Maximal Pharmacologic Reduction of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Aesthetic Breast Surgery Under General Anesthesia

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 189-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauree NaShea Beard ◽  
Arup De

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a major patient dissatisfier in aesthetic ambulatory surgical patients. Limited data exist demonstrating single surgeon reduction in PONV after utilizing modern pharmacologic techniques for analgesia and PONV chemoprophylaxis for patients who receive general anesthesia. In our study, multimodal analgesia included pregabalin, oxycontin, ketamine, and opioids; PONV chemoprophylaxis included transdermal scopolamine, diphenhydramine, dexamethasone, and ondansetron. A treatment arm of 36 patients undergoing aesthetic breast surgery was evaluated prospectively and compared with a retrospective control group of 47 patients who underwent similar procedures in the prior year. The aggressive screening for PONV risk factors preoperatively and preemptive treatment resulted in an overall reduction in PONV rate from 31.9% to 5.6%.

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Reihan Shenasi ◽  
Hamzeh Hoseinzadeh ◽  
Hasan Mohammadpor-Anvari ◽  
Davod Aghamohammadi ◽  
Reza Sari-Motlagh

Bispectral index parameter is used to guide the titration of general anesthesia. This monitoring improves recovery times and hospital discharges, as well as minimizes adverse events. The objective of this study is the comparison of anesthesia depth monitoring by conventional and bispectral index on nausea and vomiting after urological surgery. 180 participants who were scheduled for abdominal urological surgery were studied. Patients before induction of anesthesia were randomize into two groups with and without bispectral index monitoring. Incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting were recorded every 30 minutes for 2 hours and every 6 hours to 24 hours after surgery. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in Bispectral index group is 14.4% and 8.9% and in control group 28.9% and 23.3%, respectively. The risk of nausea and vomiting after surgery was reduced by 14.5% and 14.4%, respectively in patients monitored with bispectral index.INTRODUCTIONNausea is the conscious perception of medulla stimulation that is associated with vomiting center and create vomiting response (1). General anesthesia with the use of inhalants can cause nausea and vomiting after surgery (Postoperative nausea and vomiting, PONV). The incidence of PONV is reported about 20-30 percent (2). It seems that multiple-factor can cause PONV and few items such as anesthetic drugs, kind of surgery and personal risk factors is effective on PONV. These factors make into two categories that includes factors out of control by anesthesiologists and factors can control by anesthesiologists.1. Factors out of control by anesthesiologists: some of these factors are age, gender, past history of PONV and motion sickness, smoking, kind of surgery, operating time and anesthesia time, anxiety of patients and parents. 2. Factors controlled by anesthesiologists: these factors are associated of anesthesia settings, including premedications, kind of anesthesia, anesthesia drugs during surPublishedby Australian


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-106
Author(s):  
Т. Ovsiienko ◽  
◽  
M. Bondar ◽  
O. Loskutov ◽  
◽  
...  

Postoperative nausea and vomiting are common adverse effects of anaesthesia and surgery. Up to 80% of patients may be affected. These outcomes are a major cause of patient dissatisfaction. In addition, postoperative nausea and vomiting can independently cause the occurrence of rather serious complications of the postoperative period, such as aspiration of gastric contents into the airways, hemodynamic disorders in patients with a compromised cardiovascular system, failure of surgical sutures, bleeding, dehydration and electrolyte imbalance which ultimately can lead to disability of patients, prolongation of their hospitalization and higher treatment costs. Material and methods. The paper presents the results of our own research on the use of multimodal low-opioid general anesthesia as one of the methods for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting during anesthetic provision of laparoscopic kidney surgery. The study involved 38 patients who underwent laparoscopic kidney surgery. Results and discussion. To compare the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 used multimodal general anesthesia with standard opioid doses, while group 2 used multimodal low-opioid general anesthesia. The total average dose of fentanyl that was used during the entire time of anesthesia in the control group was 373.3 ± 50.8 μg (4.34 μg / kg / h). The total average dose of fentanyl that was used during the entire time of anesthesia in the study group was 217.39 ± 49.1 μg (1.76 μg / kg / h). In group 1, vomiting occurred in 4 patients out of 15 in the postoperative period, in group 2 there were 4 patients with vomitting, but out of 23 operated patients. The standardized rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the control group was 26.6%, in the main group it was 17.3%. Conclusion. As a result of comparing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients of both study groups, we found that a decrease in the dose of perioperative use of opioids helps to reduce the incidence of this complication, which increased the safety of anesthetic management, greatly facilitated and accelerated the rehabilitation of patients after laparoscopic kidney surgery. The work also highlighted and systematized information on the morphology of structures involved in the formation of postoperative nausea and vomiting, on the physiology of this process


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Si-Qi Xu ◽  
Xia Ju ◽  
Sheng-Bin Wang ◽  
Sheng-Hong Hu ◽  
Qing Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background A few studies have manifested that intravenous (IV) lidocaine or dexmedetomidine decreased the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). We investigated whether lidocaine plus dexmedetomidine infusion could better reduce the incidence of PONV than placebo after laparoscopic total hysterectomy. Methods This prospective, randomized controlled study enrolled 126 women undergoing elective laparoscopic total hysterectomy with general anesthesia. They divided into the following two groups: patients in the lidocaine combined with dexmedetomidine group (group LD) received lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg loading, 1.5 mg/kg/h infusion) and dexmedetomidine (0.5 μg/kg loading, 0.4 μg/kg/h infusion), respectively. Patients in the control group (group CON) received the equal volume of saline. The primary outcome was the incidence of nausea, vomiting and PONV for the first 48 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes included intraoperative propofol and remifentanil consumption, postoperative fentanyl requirement, Ramsay sedation score, and the incidence of bradycardia during post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay period. Results Data of 59 in CON and 60 in LD groups were analyzed. The incidence of nausea, vomiting, and PONV in group LD during the 0 to 2 hours and 24 to 48 hours after the operation was slightly lower than group CON, but the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups. The incidence of nausea, vomiting, and PONV was much lower in group LD than group CON at 2 to 24 hours after surgery (P<0.05, P<0.01, P<0.01, respectively). The cumulative requirement of fentanyl during the first 48 hours after surgery was significantly reduced in group LD compared to group CON (P<0.01, P<0.01, P<0.05, respectively). Propofol and remifentanil total dose in the intraoperative period was significantly lower in group LD compared with group CON (P<0.01 and P<0.01). However, the level of sedation and incidence of bradycardia during the PACU stay period were markedly increased in group LD compared with group CON (P<0.01 and P<0.01). Conclusion Lidocaine plus dexmedetomidine infusion markedly decreased the occurrence of nausea, vomiting and PONV within the 2 to 24 hours after laparoscopic total hysterectomy with general anesthesia. However, it increased the incidence of bradycardia and the level of sedation during the PACU stay period.


2018 ◽  
Vol 128 (6) ◽  
pp. 1099-1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Kranke ◽  
Sergio D. Bergese ◽  
Harold S. Minkowitz ◽  
Timothy I. Melson ◽  
David G. Leiman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Postoperative nausea and vomiting causes distress for patients and can prolong care requirements. Consensus guidelines recommend use of multiple antiemetics from different mechanistic classes as prophylaxis in patients at high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The prophylactic efficacy of the dopamine D2/D3 antagonist amisulpride in combination with other antiemetics was investigated. Methods This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, international, multicenter trial was conducted in 1,147 adult surgical patients having three or four postoperative nausea and vomiting risk factors. Patients were randomized to receive either intravenous amisulpride (5 mg) or matching placebo at induction of general anesthesia, in addition to one standard, nondopaminergic antiemetic, most commonly ondansetron or dexamethasone. Vomiting/retching, nausea, and use of rescue medication were recorded for 24 h after wound closure. The primary endpoint was complete response, defined as no emesis or rescue medication use in the 24-h postoperative period. Results Complete response occurred in 330 of 572 (57.7%) of the amisulpride group and 268 of 575 (46.6%) of the control group (difference 11.1 percentage points; 95% CI, 5.3 to 16.8; P &lt; 0.001). The incidences of emesis (13.8% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.003), any nausea (50.0% vs. 58.3%, P = 0.002), significant nausea (37.1% vs. 47.7%, P &lt; 0.001), and rescue medication use (40.9% vs. 49.4%, P = 0.002) were significantly lower in the amisulpride group. Adverse events and laboratory and electrocardiogram abnormalities occurred no more frequently with amisulpride than with placebo. Conclusions Intravenous amisulpride was safe and effective as prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting when given in combination with an antiemetic from another class to adult patients at high risk for suffering postoperative nausea and vomiting undergoing elective surgery under inhalational general anesthesia.


Author(s):  
Sunil Arjan ◽  
Naila Zahoor ◽  
Kenza Nadeem ◽  
Farah Liaquat ◽  
Tariq Hussain Mughal ◽  
...  

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of Metoclopramide versus Dexamethasone for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting during general anesthesia. Study Design:This is a Randomized control trial (RCT) study. Setting: Study carried out at Department of Anaesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care Unit and Pain Management, Clinic, Dow University of Health Sciences and  Dr. Ruth Pfau  Hospital Karachi, from December 2018 to June 2019. Materials and Methods:110 patients undergoing elective surgeries, who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and gave informed consent were included in the study. They were randomly assigned to either group M or group D, with 55 patients in each group. All patients were then administered either intravenous dexamethasone (8mg) in group D or intravenous metoclopramide (10mg) in group M at the time of induction of anesthesia. The main outcome measure was postoperative nausea and vomiting, at the end of 6th hour postoperatively. The SPSS version 21 was applied to the data. Results: Majority of the patients 66 (60%) were of age 35 years or less. Mean age of the patients was 35.09±11.55 years. There were more females than males, with male to female ratio being 1:1.03. Overall, in patients receiving metoclopramide, 12(21.8%)  had postoperative nausea and vomiting, while in patients who received dexamethasone, only 4 (7.3%) patients had post-operative nausea and vomiting. When comparing two groups, there was statistically significant (p= 0.02) reduced postoperative nausea/vomiting among those patients who had received intravenous dexamethasone. Conclusion: Intravenous dexamethasone is more effective than Metoclopramide in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients during general anesthesia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document