The path of Bosnia and Herzegovina towards NATO membership began after its
entry into the Partnership for Peace in November 2006. In just a few years,
Bosnia and Herzegovina has achieved an intensive dialogue with NATO (2008)
and the launch of negotiations on the Membership Action Plan (2010), which
was however activated in December 2018. In the meantime, there have come to
a discord between the key internal political factors in Bosnia and
Herzegovina and particularly clear distinction between the Bosniak and Croat
elites that unequivocally support NATO membership, and representatives of
Serbs at the state level and the Republic of Srpska who are currently
against it. Moreover, in October 2017, the National Assembly of the Republic
of Srpska took a stand by which it proclaimed the military neutrality of
this entity and in that regard insisted on consultations with the
neighboring state - the Republic of Serbia. However, in March 2018, the
Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina adopted a five-year strategic foreign
policy document which stipulates that NATO membership is one of its foreign
policy foundations. This document only added to the confusion regarding
BiH?s membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Following the
general elections held in October 2018, this issue has now posed a specific
problem over the formation of the Council of Ministers. Neighbors of Bosnia
and Herzegovina - Serbia, Croatia and Montenegro have different opinions
concerning the possibility of membership of this country in NATO.
Accordingly, Croatia declaratively expresses support and emphasizes its
interest in integrating BiH into NATO to prevent cross-border security
challenges. Serbian officials are quite restrained about BiH?s entry into
NATO, saying that this should be the result of the compromise of the elites
of the three constituent nations. The global race between the United States
and the Russian Federation represents a turning point in terms of BiH?s
membership in NATO. The United States strongly supports this process,
believing that it will secure the post-conflict Western Balkans project,
while Russia retains the explicit position that any new enlargement poses a
problem for its security.