scholarly journals Trends in Use of Cardioprotective Medication in Peripheral Artery Disease: A Nationwide Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadaf Kamil ◽  
Thomas S. G. Sehested ◽  
Kim Houlind ◽  
Jens F. Lassen ◽  
Gunnar H. Gislason ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Converting Enzyme ◽  
Peripheral Artery ◽  
Nationwide Study ◽  
History Of ◽  
Artery Disease

Background Guideline‐based cardioprotective medical therapy is intended to reduce the burden of adverse cardiovascular and limb outcomes in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, contemporary data describing trends in use of medication remains limited. The present study, therefore, aims to investigate changes in use of cardioprotective medication in PAD. Methods and Results By using Danish national healthcare registries, we identified all patients with first‐time diagnosis of PAD (1997–2016) and classified them into two groups: (1) PAD+ that includes all patients with PAD with a history of cardiovascular disease, ie, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, and stroke (n=162 627); and (2) PAD (n=87 935) that comprise patients without a history of cardiovascular disease. We determined the use of medication in the first 12 months after the incident diagnosis of PAD and estimated age standardized 1‐year mortality rates. Our results showed increase in use of cardioprotective medication throughout the study period in both groups. However, PAD+ had a higher use of medication (acetylsalicylic acid, 3.5%–48.4%; Clopidogrel, 0%–17.6%; vitamin K antagonists, 0.9%–7.8%; new oral anticoagulants, 0.0%–10.1%; Statins, 1.9%–58.1%; angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors, 1.2%–20.6%), compared with PAD (acetylsalicylic acid, 2.9%–54.4%; Clopidogrel, 0%–11.9%; vitamin K antagonists, 0.9%–2.4%; new oral anticoagulants, 0.0%–3.4%; Statins, 1.5%–56.9%; angiotensin‐converting enzyme, 0.9%–17.2%), respectively. Furthermore, 1‐year mortality rates in PAD declined with increased use of medications during study. Conclusions In this nationwide study, use of cardioprotective medication increased considerably with time, but compared to patients with other atherosclerotic diseases, there remains an underuse of guideline‐based medical therapy in patients with PAD.

Time trends in use of cardioprotective medication in patients with peripheral artery disease between 1997 and 2016: a nationwide study

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Kamil ◽  
T.S.G Sehested ◽  
K Houlind ◽  
J.F Lassen ◽  
G Gislason ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Artery Disease ◽  
Ace Inhibitors ◽  
Lifestyle Modification ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
Peripheral Artery ◽  
Nationwide Study ◽  
History Of ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
First Time ◽  
Time Diagnosis

Abstract Background Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Aggressive management of risk factors and lifestyle modification may improve outcomes for patients with PAD. The present study aims to investigate changes in use of cardioprotective medication after the incident diagnosis of PAD between 1997 and 2016. Methods By using Danish national healthcare registries, we identified all patients with first-time diagnosis of PAD between 1997 and 2016. These patients were classified into 2 main groups: PAD-all (n=167,762) that includes all PAD patients with or without a history of CVD, including myocardial infarction (MI), atrial fibrillation (AF), and stroke (n=167,761) and PAD-only (n=87,935) that comprise patients with PAD without a history of AF, MI, and stroke. We calculated temporal trends and assessed comparative use of cardioprotective medication in the first 12 months after the incident diagnosis of PAD. Results Our results showed an improved use of cardioprotective medication temporally in both groups. However, PAD-all were marginally better treated (Aspirin, 3.5% - 48.4%; Clopidogrel, 0% - 17.6%; VKA 0.9% - 7.8%; NOACs 0.0% - 10.1%; Statins, 1.9%- 58.1%; ACE-inhibitors, 1.2% - 20.6%), compared to PAD-only (Aspirin, 2.9% - 54.4%; Clopidogrel, 0% - 11.9%; VKA 0.9% - 2.4%; NOACs 0.0% - 3.4%; Statins, 1.5%- 56.9%; ACE-inhibitors, 0.9% - 17.2%), respectively. Proportion of PAD patients treated with any cardioprotective medication was greater among those with a history of MI or stroke. Whereas, PAD patients with a history of AF were substantially better treated with VKA and NOACs. Conclusion In this nationwide study, use of cardioprotective medication increased considerably with time, but there remains an underuse of guideline-recommended therapy in patients with PAD. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Use of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention across the Stroke Spectrum: Progress and Prospects

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. John Camm ◽  
Dan Atar
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin K ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
History Of ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
Patient Groups ◽  
Artery Disease

AbstractMultiple randomized controlled trials and many real-world evidence studies have consistently shown that non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are preferable to vitamin K antagonists for thromboembolic stroke prevention in the majority of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, their role in the management of patients with AF and comorbidities, as well as in other patient populations with a high risk of stroke, such as patients with prior embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) and those with atherosclerosis, is less clear. There is now increasing evidence suggesting that NOACs have a beneficial effect in the prevention of stroke in patients with AF and comorbidities, such as renal impairment and diabetes. In addition, while studies investigating the efficacy and safety of NOACs for the prevention of secondary stroke in patients with a history of ESUS demonstrated neutral results, subanalyses suggested potential benefits in certain subgroups of patients with ESUS. One NOAC, rivaroxaban, has also recently been found to be effective in reducing the risk of stroke in patients with chronic cardiovascular disease including coronary artery disease and peripheral artery disease, further broadening the patient groups that may benefit from NOACs. In this article, we will review recent evidence for the use of NOACs across the stroke spectrum in detail, and discuss the progress and future prospects in the different stroke areas.

Novel Oral Anticoagulants in Peripheral Artery Disease: Current Evidence

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (38) ◽  
pp. 4511-4515 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Koutsoumpelis ◽  
C. Argyriou ◽  
K.M. Tasopoulou ◽  
E.I. Georgakarakos ◽  
G.S. Georgiadis
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Artery Disease ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Novel Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Peripheral Artery ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Traditional Therapy ◽  
Cardiovascular Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Artery Disease

Background: Peripheral artery disease is a common manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis which strongly correlates to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In addition, the progression of peripheral artery disease leads to an increased risk of limb loss. In order to reduce these events, the benchmark of treatment and research over the last years has been the antiplatelet therapy which aims at inhibition of platelet aggregation. Over the last years, new studies combining antiplatelet agents in different therapeutic schemes have been proven efficacious. Unfortunately, patients remain still at high risk of CV events. Novel Oral Anticoagulants have been introduced as alternatives to warfarin, in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. The rationale of using medication which acts on platelet activation and the coagulation pathway of thrombosis has led investigators to examine the role of Noac's in preventing CV events in patients with peripheral artery disease, stable or unstable. Methods: The aim of this study is to review the current evidence with respect to recently published studies concerning the use of Novel anticoagulants in peripheral artery disease. Results: The Compass trial has shown that a combination of rivaroxaban with traditional therapy may produce promising results in reducing amputation rates, stroke, cardiac events, and mortality, however, there are still safety issues with bleeding requiring acute care. The ePAD study has provided us with insight concerning safety and efficacy after peripheral angioplasty or stenting and actually the need for further research. The Voyager Pad study, following the steps of Compass, is studying the effect and safety of the addition of rivaroxaban to traditional therapy in the highest risk population aka patients undergoing peripheral revascularization. The evidence concerning patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation appears to be insufficient, however, recent guidelines propose the use of novel oral anticoagulants. Conclusion: For the time being, novel oral anticoagulants in combination with aspirin may provide an alternative treatment in PAD, however, it is deemed necessary to identify patient subgroups who will benefit the most.

scholarly journals All-cause mortality and location of death in patients with established cardiovascular disease before, during, and after the COVID-19 lockdown: a Danish Nationwide Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jawad H Butt ◽  
Emil L Fosbøl ◽  
Thomas A Gerds ◽  
Charlotte Andersson ◽  
Kristian Kragholm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Location Of Death ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
History Of ◽  
Adjusted Incidence Rate ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Adjusted Incidence ◽  
Overall Mortality

Abstract Background On 13 March 2020, the Danish authorities imposed extensive nationwide lockdown measures to prevent the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and reallocated limited healthcare resources. We investigated mortality rates, overall and according to location, in patients with established cardiovascular disease before, during, and after these lockdown measures. Methods and results Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified a dynamic cohort comprising all Danish citizens with cardiovascular disease (i.e. a history of ischaemic heart disease, ischaemic stroke, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, or peripheral artery disease) alive on 2 January 2019 and 2020. The cohort was followed from 2 January 2019/2020 until death or 16/15 October 2019/2020. The cohort comprised 340 392 and 347 136 patients with cardiovascular disease in 2019 and 2020, respectively. The overall, in-hospital, and out-of-hospital mortality rate in 2020 before lockdown was significantly lower compared with the same period in 2019 [adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) CI 0.87–0.95; IRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.89–1.02; and IRR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83–0.93, respectively]. The overall mortality rate during and after lockdown was not significantly different compared with the same period in 2019 (IRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97–1.02). However, the in-hospital mortality rate was lower and out-of-hospital mortality rate higher during and after lockdown compared with the same period in 2019 (in-hospital, IRR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88–0.96; out-of-hospital, IRR 1.04, 95% CI1.01–1.08). These trends were consistent irrespective of sex and age. Conclusions Among patients with established cardiovascular disease, the in-hospital mortality rate was lower and out-of-hospital mortality rate higher during lockdown compared with the same period in the preceding year, irrespective of age and sex.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document