Impact of a Systematic Pharmacist-Initiated Antibiotic Time-Out Intervention for Hospitalized Adults

2020 ◽  
pp. 089719002098061
Author(s):  
Calley M. Paulson ◽  
Jillian F. Handley ◽  
Thomas J. Dilworth ◽  
Dan Persells ◽  
Rachael Y. Prusi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Empiric Therapy ◽  
Group Differences ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Time Out ◽  
Intra Abdominal Infection ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Introduction: Antibiotic time-outs (ATO) are a recommended antimicrobial stewardship action, but data assessing their impact are lacking. This study investigated the impact of a systematic, pharmacist initiated ATO intervention. Methods: This pre-post study included inpatients on hospitalist and intensivist services receiving empiric antibiotics for ≥48 hours. The ATO was initiated by pharmacists after 48 hours of empiric therapy and the outcome was documented including antibiotic indication, plan, and duration. An electronic medical record (EMR) alert facilitated ATO completion and pharmacists and prescribers received education prior to implementation. The primary outcome was EMR documentation of an antibiotic plan by 72 hours. Secondary outcomes included antibiotic utilization and antibiotic therapy modifications by 2 hours. Results: 399 patients were included, 199 pre- and 200 post-intervention. The most common indications were pneumonia (32%), intra-abdominal infection (20%) and urinary tract infection (19%), with no between-group differences. EMR documentation of an antibiotic plan significantly improved in the post-intervention group (19% vs. 79%, p<0.0001) as did modifications to antibiotic therapy. The median duration of in-hospital antibiotic therapy was similar between groups (4.0 vs. 4.0 days, p = 0.2499). Approximately 45% of patients in each group received discharge antibiotics and median duration of discharge antibiotic therapy prescribed was reduced (7 vs. 5 days in the pre- and post-intervention groups, respectively; p = 0.0140). Discussion: Implementation of pharmacist initiated ATO was associated with improvements in supporting EMR documentation and antibiotic therapy modifications. These findings highlight an important role in which pharmacists can serve as part of a collaborative antibiotic stewardship team.

scholarly journals Reducing the use of empiric antibiotic therapy in COVID-19 on hospital admission

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha N. Pettit ◽  
Cynthia T. Nguyen ◽  
Alison K. Lew ◽  
Palak H. Bhagat ◽  
Allison Nelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Empiric Antibiotics ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Abstract Background Empiric antibiotics for community acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) are often prescribed to patients with COVID-19, despite a low reported incidence of co-infections. Stewardship interventions targeted at facilitating appropriate antibiotic prescribing for CABP among COVID-19 patients are needed. We developed a guideline for antibiotic initiation and discontinuation for CABP in COVID-19 patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of this intervention on the duration of empiric CABP antibiotic therapy among patients with COVID-19. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective, quasi-experimental study of adult patients admitted between 3/1/2020 to 4/25/2020 with COVID-19 pneumonia, who were initiated on empiric CABP antibiotics. Patients were excluded if they were initiated on antibiotics > 48 h following admission or if another source of infection was identified. The primary outcome was the duration of antibiotic therapy (DOT) prior to the guideline (March 1 to March27, 2020) and after guideline implementation (March 28 to April 25, 2020). We also evaluated the clinical outcomes (mortality, readmissions, length of stay) among those initiated on empiric CABP antibiotics. Results A total of 506 patients with COVID-19 were evaluated, 102 pre-intervention and 404 post-intervention. Prior to the intervention, 74.5% (n = 76) of patients with COVID-19 received empiric antibiotics compared to only 42% of patients post-intervention (n = 170), p < 0.001. The median DOT in the post-intervention group was 1.3 days shorter (p < 0.001) than the pre-intervention group, and antibiotics directed at atypical bacteria DOT was reduced by 2.8 days (p < 0.001). More patients in the post-intervention group were initiated on antibiotics based on criteria consistent with our guideline (68% versus 87%, p = 0.001). There were no differences between groups in terms of clinical outcomes. Conclusion Following the implementation of a guideline outlining recommendations for initiating and discontinuing antibiotics for CABP among COVID-19 inpatients, we observed a reduction in antibiotic prescribing and DOT. The guideline also resulted in a significant increase in the rate of guideline-congruent empiric antibiotic initiation.

scholarly journals Reducing the use of empiric antibiotic therapy in patients on admission to the hospital with COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha N. Pettit ◽  
Cynthia T. Nguyen ◽  
Alison Lew ◽  
Palak Bhagat ◽  
Allison Nelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Empiric Antibiotics ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Abstract Background: Empiric antibiotics for community acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) are often prescribed to patients with COVID-19, despite a low reported incidence of co-infections. Stewardship interventions targeted at facilitating appropriate antibiotic prescribing for CABP among COVID-19 patients are needed. We developed a guideline for antibiotic initiation and discontinuation for CABP in COVID-19 patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of this intervention on the duration of empiric CABP antibiotic therapy among patients with COVID-19. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, quasi-experimental study of adult patients admitted between 3/1/2020 to 4/25/2020 with COVID-19 pneumonia, who were initiated on empiric CABP antibiotics. Patients were excluded if they were initiated on antibiotics >48hours following admission or if another infection was identified. The primary outcome was the duration of antibiotic therapy (DOT) prior to the guideline (March 1 to March27, 2020) and after guideline implementation (March 28 to April 25, 2020). We also evaluated the clinical outcomes (mortality, readmissions, length of stay) among those initiated on empiric CABP antibiotics. Results: A total of 506 patients with COVID-19 were evaluated, 102 pre-intervention and 404 post-intervention. Prior to the intervention, 74.5% (n=76) of patients with COVID-19 received empiric antibiotics compared to only 42% of patients post-intervention (n=170), p<0.001. The median DOT in the post-intervention group was 1.3 days shorter (p<0.001) than the pre-intervention group, and atypical antibiotic DOT was reduced by 2.8 days (p<0.001). More patients in the post-intervention group were initiated on antibiotics based on criteria consistent with our guideline (68% versus 87%, p=0.001). There were no differences between groups in terms of clinical outcomes. Conclusion: Following the implementation of a guideline outlining recommendations for initiating and discontinuing antibiotics for CABP among COVID-19 inpatients, we observed a reduction in antibiotic prescribing and DOT. The guideline also resulted in a significant increase in the rate of guideline-congruent empiric antibiotic initiation.

scholarly journals Reducing the use of empiric antibiotic therapy in patients on admission to the hospital with COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha N. Pettit ◽  
Cynthia T. Nguyen ◽  
Alison Lew ◽  
Palak B. Bhagat ◽  
Allison Nelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Empiric Antibiotics ◽  
Empiric Antibiotic ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Abstract Background: Empiric antibiotics for community acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) are often prescribed to patients with COVID-19, despite a low reported incidence of co-infections. Stewardship interventions targeted at facilitating appropriate antibiotic prescribing for CABP among COVID-19 patients are needed. We developed a guideline for antibiotic initiation and discontinuation for CABP in COVID-19 patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of this intervention on the duration of empiric CABP antibiotic therapy among patients with COVID-19.Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, quasi-experimental study of adult patients admitted between 3/1/2020 to 4/25/2020 with COVID-19 pneumonia, who were initiated on empiric CABP antibiotics. Patients were excluded if they were initiated on antibiotics >48hours following admission or if another infection was identified. The primary outcome was the duration of antibiotic therapy (DOT) prior to the guideline (March 1 to March27, 2020) and after guideline implementation (March 28 to April 25, 2020). We also evaluated the clinical outcomes (mortality, readmissions, length of stay) among those initiated on empiric CABP antibiotics.Results: A total of 506 patients with COVID-19 were evaluated, 102 pre-intervention and 404 post-intervention. Prior to the intervention, 74.5% (n=76) of patients with COVID-19 received empiric antibiotics compared to only 42% of patients post-intervention (n=170), p<0.001. The median DOT in the post-intervention group was 1.3 days shorter (p<0.001) than the pre-intervention group, and atypical antibiotic DOT was reduced by 2.8 days (p<0.001). More patients in the post-intervention group were initiated on antibiotics based on criteria consistent with our guideline (68% versus 87%, p=0.001). There were no differences between groups in terms of clinical outcomes.Conclusion: Following the implementation of a guideline outlining recommendations for initiating and discontinuing antibiotics for CABP among COVID-19 inpatients, we observed a reduction in antibiotic prescribing and DOT. The guideline also resulted in a significant increase in the rate of guideline-congruent empiric antibiotic initiation.

scholarly journals 87. Utilization of Methicillin-Sensitive/Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nares Screen to Decrease Vancomycin and Linezolid Use in Hospitalized Patients with Respiratory Infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S60-S60
Author(s):  
Noor F Zaidan ◽  
Rachel S Britt ◽  
David Reynoso ◽  
R Scott Ferren
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Screening Protocol ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Abstract Background Pharmacist-driven protocols for utilization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares screenings have shown to decrease duration of empiric gram-positive therapy and rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with respiratory infections. This study evaluated the impact of a pharmacist-driven MRSA nares screening protocol on duration of vancomycin or linezolid therapy (DT) in respiratory infections. Methods Patients aged 18 years and older with a medication order of vancomycin or linezolid for respiratory indication(s) were included. The MRSA nares screening protocol went into effect in October 2019. The protocol allowed pharmacists to order an MRSA nares polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for included patients, while the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) made therapeutic recommendations for de-escalation of empiric gram-positive coverage based on negative MRSA nares screenings, if clinically appropriate. Data for the pre-intervention group was collected retrospectively for the months of October 2018 to March 2019. The post-intervention group data was collected prospectively for the months of October 2019 to March 2020. Results Ninety-seven patients were evaluated within both the pre-intervention group (n = 50) and post-intervention group (n = 57). Outcomes for DT (38.2 hours vs. 30.9 hours, P = 0.601) and AKI (20% vs. 14%, P = 0.4105) were not different before and after protocol implementation. A subgroup analysis revealed a significant reduction in DT within the pre- and post-MRSA PCR groups (38.2 hours vs. 24.8 hours, P = 0.0065) when pharmacist recommendations for de-escalation were accepted. Conclusion A pharmacist-driven MRSA nares screening protocol did not affect the duration of gram-positive therapy for respiratory indications. However, there was a reduction in DT when pharmacist-driven recommendations were accepted. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Assessment of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Prescribing and Monitoring Pre- and Post-Implementation of a Pharmacy Protocol at a Community Teaching Hospital

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Miele ◽  
Mary Taylor ◽  
Aditi Shah
Keyword(s):  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Appropriate Prescribing ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group ◽  
Community Teaching

Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become popular alternatives to vitamin K antagonists for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic diseases; however, there are limited data regarding the appropriate use of DOACs in clinical practice. To ensure safety and efficacy of these medications, it is important that decisions regarding their use in patients rely on the available evidence. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of DOAC prescribing in adult patients before and after the implementation of a pharmacist-driven DOAC protocol. Methods Data were collected on adult patients admitted to a community teaching hospital who received DOAC therapy for at least 2 days between January and March 2015 (pre-intervention group) and between January and March 2016 (post-intervention group). These data were analyzed to measure inappropriately prescribed DOACs, defined based on DOAC indication, renal function, drug interactions, and other pertinent patient-specific factors. Prior to the start of data collection for the post-intervention group, a pharmacist-driven protocol was developed and implemented. DOAC education was provided to pharmacists, including an evidence-based prescribing table to guide appropriate DOAC therapy. Comparisons were made between the pre-intervention and post-intervention groups to determine the impact of the pharmacist-driven service on appropriate DOAC prescribing. Results Fifty patients were analyzed in the pre-intervention group compared with 85 patients in the post-intervention group, with a total of 333 and 816 doses administered, respectively. Of the total doses administered, 32.4% were considered inappropriate in the pre-intervention group compared with 13.8% in the post-intervention group (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.42, 95% CI, 0.19-0.96; p = 0.039). Conclusions Implementing a pharmacist-driven DOAC service significantly improved appropriate prescribing of these agents. Provider education regarding DOAC use is essential to further increase appropriate prescribing of DOACs, optimize patients' therapy, and prevent adverse drug events.

scholarly journals An Electronic Alert for HIV Screening in the Emergency Department Increases Screening but not the Diagnosis of HIV

2014 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
pp. 299-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Liu ◽  
J. Sperling ◽  
R. Green ◽  
S. Clark ◽  
D. Vawdrey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
New York ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Hiv Test ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

SummaryObjective: Based on US. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations, New York State enacted legislation in 2010 requiring healthcare providers to offer non-targeted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing to all patients aged 13–64. Three New York City adult emergency departments implemented an electronic alert that required clinicians to document whether an HIV test was offered before discharging a patient. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of the electronic alert on HIV testing rates and diagnosis of HIV positive individuals.Methods: During the pre-intervention period (2.5–4 months), an electronic “HIV Testing” order set was available for clinicians to order a test or document a reason for not offering the test (e.g., patient is not conscious). An electronic alert was then added to enforce completion of the order set, effectively preventing ED discharge until an HIV test was offered to the patient. We analyzed data from 79,786 visits, measuring HIV testing and detection rates during the pre-intervention period and during the six months following the implementation of the alert.Results: The percentage of visits where an HIV test was performed increased from 5.4% in the pre-intervention period to 8.7% (p<0.001) after the electronic alert. After the implementation of the electronic alert, there was a 61% increase in HIV tests performed per visit. However, the percentage of patients testing positive per total patients-tested was slightly lower in the post-intervention group than the pre-intervention group (0.48% vs. 0.55%), but this was not significant. The number of patients-testing positive per total-patient visit was higher in the post-intervention group (0.04% vs. 0.03%).Conclusions: An electronic alert which enforced non-targeted screening was effective at increasing HIV testing rates but did not significantly increase the detection of persons living with HIV. The impact of this electronic alert on healthcare costs and quality of care merits further examination.Citation: Schnall R, Liu N, Sperling J, Green R, Clark S, Vawdrey D. An electronic alert for HIV screening in the emergency department increases screening but not the diagnosis of HIV. Appl Clin Inf 2014; 5: 299–312 http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2013-09-RA-0075

scholarly journals 143. Modification of Linezolid Restriction Criteria Reduces ICU Gram-positive Antibiotic Consumption

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S201-S202
Author(s):  
John M Boulos ◽  
Kathryn DeSear ◽  
Bethany Shoulders ◽  
Veena Venugopalan ◽  
Stacy A Voils ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Abstract Background Antibiotic time out (ATO) policies have been proposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to limit unnecessary use of antibiotics. Critically ill patients are often treated empirically with MRSA-active agents for a prolonged duration. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of an ATO policy by targeting empiric gram-positive coverage. Methods Before this intervention, linezolid required pre-approval by the antimicrobial stewardship program or infectious diseases (ID) consult service before dispensing, and no automatic ATO policy was in place for any agent. In 2018, restriction of linezolid was modified to allow 72 hours of empiric use in the intensive care unit (ICU). This retrospective, single-center, pre- post-intervention study looked at eight ICUs at our institution from two equal periods. Adults (age ≥ 18 years) were included who received an IV gram-positive antibiotic (IVGP-AB), specifically linezolid or vancomycin, used for empiric therapy and were admitted to the ICU. The primary outcome was antimicrobial consumption of IVGP-AB defined as days of therapy (DOT) per patient. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, in-hospital mortality, 30-day readmission, and incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). Figure 1. Flowchart of patient inclusion into the study Results 2718 patients met criteria for inclusion in the study. 1091 patients were included in the pre-intervention group and 1627 patients were included in the post-intervention group. Baseline characteristics between the two groups were similar, with ID consults being higher in the pre-intervention group. Total mean DOT of IVGP-AB in pre- and- post-intervention groups was 4.97 days vs. 4.36 days, p&lt; 0.01. Secondary outcomes of in-hospital LOS, ICU LOS, and in-hospital mortality did not vary significantly between groups. Thirty-day readmission was lower in the post-intervention group (12.9% vs. 3.9%, p&lt; 0.01). AKI did not differ significantly between groups, however the need for renal replacement therapy was higher in the pre-intervention group (1.2% vs. 0.2%, p&lt; 0.01). Conclusion This study assessed the impact of an ATO policy allowing 72 hours of empiric linezolid in the ICU. We found a statistically significant reduction in days of therapy of IVGP-AB without increases in LOS, mortality, readmission, and AKI. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 1981. Implementation of an Antifungal Stewardship Bundle Focused on Candidemia in an Indian Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S663-S663
Author(s):  
Merlin Moni ◽  
Vidya Menon ◽  
Sangita Sudhir ◽  
Dipu T.S. ◽  
Jeslyn Philip ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Antifungal Therapy ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Southern India ◽  
Care Bundle ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Historical Cohort ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Abstract Background In India, Candida bloodstream infections have a reported incidence of 1–12 per 1,000 admissions and a mortality rate of up to 60%. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) can improve quality of care and clinical outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of a comprehensive candidemia ASP bundle in a hospital in southern India with an established stewardship program. Methods A single-center, pre-post quasi-experimental study was conducted at a tertiary-care center in southern India to analyze the impact of an ASP care bundle for the management of adults with candidemia. During the intervention period (October 2017–December 2018), the ASP provided recommendations to providers in accordance with the 2016 IDSA Guidelines for the Management of Candidemia, which included the following bundle: (1) appropriate selection and dosing of antifungal therapy; (2) repeat blood cultures every 48 hours until clearance; (3) removal of central venous catheters and other potential removable foci of infection; (4) echocardiogram; (5) ophthalmologic evaluation; and (6) appropriate duration of therapy. The primary outcome was initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy. Additional clinical outcomes were also compared with a historical cohort. Results One hundred and four patients with candidemia were included: 52 in the pre-intervention and 52 in the post-intervention group. Overall, baseline demographics were similar between the two groups (Table 1). Candida tropicalis (26.9%) and Candida parapsilosis (29.8%) were the most common causes of candidemia in the cohort. Following intervention, administration of appropriate antifungal therapy improved by 40.4% (28.8% pre vs. 69.2% post, P < 0.01). Average time to effective treatment initiation following culture positivity decreased from 57.6 hours to 12 hours in the post-intervention group (P < 0.01). Thirty-day all-cause mortality was similar between the two groups (34.6% 38.4%, P = 0.84). Conclusion Implementation of a comprehensive candidemia care bundle by the ASP significantly improved the use and timing of initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

The DOOR to Antibiotic Stewardship: Refining Assessments of Interventions With Desirability of Outcome Ranking

2021 ◽  
pp. 089719002098713
Author(s):  
Steven M. Smoke ◽  
Vishal V. Patel ◽  
Nicole I. Leonida
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Molecular Diagnostic ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Appropriate Therapy ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Background: Limited sample size and disparate outcome measures can hinder the ability of antimicrobial stewardship programs to assess the utility of their quality improvement interventions. Desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) is a novel methodology that incorporates multiple outcomes into a single value to more comprehensively compare therapeutic strategies. The objective of this study was to apply DOOR to a single center antibiotic stewardship intervention. Methods: A pre- and post-interventional study was conducted evaluating the impact of prospective pharmacist review of rapid molecular diagnostic testing (RDT) of blood cultures on antibiotic optimization. Outcomes included the percentage of patients who were switched to appropriate therapy, the time to appropriate therapy, and the percentage of patients who had missed de-escalation opportunities. Results: A total of 19 and 29 patients were included in the final analysis. The percentage of patients reaching appropriate therapy was 84% (16/19) and 97% ([28/29], p = 0.16) in the pre-intervention and post-intervention groups respectively. Median time to appropriate therapy was 26 hours and 36 minutes (IQR 13:05-50:45) and 22:40 (IQR 3:42-48:23, p = 0.32), respectively. One missed de-escalation opportunity was identified in the post-intervention group (0% vs 3%, p = 1.00). DOOR analysis indicated that the probability of a better outcome for the post-intervention group than the pre-intervention group was 58% (95% CI 54-62). Conclusion: In this analysis, DOOR revealed a benefit that would not have been apparent with traditional outcomes assessments. Antimicrobial stewardship programs conducting quality improvement studies should consider incorporating DOOR into their methodology.

scholarly journals Impact of a Pharmacist-Driven Respiratory Viral Panel Stewardship Program on Antibiotic Exposure Within a Multicenter Community Health System

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S353-S353
Author(s):  
Ashley Cubillos ◽  
Sandy Estrada ◽  
Harrison Bachmeier ◽  
Edgar Turner
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Antibiotic Exposure ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Laboratory Test Results ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Post Intervention Group

Abstract Background Strategies to ensure optimal use of multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) testing results for antimicrobial stewardship in acute respiratory infections remain to be elucidated. This study sought to assess the impact of pharmacist intervention (by means of prospective feedback to prescribers) on overall antibiotic exposure in patients with viral-positive mPCR Respiratory Viral Panel (RVP) laboratory test results. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients ≥18 years of age admitted to an acute care hospital with a viral-positive nasopharyngeal FilmArray Respiratory Panel test result receiving antibiotics for a suspected respiratory tract infection. Immunocompromised patients, patients with RVP samples from bronchiolar lavage, patients in the intensive care unit when samples were obtained, and patients receiving antibiotics for non-respiratory infections were excluded. Antibiotic exposure days, antibiotic discontinuation at 72 hours, and culture-positive bacterial superinfection were compared in two cohorts of patients, before and after the rollout of an educational pharmacist RVP stewardship initiative. Results Median antibiotic exposure days did not differ between the pre- and post-intervention groups (6 days vs. 7 days, P = 0.20). Antibiotic discontinuation at 72 hours was significantly lower in the post-intervention group (38% vs. 25%, P = 0.02). More patients in the post-intervention group had positive bacterial respiratory cultures (2.7% vs. 10%, P = 0.007) and chest radiographs suggestive of pneumonia (34.7% vs. 46%, P = 0.05). Patients with peak serum procalcitonin levels &lt;0.25 ng/mL were more likely to have antibiotics discontinued at 72 hours than those with peak levels ≥0.25 ng/mL (36% vs. 0%, P = 0.02). Conclusion An antimicrobial stewardship initiative by pharmacists among patients with viral-positive RVP results did not appear to impact antibiotic exposure days. Serum procalcitonin levels appeared to influence antibiotic discontinuation decisions. Alternative strategies for maximizing the antimicrobial stewardship impact of RVP testing should be explored. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document