scholarly journals Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Postoperative Morbidity after Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 229-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Téoule ◽  
Jörg Trojan ◽  
Wolf Bechstein ◽  
Guido Woeste
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Postoperative Morbidity ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Wound Infection Rate ◽  
Clavien Classification ◽  
Cancer Of The Stomach ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
The Impact

Background/Aims: Patients with locally advanced gastric cancer benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Potential disadvantages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy include increased surgical complications, leading to increased postoperative morbidity. Methods: We retrospectively studied medical records of 135 patients with resectable cancer of the stomach who underwent gastrectomy between 2002 and 2009. The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on postoperative morbidity was investigated. We compared demographic, clinical and operative data, morbidity and mortality from 105 patients who received surgical treatment immediately after diagnosis (SURG group), versus 30 patients who first received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CHEMO group). Results: Demographic, clinical and surgical procedure parameters did not differ significantly between both groups. Postoperative morbidity was 46.7% in CHEMO- and 41.9% in SURG-patients (p = 0.680). There were eight cases of death, 2/30 (6.7%) in CHEMO and 6/105 (5.7%) in the SURG group (p = 1). The overall complications according to Clavien-classification did not differ significantly (p = 0.455). The wound infection rate (23.3 vs. 3.8%; p = 0.002) and insufficiency of the duodenal stump (13.3 vs. 1.9%; p = 0.022) were significantly higher in the CHEMO group. Conclusion: This study showed no significant impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on postoperative morbidity after gastrectomy using the Clavien-classification. Only an increase in wound infections in CHEMO compared with the SURG group were noted. Therefore, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be considered safe and feasible.

scholarly journals Optimal Timing to Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinkui Wang ◽  
Zining Liu ◽  
Fei Shan ◽  
Xiangji Ying ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundThe relationship between time to surgery (TTS) and survival benefit is not sufficiently demonstrated by previous studies in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). This study aims to assess the impact of TTS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on long-term and short-term outcomes in LAGC patients.MethodsData were collected from patients with LAGC who underwent NACT between January 2007 and January 2018 at our institution. Outcomes assessed were long-term survival, pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, and postoperative complications.ResultsThis cohort of 426 patients was divided into five groups by weeks of TTS. Under cox regression, compared to other groups, the 22–28 days and 29–35 days groups revealed a better OS (≤21 vs. 22–28 days: HR 1.54, 95% CI = 0.81–2.93, P = 0.185; 36–42 vs. 22–28 days: HR 2.20, 95% CI = 1.28−3.79, P = 0.004; 43–84 vs. 22–28 days: HR 1.83, 95% CI = 1.09–3.06, P = 0.022) and PFS (≤21 vs. 22–28 days: HR 1.54, 95% CI = 0.81–2.93, P = 0.256; 36–42 vs. 22–28 days: HR 2.20, 95% CI = 1.28−3.79, P = 0.111; 43–84 vs. 22–28 days: HR 1.83, 95% CI = 1.09–3.06, P = 0.047). Further analysis revealed a better prognosis in patients with TTS within 22–35 days (OS: HR 1.78 95% CI = 1.25−2.54, P = 0.001; PFS: HR 1.49, 95% CI = 1.07−2.08, P = 0.017). Postoperative stay was significantly higher in the ≤21 days group, while other parameters revealed no statistical significance (P > 0.05). Restricted cubic spline depicted the nonlinear relationship between TTS and OS/PFS.ConclusionPatients who received surgery within 3−5 weeks experienced the maximal survival benefit without an increase in postoperative complications or lowering the rate of pCR. Further investigations are warranted.

The interaction between microsatellite instability high (MSI-high) gastric cancer and chemotherapy on survival.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 244-244
Author(s):  
Elvira Lise Vos ◽  
Steven Brad Maron ◽  
Robert Wallace Krell ◽  
Masaya Nakauchi ◽  
Megan Fiasconaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
High Status ◽  
High Group ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

244 Background: Subgroup analysis of trials data suggested a favorable prognostic role for microsatellite instability high (MSI-high) status in resectable gastric cancer, but a lack of survival benefit from neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy; questioning current standard of care for MSI-high locally advanced gastric cancer. To help guide treatment decision making, we retrospectively studied the interaction between MSI status and chemotherapy on survival in a single institution. Methods: All clinically advanced (tumor stage 3-4 or positive lymph nodes) gastric cancer patients that underwent gastrectomy between 2000-2018 with MSI status available from immunohistochemistry (IHC, deficient mismatch repair protein expression (dMMR) vs proficient (pMMR)) or DNA next generation sequencing testing (NGS, MSI-high vs low/stable (MSS)) were included. Clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival (OS) was compared between patients with neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy and without, stratified for MSI status, by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. Results: From a total of 1,844 clinically advanced patients with resection, MSI status was available in 559 as determined by IHC in 420, NGS in 88, and both in 51 with a concordance rate of 50/51 (98%). Tumors were dMMR/MSI-high in 84 (15%) and pMMR/MSS in 475 (85%). Patients with dMMR/MSI-high tumors were more often older, female, and had distal tumors with intestinal subtype. Neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 53 (63%) in the dMMR/MSI-high group and 367 (77%) in the pMMR/MSS (p = 0.006). Median (interquartile range) time of follow-up was 32 (19-57) months. In the total cohort, OS after 3 years was 82% in the dMMR/MSI-high and 59% in pMMR/MSS (p < 0.001). In the patients with neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy only, the dMMR/MSI-high had improved OS (3-years OS: 80% vs 60%, p = 0.001), and after adjustment for age and clinical tumor stage in multivariable analysis, dMMR/MSI-high status was associated with improved OS (HR 0.38 95%CI 0.22-0.68). In the dMMR/MSI-high group only, 3-year OS was 80% with chemotherapy vs 86% without (p = 0.374), and chemotherapy was not associated with a difference in OS after multivariable analysis (HR 1.03 95%CI 0.40-2.66). In case of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, grade 1 pathological response ( > 90%) was observed in 1/41 (2.4%) of the dMMR/MSI-high tumors vs 43/278 (16%) of the pMMR/MSS tumors respectively (p = 0.026). Conclusions: The incidence of MSI-high tumors in our cohort of clinically locally advanced, resectable, gastric cancers was 15%. Patients with MSI-high tumors had worse pathological treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, but better OS, compared to microsatellite stable tumors. However, in patients with MSI-high tumors, OS was not altered by neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy. We recommend assessing MSI status in locally advanced gastric cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document