scholarly journals Subcutaneous tunneling technique to improve outcomes for patients undergoing chemotherapy with peripherally inserted central catheters: a randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 030006052110045
Author(s):  
Mao-fang Xiao ◽  
Cai-qiong Xiao ◽  
Jia Li ◽  
Can Dai ◽  
Yu-ying Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Maintenance Cost ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters ◽  
Catheter Dislodgement ◽  
Subcutaneous Tunneling ◽  
And Control ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Central Catheters

Objective To compare the value of the subcutaneous tunneling technique versus the normal technique in improving the outcomes of patients undergoing chemotherapy with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Methods One hundred thirty patients were randomly divided into an experimental group (subcutaneous tunneling technique) and control group (normal technique) according to the PICC placement technique, and clinical data were compared between the groups. Results In total, 129 PICCs were successfully inserted. Compared with the control group, the experimental group had a lower occurrence of complications after placement (especially catheter dislodgement: 3.1% vs. 15.4%, venous thrombosis: 3.1% vs. 15.4%, and wound oozing: 14.1% vs. 27.7%), lower occurrence of unscheduled PICC removal (3.1% vs. 13.8%), greater comfort during placement (14.16 ± 2.21 vs. 15.09 ± 2.49 on a scale ranging from 6 to 30 points, with higher scores indicating lower degrees of comfort), and lower costs of PICC maintenance (median (interquartile range) per-day maintenance cost: 13.90 (10.99–32.83) vs. 15.69 (10.51–57.46) Yuan). The occurrence of complications and amount of bleeding during placement were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions The subcutaneous tunneling technique can improve PICC placement by reducing complications and costs of maintenance with better patient comfort during placement.

scholarly journals Effect of video-assisted education on informed consent and patient education for peripherally inserted central catheters: a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (9) ◽  
pp. 030006052094791
Author(s):  
Jia Li ◽  
Xue-fang Huang ◽  
Jie-lin Luo ◽  
Jiang-yun Zhang ◽  
Xiao-lin Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Patient Education ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Central Catheters

Objective To evaluate the effects of a video-assisted education intervention on informed consent and patient education for peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Methods We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects on informed consent of video-assisted patient education and traditional face-to-face discussion in a catheter outpatient ward of a cancer centre in Guangzhou, China, in 2018. Participants were 140 patients randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to two groups: video-assisted or traditional intervention. General information, patient retention of PICC-related information, working time spent by nurses on the procedure, and patient and nurse satisfaction with the procedure were assessed. Results The time used for informed consent was significantly shorter in the experimental group (1.02 ± 0.24 minutes) than in the control group (6.87 ± 1.10 minutes). The time used for PICC-related education was significantly shorter in the experimental group (1.03 ± 0.28 minutes) than in the control group (5.11 ± 0.57 minutes). Nurses’ degree of satisfaction with the procedure was significantly higher in the experimental group (4.10 ± 0.57) than in the control group (2.60 ± 0.70). Conclusion The use of video-assisted informed consent and patient education in this cancer centre decreased nurses’ working time and improved nurses’ satisfaction. Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR1800015664

Randomized Trial of Healthy Families Arizona

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 747-757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Winston LeCroy ◽  
Melinda F. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Home Visitation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Maternal Outcomes ◽  
And Coping ◽  
Development Assessment ◽  
And Control ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Group Child

Home visitation has the potential to improve parent, child, and maternal outcomes and has become a widely implemented prevention program across the United States. The purpose of this research was to use a randomized controlled trial to assess the short-term effectiveness of the Arizona Healthy Families program across a range of outcomes. Two hundred and forty-five families were randomly assigned to the experimental group (Healthy Families) or control group (Child Development assessment only). Results revealed significant findings across four domains including safety and resources, parenting attitudes and behaviors, health and maternal outcomes, and mental health and coping. These results were further corroborated with an analysis of qualitative findings that analyzed linguistic differences between how the treatment and control group described their parenting. These results add to the existing literature on the effectiveness of the Healthy Families model of home visitation.

scholarly journals The effectiveness of an interactive organ donation education intervention for Dutch lower-educated students: a cluster randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Steenaart ◽  
Rik Crutzen ◽  
Math JJM Candel ◽  
Nanne K de Vries
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Organ Donation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Cluster Randomized ◽  
And Control ◽  
Experimental Group

Abstract Background: Organ donation registration rates remain low, especially among people with lower educational levels. An interactive educational intervention was developed to prepare lower-educated students in the Netherlands for making a well-informed decision about organ donation. This article reports on the effects of this intervention on the intention to register (i.e. the primary outcome in the study at hand) and beliefs regarding organ donation. Methods: The effectiveness was investigated in a post-test only cluster randomized controlled trial, in which the intervention was offered to the experimental group and after measurement also to the control group. Randomization to the experimental and control groups took place at a class level. Teachers of schools for intermediate vocational education who taught a course on Citizenship delivered three intervention elements (i.e. video fragments and discussion, quizzes with tailored feedback and exercise filling out a registration form) to their students during two 50-minute lessons. Results: A total of 1170 students participated in the trial and filled out a questionnaire (45 experimental and 43 control classes). Compared to the control group, students in the experimental group had higher odds of having positive registration intentions (OR=1.81; 95%CI [1.10-2.96]), their perceived knowledge was higher (B=.62; 95%CI [.23-1.01]) and they had higher intentions to talk to family members (B=.68; 95%CI [.28-1.08]) and friends (B=.36; 95%CI [.07-.66]) about organ donation. There were no effects on the choice students intended to register (OR=1.08; 95%CI [.67-1.73]). Conclusions: Providing education in a classroom setting is an effective tool in increasing registration intentions. Despite uncertainties about the effects on actual registration behavior, a larger scale dissemination of this intervention is recommended. Providing clear information and opening the discussion about organ donation is an important and promising first step towards higher registration rates. Trial registration: The Dutch Trial Register, NTR6771. Registered on 24 October 2017. https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6557

Improvement of Hand Motor Function after Radial Shock Wave Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients

2018 ◽  
pp. 2-12
Author(s):  
M Kamaluddin ◽  
Erna Setiawati ◽  
Tanti Ajoe Kesoema
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Chronic Stroke ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Shock Wave Therapy ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
And Control ◽  
Experimental Group

Introduction: The Radial Shock Wave Therapy (RSWT) expected could improve spasticity and hand function in chronic stroke patients. This study aimed to find out the improvement of hand function after RSWT as an additional therapy in chronic stroke patients. Methods: Design study was a randomized controlled trial. The patients were assigned randomly to the experimental group (Infrared, Stretching, and RSWT) and control group (Infrared and Stretching) for six weeks. Hand motor function was measured using Fugl-Meyer Motor Assesment (FMA) before and after intervention. Conclusion: There were improvement of wrist and hand FMA scores in the experimental as well as control group Results: Median of wrist FMA scores in the experimental and control group before intervention were 2 and 3 respectively whereas median of wrist FMA scores in the experimental and control group after intervention were 5 and 4 respectively. Median of hand FMA scores in the experimental and control group before intervention were 4 and 4 respectively whereas median of hand FMA scores in the control and experimental group after intervention were 6 and 5 respectively. The scores of wrist- hand FMA in the control and experimental group after intervention were increased P = 0.001P < 0.001 (wrist) and P = 0.001 P < 0.001 (hand) respectively. However, difference increased of wrist and hand FMA scores in the experimental group after intervention were more significant. Keywords: Spasticity, Hand Function, Stroke, Radial Shock Therapy, Fugl-Meyer Motor Assesment

scholarly journals Contributions of auriculotherapy in smoking cessation: a pilot study

2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 883-890
Author(s):  
Roberta de Paiva Silva ◽  
Erika de Cássia Lopes Chaves ◽  
Sandra Cristina Pillon ◽  
Andréia Maria Silva ◽  
Denis da Silva Moreira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
And Control ◽  
Experimental Group

Objective To evaluate the contribution of auriculotherapy in smoking cessation. Method Double-blind randomized controlled trial, conducted with 30 smokers allocated into two groups: Experimental Group (21 participants received 10 sessions of auriculotherapy at specific points for smoking) and Control Group (nine participants received auriculotherapy in points that have no effect on the focus of research). Results Auriculotherapy contributed in reducing the number of cigarettes smoked in 61.9% of participants (p=0.002), in reducing the difficult to abstain from smoking in places where it is forbidden by 38% (p=0.050) and in not smoking when ill 23.8% (p=0.025). Conclusion Given the efficacy only in terms of reducing the number of cigarettes smoked and other parameters, we suggest that future studies consider the use of auriculotherapy combined with other treatment methods, in order to achieve better results in cessation/abstinence.

Effect of tunneled and nontunneled peripherally inserted central catheter placement: A randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 511-519
Author(s):  
Can Dai ◽  
Jia Li ◽  
Qiu-mei Li ◽  
Xiuquan Guo ◽  
Yu-ying Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Incidence ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Catheter Dislodgement ◽  
Experimental Group

Purpose: To compare the effect of tunneled and nontunneled peripherally inserted central catheter placement under B-mode ultrasound. Methods: A single center, randomized, controlled, nonblinded, prospective trial was conducted in Guangzhou, China, between July 2018 and May 2019. A total of 174 participants were randomized to the experimental group (tunneled peripherally inserted central catheter) or the control group (nontunneled peripherally inserted central catheter) and were followed until extubation. Basic characteristics, peripherally inserted central catheter characteristics, the incidence of complications, and the costs of peripherally inserted central catheter placement and maintenance were collected. Data were analyzed by intention-to-treat. Results: A total of 168 of the participants had successful peripherally inserted central catheter placements (85/87, 97.7% in the experimental group and 83/87, 95.4% in the control group, P = 0.682). Compared to the control group, the experimental group had a lower incidence of complications during the placement (18.4% vs 32.2%, P = 0.036), a lower incidence of wound oozing (27.6% vs 57.5%, P < 0.001), a lower incidence of medical adhesive–related skin injury (9.2% vs 25.3%, P = 0.005), a lower incidence of venous thrombosis (1.1% vs 9.2%, P = 0.034), a lower incidence of catheter dislodgement (1.1% vs 9.2%, P = 0.034), and lower costs of peripherally inserted central catheter maintenance at 1, 2, and 3 months ( P < 0.05). Conclusion: Tunneled peripherally inserted central catheter may be recommended for good effectiveness.

scholarly journals A Hospital based Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Kegel's Exercise on Postpartum Perineal Laxity

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-159
Author(s):  
Sudha A Raddi ◽  
TT Sheeba ◽  
MB Ballad
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Postnatal Care ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Postnatal Mothers ◽  
Perineal Muscle ◽  
And Control ◽  
Experimental Group

ABSTRACT Objectives The objectives of the study are to: (i) Assess the perineal muscle strength of postnatal mothers after vaginal delivery in the experimental and control groups before and after the intervention. (ii) Evaluate the effectiveness of Kegel's exercise on perineal laxity in the experimental group compared to control group. Methods This single blinded randomized controlled trial at a 1000 bedded tertiary care teaching hospital in India, enrolled 290 postnatal mothers between 20 and 40 years who had vaginal delivery with < 2 on modified Oxford grading scale as measured by per vaginal digital examination. The subjects were randomized into experimental and control groups. The experimental group received instructions to perform Kegel's exercises along with routine postnatal care while the control group received advice on routine postnatal care. Two follow-up assessments were done at 6 and 10 weeks. The primary outcome measure was increase in Oxford grading score. Results Major findings of the study were: The mean perineal muscle strength assessment scores noted before the intervention and during first and second postintervention assessments were 1.5 ± 0.52, 3.58 ± 0.51 and 4.28 ± 0.57 respectively for the experimental group and 1.56 ± 0.55, 2.41 ± 0.52 and 3 ± 0.51 respectively for the control group. Comparison of these scores between the groups by unpaired t-test yielded p-value of < 0.0001 suggesting high significant difference in favor of the experimental group. However, no additional benefit was observed after Kegel's exercise in the mothers who had episiotomy during vaginal delivery. Conclusion The Kegel's exercise is effective to reduce perineal laxity and hence should be included as a part of routine postnatal care.

scholarly journals Effect of using adaptive seating equipment on grasping and visual motor integration in children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Mahrous Elsayed ◽  
Elham Elsayed Salem ◽  
Sahar Mohamed Nour Eldin ◽  
Mai Elsayed Abbass
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Palsy ◽  
Occupational Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Visual Motor Integration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Visual Motor ◽  
And Control ◽  
Experimental Group

Abstract Background Adaptive seating is commonly used as an intervention method to enhance postural control. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of using therapy ball as a seat alternative to using typical chair on grasping and visual motor integration in the children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy. For this aim, thirty children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy from both sexes were included in this study. The children ages ranged from 3 to 6 years old. The degree of spasticity was 1 to 1+ according to modified Ashworth scale. The children were able to sit independently and follow instructions. Children were randomly assigned into two groups (experimental group and control group). Each child was evaluated before and after 3 successive months of selected occupational therapy exercises program. All the children of both groups received the same selected occupational therapy exercises program, but the children in the experimental group performed the exercises while sitting on therapy ball, and the children in the control group performed the exercises while sitting on typical chair. Results There was a significant improvement in the measured variables for both groups after treatment. The post-treatment results of the two groups of grasping and visual motor integration for age equivalent scores revealed significant difference (p=0.008 and p=0.011 respectively) in favor of the experimental group. Conclusions Therapy ball could be used as a seat alternative to using typical chair to facilitate visual motor integration and grasping in the children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy.

scholarly journals Effects of dexmedetomidine on renal function in patients with septic shock

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 205873921879406
Author(s):  
Lvlin Chen ◽  
Ying Lan ◽  
Jun-Cheng Zhu ◽  
Yan He
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
And Control ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Necrosis Factor

This study was to observe the effects of dexmedetomidine against acute kidney injury in patients with septic shock. A prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in which 80 patients with septic shock admitted in Department of Critical Care Medicine of the Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University from June 2015 to January 2017 were divided into experimental group and control group. The patients in both groups received basic treatment for septic shock, and the patients in the experimental group were given intravenous injection of dexmedetomidine, maintained with 0.1–0.2 µg kg−1 h−1 for 5 days. In both groups, the changes in the levels of interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, serum creatinine (SCr), cystatin C (Cys C), and β2-microglobulin (β2-MG) were determined before treatment and 1, 3, and 5 days after treatment. At 5 days after treatment, Cys C, β2-MG, and SCr were significantly decreased in both groups ( P < 0.05), and the degree of decrease in the experimental group was more obvious ( P < 0.05). At 1, 3, and 5 days after treatment, IL-6 and TNF-α were significantly decreased in both groups ( P < 0.05) and the degree of decrease in the experimental group was more obvious ( P < 0.05). Dexmedetomidine has certain renal protective effect in patients with septic shock, and its mechanism is possibly related to the regulation and improvement of uncontrolled inflammatory response.

The FIFA 11+ Shoulder Injury Prevention Program Was Effective in Reducing Upper Extremity Injuries Among Soccer Goalkeepers: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110218
Author(s):  
Wesam Saleh A. Al Attar ◽  
Oliver Faude ◽  
Mario Bizzini ◽  
Saud Alarifi ◽  
Hosam Alzahrani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Shoulder Injury ◽  
Warm Up ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Injury Prevention Program ◽  
Extremity Injuries ◽  
And Control ◽  
Experimental Group

Background: Soccer is one of the most popular sports worldwide. Goalkeepers are more likely to injure their upper limbs, particularly their shoulders, than outfield players. To reduce upper extremity injuries, the FIFA 11+ Shoulder Injury Prevention Program (FIFA 11+S) was developed. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the FIFA 11+S program in reducing the incidence of upper extremity injuries among amateur soccer goalkeepers. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 726 goalkeepers, who were blinded to study intent, were randomly assigned to the experimental group (n = 360) or control group (n = 366). The experimental group was instructed to perform the FIFA 11+S program before all training sessions for 1 season (6 months). The control group was instructed to continue performing their usual routine warm-up program before training sessions for 1 season. Primary outcomes included the incidence of upper extremity injury and incidence of mechanism, type, and severity of injury measured using injury risk ratios (IRR); compliance with the experimental and control interventions was also recorded. Results: A total of 50 injuries (0.62 injuries per 1000 exposure-hours) were reported in the experimental group, and 122 injuries (1.94 injuries/1000 hours) were reported in the control group. The FIFA 11+S program reduced the total number of upper extremity injuries by 68% (IRR = 0.32 [95% CI, 0.27-0.34]) compared with the usual warm-up. The FIFA 11+S program reduced the incidence of contact injury (IRR = 0.30 [95% CI, 0.25-0.31]), noncontact injury (IRR = 0.40 [95% CI, 0.35-0.43]), initial injury (IRR = 0.34 [95% CI, 0.29-0.36]), recurrent injury (IRR = 0.20 [95% CI, 0.17-0.21]), and overuse injury (IRR = 0.40 [95% CI, 0.35-0.43]). Participants in the experimental group demonstrated a significant decrease in injuries of minor (IRR = 0.32 [95% CI, 0.27-0.34]) and moderate severity (IRR = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.29-0.35]) compared with the control group. We noted no difference in compliance between the experimental and control groups (80% vs 73%, respectively; P = .92). Conclusion: The FIFA 11+S program resulted in 50% fewer upper extremity injuries among soccer goalkeepers, compared with a regular warm-up. Registration: ACTRN12618001080213 (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document