Abstract WP437: The CT Angiography Spot Sign, Hematoma Expansion and Functional Outcome in Spontaneous Cerebellar ICH

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjula D Singh ◽  
Bart Brouwers ◽  
Floris Schreuder ◽  
Andrea Morotti ◽  
Marco Pasi ◽  
...  
Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine O Brag ◽  
Erica Jones ◽  
Dominique Monlezun ◽  
Alex George ◽  
Michael Halstead ◽  
...  

Introduction: Hematoma expansion (HE) is an established predictor of mortality and poor functional outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The computed tomography angiography (CTA) “spot” sign predicts HE and deterioration. The “dot” sign on delayed post-contrast CT (PCCT) has undetermined clinical significance but is thought to represent a slower rate of bleeding than the “spot” sign. We aimed to compare the sensitivity of a “dot” sign with the “spot” sign and establish the clinical significance of the “dot” sign. Methods: Patients with ICH presenting to our center July 2008-May 2013 were identified from our stroke registry. Only patients with baseline CT, CTA and PCCT and follow-up CT 6-36 hours later were included. Patients with clot evacuation between baseline and follow-up CT were excluded. HE was defined as 1) any ≥ 1cc increase and 2) significant ≥ 12.5cc increase or >33% increase in volume. Differences in cohort characteristics were assessed using appropriate statistical tests and sensitivity was calculated from 2x2 tables. Unadjusted logistic regression models were used to investigate the relation of “spot” and “dot” signs with HE and poor functional outcome (discharge mRS 4-6). Results: Of the 210 ICH patients included in the analyses (median age 61, 44.7% female, 66.2% black), 39 (18.5%) patients had a PCCT “dot” sign and 19 (9%) had a CTA “spot” sign. Significant HE occurred in 15% with “dot” sign and 8% with “spot” sign. The PCCT “dot” sign had a sensitivity of 0.52 in predicting significant HE and a sensitivity of 0.69 in predicting discharge mRS 4-6 (compared with 0.24 and 0.30 for “spot” sign, respectively). Patients with a “dot” sign, but without a “spot” sign, had significantly increased odds of any HE (OR 5.7, 95% CI 1.9-17.8, p=0.003), mRS 4-6 (OR 8.1, 95% CI 1.03-64.6, p=0.048), and death (OR 8.1, 95% CI 1.4-48.4, p=0.02), but not significant HE (OR 2.2, 95% CI 0.7-6.7, p=0.15). Conclusions: The PCCT “dot” sign was more sensitive in predicting hematoma expansion than the CTA “spot” sign and predicted hematoma expansion and poor functional outcome even in the absence of the “spot sign.” The utility of PCCT imaging in acute evaluation of ICH patients requires validation, but our study supports clinical relevance of the “dot” sign.


2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo Yong Park ◽  
Min Ho Kong ◽  
Jung Hee Kim ◽  
Dong Soo Kang ◽  
Kwan Young Song ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dar Dowlatshahi ◽  
Hee Sahng Chung ◽  
Franco Momoli ◽  
Grant Stotts ◽  
Richard I Aviv ◽  
...  

Introduction: Hematoma expansion is a predictor of poor clinical outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The CT angiography (CTA) spot sign is a validated predictor of hematoma expansion, but its predictive performance is modest. This is in part because traditional “static” CTA can miss delayed spot signs, depending on the timing of image acquisition. Dynamic CTA (dCTA) can detect delayed spot sign formation and allows calculation of contrast extravasation rate. However, the predictive performance of a delayed “dynamic spot” and the relationship between rate of extravasation and hematoma expansion are not known. Our primary objective was to calculate the prevalence and predictive performance of the dynamic spot sign with dCTA. Our secondary objective was to determine whether the rate of contrast extravasation predicts significant hematoma expansion. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 79 patients who presented with primary ICH and underwent dCTA within 6 hours from onset. Primary outcomes were the prevalence of dCTA spot sign and its predictive performance for significant hematoma expansion (increase in hematoma by 6mL or 33% from baseline). For the secondary objective, we calculated the rate of contrast extravasation as the slope of the time curve from the first appearance of contrast at a spot sign to the maximal volume of contrast in 19 acquisitions over 60 seconds. We assessed the relationship between rate of extravasation and hematoma expansion using Mann-Whitney U test and logistic regression. Results: The prevalence of the dCTA spot sign was 45.6% (95% CI, 34.5-56.6%). Significant HE was seen in 58.1% (18/31) of spot-positive patients versus 29.0% (9/31) of spot-negative patients (P=0.04). The sensitivity and specificity of the dCTA spot sign in predicting significant HE was 67% and 63%, respectively. Median rate of extravasation was 0.0022 mL/min in patients with hematoma expansion vs 0.0013 mL/min in those without (p=0.05). Conclusion: Dynamic CTA had a higher spot sign prevalence than conventional CTA. While the sensitivity in predicting expansion was higher with dCTA, the specificity was lower, possibly due to a lower risk of expansion with delayed spot signs. The rate of extravasation was roughly double in patients with hematoma expansion.


Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Farid Radmanesh ◽  
Guido J Falcone ◽  
Christopher D Anderson ◽  
Thomas W Battey ◽  
Alison M Ayres ◽  
...  

Objectives: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients with CT angiography (CTA) spot sign are at increased risk of hematoma expansion and poor outcome. Since ICH is often the acute manifestation of a chronic cerebral vasculopathy, we investigated whether different clinical or imaging characteristics predict spot sign presence in patients with different underlying vasculopathies. Using ICH location as a surrogate for hypertension-related ICH and cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related ICH, we identified risk factors associated with spot sign. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a prospective cohort of consecutive spontaneous ICH patients with available CTA. Spot sign presence was ascertained by two independent readers blinded to clinical data. We assessed potential predictors of spot sign be performing uni- and multivariable logistic regression, analyzing deep and lobar ICH separately. RESULTS: 649 patients were eligible, 291 (45%) deep and 358 (55%) lobar ICH. Median time from symptom onset to CTA was 4.5 (IQR 5.2) and 5.7 (IQR 7.4) hours in patients with deep and lobar ICH, respectively. At least one spot sign was present in 76 (26%) deep and 103 (29%) lobar ICH patients. In mutivariable logistic regression, independent predictors of spot sign in deep ICH were warfarin (OR 2.82 [95%CI 1.06-7.57]; p=0.03), time from symptom onset to CTA (OR 0.9 [95%CI 0.81-0.97]; p=0.02), and baseline ICH volume (OR 1.27 [95%CI 1.14-1.43]; p=2.5E-5; per 10 mL increase). Predictors of spot sign in lobar ICH were preexisting dementia (OR 2.7 [95%CI 1.15-6.43]; p=0.02), warfarin (OR 4.01 [95%CI 1.78-9.29]; p=0.009), and baseline ICH volume (OR 1.27 [95%CI 1.17-1.39]; p=5.4E-8; per 10 mL increase). As expected, spot sign presence was a strong predictor of hematoma expansion in both deep (OR 3.52 [95%CI 1.72-7.2]; p=0.0005) and lobar ICH (OR 6.53 [95%CI 3.23-13.44]; p=2.2E-7). CONCLUSIONS: The most potent associations with spot sign are shared by deep and lobar ICH, suggesting that ICH caused by different vasculopathic processes share biological features. The relationship between preexisting dementia and spot sign in lobar ICH, but not deep ICH, suggests that ICH occurring in the context of more advanced cerebral amyloid angiopathy may be more likely to have prolonged bleeding.


Stroke ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 1257-1262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Wada ◽  
Richard I. Aviv ◽  
Allan J. Fox ◽  
Demetrios J. Sahlas ◽  
David J. Gladstone ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H. B Brouwers ◽  
Alessandro Biffi ◽  
Kristen A McNamara ◽  
Alison M Ayres ◽  
Valerie Valant ◽  
...  

Purpose: The presence of active contrast extravasation following CT angiography (CTA), the spot sign, predicts the development of hematoma expansion and poor clinical outcome in patients with primary intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The biological underpinnings of the spot sign remain poorly understood, and there are no established risk factors for its presence. We conducted a prospective cohort study to identify determinants of the CTA spot sign. Materials and Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients presenting to a single center with primary ICH over an 11-year period. Patients were included in this analysis if they underwent CT and CTA at presentation and consented to participation in genetic studies. CTAs were reviewed by two experienced readers, blinded to clinical data, according to previously published validated criteria. Due to its established association with lobar ICH volume, APOE genotype, as well as common clinical covariates, were analyzed for association with spot sign presence. Analyses were stratified by deep, lobar and probable / definite cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) related ICH (by Boston criteria). Results: Of 372 patients, 151 had deep, 198 had lobar and 23 had mixed ICH. We identified at least 1 spot sign in 96 of 372 patients (25.8%). In multivariate analysis, patients on warfarin were more likely to have a spot sign regardless of ICH location: OR 3.85 (95% CI 1.33-11.13, p-value 0.013) in deep ICH, OR 2.86 (95% CI 1.33-6.13, p-value 0.007) in lobar ICH and OR 6.65 (95% CI 1.34-32.99, p-value 0.020) in the subset meeting criteria for CAA-related ICH. APOE ε2, but not ε4, was associated with spot sign in lobar ICH (OR 2.09 [95% CI 1.05-4.19], p = 0.036) and CAA-related ICH (OR 2.07 [95% CI 1.24-3.46], p-value 0.005). There was no effect for ε2 or ε4 in deep ICH. ( Table 1 ) Conclusion: Patients on warfarin at the time of ICH are more likely to have a spot sign at presentation, regardless of the location of the ICH. Among patients with lobar ICH, those who possess the APOE ε2 allele are more likely to have a spot sign. Given the established relationship between APOE ε2 and vasculopathic changes in CAA, our findings suggest that both hemostatic factors and vessel pathology influence spot sign presence and risk of prolonged bleeding in ICH.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjula D. Singh ◽  
Marco Pasi ◽  
Floris H.B.M. Schreuder ◽  
Andrea Morotti ◽  
Jasper R. Senff ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: The computed tomography angiography spot sign is associated with hematoma expansion, case fatality, and poor functional outcome in spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, no data are available on the spot sign in spontaneous cerebellar ICH. Methods: We investigated consecutive patients with spontaneous cerebellar ICH at 3 academic hospitals between 2002 and 2017. We determined patient characteristics, hematoma expansion (>33% or 6 mL), rate of expansion, discharge and 90-day case fatality, and functional outcome. Poor functional outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 4 to 6. Associations were tested using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Three hundred fifty-eight patients presented with cerebellar ICH, of whom 181 (51%) underwent a computed tomography angiography. Of these 181 patients, 121 (67%) were treated conservatively of which 15 (12%) had a spot sign. Patients with a spot sign treated conservatively presented with larger hematoma volumes (median [interquartile range]: 26 [7–41] versus 6 [2–13], P =0.001) and higher speed of expansion (median [interquartile range]: 15 [24–3] mL/h versus 1 [5–0] mL/h, P =0.034). In multivariable analysis, presence of the spot sign was independently associated with death at 90 days (odds ratio, 7.6 [95% CI, 1.6–88], P =0.037). With respect to surgically treated patients (n=60, [33%]), 14 (23%) patients who underwent hematoma evacuation had a spot sign. In these 60 patients, patients with a spot sign were older (73.5 [9.2] versus 66.6 [15.4], P =0.047) and more likely to be female (71% versus 37%, P =0.033). In a multivariable analysis, the spot sign was independently associated with death at 90 days (odds ratio, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.1–4.3], P =0.033). Conclusions: In patients with spontaneous cerebellar ICH treated conservatively, the spot sign is associated with speed of hematoma expansion, case fatality, and poor functional outcome. In surgically treated patients, the spot sign is associated with 90-day case fatality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document