubmed Database ◽  
Baseline Visual Acuity

Objectives of the Study. Summary of observational studies concerning the pharmacological management of diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods. A literature review was conducted using the PubMed database on 1 February 2018 to identify studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-VEGF and dexamethasone (DEX) implants for DME. Studies with more than 10 patients and follow-up of more than 6 months were selected. Analyses were carried out on the overall population and on subgroups defined according to baseline visual acuity (BVA) and the patients’ naïve or non-naïve status. Results. Thirty-two studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-VEGF and 31 studies evaluating the efficacy of DEX-implants were retained, concerning 6,842 and 1,703 eyes, respectively. A mean gain of +4.7 letters for a mean of 5.8 injections (mean follow-up: 15.6 months) and +9.6 letters for a mean of 1.6 injections (10.3 months) was found in the anti-VEGF and DEX-implant studies, respectively. Final VA appears to be similar for both treatment (62 letters for anti-VEGF, 61.2 letters for DEX-implant), and BVA appears lower for DEX-implant, which may partially explain the greater visual gain. The DEX-implant studies show greater gains in VA compared to the anti-VEGF studies, especially for higher BVA. Indeed, mean gains for the subgroups of patients with BVA<50 letters, 50<BVA<60 letters, and BVA>60 letters are +4.3, +5.8, and +3.1 letters, respectively, in the anti-VEGF studies and +10.5, +9.3, and +8.8 letters, respectively, in the DEX-implant studies. Regarding the patient’s initial status, only naïve status appears to confer the best functional response in DEX-implant studies. Conclusion. Observational studies investigating DEX-implant report clinically similar final VA when compared to anti-VEGF, but superior visual gains in real-life practice. This latter difference could be due to the better BVA, but also to the fact that less injections were administered in the anti-VEGF observational studies than in the interventional studies.

Long-Term Efficacy of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in the Treatment of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) Disease Relapsing Posterior Uveitis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek Roshdy Elhamaky
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Posterior Uveitis ◽  
Systemic Steroid ◽  
Foveal Thickness ◽  
Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant ◽  
Central Foveal Thickness ◽  
Intravitreal Implant ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Vkh Disease

Abstract Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in the treatment of relapsing posterior uveitis in patients with chronic recurrent VKH disease.Methods: This is a prospective study of 29 eyes of 16 patients with posterior uveitis in chronic recurrent VKH disease. All patients received previous systemic steroid and immunosuppressive regimens. All patients underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination, including BCVA (log MAR), IOP, FFA, and SD-OCT. All patients underwent intravitreal injection with sustained-release dexamethasone 0.7 mg implant (Ozurdex®). Primary outcome measures included mean change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) at 24 months follow-up compared to baseline. Results: At 24 months follow-up, the mean BCVA improved from 0.82 ± 0.13 to 0.38 ± 0.06logMAR (P <0.0001). The mean CFT reduced from 505 ± 29 to 244 ± 23 um (P <0.0001). The mean IOP changed from 15.1±2.2 to16.9±3.1 mmHg with no significant value. Twenty-one eyes (72.4%) received one injection, while eight eyes (27.6%) required two injections. The mean number of injections was 1.2± 0.60. The mean follow-up time was 24.75± 0.9months. No serious ocular or systemic adverse events were noted during the follow-up period. Ocular hypertension was recorded in there (10.3%) eyes and controlled by IOP lowering medications. Cataract progression occurred in 11 (37.9%) eyes.Conclusions: Our cohort highlights the beneficial effects of the Dexamethasone implant 0.7 mg in the treatment of VKH disease relapsing posterior uveitis improving visual acuity, reducing macular edema, and minimizing the burden of systemic steroid in this sample study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document