Testing for Nonuniform Differential Item Functioning With Multiple Indicator Multiple Cause Models

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 339-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol M. Woods ◽  
Kevin J. Grimm
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 823-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Desiree Thielemann ◽  
Felicitas Richter ◽  
Bernd Strauss ◽  
Elmar Braehler ◽  
Uwe Altmann ◽  
...  

Abstract. Most instruments for the assessment of disordered eating were developed and validated in young female samples. However, they are often used in heterogeneous general population samples. Therefore, brief instruments of disordered eating should assess the severity of disordered eating equally well between individuals with different gender, age, body mass index (BMI), and socioeconomic status (SES). Differential item functioning (DIF) of two brief instruments of disordered eating (SCOFF, Eating Attitudes Test [EAT-8]) was modeled in a representative sample of the German population ( N = 2,527) using a multigroup item response theory (IRT) and a multiple-indicator multiple-cause (MIMIC) structural equation model (SEM) approach. No DIF by age was found in both questionnaires. Three items of the EAT-8 showed DIF across gender, indicating that females are more likely to agree than males, given the same severity of disordered eating. One item of the EAT-8 revealed slight DIF by BMI. DIF with respect to the SCOFF seemed to be negligible. Both questionnaires are equally fair across people with different age and SES. The DIF by gender that we found with respect to the EAT-8 as screening instrument may be also reflected in the use of different cutoff values for men and women. In general, both brief instruments assessing disordered eating revealed their strengths and limitations concerning test fairness for different groups.


Assessment ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1001-1013 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Cicero ◽  
Elizabeth A. Martin ◽  
Alexander Krieg

The Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales, including their brief versions, are among the most commonly used self-report measures of schizotypy. Although they have been used extensively in many ethnic groups, few studies have examined their differential item functioning (DIF) across groups. The current study included 1,056 Asian, 408 White, 476 Multiethnic, and 372 Hispanic undergraduates. Unidimensional models of the brief Magical Ideation Scale and Perceptual Aberration Scales fit the data well. For both scales, global tests of measurement invariance provided mixed evidence, but few of the items displayed DIF across ethnicities or between sexes within a multiple indicator multiple causes model. For the full versions of the scales and the brief Revised Social Anhedonia Scale, multiple indicator multiple causes models within an exploratory structural equation modeling framework found that few of the items had DIF. These findings suggest that some of the items may have different psychometric properties across groups, but most items do not.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-36
Author(s):  
Hasbi Wahyudi

AbstractThis study aims to detect DIF (differential item functioning) on a quality of life measurement tool that measures one aspect, namely social quality of life. Social quality of life contains 24 items developed from the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) by a National Institutes of Health (NIH). This measuring tool measures the quality of life in the social function domain of adolescent patients suffering from diseases or chronic medical conditions. Detection of DIF in this study uses a special case approach from CFA, namely CFA with covariate or multiple indicator multiple causes (MIMIC) models. This study involved 322 participants, 117 (36%) male participants and 205 (64%) female participants, with an age range between 13-23 years in Riau Province. Based on the results of the first order CFA on a set of social quality of life items there are 22 valid items. Then the MIMIC model analysis results found that the model is fit with data where the value of RMSEA = 0.048, so it is known two items that contain DIF, namely item 5 (0.135, P = 0.002) "I have a close friend" and item 23 (0.308, P = 0.002 ) "I hope to have lots of friends".Keywords: Social quality of life, MIMIC model, differential item functioningAbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeteksi DIF (differential item functioning) pada alat ukur quality of life yang mengukur salah satu aspek yaitu social quality of life. Social quality of life berisi 24 item yang dikembangkan dari Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) oleh sebuah badan National Institutes of Health (NIH). Alaalat ukur ini mengukur kualitas hidup pada domain fungsi sosial pasien remaja yang menderita penyakit atau kondisi medis kronis. Pendeteksian DIF pada penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kasus khusus dari CFA, yakni CFA with covariate atau multiple indicator multiple causes (MIMIC) model. Penelitian ini melibatkan 322 partisipan, yakni sebanyak 117 (36%) partisipan laki-laki dan 205 (64%) partisipan perempuan, dengan rentang usia antara 13-23 tahun di Propinsi Riau. Berdasarkan hasil first order CFA pada sekumpulan item-item social quality of life terdapat 22 item yang valid. Kemudian hasil analisis model MIMIC ditemukan bahwa model fit dengan data dimana nilai RMSEA = 0.048, sehingga diketahui dua item yang mengandung DIF, yaitu item 5 (0.135, P = 0.002) “saya memiliki teman dekat” dan item 23 (0.308, P = 0.002) “saya berharap mempunyai banyak teman”.Kata kunci: Social quality of life, MIMIC model, differential item functioning


2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 548-560
Author(s):  
Chung-Ping Cheng ◽  
Chi-Chen Chen ◽  
Ching-Lin Shih

The sources of differential item functioning (DIF) items are usually identified through a qualitative content review by a panel of experts. However, the differential functioning for some DIF items might have been caused by reasons outside of the experts’ experiences, leading to the sources for these DIF items possibly being misidentified. Quantitative methods can help to provide useful information, such as the DIF status and the number of sources of the DIF, which in turn help the item review and revision process to be more efficient and precise. However, the current quantitative methods assume all possible sources should be known in advance and collected to accompany the item response data, which is not always the case in reality. To this end, an exploratory strategy, combined with the MIMIC (multiple-indicator multiple-cause) method, that can be used to identify and name new sources of DIF is proposed in this study. The performance of this strategy was investigated through simulation. The results showed that when a set of DIF-free items can be correctly identified to define the main dimension, the proposed exploratory MIMIC method can accurately recover a number of possible sources of DIF and the items that belong to each. A real data analysis was also implemented to demonstrate how this strategy can be used in reality. The results and findings of this study are further discussed.


Diagnostica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-23
Author(s):  
Ariana Garrote ◽  
Elisabeth Moser Opitz

Zusammenfassung. In dieser Studie wurde der Test MARKO-D (Mathematik- und Rechenkonzepte im Vorschulalter–Diagnose) mit einer Stichprobe von Kindern aus der deutschsprachigen Schweiz ( N = 555) im ersten und zweiten Kindergartenjahr erprobt und es wurde analysiert, ob sich die Altersnormen der deutschen Stichprobe auf die Schweiz übertragen lassen. Zudem wurde der Test mit einer Teilstichprobe ( n = 87) hinsichtlich Messinvarianz über die Zeit untersucht. Die Ergebnisse des eindimensionalen Rasch-Modells zeigen, dass das Instrument für die Schweiz geeignet ist. Die Testleistungen hängen jedoch vom Kindergartenbesuch ab. Für die Schweiz müssten deshalb nebst Altersnormen auch Normen pro Kindergartenhalbjahr verwendet werden. Die Analyse mittels Differential Item Functioning ergab, dass 17 von 55 Items von großer Messvarianz über die Zeit betroffen sind. Um das Instrument für Längsschnittuntersuchungen einsetzen zu können, müsste es weiterentwickelt werden.


1995 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean M. Hammond

This paper presents an IRT analysis of the Beck Depression Inventory which was carried out to assess the assumption of an underlying latent trait common to non-clinical and patient samples. A one parameter rating scale model was fitted to data drawn from a patient and non-patient sample. Findings suggest that while the BDI fits the model reasonably well for the two samples separately there is sufficient differential item functioning to raise serious duobts of the viability of using it analogously with patient and non-patient groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document