scholarly journals The Outcome of Complex Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery for Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosei Takagi ◽  
Yuzo Umeda ◽  
Ryuichi Yoshida ◽  
Daisuke Nobuoka ◽  
Takashi Kuise ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Postoperative Morbidity ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Elderly Group ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Background/Aims: Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates after hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery remain high, and the number of elderly patients requiring such surgery has been increasing. This study aimed to investigate postoperative outcomes of complex HPB surgery for elderly patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed perioperative data of 721 patients who underwent complex HPB surgery between 2010 and 2015. The patients were divided into 2 groups: elderly (≥75 years) and non-elderly (< 75 years). Surgical outcomes of both groups were compared after propensity score-matching analysis. Subsequently, risk factors for serious postoperative morbidity were identified by multivariate analysis. Results: Before matching, the elderly group (n = 170) had more comorbidities, such as cardiovascular and renal disease, than the non-elderly group (n = 551). Matching yielded elderly (n = 170) and non-elderly groups (n = 170) with similar preoperative backgrounds. The mortality and morbidity rates did not differ significantly between the groups. In multivariate analyses, operative time (OR 1.79; p = 0.005) and blood loss (OR 1.66; p = 0.03) were identified as independent risk factors for serious postoperative morbidity, whereas older age did not have a predictive impact (OR 1.16; p = 0.52). Conclusions: Although elderly ­patients had more comorbidities and higher incidences of postoperative mortality and several complications before matching, their postoperative outcomes were equivalent to those of non-elderly patients after matching.

scholarly journals The effect of prophylactic hemoclip placement and risk factors of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding in polyps sized 6 to 20 millimeters: a propensity score matching analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Wei Chen ◽  
Chia-Jung Kuo ◽  
Cheng-Tang Chiu ◽  
Ming-Yao Su ◽  
Chun-Jung Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Potential Bias ◽  
Polyp Size ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis ◽  
History Of ◽  
Snare Polypectomy

Abstract Background Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) is a major complication of polypectomy. The effect of prophylactic hemoclipping on delayed PPB is uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic hemoclipping and identify the risk factors of delayed PPB. Methods Patients with polyps sized 6 to 20 mm underwent snare polypectomy from 2015 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients with prophylactic hemoclipping for delayed PPB prevention were included in the clipping group, and those without prophylactic hemoclipping were included in the non-clipping group. The incidence of delayed PPB and time to bleeding were compared between the groups. Multivariate analysis was used to identify the risk factors of delayed PPB. Propensity score matching was used to minimize potential bias. Results After propensity score matching, 612 patients with 806 polyps were in the clipping group, and 576 patients with 806 polyps were in the non-clipping group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of delayed PPB and days to bleeding between two groups (0.8% vs 1.3%, p = 0.4; 3.4 ± 1.94 days vs 4.13 ± 3.39 days, p = 0.94). In the multivariate analysis, the polyp size [Odds ratio (OR):1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.01–1.16, p = 0.03), multiple polypectomies (OR: 4.64, 95% CI:1.24–17.44, p = 0.02) and a history of anticoagulant use (OR:37.52, 95% CI:6.49–216.8, p < 0.001) were associated with delayed PPB. Conclusions In polyps sized 6 to 20 mm, prophylactic hemoclip placement did not decrease the risk of delayed PPB. Patients without risk factors including multiple polypectomies and anticoagulant use are no need to performing prophylactic hemoclipping.

scholarly journals Liver resection for colorectal liver-limited metastases in elderly patients: a propensity score matching analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ke-Min Jin ◽  
Kun Wang ◽  
Quan Bao ◽  
Hong-Wei Wang ◽  
Bao-Cai Xing
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis ◽  
American Society

Abstract Background Few studies have focused on the role of hepatectomy for colorectal liver-limited metastases in elderly patients compared to matched younger patients. Methods From January 2000 to December 2018, 724 patients underwent hepatectomy for colorectal liver-limited metastases. Based on a 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) model, 64 elderly patients (≥ 70 years of age) were matched to 128 younger patients (< 70 years of age) to obtain two balanced groups with regard to demographic, therapeutic, and prognostic factors. Results There were 73 elderly and 651 younger patients in the unmatched cohort. Compared with the younger group (YG), the elderly group (EG) had significantly higher proportion of American Society of Anesthesiologists score III and comorbidities and lower proportion of more than 3 liver metastases and postoperative chemotherapy (p < 0.05). After PSM for these factors, rat sarcoma virus proto-oncogene/B-Raf proto-oncogene (RAS/BRAF) mutation status and primary tumor sidedness, the EG had significantly less median intraoperative blood loss than the YG (175 ml vs. 200 ml, p = 0.046), a shorter median postoperative hospital stay (8 days vs. 11 days, p = 0.020), and a higher readmission rate (4.7% vs.0%, p = 0.036). The EG also had longer disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared to the YG, but these findings were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Old age was not an independent factor for DFS, OS, and CSS by Cox multivariate regression analysis (p > 0.05). Conclusions Hepatectomy is safe for colorectal liver-limited metastases in elderly patients, and these patients may subsequently benefit from prolonged DFS, OS, and CSS.

scholarly journals Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: A propensity score matching analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuteru Monden ◽  
Hiroshi Sadamori ◽  
Masayoshi Hioki ◽  
Satoshi Ohno ◽  
Norihisa Takakura
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Oral Intake ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Open Liver Resection ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract The number of elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) requiring surgical treatment has been continuously increasing. This study aimed to examine the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) versus open liver resection (OLR) for HCC in elderly patients at our institution in Japan.Between 2010 and 2018, LLR and OLR were performed in 80 and 138 elderly patients (>70 years) who were diagnosed with HCC, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis with covariates of baseline characteristics was applied. Intra- and postoperative data were evaluated in both groups.After PSM, 56 patients who underwent LLR and OLR, respectively, were compared. No significant differences in demographic, clinical data, and operative times were observed. Blood loss (OLR: 327 mL; LLR: 50 mL; P< 0.001), length of postoperative hospital stay (OLR: 12 days; LLR: 7 days; P< 0.001), and time to start oral intake (OLR: 2 days; LLR: 1 day; P< 0.001) were significantly lower and shorter in the LLR group than in the OLR group. The incidence of complications over Clavien-Dindo class IIIa was similar between both groups.Our results suggest that advanced age alone is not a contraindication, and LLR can be a treatment option for elderly patients with HCC.

scholarly journals Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuteru Monden ◽  
Hiroshi Sadamori ◽  
Masayoshi Hioki ◽  
Satoshi Ohno ◽  
Norihisa Takakura
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Oral Intake ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Open Liver Resection ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract BackgroundThe number of elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) requiring surgical treatment has been continuously increasing. This study aimed to examine the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) versus open liver resection (OLR) for HCC in elderly patients at our institution in Japan.MethodsBetween 2010 and 2018, LLR and OLR were performed in 80 and 138 elderly patients (aged > 70 years) who were diagnosed with HCC, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis with covariates of baseline characteristics was applied. Intra- and postoperative data were evaluated in both groups.ResultsAfter PSM, 56 patients who underwent LLR and OLR, respectively, were compared. No significant differences in demographic, clinical data, and operative times were observed. Blood loss (OLR: 327 mL, LLR: 50 mL [P < 0.001]), length of postoperative hospital stay (OLR: 12 days, LLR: 7 days [P < 0.001]), and time to start oral intake (OLR: 2 days, LLR: 1 day [P < 0.001]) were significantly lower and shorter in the LLR group than in the OLR group. The incidence of complications over Clavien-Dindo class IIIa was similar between both groups.ConclusionsOur results suggest that advanced age alone is not a contraindication, and LLR can be a treatment option for elderly patients with HCC.Trial registration: retrospectively registered

scholarly journals Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver-limited Metastases in Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ke-Min Jin ◽  
Kun Wang ◽  
Quan Bao ◽  
Hong-Wei Wang ◽  
Bao-Cai Xing
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis ◽  
American Society

Abstract Background: Few studies have focused on the role of hepatectomy for colorectal liver-limited metastases in elderly patients compared to matched younger patients.Methods: From January 2000 to December 2018, 724 patients underwent hepatectomy for colorectal liver-limited metastases. Based on a 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) model, 64 elderly patients (≥70 years of age) were matched to 128 younger patients (＜70 years of age) to obtain two balanced groups with regards to demographic, therapeutic and prognostic factors.Results: There were 73 elderly and 651 younger patients in the unmatched cohort. Compared with the younger group (YG), the elderly group (EG) had significantly higher proportion of American Society of Anesthesiologists score Ⅲ and comorbidities, and lower proportion of more than 3 liver metastases and postoperative chemotherapy (p<0.05). After PSM for these factors, rat sarcoma virus proto-oncogene/B-Raf proto-oncogene (RAS/BRAF) mutation status and primary tumor sidedness, the EG had significantly less median intraoperative blood loss than the YG (175ml vs. 200ml, p=0.046), a shorter median postoperative hospital stay (8 days vs. 11 days, p=0.020) and a higher readmission rate (4.7% vs.0%, p=0.036). The EG also had longer disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared to the YG, but these findings were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Old age was not an independent factor for DFS, OS and CSS by Cox multivariate regression analysis (p>0.05).Conclusions: Hepatectomy is safe for colorectal liver-limited metastases in elderly patients, and these patients may subsequently benefit from prolonged DFS, OS and CSS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document