scholarly journals Comparison of Bioabsorbable Steroid-Eluting Sinus Stents Versus Nasopore After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blinded Clinical Trial

2020 ◽  
pp. 014556132094763
Author(s):  
Zhenxiao Huang ◽  
Bing Zhou ◽  
Dehui Wang ◽  
Hongrui Zang ◽  
Huankang Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Middle Turbinate ◽  
Ethmoid Sinus ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Polyp Formation ◽  
Sinus Cavity ◽  
To Receive

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus stents versus absorbable Nasopore packs after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Methods: One hundred eighty-one patients with CRS who underwent ESS were randomly assigned to receive a steroid-eluting sinus stent in one ethmoid sinus cavity, whereas the contralateral control side received a Nasopore pack. Endoscopic evaluations were performed 14, 30, and 90 days after the ESS. Postoperative intervention, polyp formation, adhesions, and middle turbinate (MT) position were assessed as efficacy outcomes. Results: The stents were successfully deployed in all 181 sinuses. Thirty days after the ESS, the stents significantly reduced the need for surgical intervention compared to the Nasopore ( P < .0001). The percentage of cases with polyp formation was significantly lower on the stent sides compared with the Nasopore sides ( P < .0001) at 14, 30, and 90 days after ESS. The percentage of severe adhesion was significantly lower on the stents sides than on the Nasopore sides at postoperative day 90 ( P = .0003), whereas they were not significantly lower at postoperative days 14 and 30. There were no significant differences between the stent sides and the Nasopore sides regarding the frequency of MT lateralization at all end points. No device-related adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated significant improvement in the early postoperative outcomes by reducing the need for postoperative surgical intervention and polyp formation using steroid-eluting stents when compared with absorbable Nasopore packs. The steroid-eluting sinus stents and the Nasopore packs were each effective in preserving the ethmoid sinus patency and in preventing MT lateralization. A further prospective cohort study with long-term postoperative outcomes is warranted.

scholarly journals Conchopexy Suture versus Bolgerization in preventing middle turbinate lateralisation following FESS

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 148-153
Author(s):  
R.K. Mahaseth ◽  
U. Gurung ◽  
B. Pradhan
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Middle Turbinate ◽  
Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
University Teaching ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
P Value ◽  
Interventional Study ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Sinus Cavity ◽  
Chi Square Test

Background: Middle turbinate lateralisation is the most common minor post-operative complication following functional endoscopic sinus surgery. This study aimed to compare the outcome between Conchopexy suture and Bolgerization method in preventing middle turbinate lateralisation. Methodology: This was a prospective, comparative and interventional study conducted from May 2018 to November 2019 at Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. A total of 68 patients were divided equally into two groups. Following functional endoscopic sinus surgery, the middle turbinate was medialised either by Conchopexy suture or Bolgerization technique. Postoperative assessment was done on the second and 12th week of surgery, where the position of the middle turbinate and status of the sinus cavity were assessed using perioperative sinus endoscopic (POSE) score. Chi-square test and unpaired t test were used for comparison of postoperative results between two groups taking p value of < 0.05 as statistically significant. Results: Lateralised middle turbinate and mean POSE score was 5/34 (14.8%) and 2.1±1.25, respectively, in Conchopexy group whilst in Bolgerization group it was 6/34 (17.6%) and 2.5±1.46. However, the observed differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Conchopexy suture and Bolgerization techniques were equally effective in preventing middle turbinate lateralisation. Hence, either of these techniques could be used as an adjunct to FESS to avoid middle turbinate lateralisation.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term Low-Dose Clarithromycin in Patients With Refractory Chronic Sinusitis After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Prospective Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 014556132110320
Author(s):  
Han Chen ◽  
Bing Zhou ◽  
Qian Huang ◽  
Cheng Li ◽  
Yubin Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Administration ◽  
Nasal Cavity ◽  
Endoscopic Sinus Surgery ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Continuous Treatment ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Endoscopic Findings ◽  
Before And After

Objective: To observe the efficacy and safety of postoperative long-term low-dose oral administration of clarithromycin in patients with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis (RCRS), to explore the characteristics of postoperative microbiota in the nasal cavity in patients with RCRS, and to compare the differences and changes in microbiota in the nasal cavity before and after medication. Methods: This was a prospective, self-controlled study. Eighteen patients with RCRS who had persistent symptoms after endoscopic sinus surgery and standard therapy with normal immunoglobulin E and eosinophil level were included. Low dose (250 mg, once daily) clarithromycin was orally administrated for 12 weeks. Symptom severity and endoscopic findings were evaluated before, after 4 weeks, and 12 weeks of treatment, and nasal cavity microbiota was analyzed simultaneously. Results: A total of 18 patients with RCRS were enrolled and 17 patients completed the study. Four weeks after oral administration of clarithromycin, significant improvement was observed in subjective symptoms including nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, postnasal drip, and general discomfort, as well as endoscopic findings including general surgical cavity condition, rhinedema, and rhinorrhea ( P < .05). After continuous treatment to the 12th week, symptoms showed significant improvement compared with baseline, and endoscopic score showed significant improvement compared with both baseline and 4 weeks after treatment. Analysis of middle nasal meatus flora revealed a significant decrease of Streptococcus pneumoniae after 12 weeks of clarithromycin treatment ( P < .05), while the richness, composition, and diversity were similar before and after treatment. Patients enrolled experienced no adverse drug reaction or allergic reaction, nor clinical significant liver function impairment observed. Conclusion: Postoperative low-dose long-term oral administration of clarithromycin in patients with RCRS can improve the clinical symptoms and facilitate the mucosal epithelialization, with good tolerance and safety. The efficacy of clarithromycin in patients with RCRS may be related to its regulatory effect on nasal cavity microbiota.

scholarly journals A Case of Brain Herniation and Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage during Endoscopic Marsupialization of Ethmoid Sinus Mucocele

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (9) ◽  
pp. 427-431
Author(s):  
Song Jae Lee ◽  
Sang Gyu Park ◽  
Hae Won Choi ◽  
Kyung Rae Kim
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Brain Parenchyma ◽  
Ethmoid Sinus ◽  
Sinus Surgery ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage ◽  
Brain Herniation ◽  
Fluid Leakage ◽  
Adjacent Structures ◽  
Ethmoid Sinuses

Paranasal sinus mucocele is a slowly growing benign cystic lesion. It usually involves the frontal and ethmoid sinuses and can extend to adjacent structures, especially to the orbit, skull base and brain parenchyma. Prompt surgical intervention is needed when symptoms occur. Complete resection of mucocele is approached via endoscopic sinus surgery, while marsupialization is also widely considered. Recently, we encountered a case of spontaneous brain herniation and cerebrospinal fluid leakage during endoscopic marsupialization of ethmoid sinus mucocele. Herein, we report the case with a review of the literature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document