Three-Port, Two Located on the Pfannenstiel Line, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Comparison with Traditional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-264
Author(s):  
Musa Akoglu ◽  
Erdal Birol Bostanci ◽  
Muhammet Kadri Colakoglu ◽  
Erol Aksoy
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Postoperative Results ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
Included Patient ◽  
History Of ◽  
Abdominal Operations ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is seen as a gateway to minimally invasive surgery. We defined a new three-port technique with different port sites and compared the postoperative results with traditional four-port LC procedure in a case-match study. Between June 2012 and May 2013, 104 consecutive patients underwent three-port LC by same experienced surgeon. In the same center, 2963 consecutive patients underwent four-port LC, and of these 2963 patients, a matched group of 104 patients was selected. Data included patient age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, history of abdominal operations, intraoperative data about operating time and conversion to open surgery, and postoperative data about length of hospital stay and postoperative complications were recorded prospectively. We concluded that our new three-port technique with different port sites is as feasible and safe as traditional four-port technique.

scholarly journals Revisiting Mini-Cholecystectomy in Laparoscopic Era – A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (45) ◽  
pp. 2617-2620
Author(s):  
Phungreikan Ningshen ◽  
Khumallambam Ibomcha Singh ◽  
Ningombam Minita Devi ◽  
Malem Devi M ◽  
Yumkhaibam Sabir Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Resource Constraints ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Rectus Muscle ◽  
Normal Activity ◽  
Incision Length ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

BACKGROUND Mini-cholecystectomy (MC), with its varied incision length, has long been considered feasible with comparable results to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) 1-6,7 We undertook this study, driven by resource-constraints, by well-experienced surgeons, using 3 - 5 cm incision length, in our patients with low BMI. The aim of this study is to compare the results and outcomes between MC and LC. METHODS In this retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database, first 50 patients each were selected for MC and LC respectively. Operative time, pain-score, SSI (Surgical Site Infection), hospital stay, return to normal activity and complications were compared. RESULTS Both groups were matched for age, sex, BMI (Body Mass Index) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grading. The mean operating time for MC was 43 minutes and for LC, 64 minutes. Hospital stay for MC was 1.9 days and for LC was 1.8 days, which was statistically not significant. Return to normal activity was 8 days for MC and 6.6 days for LC. In a subset analysis of eight lean and thin patients using 3 - 3.5 cm length incision with rectus muscle splitting, the return to normal activity was 6.9 days which is comparable to LC patients. CONCLUSIONS Mini-cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy produce comparable patient outcomes. In lean and thin patient, MC may be slightly more advantageous than LC in terms of less operating time. KEYWORDS Mini-Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Outcome, Lean and Thin Patient

scholarly journals Preoperative prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a scoring system

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (10) ◽  
pp. 3388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashish K. Khetan ◽  
Meenakshi Yeola
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Gallbladder Disease ◽  
Bladder Wall ◽  
Previous History ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
Preoperative Prediction ◽  
Gall Bladder Wall ◽  
History Of

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become gold standard for the surgical treatment of gallbladder disease. 2% to 15% of patients require conversion to open surgery for various reasons. Pre-operative prediction of “difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy” may not only improve patient safety but also be useful in reducing the overall cost of therapy. The aim of this study is to study the factors determining the preoperative predictability of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Method: 30 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy operated by a single experienced surgeon. There are total 15 score from history, clinical and sonological findings. They were evaluated and scored on the basis of scoring system of Randhawa and Pujahari. Score up to 5 is defined as easy, 6-10 as difficult and 11-15 as very difficult.Result: Previous history of hospitalization for cholecystitis and increased gall bladder wall thickness were found statistically significant in predicting difficult LC.Conclusion: The scoring system had a positive prediction value for easy prediction of 81.9% and for difficult prediction of 75%. 

Near-Infrared Fluorescence Cholangiography can be a Useful Adjunct during Emergency Cholecystectomies

2020 ◽  
pp. 155335062095856
Author(s):  
Francesco Di Maggio ◽  
Naveed Hossain ◽  
Andrea De Zanna ◽  
Danya Husain ◽  
Luca Bonomo
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
Extrahepatic Bile Duct ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Biliary Anatomy ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
Complications Rate

Background. Emergency cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment for acute cholecystitis according to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommendations. The procedure is feasible but carries a higher risk of iatrogenic injury to the bile duct, which should be considered preventable. Intraoperative fluorescence cholangiography following injection of indocyanine green (ICG) has been reported to aid identification of the extrahepatic bile duct. Data on its feasibility in the context of emergency cholecystectomies are missing. Materials and Methods. Fluorescent ICG was used intraoperatively to enhance the biliary anatomy during 33 consecutive emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomies at our institution. Primary outcomes of surgery were considered the length of hospital stay, conversion to open and complications rate, including bile duct injury. Secondary outcome was operating time. A historical population of emergency cholecystectomies was used as control. Results. There were no common bile duct injuries, no adverse effects from ICG, no conversion to open surgery and no deaths. 90% of patients went home within 48 hours after the operation in the absence of complications. ICG demonstrated intraoperative biliary anatomy allowing greater confidence to the surgeon performing emergency cholecystectomies. Six patients were operated beyond 72 hours from admission, without experiencing any complication Clavien-Dindo ≥3. ICG population had the same post-operative hospitalisation and complications rate of the control group, with a shorter operating time. Conclusion. Intraoperative augmented visualisation of biliary anatomy with ICG cholangiography can be a useful technology tool, with the potential to extend the 72 hours window of safety for emergency cholecystectomies.

scholarly journals Impact of Having a Planned Additional Operation at Time of Liver Transplant on Graft and Patient Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 608
Author(s):  
Shirin Salimi ◽  
Keval Pandya ◽  
Vinay Sastry ◽  
Claire West ◽  
Susan Virtue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Liver Graft ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Additional Operation ◽  
Additional Surgery ◽  
Surgical Complexity ◽  
Abdominal Operations ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Advances in liver transplantation (LT) have allowed for expanded indications and increased surgical complexity. In select cases, additional surgery may be performed at time of LT rather than prior to LT due to the significant risks associated with advanced liver disease. We retrospectively studied the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent an additional planned abdominal or cardiac operation at time of LT between 2011–2019. An additional operation (LT+) was defined as a planned operation performed under the same anesthetic as the LT but not directly related to the LT. In total, 547 patients were included in the study, of which 20 underwent LT+ (4%). Additional operations included 10 gastrointestinal, 5 splenic, 3 cardiac, and 2 other abdominal operations. Baseline characteristics between LT and LT+ groups were similar. The median total operating time was significantly longer in LT+ compared to LT only (451 vs. 355 min, p = 0.002). Graft and patient survival, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion of blood products, length of hospital stay, and post-operative complications were not significantly different between groups. In carefully selected patients undergoing LT, certain additional operations performed at the same time appear to be safe with equivalent short-term outcomes and liver graft survival as those undergoing LT alone

scholarly journals Dexmedetomidine use during epiduroscopy reduces fentanyl use and postoperative nausea and vomiting: A single-center retrospective study

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 205031211875680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Suzuki ◽  
Ryota Inokuchi ◽  
Kazuo Hanaoka ◽  
Machi Suka ◽  
Hiroyuki Yanagisawa
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Anesthesia Care ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Monitored Anesthesia Care ◽  
History Of ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

Objectives: Minimally invasive epiduroscopy has recently been reported as an effective treatment procedure for chronic and intractable low back pain. However, no study has determined safe anesthetics for monitored anesthesia care during epiduroscopy. We aimed to compare and evaluate conventional monitored anesthesia care drugs with dexmedetomidine. Methods: A retrospective study including all patients who underwent epiduroscopy at the JR Tokyo General Hospital from April 2011 to March 2016 was designed. The epiduroscopy procedures were performed under anesthesia with dexmedetomidine plus fentanyl (dexmedetomidine group) or droperidol plus fentanyl (neuroleptanalgesia group). Patients who received analgesics other than fentanyl, another analgesic combined with fentanyl, any sedative other than dexmedetomidine or droperidol, or who had incomplete data were excluded. We compared (1) the type and dose of medication during the epiduroscopy and (2) the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results: We identified 45 patients (31 and 14 in the dexmedetomidine and neuroleptanalgesia groups, respectively) with a mean age of 69.0 years. The two groups had comparable characteristics, such as age, sex, body mass index, the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, analgesics used in the clinic, comorbidities, history of smoking, and the duration of anesthesia. The dexmedetomidine group received a significantly lower fentanyl dose during surgery (126 ± 14 vs 193 ± 21 µg, mean ± standard deviation, p = 0.014) and exhibited a significantly lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (1 vs 3, p = 0.047) than the neuroleptanalgesia group. Conclusion: This study involved elderly patients, and the use of dexmedetomidine in monitored anesthesia care during epiduroscopy procedures in these patients may reduce the required fentanyl dose during surgery and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. This strategy may help prevent respiratory depression and aspiration.

scholarly journals Intraoperative anaphylaxis

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 62-65
Author(s):  
Sujita Manandhar
Keyword(s):  
Standard Protocol ◽  
Recurrent Tonsillitis ◽  
Upper Eyelid ◽  
Anesthetic Agents ◽  
Anesthetic Drugs ◽  
Eyelid Swelling ◽  
History Of ◽  
Facial Area ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

A 24 years lady was scheduled for tonsillectomy for recurrent tonsillitis had anaphylaxis and asystole before extubation, she was revived successfully.She had no known history of allergy and exposure to anesthetic agents and was classified as an American Society of Anesthesiologists, ASA I. In the operating theatre, her baseline vitals were unremarkable and remained hemodynamically stable on receiving antibiotic and anesthetic drugs. The anesthetic course remained uneventful throughout the surgery. Upon removal of surgical drapes, upper eyelid swelling was noted, that rapidly progressed to facial area within minutes, and she developed cardiac arrest which was managed with standard protocol and resuscitated successfully.  

scholarly journals Transvaginal Appendectomy: A Systematic Review

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Ali Yagci ◽  
Cuneyt Kayaalp
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
Morbidly Obese ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
History Of ◽  
Patient Selection Criteria

Background. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a new approach that allows minimal invasive surgery through the mouth, anus, or vagina.Objective. To summarize the recent clinical appraisal, feasibility, complications, and limitations of transvaginal appendectomy for humans and outline the techniques.Data Sources. PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google-Scholar, EBSCO, clinicaltrials.gov and congress abstracts, were searched.Study Selection. All related reports were included, irrespective of age, region, race, obesity, comorbidities or history of previous surgery. No restrictions were made in terms of language, country or journal.Main Outcome Measures. Patient selection criteria, surgical techniques, and results.Results. There were total 112 transvaginal appendectomies. All the selected patients had uncomplicated appendicitis and there were no morbidly obese patients. There was no standard surgical technique for transvaginal appendectomy. Mean operating time was 53.3 minutes (25–130 minutes). Conversion and complication rates were 3.6% and 8.2%, respectively. Mean length of hospital stay was 1.9 days.Limitations.There are a limited number of comparative studies and an absence of randomized studies.Conclusions. For now, nonmorbidly obese females with noncomplicated appendicitis can be a candidate for transvaginal appendectomy. It may decrease postoperative pain and enable the return to normal life and work off time. More comparative studies including subgroups are necessary.

scholarly journals Risk factors for postoperative spinal infection: A retrospective analysis of 5065 cases

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Matt El-Kadi ◽  
Erin Donovan ◽  
Laurel Kerr ◽  
Coby Cunningham ◽  
Victor Osio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Immunosuppressive Drugs ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
History Of ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists ◽  
Record Review ◽  
Subsequent Introduction ◽  
Retrospective Medical Record Review

Background: Multiple factors increase the risk for spinal surgical site infection (SSI): prior SSI, obesity, diabetes mellitus, advanced age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, alcohol abuse, low prealbumin levels, smoking, history of cancer, chronic steroids, immunosuppressive drugs, rheumatoid arthritis, and hypothyroidism. Methods: Here, we performed a retrospective medical record review at one facility involving 5065 patients from 2010 to 2015. In 2011, there was an increase in the infection rate (1.07%) which prompted this analysis, resulting in the subsequent introduction of a protocol to reduce the infection risk. Results: The overall infection rate in this series was 0.59%. The lowest infection rate was 0.00% for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. The highest rate of infections occurred among patients undergoing posterior cervical fusions, lumbar fusions, and tumor resections. Higher infection rates were also correlated with diabetes mellitus, obesity, and increased surgical time. Conclusions: Since 2011, we instituted a protocol to limit the risks of spinal SSIs, particularly for patients exhibiting increased medical comorbidities.

scholarly journals Three Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy by a Modified Technique

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-94
Author(s):  
Mohammad Emrul Hasan Khan ◽  
Abdullah Md Abu Ayub Ansary ◽  
Md Monoarul Islam Talukdar ◽  
Fayem Chowdhury ◽  
Md Armanul Islam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Modified Technique ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
Open Conversion ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Expert Surgeon ◽  
Umbilical Scar

Introduction:Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) several modifications have been introduced to its procedure. Main aim of these modifications is to improve cosmesis & reduce pain. Several institutes are routinely performing conventional 3 ports laparoscopic. In modified 3 ports LC, the third port was moved from right hypochondrium to umbilicus, to conceal it in the umbilical scar, thereby giving the three port comfort to the surgeon and two port benefits to the patient. Methods: This observational study was conducted in the Department of Surgery of Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College & Hospital from September 2015 to October 2016. After taking valid consent a total 45 patients were selected for modified 3 ports LC. Here we tried to see the safety and benefit of this modified technique by assessing operating time, intra-operative complications, open conversion rate, postoperative wound infection, post-operative hospital stay, pain score and satisfaction with cosmetic outcome. Results: 3 patients were excluded from study due to different reasons. So, among total 42 (N) patients 30 (71.4%) were female & 12 (28.6%) were male. Operative time was 58.48 ± 32.52 minutes (range 34 to 180 minutes). 2 patients required conversion to open surgery. Pain score was 2.07 ±1.71 and cosmetic score was 8.67 ± 1.99. Conclusion: Modified 3 port laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed safely with a higher cosmetic satisfaction in selected cases by expert surgeon. J Shaheed Suhrawardy Med Coll 2020; 12(2): 90-94

Robotic Minor hepatectomy offers a Favorable Learning Curve and May Result in Superior Perioperative Outcomes Compared with Laparoscopic Approach

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (10) ◽  
pp. 1085-1088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoriav O'Connor ◽  
Brooke Vuong ◽  
Su-Tau Yang ◽  
Andrew Difronzo
Keyword(s):  
Complication Rate ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Specimen Volume ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

Minorhepatectomy (MH) is a common type of robotic-assisted liver resection, but few studies compared it with laparoscopic. We compared the perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent robotic (RH) or laparoscopic (LH) minor hepatectomy and evaluated the effect of surgeon's experience on outcomes. A prospective database was used to identify patients from 2009 through 2016 who underwent RH or LH. Two surgeons performed RH starting in 2014, whereas LH had been established before that. Of the 93 patients, 42 were in RH and 51 in LH group. The mean patient age, gender, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, proportion of patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma were similar. Operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), conversion to open, 30-day complication rate, Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were similar. There was no difference in average tumor size, specimen volume, or achievement of R0 margin. In RH group, after completing 15 cases, there were no conversions to open. After 25 cases, EBL, LOS, and 30-day complication rate were improved as compared with LH. Perioperative outcomes of robotic MH are equivalent to laparoscopic. After approximately 25 cases, robotic-assisted MH may result in superior outcomes compared with laparoscopic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document