scholarly journals Development of an Operational Convective Nowcasting Algorithm Using Raindrop Size Sorting Information from Polarimetric Radar Data

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 1477-1495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darrel M. Kingfield ◽  
Joseph C. Picca
Keyword(s):  
Model Simulation ◽  
Algorithm Design ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Polarimetric Radar ◽  
Horizontal Polarization ◽  
Spatiotemporal Resolution ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Size Sorting ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Differential Reflectivity

Abstract Raindrop size sorting is a ubiquitous microphysical occurrence in precipitating systems. Owing to the greater terminal fall speed of larger particles, a raindrop’s fall trajectory can be sensitive to its size, and strong air currents (e.g., a convective updraft) can enhance this sensitivity. Indeed, observational and numerical model simulation studies have confirmed these effects on raindrop size distributions near convective updrafts. One striking example is the lofting of liquid drops and partially frozen hydrometeors above the environmental 0°C level, resulting in a small columnar region of positive differential reflectivity ZDR in polarimetric radar data, known as the ZDR column. This signature can serve as a proxy for updraft location and strength, offering operational forecasters a tool for monitoring convective trends. Beneath the 0°C level, where WSR-88D spatiotemporal resolution is highest, anomalously high ZDR collocated with lower reflectivity factor at horizontal polarization ZH is often observed within and beneath convective updrafts. Here, size sorting creates a deficit in small drops, while relatively large drops and melting hydrometeors are present in low concentrations. As such, this unique raindrop size distribution and its related polarimetric signature can indicate updraft location sooner and more frequently than the detection of a ZDR column. This paper introduces a novel algorithm that capitalizes on the improved radar coverage at lower levels and automates the detection of this size sorting signature. At the algorithm core, unique ZH–ZDR relationships are created for each radar elevation scan, and positive ZDR outliers (often indicative of size sorting) are identified. Algorithm design, examples, performance, strengths and limitations, and future development are discussed.

scholarly journals A Variational Approach for Retrieving Raindrop Size Distribution from Polarimetric Radar Measurements in the Presence of Attenuation

2013 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Cao ◽  
Guifu Zhang ◽  
Ming Xue
Keyword(s):  
Variational Approach ◽  
Simulated Data ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Polarimetric Radar ◽  
University Of Oklahoma ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Radar Measurements ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Differential Reflectivity

AbstractThis study presents a two-dimensional variational approach to retrieving raindrop size distributions (DSDs) from polarimetric radar data in the presence of attenuation. A two-parameter DSD model, the constrained-gamma model, is used to represent rain DSDs. Three polarimetric radar measurements—reflectivity ZH, differential reflectivity ZDR, and specific differential phase KDP—are optimally used to correct for the attenuation and retrieve DSDs by taking into account measurement error effects. Retrieval results with simulated data demonstrate that the proposed algorithm performs well. Applications to real data collected by the X-band Center for Collaborative Adaptive Sensing of the Atmosphere (CASA) radars and the C-band University of Oklahoma–Polarimetric Radar for Innovations in Meteorology and Engineering (OU-PRIME) also demonstrate the efficacy of this approach.

A Comparative Study of Rainfall Retrievals Based on Specific Differential Phase Shifts at X- and S-Band Radar Frequencies

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 952-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey Y. Matrosov ◽  
Robert Cifelli ◽  
Patrick C. Kennedy ◽  
Steven W. Nesbitt ◽  
Steven A. Rutledge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Drop Diameter ◽  
Horizontal Polarization ◽  
Differential Phase Shift ◽  
Phase Measurements ◽  
Differential Phase ◽  
X Band ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Differential Reflectivity

Abstract A comparative study of the use of X- and S-band polarimetric radars for rainfall parameter retrievals is presented. The main advantage of X-band polarimetric measurements is the availability of reliable specific differential phase shift estimates, KDP, for lighter rainfalls when phase measurements at the S band are too noisy to produce usable KDP. Theoretical modeling with experimental raindrop size distributions indicates that due to some non-Rayleigh resonant effects, KDP values at a 3.2-cm wavelength (X band) are on average a factor of 3.7 greater than at 11 cm (S band), which is a somewhat larger difference than simple frequency scaling predicts. The non-Rayleigh effects also cause X-band horizontal polarization reflectivity, Zeh, and differential reflectivity, ZDR, to be larger than those at the S band. The differences between X- and S-band reflectivities can exceed measurement uncertainties for Zeh starting approximately at Zeh > 40 dBZ, and for ZDR when the mass-weighted drop diameter, Dm, exceeds about 2 mm. Simultaneous X- and S-band radar measurements of rainfall showed that consistent KDP estimates exceeding about 0.1° km−1 began to be possible at reflectivities greater than ∼26–30 dBZ while at the S band such estimates can generally be made if Zeh > ∼35–39 dBZ. Experimental radar data taken in light-to-moderate stratiform rainfalls with rain rates R in an interval from 2.5 to 15 mm h−1 showed availability of the KDP-based estimates of R for most of the data points at the X band while at the S band such estimates were available only for R greater than about 8–10 mm h−1. After correcting X-band differential reflectivity measurements for differential attenuation, ZDR measurements at both radar frequency bands were in good agreement with each other for Dm < 2 mm, which approximately corresponds to ZDR ≈ 1.6 dB. The ZDR-based retrievals of characteristic raindrop sizes also agreed well with in situ disdrometer measurements.

scholarly journals Retrieval of the raindrop size distribution from polarimetric radar data using double-moment normalisation

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy H. Raupach ◽  
Alexis Berne
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Polarimetric Radar ◽  
Climatic Regions ◽  
Retrieval Technique ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
X Band ◽  
Double Moment ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
A New Technique

Abstract. A new technique for estimating the raindrop size distribution (DSD) from polarimetric radar data is proposed. Two statistical moments of the DSD are estimated from polarimetric variables, and the DSD is reconstructed. The technique takes advantage of the relative invariance of the double-moment normalised DSD. The method was tested using X-band radar data and networks of disdrometers in three different climatic regions. Radar-derived estimates of the DSD compare reasonably well to observations. In the three tested domains, the proposed method performs similarly to and often better than a state-of-the-art DSD-retrieval technique. The approach is flexible because no specific double-normalised DSD model is prescribed. In addition, a method is proposed to treat noisy radar data to improve DSD-retrieval performance with radar measurements.

scholarly journals Toward Completing the Raindrop Size Spectrum: Case Studies Involving 2D-Video Disdrometer, Droplet Spectrometer, and Polarimetric Radar Measurements

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 877-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merhala Thurai ◽  
Patrick Gatlin ◽  
V. N. Bringi ◽  
Walter Petersen ◽  
Patrick Kennedy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radar Data ◽  
Size Spectrum ◽  
Polarimetric Radar ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Low Profile ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Drop Size Distributions ◽  
Differential Reflectivity ◽  
Global Precipitation

AbstractAnalysis of drop size distributions (DSD) measured by collocated Meteorological Particle Spectrometer (MPS) and a third-generation, low-profile, 2D-video disdrometer (2DVD) are presented. Two events from two different regions (Greeley, Colorado, and Huntsville, Alabama) are analyzed. While the MPS, with its 50-μm resolution, enabled measurements of small drops, typically for drop diameters below about 1.1 mm, the 2DVD provided accurate measurements for drop diameters above 0.7 mm. Drop concentrations in the 0.7–1.1-mm overlap region were found to be in excellent agreement between the two instruments. Examination of the combined spectra clearly reveals a drizzle mode and a precipitation mode. The combined spectra were analyzed in terms of the DSD parameters, namely, the normalized intercept parameter NW, the mass-weighted mean diameter Dm, and the standard deviation of mass spectrum σM. The inclusion of small drops significantly affected the NW and the ratio σM/Dm toward higher values relative to using the 2DVD-based spectra alone. For each of the two events, polarimetric radar data were used to characterize the variation of radar-measured reflectivity Zh and differential reflectivity Zdr with Dm from the combined spectra. In the Greeley event, this variation at S band was well captured for small values of Dm (<0.5 mm) where measured Zdr tended to 0 dB but Zh showed a noticeable decrease with decreasing Dm. For the Huntsville event, an overpass of the Global Precipitation Measurement mission Core Observatory satellite enabled comparison of satellite-based dual-frequency radar retrievals of Dm with ground-based DSD measurements. Small differences were found between the satellite-based radar retrievals and disdrometers.

scholarly journals Raindrop Size Distribution (DSD) Retrieval for X-Band Dual-Polarization Radar

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 387-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eiichi Yoshikawa ◽  
V. Chandrasekar ◽  
Tomoo Ushio
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Attenuation Correction ◽  
Statistical Fluctuation ◽  
Dual Polarization ◽  
Horizontal Polarization ◽  
Axis Ratio ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Median Volume ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Differential Reflectivity

Abstract A raindrop size distribution (DSD) retrieval method for a dual-polarization radar at attenuating frequency is proposed. The proposed method is developed such that the range profiles of the gamma DSD parameters, an intercept parameter Nw (mm−1 m−3), and a median volume diameter D0 (mm) can be estimated to match the dual-polarization measurements, measured equivalent reflectivity at horizontal polarization ZHm, measured differential reflectivity ZDRm, and measured differential propagation phase ΦDPm, where the forward scattering and backscattering are formulated simultaneously to avoid the two-step process of attenuation correction and DSD retrieval. Additionally, the proposed method does not have the attenuation-correction errors accumulated along range that traditional forward and backward processes have, since the range profiles of the DSD parameters are optimized in a radar beam simultaneously. In the simulation, the proposed algorithm showed fairly good accuracies for retrievals Nw and D0. Errors with the different axis ratio models or calibration biases in ZHm and ZDRm, which contaminate assumptions of the proposed method in real observational data, were also evaluated. Under a Gaussian fluctuation model, the estimation process, known as an iterative maximum-likelihood estimator, derives the best estimation in the statistical fluctuation conditions. This scheme could be extended to duplicative observation such as a radar network environment.

scholarly journals Comparison of Raindrop Size Distribution between NASA’s S-Band Polarimetric Radar and Two-Dimensional Video Disdrometers

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 517-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Tokay ◽  
Leo Pio D’Adderio ◽  
David A. Marks ◽  
Jason L. Pippitt ◽  
David B. Wolff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Drop Diameter ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Polarimetric Radar ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Ground Validation ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
Differential Reflectivity ◽  
Global Precipitation

AbstractThe ground-based-radar-derived raindrop size distribution (DSD) parameters—mass-weighted drop diameter Dmass and normalized intercept parameter NW—are the sole resource for direct validation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission Core Observatory satellite-based retrieved DSD. Both Dmass and NW are obtained from radar-measured reflectivity ZH and differential reflectivity ZDR through empirical relationships. This study uses existing relationships that were determined for the GPM ground validation (GV) program and directly compares the NASA S-band polarimetric radar (NPOL) observables of ZH and ZDR and derived Dmass and NW with those calculated by two-dimensional video disdrometer (2DVD). The joint NPOL and 2DVD datasets were acquired during three GPM GV field campaigns conducted in eastern Iowa, southern Appalachia, and western Washington State. The comparative study quantifies the level of agreement for ZH, ZDR, Dmass, and log(NW) at an optimum distance (15–40 km) from the radar as well as at distances greater than 60 km from radar and over mountainous terrain. Interestingly, roughly 10%–15% of the NPOL ZH–ZDR pairs were well outside the envelope of 2DVD-estimated ZH–ZDR pairs. The exclusion of these pairs improved the comparisons noticeably.

scholarly journals High-Resolution Polarimetric Radar Observations of Snow-Generating Cells

2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 1636-1658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Kumjian ◽  
Steven A. Rutledge ◽  
Roy M. Rasmussen ◽  
Patrick C. Kennedy ◽  
Mike Dixon
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Radiosonde Data ◽  
Polarimetric Radar ◽  
Front Range ◽  
Ice Crystal ◽  
Horizontal Polarization ◽  
X Band ◽  
Northern Colorado ◽  
Differential Reflectivity

AbstractHigh-resolution X-band polarimetric radar data were collected in 19 snowstorms over northern Colorado in early 2013 as part of the Front Range Orographic Storms (FROST) project. In each case, small, vertically erect convective turrets were observed near the echo top. These “generating cells” are similar to those reported in the literature and are characterized by ~1-km horizontal and vertical dimensions, vertical velocities of 1–2 m s−1, and lifetimes of at least 10 min. In some cases, these generating cells are enshrouded by enhanced differential reflectivity ZDR, indicating a “shroud” of pristine crystals enveloping the larger, more isotropic particles. The anticorrelation of radar reflectivity factor at horizontal polarization ZH and ZDR suggests ongoing aggregation or riming of particles in the core of generating cells. For cases in which radiosonde data were collected, potential instability was found within the layer in which generating cells were observed. The persistence of these layers suggests that radiative effects are important, perhaps by some combination of cloud-top cooling and release of latent enthalpy through depositional and riming growth of particles within the cloud. The implications for the ubiquity of generating cells and their role as a mechanism for ice crystal initiation and growth are discussed.

scholarly journals Retrieval of the raindrop size distribution from polarimetric radar data using double-moment normalisation

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 2573-2594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy H. Raupach ◽  
Alexis Berne
Keyword(s):  
Size Distribution ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Drop Diameter ◽  
Polarimetric Radar ◽  
Climatic Regions ◽  
Retrieval Technique ◽  
Raindrop Size Distribution ◽  
Double Moment ◽  
Raindrop Size ◽  
A New Technique

Abstract. A new technique for estimating the raindrop size distribution (DSD) from polarimetric radar data is proposed. Two statistical moments of the DSD are estimated from polarimetric variables, and the DSD is reconstructed using a double-moment normalisation. The technique takes advantage of the relative invariance of the double-moment normalised DSD. The method was tested using X-band radar data and networks of disdrometers in three different climatic regions. Radar-derived estimates of the DSD compare reasonably well to observations. In the three tested domains, in terms of DSD moments, rain rate, and characteristic drop diameter, the proposed method performs similarly to and often better than a state-of-the-art DSD-retrieval technique. The approach is flexible because no specific DSD model is prescribed. In addition, a method is proposed to treat noisy radar data to improve DSD-retrieval performance with radar measurements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document