Decision Analysis Model for Prehospital Triage of Patients With Acute Stroke

Background and Purpose— We used a decision analysis approach to analyze triage strategies for patients with acute stroke symptoms while accounting for prehospital large vessel occlusion (LVO) screening methods and key time metrics. Methods— Our decision analysis compared anticipated functional outcomes for patients within the IV-tPA (intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator) treatment window in the mothership and drip-and-ship frameworks. Key branches of the model included IV-tPA eligibility, presence of an LVO, and endovascular therapy eligibility. Our decision analysis evaluated 2 prehospital LVO screening approaches: (1) no formal screening and (2) the use of clinical LVO screening scales. An excellent outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale scores 0–1. Probabilities and workflow times were guideline-based or imputed from published studies. In sensitivity analyses, we individually and jointly varied transport time to the nearest primary stroke center, additional time required to transport directly to a comprehensive stroke center, and LVO screening scale predictive probabilities. We evaluated 2 separate scenarios: one in which ideal time metrics were achieved and one under current real-world metrics. Results— In the ideal metrics scenario, the drip-and-ship strategy was almost always favored in the absence of formal LVO screening. For patients screened positive for an LVO, mothership was favored if the additional transport time to the comprehensive stroke center was <3 to 23 minutes. Under real-world conditions, in which primary stroke center workflow is slower than ideal, the mothership strategy was favored in more scenarios, regardless of formal LVO screening. For example, mothership was favored with an additional transport time to the comprehensive stroke center of <32 to 99 minutes for patients screened positive for an LVO and <28 to 39 minutes in the absence of screening. Conclusions— Joint consideration of LVO probability, screening, workflow times, and transport times may improve prehospital stroke triage. Drip-and-ship was more favorable when more ideal primary stroke center workflow times were modeled.

Download Full-text

Field triage for endovascular stroke therapy: a population-based comparison

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery ◽

10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015033 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 12 (3) ◽

pp. 233-239 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Mahesh V Jayaraman ◽

Morgan L Hemendinger ◽

Grayson L Baird ◽

Shadi Yaghi ◽

Shawna Cutting ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Population Based ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Matched Pairs ◽

Inclusion Criteria ◽

Stroke Therapy ◽

Transport Time ◽

Field Triage ◽

Primary Stroke Center ◽

Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽

Stroke Center

BackgroundEndovascular therapy (EVT) for stroke improves outcomes but is time sensitive.ObjectiveTo compare times to treatment and outcomes between patients taken to the closest primary stroke center (PSC) with those triaged in the field to a more distant comprehensive stroke center (CSC).MethodsDuring the study, a portion of our region allowed field triage of patients who met severity criteria to a more distant CSC than the closest PSC. The remaining patients were transported to the closest PSC. We compared times to treatment and clinical outcomes between those two groups. Additionally, we performed a matched-pairs analysis of patients from both groups on stroke severity and distance to CSC.ResultsOver 2 years, 232 patients met inclusion criteria and were closest from the field to a PSC; 144 were taken to the closest PSC and 88 to the more distant CSC. The median additional transport time to the CSC was 7 min. Times from scene departure to alteplase and arterial puncture were faster in the direct group (50 vs 62 min; 93 vs 152 min; p<0.001 for both). Among patients who were independent before the stroke, the OR for less disability in the direct group was 1.47 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.93, p=0.003), and 2.06 (95% CI 1.10 to 3.89, p=0.01) for the matched pairs.ConclusionsIn a densely populated setting, for patients with stroke who are EVT candidates and closest to a PSC from the field, triage to a slightly more distant CSC is associated with faster time to EVT, no delay to alteplase, and less disability at 90 days.

Download Full-text

Abstract 1122‐000137: Characteristics and Utilization of Acute Reperfusion Therapy after Transfer of In‐Hospital LVO Strokes

Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology ◽

10.1161/svin.01.suppl_1.000137 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 1 (S1) ◽

Author(s):

Rahul Rao ◽

Conor Kelly ◽

Shashvat Desai ◽

Ashutosh Jadhav

Keyword(s):

Tertiary Care ◽

Reperfusion Therapy ◽

Artery Occlusion ◽

Basilar Artery Occlusion ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Primary Stroke Center ◽

Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽

Stroke Center ◽

Iv Tpa

Introduction : Acute repercussion therapy for acute ischemic stroke is a crucial tool in the tertiary care setting for patients presenting with large vessel occlusion (LVO). While strokes that present from the community have favorable outcomes compared to in‐hospital strokes, it is unclear if this is because of greater access to endovascular therapy. We aim to characterize the utilization of endovascular reperfusion therapy for in‐house LVO and compare outcomes of in‐house LVOs to those presenting from the community. Methods : From the period of December 2013 to December 2019, all stroke patients with an LVO who presented to a primary stroke center (“spoke” hospital) who were transferred to a comprehensive stroke center (“hub”) were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes. Results : A total of 181 in‐house strokes were transferred from a peripheral center to our comprehensive stroke center. About 16% (29) received IV‐tPA at the OSH and 2 additional patients received IV‐tPA at the CSC [17%; n = 31]. 163 patients harbored an intracranial acute vessel occlusion. Anterior LVO (ICA, M1,M2) and basilar artery occlusion was observed in 64% (n = 116) patients and 6% (n = 11) patients, respectively [Total LVO‐ 70%; n = 127]. 20% (n = 27) of LVO received IV‐tPA and 72% (n = 91) of LVO underwent thrombectomy. Reasons for not receiving included symptoms improved (25%), repeat imaging made reperfusion inadvisable (72.2%) and poor baseline (2.8%). Rates of mRS 0–2 in patients with ICA/M1/M2 receiving EVT were 13% (13/100) and the mortality rate was 45% (46/103). Rates of mRS 0–2 were significantly lower [13% vs 38%, p<0.01] and mortality was significantly higher [45% vs 18%, p<0.01] amongst anterior LVO in‐house transfer patients receiving EVT compared to all anterior LVO patients receiving EVT in the given time period. Conclusions : A relatively large proportion of in‐house LVO stroke patients underwent thrombectomy (70%). Most common cause of not receiving thrombectomy was imaging findings showing completed or large infarct. Compared to their community stroke counterparts, in‐house LVO strokes had lower efficacy outcomes and higher mortality. Further study in required to understand these findings.

Download Full-text

Changes in Patient Volumes and Outcomes After Adding Thrombectomy Capability

Stroke ◽

10.1161/strokeaha.120.032389 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Minerva H. Zhou ◽

Akash P. Kansagra

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Modest Improvement ◽

Absolute Increase ◽

Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽

Stroke Treatment ◽

Primary Stroke Center ◽

Treatment Volume ◽

Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽

Stroke Center ◽

Patient Referrals

Background and Purpose: With the rising demand for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and introduction of thrombectomy-capable stroke centers (TSC), there is interest among existing stroke hospitals to add EVT capability to attract and retain stroke patient referrals. In this work, we quantify changes in patient volumes and outcomes when adding EVT capability to an existing stroke center. Methods: In MATLAB 2017a Simulink, we simulate a 3-center system comprising an EVT-capable comprehensive stroke center, an EVT-incapable primary stroke center, and an EVT-incapable primary stroke center that gains EVT capability (TSC). We model these changes in 2 geographic settings (urban and rural) using 2 routing paradigms (Nearest Center and Bypass). In Nearest Center, patients are sent to the nearest center regardless of EVT capability. In Bypass, patients with severe strokes are sent to the nearest EVT-capable center, and all others are sent to the nearest center. Probability of good clinical outcome is determined by type and timing of treatment using outcomes reported in clinical trials. Results: Adding EVT capability in the Bypass model produced an absolute increase of 40.1% in total volume of patients with stroke and 31.2% to 31.9% in total volume of acute stroke treatments at the TSC. In the Nearest Center model, the total volume of patients with stroke did not change, but total volume of acute stroke treatment at the TSC had an absolute increase of 9.3% to 9.5%. Good clinical outcomes saw an absolute increase of 0.2% to 0.6% in the whole population and 0.3% to 1.8% in the TSC population. Conclusions: Adding EVT capability shifts patient and treatment volume to the TSC. However, these changes produce modest improvement in overall population health. Health systems should weigh relative hospital and patient benefits when considering adding EVT capability.

Download Full-text

Effect of “drip-and-ship” and “drip-and-drive” on endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion: a single-center retrospective study

Acta Radiologica ◽

10.1177/02841851211006897 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 028418512110068

Author(s):

Yu Hang ◽

Zhen Yu Jia ◽

Lin Bo Zhao ◽

Yue Zhou Cao ◽

Huang Huang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Treatment ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Primary Stroke Center ◽

Secondary Endpoints ◽

Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽

Stroke Center

Background Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO) were usually transferred from a primary stroke center (PSC) to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) for endovascular treatment (drip-and-ship [DS]), while driving the doctor from a CSC to a PSC to perform a procedure is an alternative strategy (drip-and-drive [DD]). Purpose To compare the efficacy and prognosis of the two strategies. Material and Methods From February 2017 to June 2019, 62 patients with LVO received endovascular treatment via the DS and DD models and were retrospectively analyzed from the stroke alliance based on our CSC. Primary endpoint was door-to-reperfusion (DTR) time. Secondary endpoints included puncture-to-recanalization (PTR) time, modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) rates at the end of the procedure, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Results Forty-one patients received the DS strategy and 21 patients received the DD strategy. The DTR time was significantly longer in the DS group compared to the DD group (315.5 ± 83.8 min vs. 248.6 ± 80.0 min; P < 0.05), and PTR time was shorter (77.2 ± 35.9 min vs. 113.7 ± 69.7 min; P = 0.033) compared with the DD group. Successful recanalization (mTICI 2b/3) was achieved in 89% (36/41) of patients in the DS group and 86% (18/21) in the DD group ( P = 1.000). Favorable functional outcomes (mRS 0–2) were observed in 49% (20/41) of patients in the DS group and 71% (15/21) in the DD group at 90 days ( P = 0.089). Conclusion Compared with the DS strategy, the DD strategy showed more effective and a trend of better clinical outcomes for AIS patients with LVO.

Download Full-text

Coronavirus disease 2019 is threatening stroke care systems: a real-world study

BMC Health Services Research ◽

10.1186/s12913-021-06297-4 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Jiawei Xin ◽

Xuanyu Huang ◽

Changyun Liu ◽

Yun Huang

Keyword(s):

Real World ◽

Mainland China ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Hospital Length ◽

Real World Data ◽

Care Systems ◽

Long Term Prognosis ◽

Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽

Stroke Center ◽

Medical Burden

Abstract Background Since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the stroke care systems have been seriously affected because of social restrictions and other reasons. As the pandemic continues to spread globally, it is of great significance to understand how COVID-19 affects the stroke care systems in mainland China. Methods We retrospectively studied the real-world data of one comprehensive stroke center in mainland China from January to February 2020 and compared it with the data collected during the same period in 2019. We analyzed DTN time, onset-to-door time, severity, effects after treatment, the hospital length of stays, costs of hospitalization, etc., and the correlation between medical burden and prognosis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. Results The COVID-19 pandemic was most severe in mainland China in January and February 2020. During the pandemic, there were no differences in pre-hospital or in-hospital workflow metrics (all p>0.05), while the degree of neurological deficit on admission and at discharge, the effects after treatment, and the long-term prognosis were all worse (all p<0.05). The severity and prognosis of AIS patients were positively correlated with the hospital length of stays and total costs of hospitalization (all p<0.05). Conclusions COVID-19 pandemic is threatening the stroke care systems. Measures must be taken to minimize the collateral damage caused by COVID-19.

Download Full-text

How do treatment times impact on functional outcome in stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy in Germany? Results from the German Stroke Registry

International Journal of Stroke ◽

10.1177/1747493020985260 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 174749302098526

Author(s):

Juliane Herm ◽

Ludwig Schlemm ◽

Eberhard Siebert ◽

Georg Bohner ◽

Anna C Alegiani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Functional Outcome ◽

Odds Ratio ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Poor Functional Outcome ◽

Stroke Registry ◽

Primary Stroke Center ◽

Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽

Stroke Center ◽

Center Time

Background Functional outcome post-stroke depends on time to recanalization. Effect of in-hospital delay may differ in patients directly admitted to a comprehensive stroke center and patients transferred via a primary stroke center. We analyzed the current door-to-groin time in Germany and explored its effect on functional outcome in a real-world setting. Methods Data were collected in 25 stroke centers in the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment a prospective, multicenter, observational registry study including stroke patients with large vessel occlusion. Functional outcome was assessed at three months by modified Rankin Scale. Association of door-to-groin time with outcome was calculated using binary logistic regression models. Results Out of 4340 patients, 56% were treated primarily in a comprehensive stroke center and 44% in a primary stroke center and then transferred to a comprehensive stroke center (“drip-and-ship” concept). Median onset-to-arrival at comprehensive stroke center time and door-to-groin time were 103 and 79 min in comprehensive stroke center patients and 225 and 44 min in primary stroke center patients. The odds ratio for poor functional outcome per hour of onset-to-arrival-at comprehensive stroke center time was 1.03 (95%CI 1.01–1.05) in comprehensive stroke center patients and 1.06 (95%CI 1.03–1.09) in primary stroke center patients. The odds ratio for poor functional outcome per hour of door-to-groin time was 1.30 (95%CI 1.16–1.46) in comprehensive stroke center patients and 1.04 (95%CI 0.89–1.21) in primary stroke center patients. Longer door-to-groin time in comprehensive stroke center patients was associated with admission on weekends (odds ratio 1.61; 95%CI 1.37–1.97) and during night time (odds ratio 1.52; 95%CI 1.27–1.82) and use of intravenous thrombolysis (odds ratio 1.28; 95%CI 1.08–1.50). Conclusion Door-to-groin time was especially relevant for outcome of comprehensive stroke center patients, whereas door-to-groin time was much shorter in primary stroke center patients. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03356392 . Unique identifier NCT03356392

Download Full-text

Abstract WP435: Post Procedural Monitoring Tool Improves the Joint Commission Comprehensive Stroke Center Standard Compliance

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.51.suppl_1.wp435 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Denise Gaffney ◽

Lorina Punsalang ◽

Alvina Mkrtumyan ◽

Raeesa Dhanji ◽

David McCartney ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Carotid Endarterectomy ◽

Electronic Monitoring ◽

Vital Signs ◽

Joint Commission ◽

Monitoring Tool ◽

Post Intervention ◽

Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽

Stroke Center ◽

Iv Tpa ◽

The Joint Commission

Background: The Joint Commission (TJC) Comprehensive Stroke Center standard requires monitoring of patients after IV tPA administration, diagnostic angiography, aneurysm coiling, carotid angioplasty and stenting, mechanical endovascular reperfusion (MER) and carotid endarterectomy. Meeting 100% compliance of the standard is challenging. In 2018, monitoring and documentation were among the TJC’s top ten cited survey findings. Purpose: To determine if an electronic tool can improve documentation compliance and reduce delays in monitoring of vital signs, and neurologic, pedal pulse and skin site assessments. Methods: The initiative was implemented in 2018 with the objective for all patients to have 100% of their post procedural monitoring completed. A documentation tool was created and introduced to nursing units via annual stroke education updates. The tool was added to an online nursing resource SharePoint website and application, which was accessible to all nurses within the hospital. The procedure end time was entered in the tool, which automatically calculated the documentation times. Data was compared 12 months pre and post intervention. Analysis and reporting of data were conducted monthly via the program’s quality oversight committee. Data was analyzed using T-Test. Results: In post-IV tPA patients, more patients had 100% complete documentation (79% post vs. 29% pre-implementation; p=0.006). For all post neuro-interventional radiology procedures, more patients had 100% complete documentation (68% post vs. 17% pre-implementation; p<0.001). For post carotid endarterectomy revascularization, there was a trend toward more patients with 100% complete documentation (83% vs 38%; p=0.07). Conclusion: Utilization of an electronic monitoring tool for post procedural documentation adherence can improve the percentage of patients who have 100% completed assessments and help meet the TJC standard.

Download Full-text

Abstract T P267: Development of an EMS Interfacility Ground Transport Protocol for Patients During/After IV tPA Administration for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.tp267 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Kerrin Connelly ◽

Rishi Gupta ◽

Raul Nogueira ◽

Arthur Yancey ◽

Alexander Isakov ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Transport Protocol ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Stroke Registry ◽

The Public ◽

State Office ◽

Stroke Center ◽

Iv Tpa

Purpose: To standardize the care of acute stroke patients who receive IV tPA being transported by ground EMS from a treating hospital to a stroke center. Background: National consensus guidelines exist for the hospital management of patients receiving IV tPA for acute ischemic stroke. Such patients require close monitoring and management to minimize risk of clinical deterioration. Although patients are often emergently transported from local hospitals to a stroke center, there are no treatment specific national guidelines for managing such patients enroute. As a result, there is a need to develop and implement a standardized approach to guide EMS personnel, particularly in states like Georgia where the public health burden of stroke is high. Methods: In 2012, the “Georgia EMS Interfacility Ground Transport Protocol for Patients during/after IV tPA Administration for Acute Ischemic Stroke” was developed in conjunction with the Georgia Coverdell Acute Stroke Registry, the Georgia State Office of EMS, a representative group of Georgia hospitals and EMS providers. Stakeholders were brought together with the goal of creating a unified statewide protocol. The intent was to create a streamlined protocol which could be readily implemented by pre-hospital care providers. Results: Stakeholders discussed challenges and opportunities to change the process of pre-hospital care. Challenges included recognition of the broad diversity of EMS providers representing over 250 agencies in the state. Opportunities included establishing the framework for greater collaboration across organizations and providers. The final protocol was endorsed by both the Georgia Coverdell Acute Stroke Registry and the State Office of EMS, and distributed to all EMS regions in Georgia. EMS agencies are currently implementing the protocol. Conclusion: Engaging a diverse group of statewide stakeholders to develop a new treatment protocol enhances success in implementation and serves to further the public health mission of improving care of acute stroke patients.

Download Full-text

Abstract W P292: A Comparative Analysis of the Requirements for Certification of Stroke Programs, by Type and by Nationally Recognized Certifying Body

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.wp292 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Stacey Lang

Keyword(s):

Selection Process ◽

Evaluation Process ◽

Program Leaders ◽

Primary Stroke Center ◽

Similarities And Differences ◽

Certification Organizations ◽

Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽

Stroke Center ◽

Core Measures ◽

Certification Requirements

Background and Purpose: There are currently three main, nationally recognized organizations that certify facilities as primary or comprehensive stroke centers. One of these organizations also offers a “Stroke Ready” designation. While each of these organizations share many of the same requirements, there are likewise many unique requirements between certifying bodies with respect to the certification requirements, process, performance, and on-going expectations. All should be considered when choosing a partner for certification by organizations that are committed to achieving an appropriate level of certification as determined by clinical capabilities. Differences in core measure requirements and definitions, data collection expectations and re-certification cycles among other factors are often overlooked when stroke program leaders are identifying the best certification partner for their particular organization. This poster will detail the similarities and differences among the various stroke program certifying organizations and present a detailed methodology to assist program leaders with the partner selection process. Methods: The three stroke program certifying organizations were examined for review cycles, levels of certification offered, requirements related to hospital certifications, and reportable core measures. Other factors such as cost, the actual certification process, and other considerations that may impact the successful achievement of certification within a particular organization were also reviewed. Results/Conclusion: While there are many similarities in the stroke center certification requirements and processes among the three certifying organizations, there are also significant differences. In order to ensure that the end product of a journey to certification will align with a hospital’s values, budget, and vision for the stroke program, an evaluation process in advance of certifying body selection is essential. Awareness of the similarities and differences among the stroke certification organizations can facilitate a hospital’s decision-making process for pursuit of certification as a stroke ready center, primary stroke center or comprehensive stroke center

Download Full-text

Abstract WP240: Ultra-acute Diagnostics for Stroke: Large-scale Implementation of Prehospital Biomarker Sampling

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.47.suppl_1.wp240 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Olli S Mattila ◽

Heini Harve ◽

Saana Pihlasviita ◽

Juhani Ritvonen ◽

Gerli Sibolt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Large Scale ◽

Biomarker Discovery ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Blood Sampling ◽

Blood Samples ◽

And Performance ◽

Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽

Stroke Center ◽

Acute Diagnostics

Background and purpose: Blood-based biomarkers could enable early and cost-effective diagnostics for acute stroke patients in the prehospital setting to support early initiation of treatments. However, large prehospital sample sets required for biomarker discovery and validation are missing, and the feasibility of large-scale blood sampling by emergency medical services (EMS) has not been determined. We set out to establish extensive prehospital blood sampling of thrombolysis candidates in the catchment area of our comprehensive stroke center, with a 1.5 million population base. Methods: EMS personnel were trained to collect prehospital blood samples using a cannula-adapter technique. Time delays, sample quality and performance bottlenecks were investigated between May 20, 2013 and May 19, 2014. Results: Prehospital blood sampling and study recruitment were successfully performed in 430 thrombolysis candidates, of which 55.3% were admitted outside office hours. The median (interquartile range) emergency call to prehospital sample time was 33 minutes (25-41), and the median time from reported symptom onset or wake-up to prehospital sample was 53 minutes (38-85; n=394). Prehospital sampling was performed 31 minutes (25-42) earlier than admission blood sampling, and 37 minutes (30-47) earlier than admission neuroimaging. Quality control data from 25 participating EMS units indicated a 4-minute increase in median transport time (from arrival on-scene to hospital door) for study patients compared to patients of the preceding year. The hemolysis rate in serum and plasma samples was 6.5% and 9.3% for EMS samples, and 0.7% and 1.6% for admission samples collected with venipuncture. Conclusions: Prehospital biomarker sampling is feasible in standard EMS units and provides a median timesaving of over 30 minutes to obtain first blood samples. Large biobanks of prehospital blood samples will facilitate development of ultra-acute stroke biomarkers.

Download Full-text