Abstract 16173: Clinical Characteristics and Short-term Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients With Sars-cov-2 Infection and Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gatha G Nair ◽  
Joanne Michelle M Gomez ◽  
Setri S Fugar ◽  
Jeanne du Fay de Lavallaz ◽  
Max Ruge ◽  
...  

Introduction: Early studies of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients suggested that heart failure (HF) may lead to poorer prognosis. We evaluated demographics and short-term clinical outcomes of patients with evidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in comparison to those with preserved LV systolic function (PSF). Methods: In this retrospective study of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between March and June 2, 2020 at Rush Health Systems in Metro Chicago, demographics, comorbidities and clinical outcomes of patients who demonstrated LVSD (ejection fraction [EF] <50%) on transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) were compared to that of controls with PSF. Results: Out of 1,312 hospitalized patients, 225 underwent TTE, and 44 patients showed LVSD. Demographics were similar between two groups, with exception of a higher prevalence of African American (AA) race (48 % vs. 29%; p=0.03) in the LVSD group. While 82% of patients in the LVSD cohort had history of chronic HF, only 26% of patients in the PSF had pre-existing HF (p<0.001). Underlying comorbidities were similar between groups: obesity (39% vs. 36%; p=0.86), diabetes (57% vs. 57%; p=1.0), hypertension (70% vs. 66%; p=0.72) and end-stage renal disease (20% vs. 19%; p=0.83). Coronary artery disease trended toward a higher frequency (50% vs. 34%; p=0.058) in the LVSD group. Troponin elevation (18% vs. 12%; p=0.43), vasopressor use (57% vs. 56%; p=1.0), endotracheal intubation (59% vs. 57%; p=0.87), myocardial infarction (30% vs. 23%; p=0.43), ICU admission (75% vs. 75%; p=1.0), hospital length of stay (median 11 days vs. 15 days; p=0.4), and death (25% vs. 23%; p=0.84) were similar between groups. Patients with LVSD had higher incidence of sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation than those with PSF (18% vs. 6%; p=0.016). Conclusions: In our COVID-19 admissions, LVSD was more common in AA patients. Patients with LVSD had a higher risk of ventricular arrhythmias. However, there were no differences between need for ICU admission or intubation, vasopressor requirements, length of stay or death between patients with LVSD and those without. Longitudinal follow-up studies are needed to identify differences in long-term sequelae of COVID-19 infection with evidence for LVSD.

2018 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. 197-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fidha Rahmayani ◽  
Ismail Setyopranoto ◽  

ABSTRACT Aims: The aim of the study was to determine the effect of left ventricular ejection fraction on clinical outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients. Study Design: This study design was a prospective cohort observational study. Place and Duration of Study: This study was conducted at Stroke Unit, Neurology Ward, and Cardiology Ward at the Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, between July and December 2016. Materials and Methods: Hospitalized acute ischemic stroke patients were recruited, with sample was taken by consecutive sampling until reaching amount fulfilling inclusion criterion was 62 persons. In this study, clinical outcomes were measured by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores as well as dependent variables and left ventricular ejection fraction as independent variables. Logistic regression analyses were performed to discover any potential independent variable that can influence the left ventricular ejection fraction role at the clinical outcomes with NIHSS scores. Results: Multivariate analyses revealed that several variables were significantly interacted with the influence of left ventricular ejection fraction at the clinical outcomes with NIHSS scores. These variables were the left ventricular ejection fraction <48% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.691–0.925; P = 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction + low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (95% CI: 0.73–0.949; P = 0,001), left ventricular ejection fraction + diabetes mellitus (DM) (95% CI: 0.799–0.962; P = 0,001), and left ventricular ejection fraction + low HDL + DM (95% CI: 0.841–0.98; P = 0,001). Conclusion: The influence of the lower left ventricular ejection fraction to clinical outcome of ischemic stroke patients has a worsening of neurological deficit outcome by considering the combination of several independent variables including the DM and low HDL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document