Abstract WP326: Randomized-Controlled Study on the Effects of Hand Bathing on Stroke Patients in Convalescence - Subjective Improvements in Hand Movement and Increased Positiveness in Talking

Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rika Yano ◽  
Miki Haseyama
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Hand Movement ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Convalescent Phase ◽  
Significant Difference

Background and Purpose: Depressed stroke patients are more likely to drop out of rehabilitation. Hand bathing is a term used to describe a uniquely Japanese hygiene care in which a nurse washes and stimulates the patient’s hands in warm water while talking to each other. The purpose of this study was to verify, by a randomized-controlled study, the hypothesis indicated in the author’s preliminary studies that hand bathing makes stroke patients more conscious of their hand movement on the affected side and talk more positively. Methods: Stroke patients in convalescent phase in the Brunnstrom stages I to V were randomly allocated to the hand-bathed group (23 patients) or the control (21 patients). Both groups received a 15-minute intervention four times within a week. Before and after each intervention, the visual analogue scale (VAS) was assessed for hand movement, edema, and numbness/pain, the tip palm distance was measured, and the QOL was assessed using the QUIK-R. The t-test and repeated measures ANOVA were used to analyze the data. A verbatim record of all conversation was subjected to morphological analysis, TF-IDF, and TF analysis of nouns and adjectives. Results: The hand-bathed group felt improved hand movement significantly more after the first and fourth interventions (F=4.41,p=.013). No significant difference was detected between the two groups in the VAS for edema, numbness/pain, and heavy feeling in hands. Positive adjectives were used more often by the hand-bathed group after the second, third and fourth interventions (F=3.58, p=.016). In the hand-bathed group, the average score of QOL questions on socializing and sense of contentment/well-being improved significantly after interventions (p=.003) Conclusions: The finding supported the said hypothesis in that hand bathing leads to subjective improvement in hand movement of stroke patients in convalescent phase and makes them talk more positively. It has additionally been indicated that hand bathing also helps them become more sociable and have a better sense of contentment and well-being.

scholarly journals A randomized, controlled study to compare the effects of intravenous labetalol and esmolol on haemodynamic changes during laryngoscopy and intubation

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 4003
Author(s):  
Atit Kumar ◽  
Prashant Kumar Mishra ◽  
Saurabh Shukla
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cardiovascular Stress ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Haemodynamic Changes ◽  
Β Blocker ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background: Direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation frequently induce cardiovascular stress response characterised by hypertension and tachycardia due to reflex sympathetic stimulation. Considering the clinical significance of these changes stress attenuation is needed to blunt these responses. β- blockers are used to reduce the unwanted hemodynamic responses. Esmolol is ultra-short acting cardio selective β blocker. Labetalol is useful in not only attenuating the response to laryngoscopy and intubation but also in preventing perioperative cardiovascular events. Present study compared the efficacy of esmolol and labetalol for attenuation of sympathomimetic response to laryngoscopy and intubation.Methods: It was a prospective, randomized, controlled study carried out in 75 adult patients with ASA 1 and ASA 2 posted for elective surgeries. Patients were allocated randomly into Group-1 (esmolol) and Group-2 (labetalol) and Group-3 (placebo) of 25 patients each. Inj. esmolol (1mg/kg) or Inj. labetalol (0.4 mg/kg) or placebo (0.9NS) dissolved up to 5 ml in distilled water was injected intravenously 5 minutes prior to intubation. All patients premeditated with Inj. glycopyrrolate (4µg/kg). Patient were then induced with Inj. propofol (2mg/kg), Inj. scoline (2mg/kg) given followed by laryngoscopy and intubation. Haemodynamic readings were noted at T0 (baseline before injecting the drug), T1 (1 minute after injecting the drug), T2 (after intubation), T3 (2 minutes after intubation), T4 (4 minutes after intubation), T5 (6 minutes after intubation), T6 (8 minutes after injection), T7 (10 minutes after injection).Results: Gr-1, Gr-2 and Gr-3, when compared with each other for systolic BP, diastolic BP, mean BP, and HR, showed a statistically significant difference at different intervals.Conclusions: Both the drugs are found to be effective in attenuation of hemodynamic reflex without any side effects. Further studies are recommended to substantiate the findings in present study.

scholarly journals Evaluating a combined bowel preparation for small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a prospective randomized–controlled study

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie L Hansel ◽  
Joseph A Murray ◽  
Jeffrey A Alexander ◽  
David H Bruining ◽  
Mark V Larson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Small Bowel ◽  
Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Bowel Preparation ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Completion Rate ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Capsule endoscopy (CE) is frequently hindered by intra-luminal debris. Our aim was to determine whether a combination bowel preparation would improve small-bowel visualization, diagnostic yield, and the completion rate of CE. Methods Single-blind, prospective randomized–controlled study of outpatients scheduled for CE. Bowel-preparation subjects ingested 2 L of polyethylene glycol solution the night prior to CE, 5 mL simethicone and 5 mg metoclopramide 20 minutes prior to CE and laid in the right lateral position 30 minutes after swallowing CE. Controls had no solid food after 7 p.m. the night prior to CE and no liquids 4 hours prior to CE. Participants completed a satisfaction survey. Capsule readers completed a small-bowel-visualization assessment. Results Fifty patients were prospectively enrolled (56% female) with a median age of 54.4 years and 44 completed the study (23 patients in the control group and 21 in the preparation group). There was no significant difference between groups on quartile-based small-bowel visualization (all P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between groups in diagnostic yield (P = 0.69), mean gastric (P = 0.10) or small-bowel transit time (P = 0.89). The small-bowel completion rate was significantly higher in the preparation group (100% vs 78%; P = 0.02). Bowel-preparation subjects reported significantly more discomfort than controls (62% vs 17%; P = 0.01). Conclusions Combined bowel preparation did not improve small-bowel visualization but did significantly increase patient discomfort. The CE completion rate improved in the preparation group but the diagnostic yield was unaffected. Based on our findings, a bowel preparation prior to CE does not appear to improve CE performance and results in decreased patient satisfaction (ClinicalTrials.gov, No. NCT01243736).

The impact of pharmacist telephone calls after discharge on satisfaction of oncology patients: A randomized controlled study

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 359-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sewar S Salmany ◽  
Lujeen Ratrout ◽  
Abdallah Amireh ◽  
Randa Agha ◽  
Noor Nassar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Room ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Emergency Room Visits ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The aim of the study was to determine the impact of telephone follow-up calls on satisfaction in oncology patients after hospital discharge. Method A randomized controlled study, in which patients were randomized into two groups: The experimental group with the telephone follow-up (TFU) calls (intervention) and the control group (no intervention). The telephone follow-up call was conducted within 72 h after discharge. During the call, patients were asked about their medications, namely, whether they received them, understood how to take them, and whether they developed any medication-related adverse effect. Both groups were contacted by phone two weeks later to assess their satisfaction with the discharge medication instructions and the provided pharmaceutical services, using the 5-point Likert scale. In addition, hospital records were reviewed for emergency room visits and hospital readmissions within 30 days after discharge. Results There was no difference in the percentage of patients who reported being very satisfied between both the intervention and the control groups (45% intervention vs. 48% control, P = 0.68). The mean time of the intervention phone call was 3 ± 1.7 (SD) min. During the telephone follow-up call, medication-related problems were identified in 20% of the patients. There was no significant difference in emergency room visits and hospital readmissions in the intervention group vs. control (44% vs. 53%, P = 0.123) and (37% vs. 43%, P = 0.317), respectively. Conclusion Telephone follow-up calls conducted by a pharmacist to discharged oncology patients did not improve patients' satisfaction, emergency room visits or hospital readmissions; however, they helped to identify medication-related adverse effects in the oncology patients.

scholarly journals Effects of a randomized controlled study on the behaviors of overweight schoolchildren

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastácio Neco de Souza Filho ◽  
Thaynã Alves Bezerra ◽  
Paulo Felipe Ribeiro Bandeira ◽  
Luciana Gatto Azevedo Cabral ◽  
José Fernando Vila Nova de Moraes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Vigorous Physical Activity ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Daily Routine ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
School Based ◽  
Significant Difference

This study aimed to determine the effects of a school-based multi-component intervention on accelerometer- measured physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) in schoolchildren overweight. This is a randomized controlled study with overweight schoolchildren, allocated to experimental group (EG; n = 13; 7.6 ± 0.8 years; 42.9% boys) and control group (CG; n = 17; 8.2 ± 0.9 years; 26.7% boys). The EG was submitted to a 10-week school-based intervention, comprised of PA and psychological sessions (behavioral therapy), and nutritional guidance. The CG followed the daily routine of life. The time of PA and SB were measured using accelerometers used for seven days. To compare mean SB, moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and total physical activity (TPA), generalized estimation equations (GEE) were used. It was observed that the average time in MVPA and TPA increased significantly in EG at the weekend (+ 40.9 min / day, p < 0.001; and + 51.6 min/day, p = 0.035, respectively) and at full week (+ 62.9 min/day, p < 0.001; and + 225.0 9 min/day, p = 0.038, respectively). There was no significant difference in time spent in SB after the intervention in both groups. Thus, it was concluded that the proposed school-based multicomponent intervention was effective in increasing levels of MVPA and TPA in overweight schoolchildren. This finding can optimize future interventions to promote a healthy lifestyle for schoolchildren in the school environment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document