scholarly journals Cost Analysis of Open Surgical Bedside Tracheostomy in Intensive Care Unit Patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 014556132110185
Author(s):  
Mats Døving ◽  
Steven Anandan ◽  
Kjetil Gudmundson Rogne ◽  
Tor Paaske Utheim ◽  
Cathrine Brunborg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Operating Room ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Surgical Tracheostomy ◽  
Open Surgical Tracheostomy

Objectives: Open surgical tracheostomy (OST) is a common procedure performed on intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The procedure can be performed bedside in the ICU (bedside open surgical tracheostomy, BeOST) or in the operating room (operating room open surgical tracheostomy, OROST), with comparable safety and long-term complication rates. We aimed to perform a cost analysis and evaluate the use of human resources and the total time used for both BeOSTs and OROSTs. Methods: All OSTs performed in 2017 at 5 different ICUs at Oslo University Hospital Ullevål were retrospectively evaluated. The salaries of the personnel involved in the 2 procedures were obtained from the hospital’s finance department. The time taken and the number of procedures performed were extracted from annual reports and from the electronic patient record system, and the annual expenditures were calculated. Results: Altogether, 142 OSTs were performed, of which 122 (86%) and 20 (14%) were BeOSTs and OROSTs, respectively. A BeOST cost 343 EUR (95% CI: 241.4-444.6) less than an OROST. Bedside open surgical tracheostomies resulted in an annual cost efficiency of 41.818 EUR. In addition, BeOSTs freed 279 hours of operating room occupancy during the study year. Choosing BeOST instead of OROST made 1 nurse, 2 surgical nurses, and 1 anesthetic nurse redundant. Conclusion: Bedside open surgical tracheostomy appears to be cost-, time-, and resource-effective than OROST. In the absence of contraindications, BeOSTs should be performed in ICU patients whenever possible.

scholarly journals Bedside Percutaneous Tracheostomy versus Open Surgical Tracheostomy in Non-ICU Patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evgeni Brotfain ◽  
Leonid Koyfman ◽  
Amit Frenkel ◽  
Michael Semyonov ◽  
Jochanan G. Peiser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Operating Room ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Medical Staff ◽  
Percutaneous Tracheostomy ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Surgical Tracheostomy ◽  
The World ◽  
The Common ◽  
Open Surgical Tracheostomy

Percutaneous bedside tracheostomy (PBT) is a one of the common and safe procedures in intensive care units through the world. In the present paper we published our clinical experience with a performance of PBTs in the regular ward by intensive care physicians’ team. We found it safe and similar outcome in comparison to open surgical tracheostomy method in operation room by ENT team. The performance of PBT in the regular ward showed potential economic advantages in saving medical staff and operating room resources.

scholarly journals The provision of surgical tracheostomies by maxillofacial surgeons in the UK: time for a dedicated tracheostomy team?

2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-119
Author(s):  
P Chohan ◽  
R Elledge ◽  
MK Virdi ◽  
GM Walton
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Telephone Survey ◽  
Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Surgical Tracheostomy ◽  
Surgical Teams ◽  
The Uk

Surgical tracheostomy is a commonly provided service by surgical teams for patients in intensive care where percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy is contraindicated. A number of factors may interfere with its provision on shared emergency operating lists, potentially prolonging the stay in intensive care. We undertook a two-part project to examine the factors that might delay provision of surgical tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. The first part was a prospective audit of practice within the University Hospital Coventry. This was followed by a telephone survey of oral and maxillofacial surgery units throughout the UK. In the intensive care unit at University Hospital Coventry, of 39 referrals, 21 (53.8%) were delayed beyond 24 hours. There was a mean (standard deviation) time to delay of 2.2 days (0.9 days) and the most common cause of delay was surgeon decision, accounting for 13 (61.9%) delays. From a telephone survey of 140 units nationwide, 40 (28.4%) were regularly involved in the provision of surgical tracheostomies for intensive care and 17 (42.5%) experienced delays beyond 24 hours, owing to a combination of theatre availability (76.5%) and surgeon availability (47.1%). There is case for having a dedicated tracheostomy team and provisional theatre slot to optimise patient outcomes and reduce delays. We aim to implement such a move within our unit and audit the outcomes prospectively following this change.

Inpatient Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter Complications: Should Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Lines be Placed in the Intensive Care Unit Setting?

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (8) ◽  
pp. 925-927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Martyak ◽  
Ishraq Kabir ◽  
Rebecca Britt
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Interventional Radiology ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Blood Stream Infection ◽  
Blood Stream ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Icu Patients

Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) are now commonly used for central access in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting; however, there is a paucity of data evaluating the complication rates associated with these lines. We performed a retrospective review of all PICCs placed in the inpatient setting at our institution during a 1-year period from January 2013 to December 2013. These were divided into two groups: those placed at the bedside in the ICU and those placed by interventional radiology in non-ICU patients. Data regarding infectious and thrombotic complications were collected and evaluated. During the study period, 1209 PICC line placements met inclusion criteria and were evaluated; 1038 were placed by interventional radiology in non-ICU patients, and 171 were placed at the bedside in ICU patients. The combined thrombotic and central line associated blood stream infection rate was 6.17 per cent in the non-ICU group and 10.53 per cent in the ICU group (P = 0.035). The thrombotic complication rate was 5.88 per cent in the non-ICU group and 7.60 per cent in the ICU group (P = 0.38), whereas the central line associated blood stream infection rate was 0.29 per cent in the non-ICU group and 2.92 per cent in the ICU group (P = 0.002). This study seems to suggest that PICC lines placed at the bedside in the ICU setting are associated with higher complication rates, in particular infectious complications, than those placed by interventional radiology in non-ICU patients. The routine placement of PICC lines in the ICU settings needs to be reevaluated given these findings.

scholarly journals Use of a Combination Biomarker Algorithm To Identify Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients with Suspected Sepsis at Very Low Likelihood of Bacterial Infection

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (10) ◽  
pp. 6494-6500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer H. Han ◽  
Irving Nachamkin ◽  
Susan E. Coffin ◽  
Jeffrey S. Gerber ◽  
Barry Fuchs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Serum Amyloid ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Bacterial Sepsis ◽  
Suspected Sepsis ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Amyloid A

ABSTRACTSepsis remains a diagnostic challenge in the intensive care unit (ICU), and the use of biomarkers may help in differentiating bacterial sepsis from other causes of systemic inflammatory syndrome (SIRS). The goal of this study was to assess test characteristics of a number of biomarkers for identifying ICU patients with a very low likelihood of bacterial sepsis. A prospective cohort study was conducted in a medical ICU of a university hospital. Immunocompetent patients with presumed bacterial sepsis were consecutively enrolled from January 2012 to May 2013. Concentrations of nine biomarkers (α-2 macroglobulin, C-reactive protein [CRP], ferritin, fibrinogen, haptoglobin, procalcitonin [PCT], serum amyloid A, serum amyloid P, and tissue plasminogen activator) were determined at baseline and at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after enrollment. Performance characteristics were calculated for various combinations of biomarkers for discrimination of bacterial sepsis from other causes of SIRS. Seventy patients were included during the study period; 31 (44%) had bacterial sepsis, and 39 (56%) had other causes of SIRS. PCT and CRP values were significantly higher at all measured time points in patients with bacterial sepsis. A number of combinations of PCT and CRP, using various cutoff values and measurement time points, demonstrated high negative predictive values (81.1% to 85.7%) and specificities (63.2% to 79.5%) for diagnosing bacterial sepsis. Combinations of PCT and CRP demonstrated a high ability to discriminate bacterial sepsis from other causes of SIRS in medical ICU patients. Future studies should focus on the use of these algorithms to improve antibiotic use in the ICU setting.

Nosocomial Infection After Septic Shock Among Intensive Care Unit Patients

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 1054-1065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Landelle ◽  
Alain Lepape ◽  
Adrien Français ◽  
Eve Tognet ◽  
Hélène Thizy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Initial Phase ◽  
Pulmonary Infection ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Objectives.To measure the incidence of nosocomial infection (NI) among patients with septic shock according to the place of septic shock acquisition and to evaluate the increase in the risk of pulmonary infection associated with septic shock.Design.Prospective cohort study.Setting.TWO intensive care units (ICUs) of a French university hospital.Patients and Methods.The study included a total of 209 septic shock patients during the period December 1, 2001 through April 30, 2005. The place of septic shock acquisition for 108 patients was the community; for 87, the hospital; and for 14, the ICU. To evaluate the impact of septic shock on the development of pulmonary infection, a competitive and adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) model was applied to nontrauma ICU patients.Results.Among the 209 study patients, 48 (23%) experienced 66 NIs after septic shock. There was no significant difference in the NI attack rates according to place of acquisition: for the community acquisition group, 24 cases per 100 patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 16-32); for the hospital acquisition group, 20 cases per 100 patients (95% CI, 11-28); and for the ICU acquisition group, 36 cases per 100 patients (95% CI, 11-61) (P = .3). For nontrauma ICU patients, the presence of community-acquired septic shock was found to be independently associated with a higher incidence of pulmonary infection, compared with the absence of septic shock (aHR, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.08-4.16]; P = .03).Conclusions.The risk of NI did not differ by the place of septic shock acquisition. The risk of pulmonary infection was higher for ICU patients with community-acquired septic shock who were admitted for underlying nontrauma disease. Studies are needed to investigate the pathogenic mechanisms that facilitate pulmonary infection in this population, taking into account exposure to invasive devices and immunosuppression after the initial phase of septic shock.

scholarly journals Emerging aspergillosis by azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus at an intensive care unit in the Netherlands, 2010 to 2013

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (30) ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith van Paassen ◽  
Anne Russcher ◽  
Astrid WM in 't Veld - van Wingerden ◽  
Paul E Verweij ◽  
Eduard J Kuijper
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Aspergillus Fumigatus ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Antifungal Treatment ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Resistant Isolate ◽  
Azole Resistance ◽  
Icu Patients

The prevalence of invasive aspergillosis (IA) at the intensive care unit (ICU) is unknown and difficult to assess since IA also develops in patients lacking specific host factors. In the Netherlands, increasing azole-resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus complicates treatment of patients with IA. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of IA by azole-resistant A. fumigatus at the ICU among patients receiving antifungal treatment and to follow their clinical outcome and prognosis. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a university hospital ICU from January 2010 to December 2013. From all patients who received antifungal treatment for suspected IA, relevant clinical and microbiological data were collected using a standardised questionnaire. Of 9,121 admitted ICU-patients, 136 had received antifungal treatment for suspected IA, of which 38 had a positive A. fumigatus culture. Ten of the 38 patients harboured at least one azole-resistant isolate. Resistance mechanisms consisted of alterations in the cyp51A gene, more specific TR34/L98H and TR46/T289A/Y121F. Microsatellite typing did not show clonal relatedness, though isolates from two patients were genetically related. The overall 90-day mortality of patients with IA by azole-resistant A. fumigatus and patients with suspicion of IA by azole-susceptible isolates in the ICU was 100% (10/10) vs 82% (23/28) respectively. We conclude that the changing pattern of IA in ICU patients requires appropriate criteria for recognition, diagnosis and rapid resistance tests. The increase in azole resistance rates also challenges a reconsideration of empirical antifungal therapy.

Cricoid Palpability as a Selection Criterion for Bedside Tracheostomy

2005 ◽  
Vol 133 (6) ◽  
pp. 839-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar F. Husein ◽  
Douglas D. Massick
Keyword(s):  
Operating Room ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Cricoid Cartilage ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Selection Criterion ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Surgical Tracheostomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Open Surgical Tracheostomy

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the significance of cricoid cartilage palpability as a selection criterion for bedside tracheostomy and to prospectively compare a cohort of patients undergoing bedside tracheostomy with another cohort receiving operating room tracheostomy. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective trial comparing 2 cohorts of patients receiving tracheostomies at a tertiary care center (university hospital). In all, 220 consecutive intubated patients selected for elective tracheostomy were enrolled. Of them, 134 patients had palpable cricoid cartilage and underwent open surgical tracheostomy at the bedside. The remaining 68 patients received open surgical tracheostomies in the operating room. Demographic data, patient anatomic features, and perioperative complications were prospectively recorded. There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, reason for admission, indication for tracheostomy, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, number of days intubated, or time required to perform the procedure for those patients whose tracheostomies were performed in the operating room versus the intensive care unit. RESULTS: Patients with a palpable cricoid cartilage had a significantly reduced perioperative complication rate compared with those without a palpable cricoid cartilage (2% vs 22%, P < 0.001). Comparison of cervical girth, mental-to-sternum distance, and thyroid-notch-to-sternum distance showed no significant difference between the 2 groups and did not further define selection criteria. CONCLUSION: This investigation prospectively confirms the safety of bedside tracheostomy placement in properly selected patients. Complication incidences are defined for open surgical tracheostomy at the bedside and in the operating room. Palpability of the cricoid cartilage has significant value as a selection criterion for bedside tracheostomy. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings will aid in the development of protocols and pathways for surgical airway management in critically ill patients to maximize cost-effective, high-quality care. EBM RATING: B-2

Safety of arterial catheterization using the distal radial approach in intensive care unit management: A pilot study

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110033
Author(s):  
Marina Oi ◽  
Takaaki Maruhashi ◽  
Ai Ishikura ◽  
Yutaro Kurihara ◽  
Yukiko Yaguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Radial Approach ◽  
Unit Management ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Joint Flexion ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Management

Background: Arterial catheter (A-line) is essential for managing severely ill patients, and the radial artery is the most common insertion site in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, many accidental removals occur because the insertion site of A-line in the traditional radial approach (TRA) overlaps with the joint flexion. Recent reports have shown no significant difference in the complication rates between coronarography using the distal radial approach (DRA) and that using TRA. However, to date, no report has examined accidental removals of DRA in the ICU. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the safety of the DRA A-line in ICU management. Methods: This retrospective, descriptive, and observational study enrolled patients who underwent A-line insertion using the DRA at the authors’ facility, which is a university hospital with approximately 1100 beds, from January 1, 2019 to August 31, 2019. The participants’ clinical data were extracted from their medical records. The primary outcome was the number of accidental removals. Results: The study included 20 patients with a median age of 70 (interquartile range (IQR): 58.5–77) years: 10 patients with traumas, 6 with cerebral hemorrhages, 2 with gastrointestinal perforations, and 2 with other diagnoses. The number of punctures was 1 in 15 patients, 2 in 4 patients, and 3 in 1 patient. Only 1 patient required ultrasound guidance, whereas 12 patients required the use of guidewires. The median duration after insertion was 3 (IQR 2.5–5.5) days. Accidental removal was noted in only one patient. No other complications were observed during the period from insertion to removal. Conclusions: DRA may be a safe option for insertion of a new A-line in the ICU.

scholarly journals Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy and Modifications in Intensive Care Unit Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Surgical Tracheostomy ◽  
Common Indication ◽  
Dilatational Tracheostomy ◽  
Prolonged Ventilation

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is a commonly performed procedure in critically ill patients [1]. It can be safely performed bedside. This has resulted in decline in the use of surgical tracheostomy except in few selected cases. Over the last 10 years data on newer methods of insertion, timing, safety profile and complication rates has been published, which has greatly improved our understanding of this procedure [2]. The most common indication of tracheostomy in the ICU is the need for prolonged ventilation. Less complication occur with an increase in skills. Many methods of performing PDT have been discovered recently [3]. Bronchoscopy has been found to be beneficial procedural aides the PDT [4]. In our study, a brief overview about the use of PDT in ICU and, different percutaneous techniques will be discussed. The conclusion is that percutaneous tracheostomies offer benefits for some of the outcomes when compared with surgical tracheostomies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document