scholarly journals WRF Model Sensitivity to Choice of Parameterization over South America: Validation against Surface Variables

2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (8) ◽  
pp. 3342-3355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan J. Ruiz ◽  
Celeste Saulo ◽  
Julia Nogués-Paegle
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
South America ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Surface Wind ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Forecast Model ◽  
South Atlantic Convergence Zone ◽  
Surface Model

Abstract The Weather and Research Forecast model is tested over South America in different configurations to identify the one that gives the best estimates of observed surface variables. Systematic, nonsystematic, and total errors are computed for 48-h forecasts initialized with the NCEP Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS). There is no unique model design that best fits all variables over the whole domain, and nonsystematic errors for all configurations differ little from one another; such differences are in most cases smaller than the observed day-to-day variability. An ensemble mean consisting of runs with different parameterizations gives the best skill for the whole domain. Surface variables are highly sensitive to the choice of land surface models. Surface temperature is well represented by the Noah land model, but dewpoint temperature is best estimated by the simplest land surface model considered here, which specifies soil moisture based on climatology. This underlines the need for better understanding of humid processes at the subgrid scale. Surface wind errors decrease the intensity of the low-level jet, reducing expected heat and moisture advection over southeast South America (SESA), with negative precipitation errors over SESA and positive biases over the South Atlantic convergence zone (SACZ). This pattern of errors suggests feedbacks between wind errors, precipitation, and surface processes as follows: an increase of precipitation over the SACZ produces compensating descent in SESA, with more stable stratification, less rain, less soil moisture, and decreased rain. This is a clear example of how local errors are related to regional circulation, and suggests that improvement of model performance requires not only better parameterizations at the subgrid scales, but also improved regional models.

The influence of the land surface on hydrometeorology and ecology: new advances from modeling and satellite remote sensing

2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 95-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Venkat Lakshmi ◽  
Seungbum Hong ◽  
Eric E. Small ◽  
Fei Chen
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Processes ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Land Surface Processes ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Vegetation Fraction ◽  
Moisture Variation

The importance of land surface processes has long been recognized in hydrometeorology and ecology for they play a key role in climate and weather modeling. However, their quantification has been challenging due to the complex nature of the land surface amongst other reasons. One of the difficult parts in the quantification is the effect of vegetation that are related to land surface processes such as soil moisture variation and to atmospheric conditions such as radiation. This study addresses various relational investigations among vegetation properties such as Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Leaf Area Index (LAI), surface temperature (TSK), and vegetation water content (VegWC) derived from satellite sensors such as Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and EOS Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E). The study provides general information about a physiological behavior of vegetation for various environmental conditions. Second, using a coupled mesoscale/land surface model, we examine the effects of vegetation and its relationship with soil moisture on the simulated land–atmospheric interactions through the model sensitivity tests. The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model was selected for this study, and the Noah land surface model (Noah LSM) implemented in the WRF model was used for the model coupled system. This coupled model was tested through two parameterization methods for vegetation fraction using MODIS data and through model initialization of soil moisture from High Resolution Land Data Assimilation System (HRLDAS). Finally, this study evaluates the model improvements for each simulation method.

scholarly journals Assessment of WRF Land Surface Model Performance over West Africa

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-30
Author(s):  
Ifeanyi C. Achugbu ◽  
Jimy Dudhia ◽  
Ayorinde A. Olufayo ◽  
Ifeoluwa A. Balogun ◽  
Elijah A. Adefisan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
West Africa ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Reanalysis Dataset ◽  
The North ◽  
Temperature And Precipitation ◽  
Moisture Advection

Simulations with four land surface models (LSMs) (i.e., Noah, Noah-MP, Noah-MP with ground water GW option, and CLM4) using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model at 12 km horizontal grid resolution were carried out as two sets for 3 months (December–February 2011/2012 and July–September 2012) over West Africa. The objective is to assess the performance of WRF LSMs in simulating meteorological parameters over West Africa. The model precipitation was assessed against TRMM while surface temperature was compared with the ERA-Interim reanalysis dataset. Results show that the LSMs performed differently for different variables in different land-surface conditions. Based on precipitation and temperature, Noah-MP GW is overall the best for all the variables and seasons in combination, while Noah came last. Specifically, Noah-MP GW performed best for JAS temperature and precipitation; CLM4 was the best in simulating DJF precipitation, while Noah was the best in simulating DJF temperature. Noah-MP GW has the wettest Sahel while Noah has the driest one. The strength of the Tropical Easterly Jet (TEJ) is strongest in Noah-MP GW and Noah-MP compared with that in CLM4 and Noah. The core of the African Easterly Jet (AEJ) lies around 12°N in Noah and 15°N for Noah-MP GW. Noah-MP GW and Noah-MP simulations have stronger influx of moisture advection from the southwesterly monsoonal wind than the CLM4 and Noah with Noah showing the least influx. Also, analysis of the evaporative fraction shows sharp gradient for Noah-MP GW and Noah-MP with wetter Sahel further to the north and further to the south for Noah. Noah-MP-GW has the highest amount of soil moisture, while the CLM4 has the least for both the JAS and DJF seasons. The CLM4 has the highest LH for both DJF and JAS seasons but however has the least SH for both DJF and JAS seasons. The principal difference between the LSMs is in the vegetation representation, description, and parameterization of the soil water column; hence, improvement is recommended in this regard.

Response of the surface climate to different land surface models: WRF sensitivity to surface model options

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela C.A. Lima ◽  
Rita M. Cardoso ◽  
Pedro M.M. Soares
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Heat Fluxes ◽  
Surface Processes ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Land Surface Models ◽  
Land Surface Processes ◽  
Surface Models

<p>The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.2 includes different land surface schemes, allowing a better representation of the land surface processes. Four simulations with the WRF model differing in land surface models and options were investigated as a sensitivity study over the European domain. These experiments span from 2004-2006 with a one-month spin-up and were performed at 0.11<sup>o</sup> horizontal resolution with 50 vertical levels, following the CORDEX guidelines. The lateral boundary conditions were driven by ERA5 reanalysis from European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts. For the first experiment, the Noah land surface model was used. For the remaining simulations, the Noah-MP (multi-physics) land surface model was used with different runoff and groundwater options: (1) original surface and subsurface runoff (free drainage), (2) TOPMODEL with groundwater and (3) Miguez-Macho & Fan groundwater scheme. The physical parameterizations options are the same for all simulations. These experiments allow the analysis of the sensitivity of different land surface options and to understand how the representation of land surface processes impacts on the atmosphere properties. This study focusses on the investigation of land-atmosphere feedbacks trough the analysis of the soil moisture – temperature and soil moisture – precipitation interactions, latent and sensible heat fluxes, and moisture fluxes. The influence of different surface model options on atmospheric boundary layer is also explored.</p><p>Acknowledgements. The authors wish to acknowledge the LEADING (PTDC/CTA-MET/28914/2017) project funded by FCT. The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support FCT through project UIDB/50019/2020 – Instituto Dom Luiz.</p>

scholarly journals Analysis of WRF Model Performance over Subtropical Region of Delhi, India

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manju Mohan ◽  
Shweta Bhati
Keyword(s):  
Surface Layer ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Subtropical Region ◽  
Statistical Measures ◽  
Current Availability

Model performance and sensitivity to model physics options are studied with the Weather Research and Forecasting model (version 3.1.1) over Delhi region in India for surface and upper air meteorological parameters in summer and winter seasons. A case study with the model has been performed with different configurations, and the best physics options suited for this region have been, determined. Comparison between estimated and observed data was carried out through standard statistical measures. Generally, the combination of Pleim-Xiu land surface model, Pleim surface layer scheme, and Asymmetric Convective Model has been found to produce better estimates of temperature and relative humidity for Delhi region. Wind speed and direction estimations were observed best for MM5 similarity surface layer along with Yonsei University boundary layer scheme. Nested domains with higher resolutions were not helpful in improving the simulation results as per the current availability of the data. Overall, the present case study shows that the model has performed reasonably well over the subtropical region of Delhi.

Effect of Land–Atmosphere Interactions on the IHOP 24–25 May 2002 Convection Case

2006 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teddy R. Holt ◽  
Dev Niyogi ◽  
Fei Chen ◽  
Kevin Manning ◽  
Margaret A. LeMone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Air Temperature ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Weather Forecasting ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Atmospheric Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Numerical simulations are conducted using the Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS) to investigate the impact of land–vegetation processes on the prediction of mesoscale convection observed on 24–25 May 2002 during the International H2O Project (IHOP_2002). The control COAMPS configuration uses the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version of the Noah land surface model (LSM) initialized using a high-resolution land surface data assimilation system (HRLDAS). Physically consistent surface fields are ensured by an 18-month spinup time for HRLDAS, and physically consistent mesoscale fields are ensured by a 2-day data assimilation spinup for COAMPS. Sensitivity simulations are performed to assess the impact of land–vegetative processes by 1) replacing the Noah LSM with a simple slab soil model (SLAB), 2) adding a photosynthesis, canopy resistance/transpiration scheme [the gas exchange/photosynthesis-based evapotranspiration model (GEM)] to the Noah LSM, and 3) replacing the HRLDAS soil moisture with the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) 40-km Eta Data Assimilation (EDAS) operational soil fields. CONTROL, EDAS, and GEM develop convection along the dryline and frontal boundaries 2–3 h after observed, with synoptic-scale forcing determining the location and timing. SLAB convection along the boundaries is further delayed, indicating that detailed surface parameterization is necessary for a realistic model forecast. EDAS soils are generally drier and warmer than HRLDAS, resulting in more extensive development of convection along the dryline than for CONTROL. The inclusion of photosynthesis-based evapotranspiration (GEM) improves predictive skill for both air temperature and moisture. Biases in soil moisture and temperature (as well as air temperature and moisture during the prefrontal period) are larger for EDAS than HRLDAS, indicating land–vegetative processes in EDAS are forced by anomalously warmer and drier conditions than observed. Of the four simulations, the errors in SLAB predictions of these quantities are generally the largest. By adding a sophisticated transpiration model, the atmospheric model is able to better respond to the more detailed representation of soil moisture and temperature. The sensitivity of the synoptically forced convection to soil and vegetative processes including transpiration indicates that detailed representation of land surface processes should be included in weather forecasting models, particularly for severe storm forecasting where local-scale information is important.

scholarly journals Improving Weather Predictability by Including Land Surface Model Parameter Uncertainty

2016 ◽  
Vol 144 (4) ◽  
pp. 1551-1569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rene Orth ◽  
Emanuel Dutra ◽  
Florian Pappenberger
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Parameter Uncertainty ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Soil Depth ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Stomatal Resistance ◽  
Forecast Skill ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Earth System

Abstract The land surface forms an important component of Earth system models and interacts nonlinearly with other parts such as ocean and atmosphere. To capture the complex and heterogeneous hydrology of the land surface, land surface models include a large number of parameters impacting the coupling to other components of the Earth system model. Focusing on ECMWF’s land surface model Hydrology Tiled ECMWF Scheme of Surface Exchanges over Land (HTESSEL), the authors present in this study a comprehensive parameter sensitivity evaluation using multiple observational datasets in Europe. The authors select six poorly constrained effective parameters (surface runoff effective depth, skin conductivity, minimum stomatal resistance, maximum interception, soil moisture stress function shape, and total soil depth) and explore their sensitivity to model outputs such as soil moisture, evapotranspiration, and runoff using uncoupled simulations and coupled seasonal forecasts. Additionally, the authors investigate the possibility to construct ensembles from the multiple land surface parameters. In the uncoupled runs the authors find that minimum stomatal resistance and total soil depth have the most influence on model performance. Forecast skill scores are moreover sensitive to the same parameters as HTESSEL performance in the uncoupled analysis. The authors demonstrate the robustness of these findings by comparing multiple best-performing parameter sets and multiple randomly chosen parameter sets. The authors find better temperature and precipitation forecast skill with the best-performing parameter perturbations demonstrating representativeness of model performance across uncoupled (and hence less computationally demanding) and coupled settings. Finally, the authors construct ensemble forecasts from ensemble members derived with different best-performing parameterizations of HTESSEL. This incorporation of parameter uncertainty in the ensemble generation yields an increase in forecast skill, even beyond the skill of the default system.

scholarly journals Benchmarking and Process Diagnostics of Land Models

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 1835-1852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grey S. Nearing ◽  
Benjamin L. Ruddell ◽  
Martyn P. Clark ◽  
Bart Nijssen ◽  
Christa Peters-Lidard
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Process Diagnostics ◽  
Surface Energy Fluxes ◽  
Structural Error ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Parameter Values ◽  
Process Level

Abstract We propose a conceptual and theoretical foundation for information-based model benchmarking and process diagnostics that provides diagnostic insight into model performance and model realism. We benchmark against a bounded estimate of the information contained in model inputs to obtain a bounded estimate of information lost due to model error, and we perform process-level diagnostics by taking differences between modeled versus observed transfer entropy networks. We use this methodology to reanalyze the recent Protocol for the Analysis of Land Surface Models (PALS) Land Surface Model Benchmarking Evaluation Project (PLUMBER) land model intercomparison project that includes the following models: CABLE, CH-TESSEL, COLA-SSiB, ISBA-SURFEX, JULES, Mosaic, Noah, and ORCHIDEE. We report that these models (i) use only roughly half of the information available from meteorological inputs about observed surface energy fluxes, (ii) do not use all information from meteorological inputs about long-term Budyko-type water balances, (iii) do not capture spatial heterogeneities in surface processes, and (iv) all suffer from similar patterns of process-level structural error. Because the PLUMBER intercomparison project did not report model parameter values, it is impossible to know whether process-level error patterns are due to model structural error or parameter error, although our proposed information-theoretic methodology could distinguish between these two issues if parameter values were reported. We conclude that there is room for significant improvement to the current generation of land models and their parameters. We also suggest two simple guidelines to make future community-wide model evaluation and intercomparison experiments more informative.

scholarly journals Development and application of the WRFPLUS-Chem online chemistry adjoint and WRFDA-Chem assimilation system

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1857-1876 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Guerrette ◽  
D. K. Henze
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Vertical Mixing ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Sensitivity Study ◽  
Climate Impacts ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Develop Land ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Here we present the online meteorology and chemistry adjoint and tangent linear model, WRFPLUS-Chem (Weather Research and Forecasting plus chemistry), which incorporates modules to treat boundary layer mixing, emission, aging, dry deposition, and advection of black carbon aerosol. We also develop land surface and surface layer adjoints to account for coupling between radiation and vertical mixing. Model performance is verified against finite difference derivative approximations. A second-order checkpointing scheme is created to reduce computational costs and enable simulations longer than 6 h. The adjoint is coupled to WRFDA-Chem, in order to conduct a sensitivity study of anthropogenic and biomass burning sources throughout California during the 2008 Arctic Research of the Composition of the Troposphere from Aircraft and Satellites (ARCTAS) field campaign. A cost-function weighting scheme was devised to reduce the impact of statistically insignificant residual errors in future inverse modeling studies. Results of the sensitivity study show that, for this domain and time period, anthropogenic emissions are overpredicted, while wildfire emission error signs vary spatially. We consider the diurnal variation in emission sensitivities to determine at what time sources should be scaled up or down. Also, adjoint sensitivities for two choices of land surface model (LSM) indicate that emission inversion results would be sensitive to forward model configuration. The tools described here are the first step in conducting four-dimensional variational data assimilation in a coupled meteorology–chemistry model, which will potentially provide new constraints on aerosol precursor emissions and their distributions. Such analyses will be invaluable to assessments of particulate matter health and climate impacts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document