Abstract 160: Impact of Medication Adherence on Risk of Stroke, Major Bleeding and Other Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Using Novel Oral Anticoagulants (Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban)

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chinmay G Deshpande ◽  
Cynthia Willey Temkin ◽  
Robert Laforge ◽  
Stephen Kogut
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Drug Use ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Adherence Assessment ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban have shown better or similar efficacy to lower stroke risk compared to warfarin in clinical trials. Evidence suggests adherence to cardiac drugs tend to reduce outcomes and cost. Our study is the first to examine the impact of atleast 6 to 12 month adherence to NOACs on ischemic stroke, major bleeding, Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism (DVTPE) risk in a propensity score based matched sample. Methods: A retrospective cohort study utilized de-identified data from Optum® Clinformatics™ Data Mart database (OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, MN) (Jan 1, 2010 and Dec 31, 2012). Adult patients with ≥ 1 diagnosis of atrial fibrillation or flutter (ICD9 427.31/32), >1 prescription of NOACs, 6 months pre-index continuous enrollment and CHA2DS2VASC score >1 were included. Adherence was calculated using Proportion of Days Covered (PDC ≥80%) for atleast 6 and 12 months of NOAC use and cohorts (adherent vs. non adherent) were matched on propensity score using Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting (IPTW) controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline. The risk of ischemic stroke, major bleeding (primary outcomes) and DVTPE (exploratory outcome) was evaluated for the matched cohorts post adherence assessment using Cox regression. Results: Out of 25,150 NOAC patients, a total of 3,629 and 1,946 patients with atleast 6 and 12 months of NOAC use were included. Across 2 cohorts, the mean age of the sample was 65 years, 65% were males and >60% had a moderate-high risk of stroke (CHA2DS2VASC>2). Adherence (PDC ≥80%) was 77% and 76% for patients with 6 and 12 month drug use. Post 12 months of drug use, the overall incidence of bleeding, stroke, and DVTPE in the follow-up period was 4.42%, 1.80%, and 0.82% respectively. Each outcome was analyzed separately to avoid calculation of competing risks. Using Cox models with IPTW balanced cohorts, non-adherence was significantly (p ≤0.05) associated with an increase in stroke (≥ 1.5 fold) and DVTPE (≥ 2 fold) risk in both 6 and 12 month users. The risk of bleeding was not significantly different across adherent vs. non adherent users (Table). Conclusion: In our sample, adherence to NOACs was associated with a reduction in stroke and DVTPE risk but did not substantially increase bleeding risk. Further studies with newer NOACs are warranted.

Safety of early anticoagulation in patients treated with urgent reperfusion for acute ischemic stroke related to non-valvular atrial fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Giustozzi
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Early Recurrence ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Hemorrhagic Event

Abstract Background The optimal timing for starting anticoagulation after an acute ischemic stroke related to non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a challenge, especially in patients treated with systemic thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy. Purpose We aimed to assess the rates of early recurrence and major bleeding in patients with acute ischemic stroke and AF treated with thrombolytic therapy and/or thrombectomy who received oral anticoagulants for secondary prevention. Methods We combined the dataset of the RAF and the RAF-NOACs studies, which were prospective observational studies carried out from January 2012 to March 2014 and April 2014 to June 2016, respectively. We included consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke and AF treated with either vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or new oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Primary outcome was the composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack, symptomatic systemic embolism, symptomatic cerebral bleeding, and major extracerebral bleeding within 90 days from the inclusion. Results A total of 2,159 patients were included in the RAF and RAF-NOACs trials, of which 564 patients (26%) were treated with urgent reperfusion therapy. After acute stroke, 505 (90%) patients treated with reperfusion and 1,287 out of the 1,595 (81%) patients not treated with reperfusion started oral anticoagulation. Timing of starting oral anticoagulation was similar in reperfusion-treated and untreated patients (13.5±23.3 vs 12.3±18.3 days, respectively, p=0.287). At 90 days, the composite rate of recurrence and major bleeding occurred in 37 (7%) of patients treated with reperfusion treatment and in 139 (9%) of untreated patients (p=0.127). Twenty-four (4%) reperfusion-treated patients and 82 (5%) untreated patients had early recurrence while major bleeding occurred in 13 (2%) treated and in 64 (4%) untreated patients, respectively. Seven patients in the untreated group experienced both an ischemic and hemorrhagic event. Figure 1 shows the risk of early recurrence and major bleeding over time in patients treated and not treated with reperfusion treatments. The use of NOACs was associated with a favorable rate of the primary outcome compared to VKAs (Odd ratio 0.4, 95% Confidence Interval 0.3–0.7). Conclusions Reperfusion treatment did not influence the risk of early recurrence and major bleeding in patients with AF-related acute ischemic stroke who started anticoagulant treatment. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals The Number of Concomitant Drugs and the Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Routine Care Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

TH Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 04 (04) ◽  
pp. e417-e426
Author(s):  
Carline J. van den Dries ◽  
Sander van Doorn ◽  
Patrick Souverein ◽  
Romin Pajouheshnia ◽  
Karel G.M. Moons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
P Value ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Mortality Effect

Abstract Background The benefit of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) on major bleeding was less prominent among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with polypharmacy in post-hoc randomized controlled trials analyses. Whether this phenomenon also exists in routine care is unknown. The aim of the study is to investigate whether the number of concomitant drugs prescribed modifies safety and effectiveness of DOACs compared with VKAs in AF patients treated in general practice. Study Design Adult, nonvalvular AF patients with a first DOAC or VKA prescription between January 2010 and July 2018 were included, using data from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Primary outcome was major bleeding, secondary outcomes included types of major bleeding, nonmajor bleeding, ischemic stroke, and all-cause mortality. Effect modification was assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression, stratified for the number of concomitant drugs into three strata (0–5, 6–8, ≥9 drugs), and by including the continuous variable in an interaction term with the exposure (DOAC vs. VKA). Results A total of 63,600 patients with 146,059 person-years of follow-up were analyzed (39,840 person-years of DOAC follow-up). The median age was 76 years in both groups, the median number of concomitant drugs prescribed was 7. Overall, the hazard of major bleeding was similar between VKA-users and DOAC-users (hazard ratio [HR] 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87–1.11), though for apixaban a reduction in major bleeding was observed (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.68–0.98). Risk of stroke was comparable, while risk of nonmajor bleeding was lower in DOAC users compared with VKA users (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.88–0.97). We did not observe any evidence for an impact of polypharmacy on the relative risk of major bleeding between VKA and DOAC across our predefined three strata of concomitant drug use (p-value for interaction = 0.65). For mortality, however, risk of mortality was highest among DOAC users, increasing with polypharmacy and independent of the type of DOAC prescribed (p-value for interaction <0.01). Conclusion In this large observational, population-wide study of AF patients, risk of bleeding, and ischemic stroke were comparable between DOACs and VKAs, irrespective of the number of concomitant drugs prescribed. In AF patients with increasing polypharmacy, our data appeared to suggest an unexplained yet increased risk of mortality in DOAC-treated patients, compared with VKA recipients.

scholarly journals Edoxaban versus warfarin on stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation: a territory-wide cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dicken Kong ◽  
Jiandong Zhou ◽  
Sharen Lee ◽  
Keith Sai Kit Leung ◽  
Tong Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Risk Predictors

AbstractBackgroundIn this territory-wide, observational, propensity score-matched cohort study, we evaluate the development of transient ischaemic attack and ischaemic stroke (TIA/Ischaemic stroke) in patients with AF treated with edoxaban or warfarin.MethodsThis was an observational, territory-wide cohort study of patients between January 1st, 2016 and December 31st, 2019, in Hong Kong. The inclusion were patients with i) atrial fibrillation, and ii) edoxaban or warfarin prescription. 1:2 propensity score matching was performed between edoxaban and warfarin users. Univariate Cox regression identifies significant risk predictors of the primary, secondary and safety outcomes. Hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence interval [CI] and p values were reported.ResultsThis cohort included 3464 patients (54.18% males, median baseline age: 72 years old, IQR: 63-80, max: 100 years old), 664 (19.17%) with edoxaban use and 2800 (80.83%) with warfarin use. After a median follow-up of 606 days (IQR: 306-1044, max: 1520 days), 91(incidence rate: 2.62%) developed TIA/ischaemic stroke: 1.51% (10/664) in the edoxaban group and 2.89% (81/2800) in the warfarin group. Edoxaban was associated with a lower risk of TIA or ischemic stroke when compared to warfarin.ConclusionsEdoxaban use was associated with a lower risk of TIA or ischemic stroke after propensity score matching for demographics, comorbidities and medication use.

Abstract 140: Comparison of Major Complication of Oral Anticoagulants in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Seok Lee
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Gi Bleeding ◽  
Ischemic Stroke Risk ◽  
Meta Analyses

Background: Oral anticoagulants known as a novel oral anticoagulant have been used for the management of non -valvular atrial fibrillation. There was no enough study regarding the efficacy and safety of three major new oral anticoagulants. We assessed major three oral anticoagulants in terms of major bleeding complication and stroke prevention by meta-analyses studies comparing those drugs. Method: Relevant studies were identified through electronic literature searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and clinicaltrials.gov (from inception to February 24, 2016). RevMan and ITC software were used for direct comparisons, respectively. Results: Apixaban (N=6020), versus dabigatran(N=12038), apixaban versus rivaroxaban(N=8503) and rivaroxaban versus dabigatran were analyzed directly. There was significantly higher major bleeding risks in apixaban compared to dabigatran (both 110mg and 150mg) after adjusting baseline bleeding risk (Relative risk 3.41, 95% confidence interval(2.61 to 4.47) in 110mg, (5.62, 4.83 to 6.54) in 150mg. Intracranial bleeding risk in apixaban was significantly higher than in dabigatran (10.5, 6.10 to18.01). However, apixaban had less GI bleeding risk compared to dabigatran (0.80 , 0.65 to 0.98) and also had less ischemic stroke risk (0.31,0.22 to 0.42). Rivaroxaban showed higher major bleeding risk than dabigatran 110mg (2.34 , 1.81 to 3.03), however, Rivaroxaban had less bleeding risk compared to dabigatran 150mg (0.41, 0.35 to 0.46). Dabigatran 110mg and 150mg had less GI bleeding risk compared to rivaroxaban (0.31 , 0.24 to 0.39) and (0.23,0.17 to 0.29) respectively. Ischemic stroke risk was also decreased in dabigatran110mg (0.46, 0.38 to 0.57). and 150mg (0.66 ,0.52 to 0.83). Conclusion: Observed oral anticoagulants were associated with various complications. Overall, apixaban had higher intracranial bleeding risk than dabigatran. The highest GI bleeding risk in rivaroxaban compared to apixaban and dabigatran. Ischemic stroke risk was the highest in dabigatran. In conclusion, we may use those oral anticoagulant based on risks rates, however, a larger study with longer follow-up is needed to corroborate findings.

Impact of weight on the efficacy and safety of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 361-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaqib H Malik ◽  
Srikanth Yandrapalli ◽  
Suchith Shetty ◽  
Wilbert S Aronow ◽  
Diwakar Jain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Low Bmi ◽  
Direct Acting ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants

Abstract Aims This study sought to determine the impact of weight and body mass index (BMI) on the safety and efficacy of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Methods and results A systematic literature search was employed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane clinical trials with no language or date restrictions. Randomized trials or their substudies were assessed for relevant outcome data for efficacy that included stroke or systemic embolization (SSE), and safety including major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Binary outcome data and odds ratios from the relevant articles were used to calculate the pooled relative risk. For SSE, the data from the four Phase III trials showed that DOACs are better or similarly effective with low BMI 0.73 (0.56–0.97), normal BMI 0.72 (0.58–0.91), overweight 0.87 (0.76–0.99), and obese 0.87 (0.76–1.00). The risk of major bleeding was also better or similar with DOACs in all BMI subgroups with low BMI 0.62 (0.37–1.05), normal BMI 0.72 (0.58–0.90), overweight 0.83 (0.71–0.96), and obese 0.91 (0.81–1.03). There was no impact on mortality in all the subgroups. In a meta-regression analysis, the effect size advantage of DOACs compared with warfarin in terms of safety and efficacy gradually attenuated with increasing weight. Conclusion Our findings suggest that a weight-based dosage adjustment may be necessary to achieve optimal benefits of DOACs for thromboembolic prevention in these patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Further dedicated trials are needed to confirm these findings. PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019140693. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php? ID=CRD42019140693.

P4745Concomitant oral anticoagulant and antidepressant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and risk of stroke and bleeding: a population based cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J J Komen ◽  
P Hjemdahl ◽  
A K Mantel - Teeuwisse ◽  
O H Klungel ◽  
B Wettermark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Anticoagulant Treatment ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant Treatment ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Antidepressant Use

Abstract Background Anticoagulation treatment reduces the risk of stroke but increases the risk of bleeding in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Antidepressants use is associated with increased risk for stroke and bleeds. Objective To assess the association between antidepressant use in AF patients with oral anticoagulants and bleeding and stroke risk. Methods All AF patients newly prescribed with an oral anticoagulant in the Stockholm Healthcare database (n=2.3 million inhabitants) from July 2011 until 2016 were included and followed for one year or shorter if they stopped claiming oral anticoagulant treatment or had an outcome of interest. Outcomes were severe bleeds and strokes, requiring acute hospital care. During follow-up, patients were considered exposed to antidepressant after claiming a prescription for the duration of the prescription. With a time-varying Cox regression, we assessed the association between antidepressant use and strokes and bleeds, adjusting for confounders (i.e., age, sex, comorbidities, comedication, and year of inclusion). In addition, we performed a propensity score matched analysis to test the robustness of our findings. Results Of the 30,595 patients included after claiming a prescription for a NOAC (n=13,506) or warfarin (n=17,089), 4 303 claimed a prescription for an antidepressant during follow-up. A total of 712 severe bleeds and 551 strokes were recorded in the cohort. Concomitant oral anticoagulant and antidepressant use was associated with increased rates of severe bleeds (4.7 vs 2.7 per 100 person-years) compared to oral anticoagulant treatment without antidepressant use (aHR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.12–1.80), but not significantly associated with increased stroke rates (3.5 vs 2.1 per 100 person-years, aHR 1.23, 95% CI: 0.93–1.62). No significant differences were observed between different oral anticoagulant classes (i.e., warfarin or NOAC) or different antidepressant classes (i.e., SSRI, TCA, or other antidepressant). Additional propensity-score matched analyses yielded similar results but showed a significantly increased risk for stroke (HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.08–2.02). Incidence rates of strokes and bleeds Conclusion Concomitant use of an oral anticoagulant and an antidepressant, irrespective of type, is associated with an increased bleeding risk. Increased awareness and a critical consideration for the need of an antidepressant is recommended in this population. Acknowledgement/Funding Swedish Heart Lung Foundation

P4780Effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
I K Moon ◽  
S R Lee ◽  
E K Choi ◽  
E J Lee ◽  
J H Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Composite Outcome ◽  
Gi Bleeding ◽  
Warfarin Group

Abstract Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often have concomitant valvular heart disease (VHD), especially in Asia. There are limited data on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) impact on outcomes for stroke prevention and bleeding for these patients in real world clinical practice. Purpose To investigate the effectiveness and safety of NOACs compared with warfarin in patients with AF and associated Evaluated Heartvalves, Rheumatic or Artificial (EHRA) type 2 VHD. Methods We identified oral anticoagulants naive patients with AF and EHRA type 2 VHD from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database between 2014 and 2016 (n=2,671 taking warfarin; n=3,058 taking NOAC). Six clinical outcomes including ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), gastrointestinal bleeding (GI), major bleeding, all-cause death, and their composite outcome and fatal clinical events (any events that led to death within 30-day of its occurrence) were evaluated. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to balance covariates between the two groups. Results After weighted using 5% trimmed IPTW method (n=2371 taking warfarin; n=2792 taking NOAC), the mean age was 71.2 years, male was 57% and CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.9. During a mean 1.4-year follow-up, weighted incidence rate of ischemic stroke, ICH, GI bleeding, and all-cause death were lower in the NOAC group than in the warfarin group. Compared to warfarin, NOACs were associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53–0.96), GI bleeding (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.35–0.72) and major bleeding (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45–0.80). Although NOAC and warfarin groups showed similar incidence rate of ICH, NOAC group was associated with a significantly lower risk of fatal ICH compared to warfarin group (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.07–0.83). Overall, NOACs were associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.58–0.80). For an exploratory analysis, patients with EHRA type 1 VHD (n=366 taking warfarin; n=345 taking NOAC) was evaluated. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, NOAC group showed a comparable risk of ischemic stroke, ICH, all-cause death and composite outcome. Clinical outcome in AF patients with VHD Conclusion In this nationwide Asian AF population with EHRA type 2 VHD, NOAC use was associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, all-cause death, and the composite outcome compared to warfarin.

scholarly journals Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moon ◽  
Lee ◽  
Choi ◽  
Lee ◽  
Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Composite Outcome ◽  
Gi Bleeding ◽  
Valvular Heart Diseases

Background: There are limited data for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) impact on outcomes for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and valvular heart diseases (VHDs). Methods: We identified patients with AF and associated Evaluated Heartvalves, Rheumatic or Artificial (EHRA) type 2 VHDs, and who had been naïve from the oral anticoagulants in the Korean National Health Insurance Service database between 2014 and 2016 (warfarin: n = 2671; NOAC: n = 3058). For analyzing the effect of NOAC on primary prevention, we excluded those with a previous history of ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding events. To balance covariates, we used the propensity score weighting method. Ischemic stroke, ICH, GI bleeding, major bleeding, all-cause death, and their composite outcome and fatal clinical events were evaluated. Results: During a follow-up with a mean duration of 1.4 years, NOACs were associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke (hazard ratio (HR): 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53–0.96), GI bleeding (HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.35–0.72), fatal ICH (HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.07–0.83), and major bleeding (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.45–0.80) compared with warfarin. Overall, NOACs were associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.58–0.80). Conclusions: In this nationwide Asian AF population with EHRA type 2 VHDs, NOAC use was associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, all-cause death, and the composite outcome compared to warfarin use.

scholarly journals Association of Preceding Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Ischemic Stroke, Intracranial Hemorrhage, or Gastrointestinal Bleed and Mortality

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joris J Komen ◽  
Tomas Forslund ◽  
Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse ◽  
Olaf H Klungel ◽  
Mia von Euler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Antithrombotic Treatment ◽  
Healthcare Database ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleed ◽  
History Of

Abstract Aims To analyze 90-day mortality in AF patients after a stroke or a severe bleed and assess associations with the type of antithrombotic treatment at the event. Methods and Results From the Stockholm Healthcare database, we selected 6 017 patients with a known history of AF who were diagnosed with ischemic stroke, 3 006 with intracranial hemorrhage, and 4 291 with a severe gastrointestinal bleed (GIB). The 90-day mortality rates were 25.1% after ischemic stroke, 31.6% after intracranial hemorrhage, and 16.2% after severe GIB. We used Cox regression and propensity score matched analyses to test the association between antithrombotic treatment at the event and 90-day mortality. After intracranial hemorrhage, there was a significantly higher mortality rate in warfarin compared to NOAC treated patients (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.36 CI: 1.04 – 1.78). After an ischemic stroke and a severe GIB, patients receiving antiplatelets or no antithrombotic treatment had significantly higher mortality rates compared to patients on NOACs, but there was no difference comparing warfarin to NOACs (aHR 0.84 CI: 0.63 – 1.12 after ischemic stroke, aHR 0.91 CI: 0.66 – 1.25 after severe GIB). Propensity score matched analysis yielded similar results. Conclusion Mortality rates were high in AF patients suffering from an ischemic stroke, an intracranial hemorrhage, or a severe GIB. NOAC treatment was associated with a lower 90 day mortality after intracranial hemorrhage than warfarin.

scholarly journals Bleeding and thromboembolism due to drug-drug interactions with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants—a Swedish, register-based cohort study in atrial fibrillation outpatients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan Holm ◽  
Buster Mannheimer ◽  
Rickard E Malmström ◽  
Erik Eliasson ◽  
Jonatan D Lindh
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Drug Register ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Purpose To study the association between interacting drugs and bleeding or thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation outpatients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Methods Population-based cohort study of outpatients treated with NOACs in Sweden from 2008 to 2017. Patients with atrial fibrillation and newly initiated NOAC treatment were identified in the Prescribed Drug Register. Comorbidities and outcome data were retrieved from the Patient Register and the Cause of Death Register. Cox-regression analyses were performed to evaluate the primary endpoints any severe bleed and ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack/stroke unspecified during the first six months of treatment. Secondary endpoints were gastrointestinal bleeding, intracranial bleeding, ischemic stroke, and venous thromboembolism. Results Increased risk of any severe bleed was found when NOAC treatment, and drugs with pharmacodynamic effect on bleeding were combined, compared to NOAC only. An increased risk with these combinations was evident for apixaban (hazard ratio (HR) 1.47; 95% CI 1.33–1.63), rivaroxaban (HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.49–1.92), and dabigatran (HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.05–1.52). For apixaban, there was an increased risk of any severe bleed when combined with CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.01–1.5). The use of inducers of CYP3A4 and/or P-gp was low in this cohort, and effects on ischemic stroke/TIA/stroke unspecified could not be established. Conclusion Increased risk of bleeding was seen for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions with NOACs. Prescribers need to be vigilant of the effect of interacting drugs on the risk profile of patients treated with NOACs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document