Hochrisiko-CLL: Zielgerichtete Kombinationstherapie verbessert das Überleben

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Katja Zirlik
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukaemia ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
To Receive

<b>Background:</b> Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and high-risk features have poorer outcomes on ibrutinib than those without high-risk features. The aim of this study was to assess the benefit of adding ublituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, to ibrutinib therapy in this population. <b>Methods:</b> We did a randomised, phase 3, multicentre study (GENUINE) of patients aged 18 years or older with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia with at least one of 17p deletion, 11q deletion, or TP53 mutation, at 119 clinics in the USA and Israel. Eligible patients had received at least one previous chronic lymphocytic leukaemia therapy and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower. We randomised patients (1:1) using permuted block randomisation with a block size of four and stratified by previous lines of therapy (one vs two or more) to receive ibrutinib alone or ibrutinib in combination with ublituximab. Treatment allocation was not masked to patients or investigators. Ibrutinib was given orally daily at 420 mg for all cycles. Ublituximab was given intravenously in 28-day cycles, with increasing doses during cycle 1 (≤150 mg on day 1, 750 mg on day 2, and 900 mg on days 8 and 15) and continuing at 900 mg on day 1 of cycles 2–6. After cycle 6, ublituximab was given at 900 mg every three cycles. The study was initially designed with co-primary endpoints of progression-free survival and overall response rate but due to protracted patient accrual, the protocol was amended to have a single primary endpoint of independent review committee-assessed overall response rate (defined as the proportion of patients who had a partial response, complete response, or complete response with incomplete marrow recovery according to the 2008 International Workshop on CLL criteria) in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was evaluated in the population of patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02301156, and the final analysis is presented. <b>Findings:</b> 224 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 126 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive ublituximab plus ibrutinib (n = 64) or ibrutinib alone (n = 62) between Feb 6, 2015, and Dec 19, 2016. After a median follow-up of 41·6 months (IQR 36·7–47·3), the overall response rate was 53 (83%) of 64 patients in the ublituximab plus ibrutinib group and 40 (65%) of 62 patients in the ibrutinib group (p = 0·020). 117 patients, including 59 in the ublituximab plus ibrutinib group and 58 in the ibrutinib group, received at least one dose of treatment and were included in safety analyses. Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2. The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were neutropenia (11 [19%] patients in the ublituximab plus ibrutinib group and seven [12%] in the ibrutinib group), anaemia (five [8%] and five [9%]), and diarrhoea (six [10%] and three [5%]). The most common serious adverse events were pneumonia (six [10%] in the ublituximab plus ibrutinib group and four [7%] in the ibrutinib group), atrial fibrillation (four [7%] and one [2%]), sepsis (four [7%] and one [2%]), and febrile neutropenia (three [5%] and one [2%]). Two patients in the ublituximab plus ibrutinib group died due to adverse events (one cardiac arrest and one failure to thrive), neither of which were treatment-related. Five patients in the ibrutinib group died due to adverse events, including one cardiac arrest, one cerebral infarction, one intracranial haemorrhage, one Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia infection, and one unexplained death; the death due to cardiac arrest was considered to be treatment-related. <b>Interpretation:</b> The addition of ublituximab to ibrutinib resulted in a statistically higher overall response rate without affecting the safety profile of ibrutinib monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. These findings provide support for the addition of ublituximab to Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of these patients. <b>Funding:</b> TG Therapeutics.

scholarly journals FINAL Results of an Phase, Multicenter, Randomied, Controlled OPEN LEVEL Trial: Decitabine Therapy in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3865-3865
Author(s):  
Zonghong Shao ◽  
Hui Liu ◽  
Hao Jiang ◽  
Hongyan Tong ◽  
Ruixiang Xiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background: DNA hypomethylating agent, decitabine, has become the current standard therapy for patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Decitabine was launched in China in August 2009 without clinical trials. According to some retrospective studies, the efficacy and safety are similar to those reported in other countries, but there is still a lack of large-scale prospective clinical trials. So we start a prospective clinical trial in China to compare the effect and safety of decitabine in MDS, which was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02013102). Design: Adults with intermediate or high risk MDS by the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS≥0.5) were randomized to receive either decitabine 20 mg/m2 IV daily for 5 days (arm Ⅰ) or decitabine 12 mg/m2 IV daily for 8 days (arm Ⅱ) every four weeks. Patients continued to receive study drug for 4 cycles until death, disease progression, intercurrent illness preventing further administration of treatment, unacceptable adverse event or decision by the patient to withdraw from the study. And supportive care were permitted. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR, CR+mCR+PR) by International Working Group (IWG 2006) criteria, secondary end points included CR, mCR, PR, HI, safety, et al. Results: We enrolled a total of 198 patients between 8/2013 and 12/2017, among which 7 patients didn't take decitabine, and 191 were included in the analysis. 94 in arm Ⅰ recieved decitabine and 97 in arm Ⅱ. 32.8% of patients withdrew from the study for a variety of reasons, including progression and death (5.1%), personal decision (13.6%), adverse events (6.6%), and other causes (7.6%). The median age of patients in arm Ⅰ was 54.88 years old and 54.82 years old in arm II. The median follow-up was 106 days for patients in both arms. The patients received a mean 2.5 cycles of decitabine therapy for arm Ⅰ and 2.0 cycles for arm Ⅱ. The overall response rate was 39.3% in total, and 41.5% and 38.1% (p=0.6598) for patients in arm Ⅰ and arm Ⅱ, respectively. And CR was 18.1% and 14.4% (p= 0.5584) , PR was 6.4% and 3.1% (p=0.3257) , mCR was 17.0% and 20.6% (p=0.5814) , HI was 3.2% and 1.0% (p=0.3633) , for patients in armⅠand armⅡ, respectively (Table 1). Among all patients, 38.7% were intermediate-1 risk, 40.3% were intermediate-2 risk, 20.4% were high risk. Analysis of response by MDS patient subtypes is shown in Table 2. Those who were higher risk experienced higher ORR and CR, while the difference is not significant between two arms (p>0.05). As expected, cytopenias were the most frequent complications (76.4%). Grade 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia considered to be at least possibly related to the study drug occurred at rates of 23.0%, 34.6%, and 34.6% of patients, respectively. Nonhematologic adverse events were also common including abnormal metabolism and nutrition (23.40% vs 18.56%), abnormal gastrointestinal function (29.79% vs 41.24%), cardiac disorders (11.70% vs 14.43%), infection and infectious diseases (32.98% vs 36.08%), abnormal skin and subcutaneous tissue and so on, which were no significant differences between two ams. During the study there were 17 SAE, only 7 cases were possibly related to drug therapy, such as pulmonary infection, Sepsis, myelosuppression, intracranial hemorrhage, hepatic failure, and arrhythmia. Conclusions: The use of 5-day and 8-day schedule decitabine is safe and effective in patients with intermediate and high risk MDS, among which there was no significant differences. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals PD-1 Blockade in Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (23) ◽  
pp. 2620-2627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaume Capdevila ◽  
Lori J. Wirth ◽  
Thomas Ernst ◽  
Santiago Ponce Aix ◽  
Chia-Chi Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Humanized Monoclonal Antibody

PURPOSE Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy that is almost always fatal and lacks effective systemic treatment options for patients with BRAF-wild type disease. As part of a phase I/II study in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors, patients with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma were treated with spartalizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against the programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor. METHODS We enrolled patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic anaplastic thyroid carcinoma in a phase II cohort of the study. Patients received 400 mg spartalizumab intravenously, once every 4 weeks. The overall response rate was determined according to RECIST v1.1. RESULTS Forty-two patients were enrolled. Adverse events were consistent with those previously observed with PD-1 blockade. Most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (12%), pruritus (12%), fatigue (7%), and pyrexia (7%). The overall response rate was 19%, including three patients with a complete response and five with a partial response. Most patients had baseline tumor biopsies positive for PD-L1 expression (n = 28/40 evaluable), and response rates were higher in PD-L1–positive (8/28; 29%) versus PD-L1–negative (0/12; 0%) patients. The highest rate of response was observed in the subset of patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50% (6/17; 35%). Responses were seen in both BRAF-nonmutant and BRAF-mutant patients and were durable, with a 1-year survival of 52.1% in the PD-L1–positive population. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first clinical trial to show responsiveness of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma to PD-1 blockade.

scholarly journals Impact of Cumulative Dose of Carfilzomib in Combination with Lenalidomide and Desamethasone in Relapsed Refractory Myeloma Patients: A Retrospective Real Life Survey of the Sicilian Myeloma Network

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5636-5636
Author(s):  
Concetta Conticello ◽  
Enrica Antonia Martino ◽  
Vittorio Del Fabro ◽  
Giuseppe Sapienza ◽  
Valeria Calafiore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cumulative Dose ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background: Triplet-based lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Rd) combinations have become the new standard of care for early relapse and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Carfilzomib is a novel selective proteasome inhibitor (PI) with high efficacy in RRMM. The ASPIRE phase 3 trial showed the superiority of carfilzomib-based triplet (KRd compared to Rd), leading to approval of K for RRMM. However, little is known about safety and efficacy of KRd outside a clinical trial context. Experimental design and aims: In 11 Sicilian Centers belonging to the Sicilian Myeloma Network, from November 2016, when KRd regimen was approved in Italy, to June 2018, 103 consecutive RRMM patients (previous lines 1-10) have received KRd regimen, according to ASPIRE schedule. Lenalidomide dosage was reduced in patients with a low count of platelet and/or renal failure according to manufacturer guidelines. Since previous studies have demonstrated that increased cumulative dose of first generation PI bortezomib significantly improved overall survival of patients treated with VMP regimen, we studied the effect of cumulative dose of Carfilzomib in RRMM patients receiving KRd. Results: Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients included in the study are summarized in Table 1. Median age was 65 years (range 33-86), most patients were males (54%). About half of the patients included in the survey were refractory to previous treatment (54%); Sixty-five (63%) patients received at least 5 cycles of KRd and 38 (36%) received at least 10 cycles. Overall response rate was 34% (35 patients); 18 patients (17%) achieved a complete response (CR), 6 patients minimal response (MR), 13 (12%) patients achieved PR, 16 patients achieved MR and then progressed; progression occurred in 20 patients, among them 3 did not reached any response. Delays due to adverse events were 33%, mainly due to febrile neutropenia (22%), thromboembolic events (4.5%), heart failure (3%), or thrombocytopenia (4.5%). To prevent hematological toxicities, 24% of patients received granulocyte growth factors, 15% erythropoietin. In 30 patients treatment was reduced (mainly due to lenalidomide toxicity) and in 5 patients discontinued for toxicity. Thus, median cumulative carfizomib doses at 2, 3, 4 and 6 cycles were respectively 480 mg (282 mg/m2), 735 mg (435 mg/m2), 995 mg (589 mg/m2) and 1522mg (890 mg/m2). After a median follow up of 16.2 months, PFS at 12 months was 67.3%. We found that median PFS was significantly longer in patients who received at least 480 mg (282 mg/m2) within first two months of treatment compared to those that could not receive full-dose KRd (respectively, undefined vs 11 months p=0.04). To identify patients that could obtain the most advantage by KRd treatment, 65 patients who had received at least six cycles were distinguished in two groups, based on previous treatments. In group A, 27 patients were heavily pretreated (median previous lines 4, range 2-10) and had previously received lenalidomide while 38 patients included in group B were less pretreated (median previous lines 3, range 1-5) and lenalidomide- naïve. We found that group A had lower PFS than group B although duration of PFS from the previous treatment was similar in both groups. Conclusions: In our cohort of patients rate of VGPR or better obtained with KRd combination was high with an overall response rate of 34%, with an acceptable safety profile. It is therefore reasonable that approaches to achieve a higher cumulative dose, such as continuing therapy in responding patients and/or proactive adverse events management, influence efficacy. In addition, it is likely that patients not previously exposed to several lines of treatment including lenalidomide are the best candidate for a favorable outcome with KRd regimen. Disclosures Di Raimondo: Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Phase 1/2a study of 177Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan in relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (17) ◽  
pp. 4091-4101
Author(s):  
Arne Kolstad ◽  
Tim Illidge ◽  
Nils Bolstad ◽  
Signe Spetalen ◽  
Ulf Madsbu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract For patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma who fail initial anti-CD20–based immunochemotherapy or develop relapsed or refractory disease, there remains a significant unmet clinical need for new therapeutic approaches to improve outcomes and quality of life. 177Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan is a next-generation single-dose CD37-directed radioimmunotherapy (RIT) which was investigated in a phase 1/2a study in 74 patients with relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma, including 57 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). To improve targeting of 177Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan to tumor tissue and decrease hematologic toxicity, its administration was preceded by the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab and the “cold” anti-CD37 antibody lilotomab. The most common adverse events (AEs) were reversible grade 3/4 neutropenia (31.6%) and thrombocytopenia (26.3%) with neutrophil and platelet count nadirs 5 to 7 weeks after RIT. The most frequent nonhematologic AE was grade 1/2 nausea (15.8%). With a single administration, the overall response rate was 61% (65% in patients with FL), including 30% complete responses. For FL with ≥2 prior therapies (n = 37), the overall response rate was 70%, including 32% complete responses. For patients with rituximab-refractory FL ≥2 prior therapies (n = 21), the overall response rate was 67%, and the complete response rate was 24%. The overall median duration of response was 13.6 months (32.0 months for patients with a complete response). 177Lu-lilotomab satetraxetan may provide a valuable alternative treatment approach in relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly in patients with comorbidities unsuitable for more intensive approaches. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01796171.

Everolimus and exemestane in hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: A comprehensive cancer center’s experience.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13017-e13017
Author(s):  
Inês Moreira ◽  
Marta Ferreira ◽  
Ana Afonso ◽  
Ana Ferreira ◽  
Ana Rodrigues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive

e13017 Background: Activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin intracellular signaling pathway is one of the mechanisms of endocrine resistance in breast cancer. The addition of everolimus to exemestane improves progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) previously treated with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAIs). The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of everolimus plus exemestane in patients with HR+ ABC. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with HR+, HER2 negative ABC treated with everolimus/exemestane that recurred or progressed during/after treatment with NSAIs in a portuguese comprehensive cancer center. Study endpoints were PFS, overall survival (OS), overall response rate and adverse events. Results: Between April 2014 and September 2020, 63 female patients were treated with everolimus/exemestane. Median age was 59 years (36-79), and all had performance status ECOG ≤2. Seventeen (27.0%) patients had bone metastasis alone, 39 (61.9%) had bone and visceral metastasis, 25 (39.7%) had metastasis in 3 or more sites and 87.3% had previous hormone-sensitive disease. Before everolimus/exemestane, 61 (96.8%) patients were being treated with palliative endocrine therapy (alone or in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors) or chemotherapy (ChT) and 2 (3.2%) patients were under adjuvant endocrine therapy. Median follow-up time was 12.8 months (1.4-74.6), with 39 patients alive. Overall response rate was 14.3% (1 complete response and 8 partial responses) and 45 patients had stable disease. Median PFS was 5.6 months (CI95% 2.4-8.8) and median OS was 25.4 months (CI95% 10.3-40.5). Subgroup analysis regarding PFS was statistically significant for previous treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors (p = 0.026) and for site of metastasis (p = 0.025). In the subgroup of patients that previously underwent palliative ChT, median PFS was 4.0 months (CI95% 0.2-9.6) and median OS was 18.6 months (CI95% 8.2-29.0). For patients that did not receive previous palliative ChT, median PFS was 5.8 months (CI95% 3.8-7.8) and median OS was 43.5 months (CI95% 2.0-85.0). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 21 (33.3%) patients, and were: nausea, anorexia, rash, headache, haematologic toxicity, hepatic cytolysis, hyperglycaemia, pneumonitis, oral mucositis and acute kidney failure with need for haemodialysis. Fifty-five (87.3%) patients suspended everolimus, 34 (54.0%) due to disease progression and 21 (33.3%) due to toxicity. Conclusions: Our results confirm the effectiveness and safety of everolimus/exemestane in real-world setting and support its use mainly before palliative ChT. Everolimus/exemestane in HR+ ABC is feasible in the clinic, with toxicity manageable under close surveillance.

scholarly journals Phase II Study of Lenvatinib in Patients With Progressive, Recurrent or Metastatic Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (18) ◽  
pp. 1529-1537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vatche Tchekmedyian ◽  
Eric J. Sherman ◽  
Lara Dunn ◽  
Crystal Tran ◽  
Shrujal Baxi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
End Point ◽  
Adenoid Cystic

PURPOSE Recurrent or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma (R/M ACC) is a malignant neoplasm of predominantly salivary gland origin for which effective therapies are lacking. We conducted a phase II trial evaluating the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor lenvatinib in patients with R/M ACC. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study was conducted with a two-stage minimax design. Patients with histologically confirmed R/M ACC of any primary site with radiographic and/or symptomatic progression were eligible. Any prior therapy was allowed except previous lenvatinib. Patients received lenvatinib 24 mg orally per day. The primary end point was overall response rate. Secondary end points were progression-free survival and safety. An exploratory analysis of how MYB expression and genomic alterations relate to outcomes was conducted. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were enrolled; 32 were evaluable for the primary end point. Five patients (15.6%) had a confirmed partial response, 24 patients (75%) had stable disease, two patients (6.3%) discontinued treatment as a result of toxicity before the first scan, and one patient (3.1%) had progression of disease as best response. Median progression-free survival time was 17.5 months (95% CI, 7.2 months to not reached), although only eight progression events were observed. Patients otherwise were removed for toxicity (n = 5), as a result of withdrawal of consent (n = 9), or at the treating physician’s discretion (n = 6). Twenty-three patients required at least one dose modification, and 18 of 32 patients discontinued lenvatinib for drug-related issues. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypertension (n = 9; 28.1%) and oral pain (n = 3; 9.4%). Three grade 4 adverse events were observed (myocardial infarction, n = 1; posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, n = 1; and intracranial hemorrhage, n = 1). CONCLUSION This trial met the prespecified overall response rate primary end point, demonstrating antitumor activity with lenvatinib in R/M ACC patients. Toxicity was comparable to previous studies, requiring monitoring and management.

Capecitabine in patients with platinum-pretreated advanced or recurrent cervical carcinoma: a retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppa Maltese ◽  
Stefano Lepori ◽  
Ilaria Sabatucci ◽  
Elisa Tripodi ◽  
Domenica Lorusso
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cervical Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Recurrent Cervical Cancer ◽  
Oral Capecitabine ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Dismal Prognosis

BackgroundCervical cancer is a common malignancy among women and, when recurring, presents a dismal prognosis. After platinum failure, second-line treatments report response rates ranging from 3–15%, a median progression-free survival of about 3 months and a median overall survival of about 5.5 months.To retrospectively evaluate the activity and safety of capecitabine in patients with advanced/recurrent cervical carcinoma.MethodsA retrospective review of medical records of recurrent cervical cancer patients, who had failed a previous platinum–paclitaxel treatment and received oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 twice daily continuously from day 1 to day 14 every 21 days, was performed from December 2013 to March 2018 at the Gynecologic Oncology Unit of the Fondazione IRCCS National Cancer Institute of Milan, Italy. The response rate was evaluated every three cycles according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 criteria. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 were used to evaluate adverse events.ResultsWe retrospectively analyzed 35 patients with recurrent cervical carcinoma, treated with oral capecitabine. All patients had previously received and failed a combination of carboplatin plus paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced/recurrent disease. Median age at the first capecitabine administration was 53 years (range 27–82). All patients were evaluable for response: the overall response rate was 34.2% (2.8% complete responses and 31.4% partial responses) with a clinical benefit rate of 57% (overall response rate plus 22.8% stabilizations of disease). The most common grade 1–2 adverse events per patient were fatigue (71.3%), hand-foot syndrome (57.0%), diarrhea (31.3%), constipation (17.0%), and nausea (10.4%). Only three patients (8.5%) reported grade 3 adverse events.ConclusionsOur data suggest that oral capecitabine should be considered an active and safe treatment in patients with recurrent cervical carcinoma after platinum failure. Based on these results, we consider capecitabine as warranting further clinical evaluation.

Decitabine Low-Dose Schedule (100 mg/m2/Course) in Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS). Comparison of 3 Different Dose Schedules.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2522-2522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Susan O’Brien ◽  
Francis Giles ◽  
Farhad Ravandi-Kashani ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Optimal Schedule ◽  
Dose Schedule ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Transfusion Independence ◽  
Secondary Mds ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background Decitabine (DAC), a hypomethylating agent, has shown activity in MDS. DAC 150 mg/m2 by continuous infusion has been associated with CR rates of 10% to 20%. We investigated optimizing the dose schedule of DAC in MDS. Study Group and Methods Patients (pts) with IPSS intermediate 1–2 & high risk MDS were randomized to one of 3 schedules of DAC: 1) 20 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour daily x 5; 2) 10 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour daily x 10; or 3)10 mg/m2 subcutaneously (SQ) BID x 5. A total of 95 pts are to be treated; Bayesian randomization is implemented based on CR rates. Courses were given every 28 days. Delays to allow counts recovery were permitted every 3 courses, or if myelosuppression without disease, or severe myelosuppression complications. Pts were allowed to receive erythropoietin 40,000 units weekly for anemia, or GCSF if needed. Response criteria for CR & PR were as for AML (PR requiring also ↓ blasts by &gt;50%). Clinical benefit (CB) referred to one or more of: platelets î by ≥ 50% and &gt;30 x 109/L, or granulocytes increase by ≥ 100% and to &gt;109/L, or hemoglobin î by ≥ 2 g/dl or transfusion independence, or splenomegaly ↓ by 50% or more, or monocytes ↓ by 50% or more (pretreatment &gt;5 x 109/L). Results 92 pts have been treated; median age 65 (31–90) yrs; 66% &gt;60 yrs old. IPSS: intermediate-1 25%; intermediate-2 38%; high 19%; CMML 17% Cytogenetic abnormalities 57%; secondary MDS 17%; marrow blasts &gt; 10% in 31%. 27 pts had prior erythropoietin; 17 had prior GCSF; 22 had other prior therapies. Presently, 89 pts have received 1 course. Results: 32 CR (36%); 7 PR (8%); 13 marrow CR + CB (15%); 16 CB (18%); overall response 68/89=76%. Median courses to CR 3 (range 1 to 6). Median follow-up of 9 months; 48 pts continue on DAC. Compared with a 114 pts with MDS who received intensive chemotherapy (2000–2004), CR rate was lower with DAC (36% vs. 45%), overall response rate was favorable; 6-week mortality was lower with DAC (1% vs. 21%); and estimated survival favorable (p = 0.00007). CR rates by schedule: 5 days IV 24/58 (41%); 5 days SQ 4/14 (28%); 10 day IV 4/17 (24%). There was more myelosuppression with 10 day IV. After 55 patients were randomized, the 5 day IV arm was determined statistically superior, therefore, remaining patients were not randomized, but were treated with 5 days IV therapy. Conclusions DAC has significant anti-MDS activity; 2) optimal schedule: 20 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour daily x 5; 3) timely repeated courses needed for optimal response.

Cardiac Biomarkers Predict for Ability To Tolerate and Complete Therapy with Lenalidomide ± Dexamathosone in AL Amyloidosis.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 130-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Martha Lacy ◽  
Steven Zeldenrust ◽  
Suzanne R. Hayman ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Troponin T ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Cardiac Biomarkers ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Cardiac Biomarker ◽  
Overall Response

Abstract Background: Primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) is an incurable plasma cell disorder. Lenalidomide, especially in conjunction with dexamethasone, has been shown to be highly active in patients with multiple myeloma. Methods: We studied the toxicity and efficacy of lenalidomide in patients with symptomatic AL. Patients received single agent lenalidomide. If progression by 3 months or no evidence of hematologic response after 3 cycles, dexamethasone was added. Originally, twenty-three patients (Cohort 1) were enrolled according to study design. Because of a significant early drop out rate and notable activity of the regimen, the trial was modified to include an additional 15 patients (Cohort 2). Baseline characteristics and adverse events are available for all enrolled patients, but at the time of this writing, response data are available for Cohort 1 patients due to short follow-up of Cohort 2, but will be updated by the time of the meeting. Results: Median age was 64 years, with 69% male. Twenty-three were previously treated. Organ involvement was cardiac (67%), renal (64%), hepatic (17%), nerve (17%). Thirty-three, twenty-two, and forty-four percent of patients were cardiac biomarker stage 1, 2, and, 3 respectively. Of the 37 patients, one was a cancel, and 6 have not yet made it through 3 months of protocol treatment and event monitoring. The respective median follow-ups for Cohorts 1 and 2 are 17 and 3.4 months. Of the remaining, 30 patients, within the first 3 cycles of therapy fifteen patients discontinued treatment: 7 early deaths and 8 adverse events or other causes. Three additional patients died 0.5 to 2 months after stopping treatment. The best predictor for early withdrawal and/or death was baseline NT-proBNP and cardiac biomarker staging system (cut-offs for serum troponin T &lt;0.035 ng/ml and NT-proBNP &lt;332 pg/ml--Stage I neither above cut-off; Stage III, both above cut-off; and Stage II, one above cut-off). Figure1 Figure1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Of the twenty 22 patients assessed for response ten patients responded to treatment for an overall response rate of 45%, including 23% organ responders. Among the patients with organ responses, there were four renal responses, two cardiac responses and two liver responses. All but one of the responders had dexamethasone added to their treatment program. The most common grade 3−4 adverse events at least possibly attributable to lenalidomide were neutropenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (21%), fatigue (15%), and rash (12%). Conclusions: Lenalidomide and dexamethasone has significant activity in patients with AL with an overall response rate of 45%. Baseline NT−proBNP may be an effective eligibility screening strategy for subsequent trials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document