scholarly journals Science, Story, and Structure: Framing the Conversation for Psychology Faculty and Librarian Information Literacy Collaboration

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loretta L. C. Brady ◽  
Melinda Malik
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Information Literacy ◽  
Literacy Skill ◽  
Psychology Faculty ◽  
Science Story ◽  
Writing Assignment ◽  
Undergraduate Psychology ◽  
Psychology Major ◽  
Literacy Skill Development

This case study illuminates the effectiveness of collaboration between a librarian and psychology faculty as they use the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education and the Guidelines for the Undergraduate Psychology Major to improve an assignment and frame their conversation on scaffolding students’ information literacy skill development. Faculty and librarian collaboration is critical to supporting student learning. Disciplinary standards may be effective tools for librarians and faculty to frame their collaboration, using a shared vocabulary to engage in meaningful conversation about the planning and implementation of course assignments in order to facilitate student learning. Through examination of an undergraduate psychology writing assignment, a librarian and psychology faculty critically examine various paths to information literacy.

scholarly journals A Technology-Dependent Information Literacy Model within the Confines of a Limited Resources Environment

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 119-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Abunadi
Keyword(s):  
Information Literacy ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Literacy Skills ◽  
Literacy Skill ◽  
Longitudinal Case Study ◽  
Case Study Methodology ◽  
Information Literacy Skills ◽  
Study Methodology ◽  
Literacy Skill Development

The purpose of this paper is to investigate information literacy as an increasingly evolving trend in computer education. A quantitative research design was implemented, and a longitudinal case study methodology was conducted to measure tendencies in information literacy skill development and to develop a practical information literacy model. It was found that both students and educators believe that the combination of information literacy with a learning management system is more effective in increasing information literacy and research skills where information resources are limited. Based on the quantitative study, a practical, technology-dependent information literacy model was developed and tested in a case study, resulting in fostering the information literacy skills of students who majored in information systems. These results are especially important in smaller universities with libraries having limited technology capabilities, located in developing countries.

What Clinicians Need to Know About Early Literacy Development in Children With Hearing Loss

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Runnion ◽  
Shelley Gray
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Early Literacy ◽  
Skill Development ◽  
Reading Proficiency ◽  
Literacy Skills ◽  
Literacy Skill ◽  
Early Literacy Development ◽  
Literacy Skill Development ◽  
Children With Hearing Loss

PurposeChildren with hearing loss may not reach the same level of reading proficiency as their peers with typical development. Audiologists and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) have important roles to play in preventing this problem early in children's development. In this tutorial, we aim to communicate how the habilitation practices of audiologists and intervention services of SLPs can support early literacy skill development in children with hearing loss.MethodWe describe key findings from peer-reviewed research articles to provide a review of early literacy skill development, to explain the relationship between early literacy skills and conventional reading skills, and to highlight findings from early literacy skill intervention studies that included children with hearing loss who use spoken language. We conclude with a hypothetical case study to illustrate how audiologists and SLPs can support early literacy acquisition in children with hearing loss.ConclusionFindings from studies of young children with hearing loss suggest that a promising approach to improving reading outcomes is to provide explicit early literacy instruction and intervention.

Librarians and instructors developing student learning outcomes

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 484-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kacy Lundstrom ◽  
Britt Anna Fagerheim ◽  
Elizabeth Benson
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Information Literacy ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Threshold Concepts ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Writing Instructors ◽  
Department Faculty ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose – The purpose of this paper if to design a workshop that effectively facilitates the collaborative revision of student learning outcomes based on current research relating to competencies in information literacy (IL). Design/methodology/approach – This case study describes collaborations between librarians and writing instructors throughout an eight-week workshop. The workshop focused on using the results of assessments to revise learning outcomes and restructure instruction practices to help students in the areas they struggle with the most. Three significant frameworks, including threshold concepts, backward design and decoding the disciplines, were used to facilitate effective discussion and revise learning outcomes. Findings – The structure of the workshop based on three key frameworks stimulated innovation, fostered collegiality, prompted future collaborative opportunities and garnered buy-in for the importance and implementation of IL initiatives. This collaboration served as a pilot workshop for future plans to write and revise IL outcomes with other departments across campus. Practical implications – This study can serve as a model for future collaborations with any department faculty, especially when IL learning outcomes need to be articulated or revised. The frameworks described are particularly helpful for guiding this process. Originality/value – While much is written on librarian collaborations, this case study emphasizes the importance of creating even closer collaborative opportunities that place both non-library faculty and teaching librarians on equal footing, allowing everyone in the workshop to take part in the design and implementation of integrating IL into a program. It also gives concrete ways to use threshold concepts to discuss IL issues with faculty, which is a major focus of the newly drafted Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education.

scholarly journals Doctoral Students Becoming Researchers: An Innovative Curriculum

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah S. Garson
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Information Literacy ◽  
Literacy Skill ◽  
Quality Literature ◽  
Literacy Skill Development ◽  
Entering Students ◽  
Long Course ◽  
Innovative Curriculum ◽  
Information Literacy Competencies

Creating a quality literature review is fundamental to doctoral student professionalization, yet research into how the literature review is taught, learned, or experienced is limited.  Responding to this under-addressed but critical key to doctoral education, the focus of this mixed methods study is on students’ perceptions of a year-long course, co-taught by a faculty member and embedded librarian, devoted specifically to addressing the literature review.  Analysis of students’ course evaluations and written reflections/feedback over an eight year period revealed four primary themes: 1) Entering students’ technological know-how does not guarantee effective information literacy skill and without the requisite skills one-shot library workshops are insufficient for making learning whole;  2) Rather than conceiving of the literature review as a product, constructing a literature review represents a pivotal process in doctoral students’ research and literacy skill development; 3) Creating a literature review, and the process it entails, signals in students the development of their professional researcher identity, involving movement beyond “how to” to address questions of “why” and “for whom”; 4) The literature review course was experienced as a substantively different course than is typical in the doctoral experience, mirroring the course’s  foundational assumption that librarians, instructors, and learners share agency in creating the literature review process. The course curriculum is framed by two simultaneous learning streams: information literacy competencies and student research agenda. The course curriculum aligns information literacy competencies and research methodology with the goal of exploring and purposefully integrating creativity and curiosity in the search and research construction process.

scholarly journals Information Literacy Skill Development and Assessment in Engineering

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Senay Purzer ◽  
Michael Fosmire ◽  
Amy Van Epps ◽  
Ruth Wertz ◽  
Kerrie Douglas
Keyword(s):  
Information Literacy ◽  
Skill Development ◽  
Literacy Skill ◽  
Literacy Skill Development

scholarly journals The development of student learning and information literacy: A case study

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-224
Author(s):  
Harjinder Rahanu ◽  
Elli Georgiadou ◽  
Nawaz Khan ◽  
Robert Colson ◽  
Vanessa Hill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Information Literacy

scholarly journals Integrating Information Literacy into Curriculum Assessment Practice: An Informatics Case Study

2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-14
Author(s):  
Annette Meldrum ◽  
◽  
Holly Tootell
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Information Literacy ◽  
Literacy Skills ◽  
Assessment Practice ◽  
Curriculum Assessment ◽  
Information Literacy Skills ◽  
Integrated Information

This article describes how an Informatics subject has integrated information literacy skills into its curriculum assessment practice. The paper provides a background on the role information literacies have in student learning and explains the importance of ensuring the literacies are aligned with subject content and assessment practice. It describes the results of an informatics subject that has been developed through collaboration between Academic and Faculty Librarian.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document