Abstract 2334: Head-to-head Comparison of Whole-Heart Coronary MR and 40/64 slice Multidetector-CT Angiography for Detection of Coronary Artery Stenosis.

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Catherine Pouleur ◽  
Jean-Benoit le Polain de Waroux ◽  
Joelle Kefer ◽  
Céline Goffinet ◽  
Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Cardiac Catheterization ◽  
Multidetector Ct ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Free Breathing ◽  
Luminal Diameter ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Coronary Imaging ◽  
Coronary Stenoses ◽  
Whole Heart

Purpose . Whole-heart magnetic resonance coronary angiography (WH-MRCA) has been recently proposed for non-invasive coronary imaging. Early studies have suggested that WH-MRCA might have similarly high diagnostic accuracy for detection of coronary disease as multidetector CT (MDCT). Yet, no direct comparison between both techniques has been performed. The aim of the present study was therefore to perform a head-to-head comparison of both techniques for detection of significant coronary stenoses using invasive cardiac catheterization as reference standard. Methods. Seventy-seven consecutive patients (56 M, 61±14 years) prospectively underwent free-breathing 3-dimensional WH-MRCA and 40/64-slice MDCT before cardiac catheterization. WH-MRCA and MDCT images were visually graded by 2 blinded observers and the diagnostic accuracy of both methods for detecting >50% luminal diameter stenoses (DS) in segments and vessels >1.5 mm size was compared using quantitative angiography (QCA) as reference method. Results. MDCT was successfully completed in all 77 patients in < 5 minutes. By contrast, WH-MRCA failed in 9 patients (12%) because of poor navigator performance and lasted 20±4 minutes (p<.01 vs MDCT). According to QCA, out of 992 segments > 1.5 mm diameter, 49 presented >50% DS. If all segments including non interpretable segments were considered, WH-MRCA had lower sensibility (35/49 or 71% vs. 45/49 or 92%, p<0.001), lower specificity (644/943 or 68% vs. 863/943 or 92%, p<0.001) and accuracy (679/992 or 68% vs. 908/992 or 92%, p<0.001) for detection of coronary stenosis than MDCT. However if only interpretable segments were considered, the sensitivity (35/37 or 95% vs. 45/46 or 98%, p=0.58), specificity (644/689 or 93% vs. 863/917 or 94%, p=0.67) and diagnostic accuracy (679/726 or 94%, vs. 908/963 or 94%, p=0.58) of WH-MRCA and MDCT for detection of >50% DS was similar. This was also the case on per-vessel basis. Conclusion. In the present study, MDCT had higher success rate than WH-MRCA. Therefore on an intention to diagnose basis, MDCT was superior to WH-MRCA. However, the diagnostic accuracy of WH-MRCA on per-segment and per-vessel basis was not statistically different from MDCT if only interpretable segments were considered.

Abstract 18795: Resting Patient- and Vessel-Specific Myocardial Perfusion Attenuation Patterns Improves Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanglei Xiong ◽  
Iksung Cho ◽  
Heidi Gransar ◽  
Deeksha Kola ◽  
Kimberly Elmore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Perfusion ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Coronary Stenosis ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Ct Perfusion ◽  
Quantitative Coronary Angiography ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Luminal Diameter ◽  
Coronary Stenoses

Introduction: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) demonstrates improved performance for diagnosis of high-grade coronary stenoses, but may be affected by artifacts and overestimation of stenosis severity. Whether the addition of resting myocardial perfusion attenuation patterns subtended by stenosis seen on CCTA improves diagnostic performance has not been examined to date. Methods: We evaluated 127 patients (mean age 53.0, 54.3% male) who underwent CCTA and ICA. Percentage of coronary stenosis was assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), which served as the reference comparator to CCTA. CCTA stenosis was categorized as 0%, 1-24%, 25-49%, 50-69%, 70-99%, and 100% luminal diameter reduction. Automated software (SmartHeart, Redwood City, CA) was used to measure resting CT perfusion attenuation patterns in myocardial segments by AHA 17-segment model. Segmental CT attenuation values were assigned to territories subtended by left anterior descending (LAD), left circumflex (LCX), and right coronary arteries (RCA). Per-patient and per-vessel analyses were based on highest severity (maximal stenosis, minimal attenuation). On both per-patient and per-vessel basis, logistic regression was devised for CCTA stenosis alone and for CCTA plus resting myocardial attenuation. Diagnostic accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) were determined. Results: Diagnostic accuracy of CCTA alone was 84.0%, 85.5%, 90.4%, and 88.6%, at per-patient, per-LAD, per-LCX and per-RCA level, respectively. In comparison, the accuracy of CCTA plus myocardial attenuation were 89.6%, 91.9%, 95.2%, and 92.7%. The AUCs using CCTA alone to discriminate QCA-confirmed coronary stenoses >70% were 0.823 (95% CI: 0.737-0.909), 0.782 (95% CI: 0.667-0.898), 0.690 (95% CI: 0.503-0.878), and 0.793 (95% CI: 0.640-0.945) for per-patient, per-LAD, per-LCX, and per-RCA analysis, respectively. The AUCs using CCTA plus myocardial attenuation improved to 0.864 (95% CI: 0.765-0.962), 0.881 (95% CI: 0.793-0.968), 0.772 (95% CI: 0.535-1.000), and 0.820 (95% CI: 0.685-0.954). Conclusions: The addition of resting CT myocardial perfusion attenuation patterns improves identification and discrimination of high-grade coronary stenosis by CCTA.

scholarly journals Imaging coronary plaques using 3D motion-compensated [18F]NaF PET/MR

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Mayer ◽  
Thomas-Heinrich Wurster ◽  
Tobias Schaeffter ◽  
Ulf Landmesser ◽  
Andreas Morguet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Attenuation Correction ◽  
Free Breathing ◽  
Cardiac Motion ◽  
Water Fraction ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Background Ratio ◽  
Motion Models ◽  
Physiological Motion ◽  
Atherosclerosis Imaging ◽  
Novel Applications

Abstract Background Cardiac PET has recently found novel applications in coronary atherosclerosis imaging using [18F]NaF as a radiotracer, highlighting vulnerable plaques. However, the resulting uptakes are relatively small, and cardiac motion and respiration-induced movement of the heart can impair the reconstructed images due to motion blurring and attenuation correction mismatches. This study aimed to apply an MR-based motion compensation framework to [18F]NaF data yielding high-resolution motion-compensated PET and MR images. Methods Free-breathing 3-dimensional Dixon MR data were acquired, retrospectively binned into multiple respiratory and cardiac motion states, and split into fat and water fraction using a model-based reconstruction framework. From the dynamic MR reconstructions, both a non-rigid cardiorespiratory motion model and a motion-resolved attenuation map were generated and applied to the PET data to improve image quality. The approach was tested in 10 patients and focal tracer hotspots were evaluated concerning their target-to-background ratio, contrast-to-background ratio, and their diameter. Results MR-based motion models were successfully applied to compensate for physiological motion in both PET and MR. Target-to-background ratios of identified plaques improved by 7 ± 7%, contrast-to-background ratios by 26 ± 38%, and the plaque diameter decreased by −22 ± 18%. MR-based dynamic attenuation correction strongly reduced attenuation correction artefacts and was not affected by stent-related signal voids in the underlying MR reconstructions. Conclusions The MR-based motion correction framework presented here can improve the target-to-background, contrast-to-background, and width of focal tracer hotspots in the coronary system. The dynamic attenuation correction could effectively mitigate the risk of attenuation correction artefacts in the coronaries at the lung-soft tissue boundary. In combination, this could enable a more reproducible and reliable plaque localisation.

Preprocedural β-Blockers in the Functional Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Lesions by Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio

Angiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 000331972199617
Author(s):  
Monica Verdoia ◽  
Rocco Gioscia ◽  
Matteo Nardin ◽  
Orazio Viola ◽  
Marta Francesca Brancati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Assessment ◽  
Lesion Length ◽  
Functional Evaluation ◽  
Luminal Diameter ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Coronary Stenoses ◽  
Minimal Luminal Diameter ◽  
Coronary Lesions ◽  
Β Blockers ◽  
The Impact

Aim: Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) has emerged as the strategy of choice for the assessment of intermediate coronary lesions. The impact of preprocedural β-blockers therapy on the iFR was the aim of this study. Methods: We included patients undergoing functional assessment of intermediate (40%-70%) coronary lesions in 2 centers. The iFR measurement was performed by pressure-recording guidewire and calculated at the core laboratory using the manufacturers’ dedicated software. Minimal luminal diameter, reference diameter, percent diameter stenosis, and length of the lesion were measured. Positive iFR was considered for values <0.90. Results: We included 197 patients undergoing functional evaluation of 223 coronary lesions. Patients on β-blockers (69%) had more frequently hypertension ( P = .05); previous myocardial infarction ( P = .01); therapy with clopidogrel ( P = .02), statins, and aspirin; and acute coronary syndrome at presentation ( P < .001, respectively). Mean iFR values were slightly higher in patients on β-blockers (0.94 ± 0.06 vs 0.92 ± 0.06, P = .11). The rate of positive iFR was significantly lower with β-blockers (14.9% vs 27.5%, P = .04). On multivariate analysis, β-blockers use was a predictor of the significance of coronary stenoses (odds ratio [OR] = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.23-0.98; P = .05) together with lesion length (OR = 1.04; 95% CI = 1.01-1.07; P = .007). Conclusion: Among patients undergoing iFR, preprocedural β-blockers are associated with higher absolute values and a lower rate of positive iFR.

Diagnostic accuracy of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio (iFR) for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia: a comparison with non-invasive stress imaging

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Stazzoni ◽  
L Tessandori ◽  
P Spontoni ◽  
M Angelillis ◽  
C Giannini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Myocardial Ischaemia ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Coronary Revascularization ◽  
Stress Test ◽  
Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Coronary Stenoses ◽  
Epicardial Stenosis

Abstract Background Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio (iFR) allows for the assessment of the haemodynamic effects of epicardial coronary stenoses without the need for hyperaemia; iFR is currently recommended as a means to evaluate myocardial ischaemia. Purpose To assess the diagnostic accuracy of iFR with respect to the identification of coronary epicardial stenoses causing ischemia. Therefore, we combined anatomical (% stenosis at invasive coronary angiography, ICA) and functional (non-invasive imaging stress test, NIST) information to obtain a “gold standard” for the identification of stenoses causing ischaemia. Methods We enrolled 71 patients (52 male, 19 female; age mean 68.4±8.1 years) with chronic coronary syndrome or low-risk acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation who had at least a NIST and who had at least one vessel with a 50%-85% stenosis at ICA. iFR was measured in all coronary arteries with stenosis &gt;50% and categorised according to the 0.89 threshold for ischaemia. Results iFR was assessed in 122 vessels. In a per-vessel analysis, in 56.7% ischaemia was present both at iFR and NIST, in 21.3% ischaemia was absent in both, while in 23.0% ischaemia was found at NIST but not confirmed by iFR. The overall accuracy of iFR with respect to NIST was 90.1%. However, when considering as the “gold standard” for coronary disease causing ischaemia the contemporary presence of an epicardial stenosis &gt;70% at ICA and a positive NIST, the diagnostic accuracy of iFR greatly improved. The sensibility, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 96.5%, 75.0%, 73.3%, 96.7% and 84.4%, respectively. In case of discordance between NIST and iFR, revascularization was based on iFR. At a mean follow-up of 23±18 months, the composite endpoint of MACE (major adverse cardiac events, defined as the composite of all-cause death, nonfatal MI and unplanned coronary revascularization) occurred in 16.4%, while death/MI occurred in 11.9%. Stratification according to the per-patient concordance between iFR and NIST showed no significant differences in rates of MACE (p=0.50) and death/MI (p=0.20). Stratification based on iFR showed a higher death/MI rate in iFR-positive patients (11.9% vs. 0%, p=0.047) and a trend to higher MACE rate (11.9% vs. 4.47% p=0.14), Conclusions The diagnostic accuracy of iFR is low when compared with NIST as the reference for myocardial ischaemia, but it is very high when compared with the combined presence of epicardial stenosis and positive NIST. Therefore, iFR can accurately guide the decision to treat or defer revascularization of intermediate coronary stenoses, being most useful in patients with multivessel CAD and when non-invasive functional data are lacking or discordant with anatomy. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document