Origins of the IOD-like Biases in CMIP Multimodel Ensembles: The Atmospheric Component and Ocean–Atmosphere Coupling

Previous studies reveal that the last generation of coupled general circulation models (CGCMs) commonly suffer from the so-called Indian Ocean dipole (IOD)-like biases, lowering the models’ ability in climate prediction and projection. The present study shows that such IOD-like biases are reduced insignificantly or even worsen in CGCMs from phase 5 to phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). The origins of the IOD-like biases in CGCMs are further investigated by comparing model outputs from CMIP and the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP). The CGCMs’ errors are divided into the biases from the AMIP simulation (AMIP biases) and ocean–atmosphere coupling (coupling biases). For the multimodel ensemble mean, the AMIP (coupling) biases account for about two-thirds (one-third) of the IOD-like CMIP biases. In AMIP simulations, the South Asian summer monsoon (SASM) is overly strong; therefore, it could advect overly large easterly momentum from the south Indian Ocean (IO) to the equator. The resultant equatorial easterly wind bias would initiate the convection–circulation feedback and develop large IOD-like AMIP biases. In contrast, the coupling biases weaken the SASM and hence generate warm SST error over the western IO during boreal summer. Such SST error persists to boreal autumn and triggers the Bjerknes feedback, developing the IOD-like coupling biases. Furthermore, the intermodel spread in the IOD-like CMIP biases is largely explained by the intermodel differences in the coupling biases rather than the AMIP biases. The results imply that substantial efforts should be respectively made on reducing the atmospheric models’ intrinsic monsoon biases as well as advancing the simulations of ocean–atmosphere coupling processes.