The V-Shaped Distal Triceps Tendon Repair: A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 1952-1958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bastian Scheiderer ◽  
Florian B. Imhoff ◽  
Daichi Morikawa ◽  
Lucca Lacheta ◽  
Elifho Obopilwe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Failure Load ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Biomechanical Analysis ◽  
Gap Formation ◽  
Suture Bridge ◽  
Repair Technique ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Load To Failure ◽  
Triceps Tendon ◽  
Insertion Area

Background: Restoring footprint anatomy, minimizing gap formation, and maximizing the strength of distal triceps tendon repairs are essential factors for a successful healing process and return to sport. Hypothesis: The novel V-shaped distal triceps tendon repair technique with unicortical button fixation closely restores footprint anatomy, provides minimal gap formation and high ultimate failure load, and minimizes iatrogenic fracture risk in acute/subacute distal triceps tendon tears. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twenty-four cadaveric elbows (mean ± SD age, 66 ± 5 years) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 repair groups: the transosseous cruciate repair technique (gold standard), the knotless suture-bridge repair technique, and the V-shaped distal triceps tendon repair technique. Anatomic measurements of the central triceps tendon footprint were obtained in all specimens with a 3-dimensional digitizer before and after the repair. Cyclic loading was performed for a total of 1500 cycles at a rate of 0.25 Hz, pulling in the direction of the triceps. Displacements were measured on the medial and lateral tendon sites with 2 differential variable reluctance transducers. Load to failure and construct failure mode were recorded. Results: The mean triceps bony insertion area was 399.05 ± 81.23 mm2. The transosseous cruciate repair technique restored 36.6% ± 16.8% of the native tendon insertion area, which was significantly different when compared with the knotless suture-bridge repair technique (85.2% ± 14.8%, P = .001) and the V-shaped distal triceps tendon repair technique (88.9% ± 14.8%, P = .002). Mean displacement showed no significant difference between the V-shaped distal triceps tendon repair technique (medial side, 0.75 ± 0.56 mm; lateral side, 0.99 ± 0.59 mm) and the knotless suture-bridge repair technique (1.61 ± 0.97 mm and 1.29 ± 0.8 mm) but significance between the V-shaped distal triceps tendon repair technique and the transosseous cruciate repair technique (4.91 ± 1.12 mm and 5.78 ± 0.9 mm, P < .001). Mean peak failure load of the V-shaped distal triceps tendon repair technique (732.1 ± 156.0 N) was significantly higher than that of the knotless suture-bridge repair technique (505.4 ± 173.9 N, P = .011) and the transosseous cruciate repair technique (281.1 ± 74.8 N, P < .001). Mechanism of failure differed among the 3 repairs, with the only olecranon fracture occurring in the knotless suture-bridge repair technique at the level of the lateral row suture anchors. Conclusion: At time zero, the V-shaped distal triceps tendon repair technique and the knotless suture-bridge repair technique both provided anatomic footprint coverage. Ultimate load to failure was highest for the V-shaped distal triceps tendon repair technique, while gap formation was different only in comparison with the transosseous cruciate repair technique. Clinical Relevance: The V-shaped distal triceps tendon repair technique provides an alternative procedure to other established repairs for acute/subacute distal triceps tendon ruptures. The reduced repair site motion of the V-shaped distal triceps tendon repair technique and the knotless suture-bridge repair technique at the time of surgery may allow a more aggressive rehabilitation program in the early postoperative period.

scholarly journals A Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of 2 Double-Row, Distal Triceps Tendon Repairs

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596711770830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Dorweiler ◽  
Rufus O. Van Dyke ◽  
Robert C. Siska ◽  
Michael A. Boin ◽  
Mathew J. DiPaola
Keyword(s):  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Biomechanical Properties ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Repair Technique ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Load To Failure ◽  
Tendon Ruptures ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Triceps Tendon ◽  
Double Row Repair

Background: Triceps tendon ruptures are rare orthopaedic injuries that almost always require surgical repair. This study tests the biomechanical properties of an original anchorless double-row triceps repair against a previously reported knotless double-row repair. Hypothesis: The anchorless double-row triceps repair technique will yield similar biomechanical properties when compared with the knotless double-row repair technique. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eighteen cadaver arms were randomized into 2 groups. One group received the anchorless repair and the other received the knotless anchor repair. A materials testing system (MTS) machine was used to cycle the repaired arms from 0° to 90° with a 2.5-pound weight for 1500 cycles at 0.25 Hz. Real-time displacement of the tendon was measured during cycling using a probe. Load to failure was performed after completion of cyclic loading. Results: The mean displacement with the anchorless technique was 0.77 mm (SD, 0.25 mm) at 0° (full elbow extension) and 0.76 mm (SD, 0.38 mm) at 90° (elbow flexion). The mean displacement with the anchored technique was 0.83 mm (SD, 0.57 mm) at 0° and 1.01 mm (SD, 0.62 mm) at 90°. There was no statistically significant difference for tendon displacement at 0º ( P = .75) or 90º ( P = .31). The mean load to failure with the anchorless technique was 618.9 N (SD, 185.6 N), while it was 560.5 N (SD, 154.1 N) with the anchored technique, again with no statistically significant difference ( P = .28). Conclusion: Our anchorless double-row triceps repair technique yields comparable biomechanical properties to previously described double-row triceps tendon repair techniques, with the added benefit of avoiding the cost of suture anchors. Clinical Relevance: This anchorless double-row triceps tendon repair can be considered as an acceptable alternative to a knotless anchor repair for triceps tendon ruptures.

scholarly journals A Biomechanical Comparison of Limited Open Versus Krackow Repair for Achilles Tendon Rupture

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 247301141771543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert G. Dekker ◽  
Charles Qin ◽  
Cort Lawton ◽  
Muturi G. Muriuki ◽  
Robert M. Havey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Gap Formation ◽  
Postoperative Rehabilitation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Load To Failure

Background: Soft tissue complications after Achilles tendon repair has led to increased interest in less invasive techniques. Various limited open techniques have gained popularity as an alternative to open operative repair. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare an open Krackow and limited open repair for Achilles tendon rupture. We hypothesized that there would be no statistical difference in load to failure, work to failure, and initial linear stiffness. Methods: A simulated Achilles tendon rupture was created 4 cm proximal to its insertion in 18 fresh-frozen cadaveric below-knee lower limbs. Specimens were randomized to open or limited open PARS Achilles Jig System repair. Repairs were loaded to failure at a rate of 25.4 mm/s to reflect loading during normal ankle range of motion. Load to failure, work to failure, and initial linear stiffness were compared between the 2 repair types. Results: The average load to failure (353.8 ± 88.8 N vs 313.3 ± 99.9 N; P = .38) and work to failure (6.4 ± 2.3 J vs 6.3 ± 3.5 J; P = .904) were not statistically different for Krackow and PARS repair, respectively. Mean initial linear stiffness of the Krackow repair (17.8 ± 5.4 N/mm) was significantly greater than PARS repair (11.8 ± 2.5 N/mm) ( P = .011). Conclusion: No significant difference in repair strength was seen, but higher initial linear stiffness for Krackow repair suggests superior resistance to gap formation, which may occur during postoperative rehabilitation. With equal repair strength, but less soft tissue devitalization, the PARS may be a favorable option for patients with risk factors for soft tissue complications.

scholarly journals Biomechanical Head-to-Head Comparison of 2 Sutures and the Giftbox Versus Bunnell Techniques for Midsubstance Achilles Tendon Ruptures

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596711770747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rufus O. Van Dyke ◽  
Sejul A. Chaudhary ◽  
Gregory Gould ◽  
Roman Trimba ◽  
Richard T. Laughlin
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Biomechanical Testing ◽  
Gap Formation ◽  
Postoperative Rehabilitation ◽  
Repair Technique ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Load To Failure ◽  
Tendon Ruptures ◽  
To Receive

Background: Acute midsubstance Achilles tendon ruptures are a common orthopaedic problem for which the optimal repair technique and suture type remain controversial. Head-to-head comparisons of current fixation constructs are needed to establish which stitch/suture combination is most biomechanically favorable. Hypothesis: Of the tested fixation constructs, Giftbox repairs with Fiberwire will exhibit superior stiffness and strength during biomechanical testing. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Two biomechanical trials were performed, isolating stitch technique and suture type, respectively. In trial 1, 12 transected fresh-frozen cadaveric Achilles tendon pairs were randomized to receive either the Giftbox-modified Krackow or the Bunnell stitch with No. 2 Fiberwire suture. Each repair underwent cyclic loading, oscillating between 10 and 100 N at 2 Hz for 1000 cycles, with repair gapping measured at 500 and 1000 cycles. Load-to-failure testing was then performed, and clinical and catastrophic failure values were recorded. In trial 2, 10 additional paired cadaveric Achilles tendons were randomized to receive a Giftbox repair with either No. 2 Fiberwire or No. 2 Ultrabraid. Testing and data collections protocols in trial 2 replicated those used in trial 1. Results: In trial 1, the Bunnell group had 2 failures during cyclic loading while the Giftbox had no failures. The mean tendon gapping after cyclic loading was significantly lower in the Giftbox repairs (0.13 vs 2.29 mm, P = .02). Giftbox repairs were significantly stiffer than Bunnell (47.5 vs 38.7 N/mm, P = .019) and showed more tendon elongation (5.9 ± 0.8 vs 4.5 ± 1.0 mm, P = .012) after 1000 cycles. Mean clinical load to failure was significantly higher for Giftbox repairs (373 vs 285 N, P = .02), while no significant difference in catastrophic load to failure was observed (mean, 379 vs 336 N; P = .61). In trial 2, there were no failures during cyclic loading. The Giftbox + Fiberwire repairs recorded higher clinical load-to-failure values compared with Giftbox + Ultrabraid (mean, 361 vs 239 N; P = .005). No other biomechanical differences were observed in trial 2. Conclusion: Simulated early rehabilitation biomechanical testing showed that Giftbox-modified Krackow Achilles repair technique with Fiberwire suture was stronger and more resistant to gap formation at the repair site than combinations that incorporated the Bunnell stitch or Ultrabraid suture. Clinical Relevance: A more in-depth understanding of the biomechanical properties of the Giftbox repair will help inform surgical decision making because stronger repairs are less likely to fail during accelerated postoperative rehabilitation.

Biomechanical Evaluation of a Four-Strand Modification of the Tang Method of Tendon Repair

2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. CAO ◽  
J. B. TANG
Keyword(s):  
Ultimate Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Gap Formation ◽  
Single Cycle ◽  
Tensile Testing Machine ◽  
Load To Failure ◽  
Biomechanical Evaluation ◽  
Finger Motion ◽  
Initial Force

We report a four-strand modification of the Tang technique of tendon repair that uses fewer sutures and fewer knots on the tendon surface. This repair consists of four longitudinal and two horizontal strands that form a “U” configuration within the tendon made with a single looped suture. Thirty-four fresh pig flexor tendons were divided into 3 groups and repaired with the four-strand modified Tang method, a double-looped four-strand method or a double Kessler repair (four-strand). The tendons were subjected to a single cycle of load-to-failure test in a tensile testing machine. The initial force, 2-mm gap formation force and ultimate strength of the four-strand modified Tang repair were statistically identical to those of the double looped suture and were superior to those of the double Kessler repair. Ultimate strength was 43.4 ± 4.3 N for the four-strand modified Tang method, 45.2 ± 4.0 N for the double-looped method and 39.1 ± 4.0 N for the double Kessler repair. The four-strand modification of the Tang method appears to have strength sufficient for protected active finger motion. Given our preliminary clinical experience with this method, we recommend this new and simplified technique for clinical flexor tendon repairs.

Simplifying four-strand flexor tendon repair using double-stranded suture: a comparative ex vivo study on tensile strength and bulking

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. H. Low ◽  
T. S. Ahmad ◽  
E. S. Ng
Keyword(s):  
Tensile Strength ◽  
Flexor Tendon ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Flexor Digitorum Profundus ◽  
Flexor Tendon Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Load To Failure ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
Flexor Digitorum

We have compared a simple four-strand flexor tendon repair, the single cross-stitch locked repair using a double-stranded suture (dsSCL) against two other four-strand repairs: the Pennington modified Kessler with double-stranded suture (dsPMK); and the cruciate cross-stitch locked repair with single-stranded suture (Modified Sandow). Thirty fresh frozen cadaveric flexor digitorum profundus tendons were transected and repaired with one of the core repair techniques using identical suture material and reinforced with identical peripheral sutures. Bulking at the repair site and tendon–suture junctions was measured. The tendons were subjected to linear load-to-failure testing. Results showed no significant difference in ultimate tensile strength between the Modified Sandow (36.8 N) and dsSCL (32.6 N) whereas the dsPMK was significantly weaker (26.8 N). There were no significant differences in 2 mm gap force, stiffness or bulk between the three repairs. We concluded that the simpler dsSCL repair is comparable to the modified Sandow repair in tensile strength, stiffness and bulking.

scholarly journals Distal Triceps Tendon Injury

2022 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 263502542110445
Author(s):  
John R. Matthews ◽  
Ryan W. Paul ◽  
Kevin B. Freedman
Keyword(s):  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Eccentric Contraction ◽  
Tendon Injury ◽  
Acute Onset ◽  
Gap Formation ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Left Posterior ◽  
Tendon Ruptures ◽  
Triceps Tendon

Background: Triceps tendon ruptures typically result from a forceful elbow eccentric contraction. The goal of a distal triceps tendon repair is to reattach the torn tendon back to the olecranon. Surgery is indicated for patients with complete rupture of the triceps tendon or symptomatic partial tears with failed conservative management. The complication rate occurs in 22% of patients postoperatively; however, only 0% to 4% of patients suffer a re-rupture of the tendon. Indications: We present a case of a highly active 38-year-old right-hand dominant man with acute onset of left posterior elbow pain following 1-handed pushup resulting in a complete distal triceps avulsion with 1.5 cm retraction. Technique: The distal triceps avulsion was repaired in a double row fashion using 2 double-loaded all-suture anchors in the medial row and anchor in the lateral row through a posterior approach. Results: Full anatomic footprint coverage was able to be achieved intraoperatively, and gentle range of motion from 0 to 90 degrees of flexion did not result in gap formation. Discussion/Conclusion: Successful outcomes with full anatomic footprint coverage of the distal triceps tendon can be achieved through a double row repair configuration.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes and Cadaveric Biomechanical Analysis of Endoscopic Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair With Absorbable Suture

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 247301142096596
Author(s):  
Daniel Carpenter ◽  
Katherine Dederer ◽  
Paul Weinhold ◽  
Joshua N. Tennant
Keyword(s):  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Biomechanical Analysis ◽  
Absorbable Suture ◽  
Operative Repair ◽  
Repair Technique ◽  
Achilles Tendon Repair

Background: Percutaneous repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) continues to gain in popularity. The primary aim of the study was to review the outcomes of a patient cohort undergoing a novel technique of endoscopic percutaneous Achilles tendon repair with absorbable suture. A secondary purpose of this study was to evaluate the basic biomechanical properties of the technique. Methods: A cohort of 30 patients who underwent percutaneous ATR repair was retrospectively analyzed with Achilles Tendon Rupture Scores (ATRS), complications, and additional outcome measures. For a biomechanical analysis portion of the study, 12 cadaveric specimens were paired and randomized to either novel percutaneous repair or open Kessler repair with absorbable suture. These specimens were subjected to 2 phases of cyclical testing (100 cycles 10-43 N followed by 200 cycles 10-86 N) and ultimate strength testing. Results: In the clinical portion of the study we report excellent patient reported outcomes (mean ATRS 94.1), high level of return to sport, and high patient satisfaction. One partial re-rupture was reported but with no major wound or neurologic complications. In the biomechanical portion of the study we found no significant difference in tendon gapping between percutaneous and open repairs in phase 1 of testing. In phase 2, increased gapping occurred between percutaneous (17.8 mm [range 10.7-24.1, SD 6.4]) and open repairs (10.8 mm [range 7.6-14.9, SD 2.7, P = .037]). The ultimate load at failure was not statistically different between the 2 repairs. Conclusions: A percutaneous ATR repair technique using endoscopic assistance and absorbable suture demonstrated low complications and good outcomes in a cohort of patients, with high satisfaction, and excellent functional outcomes including high rates of return to sport. Cadaveric biomechanical testing demonstrated excellent survival during testing and minimal increase in gapping compared with open repair technique, representing sufficient strength to withstand forces seen in early rehabilitation. A percutaneous Achilles tendon repair technique with absorbable suture may minimize risks associated with operative repair while still maintaining the benefit of operative repair. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Effect of Supraspinatus Tendon Repair Technique on the Infraspinatus Tendon

2011 ◽  
Vol 133 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelly Andarawis-Puri ◽  
Andrew F. Kuntz ◽  
Matthew L. Ramsey ◽  
Louis J. Soslowsky
Keyword(s):  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Supraspinatus Tendon ◽  
Joint Rotation ◽  
Repair Technique ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Average Maximum ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tendon Strain ◽  
Tendon Insertion ◽  
Infraspinatus Tendon

Supraspinatus tendon tears are common and often propagate into larger tears that include the infraspinatus tendon, resulting in loss of function and increased pain. Previously, we showed that the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons mechanically interact through a range of rotation angles, potentially shielding the torn supraspinatus tendon from further injury while subjecting the infraspinatus tendon to increased risk of injury. Surgical repair of torn supraspinatus tendons is common, yet the effect of the repair on the infraspinatus tendon is unknown. Since we have established a relationship between strain in the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons the success of a supraspinatus tendon repair depends on its effect on the loading environment in the infraspinatus tendon. More specifically, the effect of transosseous supraspinatus tendon repair in comparison to one that utilizes suture anchors, as is commonly done with arthroscopic repairs, on this interaction through these joint positions will be evaluated. We hypothesize that at all joint positions evaluated, both repairs will restore the interaction between the two tendons. For both repairs, (1) increasing supraspinatus tendon load will increase infraspinatus tendon strain and (2) altering the rotation angle from internal to external will increase strain in the infraspinatus tendon. Strains were measured in the infraspinatus tendon insertion through a range of joint rotation angles and supraspinatus tendon loads, for the intact, transosseous, and suture anchor repaired supraspinatus tendons. Images corresponding to specific supraspinatus tendon loads were isolated for the infraspinatus tendon insertion for analysis. The effect of supraspinatus tendon repair on infraspinatus tendon strain differed with joint position. Altering the joint rotation did not change strain in the infraspinatus tendon for any supraspinatus tendon condition. Finally, increasing supraspinatus tendon load resulted in an increase in average maximum and decrease in average minimum principal strain in the infraspinatus tendon. There is a significant difference in infraspinatus tendon strain between the intact and arthroscopically (but not transosseous) repaired supraspinatus tendons that increases with greater loads. Results suggest that at low loads neither supraspinatus tendon repair technique subjects the infraspinatus tendon to potentially detrimental loads; however, at high loads, transosseous repairs may be more advantageous over arthroscopic repairs for the health of the infraspinatus tendon. Results emphasize the importance of limiting loading of the repaired supraspinatus tendon and that at low loads, both repair techniques restore the interaction to the intact supraspinatus tendon case.

scholarly journals Effects of Veneering Ceramic and Methods on Failure Load of Veneered Zirconia

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 2129
Author(s):  
Hattanas Kumchai ◽  
Patrapan Juntavee ◽  
Arthur F. Sun ◽  
Dan Nathanson
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ceramic ◽  
Failure Load ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Bending Test ◽  
Three Point Bending ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Load To Failure ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Feldspathic Porcelain ◽  
Post Hoc

Background: A variety of veneering options to zirconia frameworks are now available. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of veneer materials, veneering methods, cement materials, and aging on the failure load of bilayered veneer zirconia. Material and methods: Zirconia bars (20 × 4 × 1 mm) were veneered to 2 mm total thickness (n = 10/group). Veneering method groups included: 1. Hand-layered feldsparthic porcelain (VM = Vita VM9, Vident) and fluorapatite glass–ceramic (CR = IPS e.max Ceram, IvoclarVivadent); 2. Pressed feldspathic porcelain (PM = Vita PM9, Vident) and fluorapatite glass–ceramic (ZP = IPS e.max ZirPress, IvoclarVivadent); 3. CAD-/CAM-milled feldspathic ceramic (TF = Vitablocs Triluxe Forte, Vident) and lithium-disilicate glass–ceramic (CAD = IPS e.max CAD, IvoclarVivadent). CAD/CAM veneers were either cemented with resin cements (P = Panavia21, KurarayDental), (R = RelyX Ultimate, 3M ESPE), (M = Multilink Automix, Ivoclar Vivadent) or fused with fusion glass–ceramic (C = CrystalConnect, IvoclarVivadent). A three-point bending test (15 mm span, zirconia on tension side) was performed on Instron universal testing machine (ISO 6872) recording load-to-failure (LTF) of first veneer cracks or catastrophic failure. For group VM, PM, TF-M, TF-C, CAD-M, CAD-C, ten more bars were prepared and aged with cyclic loading (100,000 cycles, 50% LTF) and thermocycling (2000 cycles) before testing. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, Tukey HSD post hoc tests, and t-test (α = 0.05). Zirconia veneered with IPS e.max CAD by fusing had significantly higher failure load compared with zirconia veneered with other veneering materials. (p ≤ 0.05). For cemented veneers, the cement type had a significant effect on the failure load of the veneer zirconia specimens. Specimens cemented with Panavia 21 had a lower resistance to loading than other cements. The aging experiment revealed a significant difference in failure load between non-aged and aged bars in groups VM and PM, but not in the groups with CAD-/CAM-milled veneers. In conclusion, veneer materials, veneering methods, and cement materials have a significant effect on the failure load of bilayered veneer zirconia. CAD-/CAM-milled veneer zirconia is not susceptible to aging performed in this study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document