scholarly journals The comparison makes a difference: What to choose when measuring the Just Noticeable Difference of a 3D cue-conflicting standard

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2803
Author(s):  
Ailin Deng ◽  
Jovan Kemp ◽  
Fulvio Domini
Keyword(s):  
Just Noticeable Difference

A testing paradigm for quantifying ICC profilers

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-85
Author(s):  
Pooshpanjan Roy Biswas ◽  
Alessandro Beltrami ◽  
Joan Saez Gomez
Keyword(s):  
Digital Camera ◽  
Visual Assessment ◽  
Just Noticeable Difference ◽  
Color Management ◽  
Color Gamut ◽  
Gamut Mapping ◽  
Digital File ◽  
Mapping Process ◽  
Testing Paradigm

To reproduce colors in one system which differs from another system in terms of the color gamut, it is necessary to use a color gamut mapping process. This color gamut mapping is a method to translate a specific color from a medium (screen, digital camera, scanner, digital file, etc) into another system having a difference in gamut volume. There are different rendering intent options defined by the International Color Consortium [5] to use the different reproduction goals of the user [19]. Any rendering intent used to reproduce colors, includes profile engine decisions to do it, i.e. looking for color accuracy, vivid colors or pleasing reproduction of images. Using the same decisions on different profile engines, the final visual output can look different (more than one Just Noticeable Difference[16]) depending on the profile engine used and the color algorithms that they implement. Profile performance substantially depends on the profiler engine used to create them. Different profilers provide the user with varying levels of liberty to design a profile for their color management needs and preference. The motivation of this study is to rank the performance of various market leading profiler engines on the basis of different metrics designed specifically to report the performance of particular aspects of these profiles. The study helped us take valuable decisions regarding profile performance without any visual assessment to decide on the best profiler engine.

scholarly journals Self-generation and sound intensity interactively modulate perceptual bias, but not perceptual sensitivity

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Paraskevoudi ◽  
Iria SanMiguel
Keyword(s):  
Stimulus Intensity ◽  
Empirical Support ◽  
Sound Intensity ◽  
Perceptual Bias ◽  
Perceptual Processing ◽  
Interactive Effects ◽  
Just Noticeable Difference ◽  
External Sources ◽  
Motor Actions ◽  
Near Threshold

AbstractThe ability to distinguish self-generated stimuli from those caused by external sources is critical for all behaving organisms. Although many studies point to a sensory attenuation of self-generated stimuli, recent evidence suggests that motor actions can result in either attenuated or enhanced perceptual processing depending on the environmental context (i.e., stimulus intensity). The present study employed 2-AFC sound detection and loudness discrimination tasks to test whether sound source (self- or externally-generated) and stimulus intensity (supra- or near-threshold) interactively modulate detection ability and loudness perception. Self-generation did not affect detection and discrimination sensitivity (i.e., detection thresholds and Just Noticeable Difference, respectively). However, in the discrimination task, we observed a significant interaction between self-generation and intensity on perceptual bias (i.e. Point of Subjective Equality). Supra-threshold self-generated sounds were perceived softer than externally-generated ones, while at near-threshold intensities self-generated sounds were perceived louder than externally-generated ones. Our findings provide empirical support to recent theories on how predictions and signal intensity modulate perceptual processing, pointing to interactive effects of intensity and self-generation that seem to be driven by a biased estimate of perceived loudness, rather by changes in detection and discrimination sensitivity.

The Just Noticeable Difference in Complexity of Jobs

1977 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 606-611
Author(s):  
Shlomo Globerson
Keyword(s):  
Just Noticeable Difference

scholarly journals Determination of Recognition Threshold and Just Noticeable Difference in the Sensory Perception of Pungency ofZanthoxylum bangeanum

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 1044-1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu-Lu Zhang ◽  
Lei Zhao ◽  
Hou-Yin Wang ◽  
Rui-Cong Zhi ◽  
Bo-Lin Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensory Perception ◽  
Recognition Threshold ◽  
Just Noticeable Difference

Spectral Sensitivity of Photoreceptors and Colour Vision in the Solitary Bee, Osmia Rufa

1988 ◽  
Vol 136 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-52
Author(s):  
R. MENZEL ◽  
E. STEINMANN ◽  
J. DE SOUZA ◽  
W. BACKHAUS
Keyword(s):  
Spectral Sensitivity ◽  
Colour Vision ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Just Noticeable Difference ◽  
Species Discrimination ◽  
Colour Space ◽  
Absorption Function ◽  
Perceptual Distance ◽  
Line Elements ◽  
Colour Signals

The spectral sensitivity of single photoreceptors of Osmia rufa was determined by a fast voltage-clamp technique. Three receptor types were found whose spectral sensitivity functions followed a rhodopsin-like photopigment absorption function with λmax values at 348nm (ultraviolet receptor), 436nm (blue receptor) and 572nm (green receptor). The λmax of the green receptor in Osmia rufa is shifted to much longer wavelengths compared with other insect species. Discrimination of colour signals was tested after training a bee at the entrance to its nest. The colour signals were filter discs (70 mm in diameter) with a hole (10 mm in diameter) in the centre and the bees quickly learned to use the coloured disc as a marker of the nest entrance. Tests were dual forced-choice tests with two coloured discs closely positioned next to each other. 94 different tests were each repeated 5–15 times and were performed after training to 12 different colour signals. A photoreceptor model was used to calculate the loci of the colour signals in a three-dimensional colour space and in a chromaticity diagram. The perceptual distance between the colour loci was calculated as line elements (minimum number of just noticeable difference, jnd-steps), which were based on the noiseproperties of the photoreceptors. The discrimination determined by the behavioural tests correlated very well with the jnd-steps. The correlation was better for the line elements in the colour plane than in the colour space. Osmia rufa was compared with the honeybee Apis mellifera and the stingless bee Melipona quadrifasciata. There is no difference in colour selection between Osmia and Apis, whereas Melipona discriminates less well in the violet-blue region. The model calculation was used to compare the chromaticity diagrams and the spectral discrimination functions of the three species. It is concluded that the receptor model used in this study predicts the discrimination behaviour of the three bee species very well. Therefore, comparative studies on colour vision in flowervisiting insects may be based on spectral measurements of the photoreceptors, and in many cases this reduces the extent of laborious behavioural studies.

scholarly journals The effectiveness of TiO2 additions to mortar to maintain initial conditions in terms of its reflectance to solar radiation

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 39-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sérgio Roberto Andrade Dantas ◽  
Fulvio Vittorino ◽  
Kai Loh
Keyword(s):  
Solar Radiation ◽  
Ultraviolet Radiation ◽  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Type A ◽  
Just Noticeable Difference ◽  
Type B ◽  
Climate Conditions ◽  
Type D ◽  
Type C ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Contact of facades with degradation agents and direct incidence of ultraviolet radiation on external coatings make them more opaque over time, affecting their colour and reflectance characteristics. This study evaluated the effect of adding different TiO2 contents to mortars applied in concrete substrates in order to verify the reflectance maintenance on surfaces after exposure over time. Mortar with different concentrations of TiO2 (1%, 5%, 10%) were produced in relation to the total dry premix, added as a powder and compared to unpainted mortar without TiO2 (type "A") and painted mortar without TiO2 (type "B"), both used as a reference for colour and reflectance. Exposed over 16 months to climate conditions in São Paulo, regarding the maintenance of reflectance and solar radiation, the results showed that type "B" (0%TiO2) painted mortar presented the best performance. Type "C" (1%TiO2) and type "D" (5%TiO2) unpainted mortar remained more stable. Type "A" (0%TiO2) and type "E" (10%TiO2) unpainted mortar showed greater differences according to the Just Noticeable Difference (JND) range caused by dirt pick up.

Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Responses to Modulation of Contrast of a Grating Pattern

Perception ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Bodis-Wollner ◽  
C D Hendley ◽  
J J Kulikowski
Keyword(s):  
Visual System ◽  
Human Visual System ◽  
Just Noticeable Difference ◽  
Evoked Responses ◽  
Successive Presentation ◽  
Electrophysiological Data ◽  
Grating Pattern ◽  
Modulation Rate ◽  
Contrast Discrimination ◽  
Lower Contrast

Contrast-modulated grating patterns were used to compare evoked responses and psychophysical thresholds of contrast modulation. The stimulus consisted of the successive presentation of a grating pattern at a higher and lower contrast. At a modulation rate of 8 Hz it was found that there is correspondence between the two kinds of data for a 6 cycle/degree grating. The just noticeable difference was not constant, and data approximated a Weber's law of contrast discrimination. However, it was found that there is a slight departure from this law, in that the ratio decreases with mean contrast. Both psychophysical and electrophysiological data exclude a model of simple luminance detection and are consistent with the operation of spatial contrast detectors in the human visual system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document