scholarly journals Low spatial frequencies are suppressively masked across spatial scale, orientation, field position, and eye of origin

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (10) ◽  
pp. 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim S. Meese ◽  
Robert F. Hess
Perception ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 109-109
Author(s):  
S Oddo ◽  
J Beck ◽  
E Mingolla

We compared the perceived segregation of patterns composed of the same two element types arranged in vertical stripes in the top and bottom regions and in a checkerboard in the middle region. The elements in all patterns differed in hue. Some patterns were equated for luminance and others for brightness. We investigated the effects of hue, spatial scale, and background luminance on the segregation of the element-arrangement patterns. Hue similarity, as rated by subjects in a separate procedure, was a relatively weak factor for predicting perceived segregation. The effects of brightness differences and luminance differences interacted with background luminance and spatial scale. Perceived segregation was stronger with a black background than with a white background (Pessoa, Beck, and Mingolla, ARVO '94; Vision Research, in press) and stronger for higher spatial frequencies. The results are discussed in terms of the relative importance of ‘low-order’ factors such as cone contrasts and ‘high-order’ factors such as similarity in mediating texture segregation.


Perception ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 977-994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harvey S Smallman ◽  
Donald I A MacLeod

How are binocular disparities encoded and represented in the human visual system? An ‘encoding cube’ diagram is introduced to visualise differences between competing models. To distinguish the models experimentally, the depth-increment-detection function (discriminating disparity d from d ± Δ d) was measured as a function of standing disparity ( d) with spatially filtered random-dot stereograms of different centre spatial frequencies. Stereothresholds degraded more quickly as standing disparity was increased with stimuli defined by high rather than low centre spatial frequency. This is consistent with a close correlation between the spatial scale of detection mechanisms and the disparities they process. It is shown that a simple model, where discrimination is limited by the noisy ratio of outputs of three disparity-selective mechanisms at each spatial scale, can account for the data. It is not necessary to invoke a population code for disparity to model the depth-increment-detection function. This type of encoding scheme implies insensitivity to large interocular phase differences. Might the system have developed a strategy to disambiguate or shift the matches made at fine scales with those made at the coarse scales at large standing disparities? In agreement with Rohaly and Wilson, no evidence was found that this is so. Such a scheme would predict that stereothresholds determined with targets composed of compounds of high and low frequency should be superior to those of either component alone. Although a small stereoacuity benefit was found at small disparities, the more striking result was that stereothresholds for compound-frequency targets were actually degraded at large standing disparities. The results argue against neural shifting of the matching range of fine scales by coarse-scale matches posited by certain stereo models.


Author(s):  
J.M. Cowley

The problem of "understandinq" electron microscope imaqes becomes more acute as the resolution is improved. The naive interpretation of an imaqe as representinq the projection of an atom density becomes less and less appropriate. We are increasinqly forced to face the complexities of coherent imaqinq of what are essentially phase objects. Most electron microscopists are now aware that, for very thin weakly scatterinq objects such as thin unstained bioloqical specimens, hiqh resolution imaqes are best obtained near the optimum defocus, as prescribed by Scherzer, where the phase contrast imaqe qives a qood representation of the projected potential, apart from a lack of information on the lower spatial frequencies. But phase contrast imaqinq is never simple except in idealized limitinq cases.


Author(s):  
Henry I. Smith ◽  
D.C. Flanders

Scanning electron beam lithography has been used for a number of years to write submicrometer linewidth patterns in radiation sensitive films (resist films) on substrates. On semi-infinite substrates, electron backscattering severely limits the exposure latitude and control of cross-sectional profile for patterns having fundamental spatial frequencies below about 4000 Å(l),Recently, STEM'S have been used to write patterns with linewidths below 100 Å. To avoid the detrimental effects of electron backscattering however, the substrates had to be carbon foils about 100 Å thick (2,3). X-ray lithography using the very soft radiation in the range 10 - 50 Å avoids the problem of backscattering and thus permits one to replicate on semi-infinite substrates patterns with linewidths of the order of 1000 Å and less, and in addition provides means for controlling cross-sectional profiles. X-radiation in the range 4-10 Å on the other hand is appropriate for replicating patterns in the linewidth range above about 3000 Å, and thus is most appropriate for microelectronic applications (4 - 6).


Author(s):  
K.-H. Herrmann ◽  
E. Reuber ◽  
P. Schiske

Aposteriori deblurring of high resolution electron micrographs of weak phase objects can be performed by holographic filters [1,2] which are arranged in the Fourier domain of a light-optical reconstruction set-up. According to the diffraction efficiency and the lateral position of the grating structure, the filters permit adjustment of the amplitudes and phases of the spatial frequencies in the image which is obtained in the first diffraction order.In the case of bright field imaging with axial illumination, the Contrast Transfer Functions (CTF) are oscillating, but real. For different imageforming conditions and several signal-to-noise ratios an extensive set of Wiener-filters should be available. A simple method of producing such filters by only photographic and mechanical means will be described here.A transparent master grating with 6.25 lines/mm and 160 mm diameter was produced by a high precision computer plotter. It is photographed through a rotating mask, plotted by a standard plotter.


Author(s):  
Joachim Frank

Compared with images of negatively stained single particle specimens, those obtained by cryo-electron microscopy have the following new features: (a) higher “signal” variability due to a higher variability of particle orientation; (b) reduced signal/noise ratio (S/N); (c) virtual absence of low-spatial-frequency information related to elastic scattering, due to the properties of the phase contrast transfer function (PCTF); and (d) reduced resolution due to the efforts of the microscopist to boost the PCTF at low spatial frequencies, in his attempt to obtain recognizable particle images.


Author(s):  
Gregor Volberg

Previous studies often revealed a right-hemisphere specialization for processing the global level of compound visual stimuli. Here we explore whether a similar specialization exists for the detection of intersected contours defined by a chain of local elements. Subjects were presented with arrays of randomly oriented Gabor patches that could contain a global path of collinearly arranged elements in the left or in the right visual hemifield. As expected, the detection accuracy was higher for contours presented to the left visual field/right hemisphere. This difference was absent in two control conditions where the smoothness of the contour was decreased. The results demonstrate that the contour detection, often considered to be driven by lateral coactivation in primary visual cortex, relies on higher-level visual representations that differ between the hemispheres. Furthermore, because contour and non-contour stimuli had the same spatial frequency spectra, the results challenge the view that the right-hemisphere advantage in global processing depends on a specialization for processing low spatial frequencies.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Peria ◽  
Becky Nichols ◽  
Geoffrey R. Loftus

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Rauschenberger ◽  
James Jeng-Weei Lin ◽  
Xianjun Sam Zheng ◽  
Chris Lafleur

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document