Opioid Prescribing at Discharge in Opioid-Naïve Trauma Patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110111
Author(s):  
Jackie P. Johnston ◽  
Alexis M. LaPietra ◽  
Osama A. Elsawy ◽  
Antai Wang ◽  
Lynette M. Richards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Traumatic Injury ◽  
Opioid Analgesics ◽  
Multimodal Analgesia ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Opioid Prescribing

Background Opioid analgesics remain mainstay of treatment for trauma-related pain despite growing concerns for opioid dependency or misuse. The purpose of this study was to evaluate opioid prescribing at hospital discharge after traumatic injury. Methods This is a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients ≥18 years of age admitted for ≥24 hours with a primary diagnosis of traumatic injury. Those with alcohol use disorder, polysubstance abuse, chronic opioid use, or in-hospital mortality were excluded. The primary outcome was the incidence of patients prescribed opioids at discharge. Secondary outcomes included percent of patients who received nonopioids, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Results Of the 927 encounters, 471 were included. The mean age was 60 ± 23 years, and 62.0% were male. The majority were blunt trauma, and 49.9% were falls. Mean initial injury severity score (ISS) was 9 ± 7.2. Of the 70.4% of patients prescribed opioids, 39.4% were discharged on opioids. Age ≥30 years, ICU admission, ISS <9, or Charlson Comorbidity Index >1 was less likely to have opioids prescribed at discharge. Most received nonopioids (93.6%) and multimodal analgesia (84.3%). The median hospital and ICU LOS were 5 (3-9) and 2 (0-4) days, respectively. Discussion Only 39.4% had opioids prescribed at discharge. Opioid-reductive strategies may decrease in-hospital and discharge opioid prescribing. While opioid analgesics remain a mainstay of trauma-associated pain management, institution-wide opioid-sparing strategies can further reduce discharge opioid prescribing after trauma.

An Objective Study of the Impact of the Electronic Medical Record on Outcomes in Trauma Patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (11) ◽  
pp. 1249-1254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. Schenarts ◽  
Claudia E. Goettler ◽  
Michael A. White ◽  
Brett H. Waibel
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Medical Record ◽  
Electronic Medical Record ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Unit Length ◽  
Traumatic Injury ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Delay In Diagnosis ◽  
The Impact

It is commonly believed that the electronic medical record (EMR) will improve patient outcomes. However, there is scant published literature to support this claim and no studies in any surgical population. Our hypothesis was that the EMR would not improve objective outcome measures in patients with traumatic injury. Prospectively collected data from our university-based Level I trauma center was retrospectively reviewed. Demographic, injury severity as well as outcomes and complications data were compared for all patients admitted over a 20-month period before introduction of the EMR and a 20-month period after full, hospital-wide use of the EMR. Implementation of the EMR was associated with a decreased hospital length of stay, P = 0.02; intensive care unit length of stay, P = 0.001; ventilator days, P = 0.002; acute respiratory distress syndrome, P = 0.006, pneumonia, P = 0.008; myocardial infarction, P = 0.001; line infection, P = 0.03; septicemia, P = 0.000; renal failure, P = 0.000; drug complication, P = 0.001; and delay in diagnosis, P = 0.04. There was no difference in mortality, unexpected cardiac arrest, missed injury, pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis, or late urinary tract infection. This is the first study to investigate the impact of the EMR in surgical patients. Although there was an improvement in some complications, the overall impact was inconsistent.

scholarly journals Trauma resource pit stop: increasing efficiency in the evaluation of lower severity trauma patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000670
Author(s):  
Imad S Dandan ◽  
Gail T Tominaga ◽  
Frank Z Zhao ◽  
Kathryn B Schaffer ◽  
Fady S Nasrallah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Trauma Team ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Evaluation Time ◽  
Retrospective Comparison ◽  
Trauma Bay

BackgroundOvertriage of trauma patients is unavoidable and requires effective use of hospital resources. A ‘pit stop’ (PS) was added to our lowest tier trauma resource (TR) triage protocol where the patient stops in the trauma bay for immediate evaluation by the emergency department (ED) physician and trauma nursing. We hypothesized this would allow for faster diagnostic testing and disposition while decreasing cost.MethodsWe performed a before/after retrospective comparison after PS implementation. Patients not meeting trauma activation (TA) criteria but requiring trauma center evaluation were assigned as a TR for an expedited PS evaluation. A board-certified ED physician and trauma/ED nurse performed an immediate assessment in the trauma bay followed by performance of diagnostic studies. Trauma surgeons were readily available in case of upgrade to TA. We compared patient demographics, Injury Severity Score, time to physician evaluation, time to CT scan, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Comparisons were made using 95% CI for variance and SD and unpaired t-tests for two-tailed p values, with statistical difference, p<0.05.ResultsThere were 994 TAs and 474 TRs in the first 9 months after implementation. TR’s preanalysis versus postanalysis of the TR group shows similar mean door to physician evaluation times (6.9 vs. 8.6 minutes, p=0.1084). Mean door to CT time significantly decreased (67.7 vs. 50 minutes, p<0.001). 346 (73%) TR patients were discharged from ED; 2 (0.4%) were upgraded on arrival. When admitted, TR patients were older (61.4 vs. 47.2 years, p<0.0001) and more often involved in a same-level fall (59.5% vs. 20.1%, p<0.0001). Undertriage was calculated using the Cribari matrix at 3.2%.DiscussionPS implementation allowed for faster door to CT time for trauma patients not meeting activation criteria without mobilizing trauma team resources. This approach is safe, feasible, and simultaneously decreases hospital cost while improving allocation of trauma team resources.Level of evidenceLevel II, economic/decision therapeutic/care management study.

scholarly journals Does emergency medicine length of stay predict trauma outcomes at a Level 1 Trauma Center?

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Powers Kinney ◽  
Kamal Gursahani ◽  
Eric Armbrecht ◽  
Preeti Dalawari
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Hospital Capacity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 1 Trauma Center

Objective: Previous studies looking at emergency department (ED) crowding and delays of care on outcome measures for certain medical and surgical patients excluded trauma patients. The objectives of this study were to assess the relationship of trauma patients’ ED length of stay (EDLOS) on hospital length of stay (HLOS) and on mortality; and to examine the association of ED and hospital capacity on EDLOS.Methods: This was a retrospective database review of Level 1 and 2 trauma patients at a single site Level 1 Trauma Center in the Midwest over a one year period. Out of a sample of 1,492, there were 1,207 patients in the analysis after exclusions. The main outcome was the difference in hospital mortality by EDLOS group (short was less than 4 hours vs. long, greater than 4 hours). HLOS was compared by EDLOS group, stratified by Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS) category (< 0.5, 0.51-0.89, > 0.9) to describe the association between ED and hospital capacity on EDLOS.Results: There was no significant difference in mortality by EDLOS (4.8% short and 4% long, p = .5). There was no significant difference in HLOS between EDLOS, when adjusted for TRISS. ED census did not affect EDLOS (p = .59), however; EDLOS was longer when the percentage of staffed hospital beds available was lower (p < .001).Conclusions: While hospital overcrowding did increase EDLOS, there was no association between EDLOS and mortality or HLOS in leveled trauma patients at this institution.

Abstract 183: Outcomes for Major Trauma Patients in Counties Without Trauma Centers Are Worse: Nationwide Population-Based Research in Taiwan

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorji Harnod ◽  
Chu Hui Chang ◽  
Ray E Chang
Keyword(s):  
Major Trauma ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Total Mortality ◽  
Data Bank ◽  
Claim Data ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Direct Transfer ◽  
Trauma Centers ◽  
Icu Admission

Background: Some articles proved indirect-transfer the major trauma patients to the trauma centers had non-significant different outcomes with the patients direct-transfer to the centers. But the outcomes for the major trauma patients in the counties without trauma centers still can be worse. So we did a population based research by using the NHIRD data for the results. Methods: From the claim data of one million beneficiaries of Taiwan National Health Insurance during the year of 2006 to 2008, all of the trauma patients were identified from the database by the ICD-9-CM system. ICDMAP-90 was used for calculating the Injury Severity Score (ISS) as the variable controlling the disease severity. The patients of major trauma were defined as ISS more than fifteen. We used the diagnosis one year before the trauma admission for calculating Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). The first hospitals and the second transferred hospitals that the major trauma patients admitted, and the areas of the first hospitals were recognized in our data bank. The condition of transfer, age, genders, intubation, ICU admission, ISS, CCI, and the triage classifications were adjusted in a logistic regression model for further analysis. Results: There were 2497 major trauma patients (ISS more then 15). The total mortality rate was 12.49%. The variables like age, intubation, ICU admission, ISS and CCI were significant for mortality, but the condition of transfer was not significant in our model. After controlling all the factors, the major trauma patients that first admitted in the areas with no trauma centers have a significant higher risk of mortality (OR=1.73, P=0.005). Conclusions: Our results hint that, although indirect-transfer for the major trauma patients have insignificant difference in mortality with the direct transfer patients, the counties with no trauma centers have significant higher mortality rates in major trauma patients. Further researches are needed for investigating the possible reasons.

Intraabdominal Injury is Common in Blunt Trauma Patients who Sustain Spinal Cord Injury

2007 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 1035-1038
Author(s):  
Ali Salim ◽  
Marcus Ottochian ◽  
Ryan J. Gertz ◽  
Carlos Brown ◽  
Kenji Inaba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blunt Trauma ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Unit Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Intraabdominal Injury

The evaluation of the abdomen in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) is challenging for obvious reasons. There are very little data on the incidence and complications of patients who sustain SCI with concomitant intraabdominal injury (IAI). To determine the incidence and outcomes of IAI in blunt trauma patients with SCI, a trauma registry and record review was performed between January 1998 and December 2005. Baseline demographic data, Injury Severity Score, and associated IAI were collected. Two groups were established and outcomes were analyzed based on the presence or absence of IAI. Intraabdominal and hollow viscus injures were found in 15 per cent and 6 per cent, respectively, of 292 patients with blunt SCI. The presence of intraabdominal injury varied according to the level of the SCI: 10 per cent of cervical, 23 per cent of thoracic, and 18 per cent of lumbar SCI. The overall mortality was 16 per cent. The presence of intraabdominal injury was associated with longer intensive care unit length of stay (13 versus 6 days, P < 0.01), hospital length of stay (23 versus 18 days, P < 0.05), higher complication rate (46% versus 33%, P = 0.09), and higher mortality (44% versus 11%, P < 0.01) when compared with patients with SCI without IAI. Intraabdominal injuries are common in blunt SCI. Liberal evaluation with computed tomography is necessary to identify injuries early.

Multimodal Analgesia and Opioid Use in Critically Ill Trauma Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 228 (5) ◽  
pp. 769-775.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasey L. Hamrick ◽  
Carl A. Beyer ◽  
Jin A. Lee ◽  
Christine S. Cocanour ◽  
Jeremiah J. Duby
Keyword(s):  
Critically Ill ◽  
Multimodal Analgesia ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Opioid Use

Clinical Characteristics of Trauma Patients Requiring Hydrocortisone Treatment for Refractory Hypotension

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (8) ◽  
pp. 821-824
Author(s):  
Gina Kim ◽  
Jeffrey Young
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Traumatic Injury ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Data Repository ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Lower Blood ◽  
Refractory Hypotension ◽  
The University ◽  
Stress Dose

Corticosteroids play an important role in responding to physiologic stress in the human body. However, its application in critical care remains heavily debated. The purpose of this study was to identify patient characteristics associated with receiving stress-dose steroids during the intensive care unit stay after traumatic injury and its effect on in-hospital mortality. Patients admitted to the University of Virginia trauma center between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2015, were identified using our Trauma Registry. Stress dose steroids were defined as 100 mg IV hydrocortisone every eight hours. Patients who received stress-dose steroids were identified using the Clinical Data Repository. Patient characteristics associated with increased likelihood of receiving stress-dose steroids during admission were age >65, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, burn injuries, Injury Severity Score >15, lower blood pressure (141/80 vs 125/76 mm Hg), and higher heart rate (87 vs 94/min). Patients who received stress-dose steroids were found to have increased mortality but not after controlling for the aforementioned patient factors associated with increased likelihood of receiving stress-dose steroids. The use of stress-dose steroids in critically ill patients with refractory hypotension does not appear to affect in-hospital mortality.

Placement of Surgical Feeding Tubes Among Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Requiring Exploratory Abdominal Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 635-642
Author(s):  
Peter I. Cha ◽  
Ronald M. Jou ◽  
David A. Spain ◽  
Joseph D. Forrester
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Unit Length ◽  
Feeding Tube ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement

Objectives The purpose of this study was to identify trauma patients who would benefit from surgical placement of an enteral feeding tube during their index abdominal trauma operation. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients admitted to 2 level I trauma centers between January 2013 and February 2018 requiring urgent exploratory abdominal surgery. Results Six-hundred and one patients required exploratory abdominal surgery within 24 hours of admission after trauma activation. Nineteen (3% of total) patients underwent placement of a feeding tube after their initial exploratory surgery. On multivariate analysis, an intracranial Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥4 (odds ratio [OR] = 9.24, 95% CI 1.09-78.26, P = .04) and a Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8 (OR = 4.39, 95% CI 1.38-13.95, P = .01) were associated with increased odds of requiring a feeding tube. All patients who required a feeding tube had an Injury Severity Score ≥15. While not statistically significant, patients with an open surgical feeding tube compared with interventional radiology/percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement had lower median intensive care unit length of stay, fewer ventilator days, and shorter median total hospital length of stay. Conclusions Trauma patients with severe intracranial injury already requiring urgent exploratory abdominal surgery may benefit from early, concomitant placement of a feeding tube during the index abdominal operation, or at fascial closure.

Multimodal Analgesia and Decreased Opioid Use in Adult Trauma Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (8) ◽  
pp. 950-954
Author(s):  
Andrew L. Drahos ◽  
Anthony M. Scott ◽  
Tracy J. Johns ◽  
Dennis W. Ashley
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Multimodal Analgesia ◽  
The United States ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Trauma Service ◽  
The Impact

Background There is an opioid epidemic in the United States. With the increased concern of over-prescribing opioids, physicians are seeking alternative pain management strategies. The purpose of this study is to review the impact of instituting a multimodal analgesia (MMA) guideline on decreasing opioid use in trauma patients at a Level 1 trauma center. Methods In 2017, an MMA guideline was developed and included anti-inflammatories, muscle relaxants, neuropathic agents, and local analgesics in addition to opioids. Staff were educated and the guideline was implemented. A retrospective review of medications prescribed to patients admitted from 2016 through 2018 was performed. Patients admitted in 2016 served as the control group (before MMA). In 2018, all patients received multimodal pain therapy as standard practice, and served as the comparison group. Results A total of 10 340 patients were admitted to the trauma service from 2016 through 2018. There were 3013 and 3249 patients for review in 2016 and 2018, respectively. Total morphine milligram equivalents were 2 402 329 and 1 975 935 in 2016 and 2018, respectively, a 17.7% decrease ( P < .001). Concurrently, there was a statistically significant increase in the use of multimodal pain medications. A secondary endpoint was studied to evaluate for changes in acute kidney injury; there was not a statistically significant increase (0.56% versus 0.68%, P = .55). Discussion Implementation of an MMA guideline significantly reduced opioid use in trauma patients. The use of nonopioid MMA medications increased without an increased incidence of acute kidney injury.

A Contemporary Analysis of Delayed Diagnoses After Traumatic Injury

2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482095145
Author(s):  
Justin S. Hatchimonji ◽  
Catherine E. Sharoky ◽  
Elinore J. Kaufman ◽  
Lucy W. Ma ◽  
Anna E. Garcia Whitlock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Traumatic Injury ◽  
Trauma Team ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Extremity Injury ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Common Category ◽  
Multivariable Regression Model ◽  
Multivariable Regression

Background Factors associated with delayed injury diagnosis (DID) have been examined, but incompletely researched. Methods We evaluated demographics, mechanism, and measures of mental status and injury severity among 10 years’ worth of adult trauma patients at our center for association with DID in a multivariable regression model. Descriptions of DID injuries were reviewed to highlight characteristics of these injuries. Results We included 13 509 patients, 89 (0.7%) of whom had a recognized DID. In regression analysis, ISS (OR 1.04 per point, 95% CI 1.02-1.06) and number of injuries (OR 1.08 per injury, 95% CI 1.04-1.11) were associated with DID. Operative patients had twice the odds of DID (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.18-3.44). The most common category of DID was orthopedic extremity injury (22/89). Conclusion DID is associated with injury severity and operative intervention. This suggests that the presence of an injury requiring operation may distract the trauma team from additional injuries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document