Perceived Formal and Informal Sanctions in Deterring Cybercrime in a College Sample

2021 ◽  
pp. 104398622110016
Author(s):  
Adam M. Bossler

The threat of formal sanctions is the criminal justice system’s primary tool to discourage online and offline deviant behavior. Yet, scholars have expressed strong concerns about the effectiveness of formal sanctions to deter cybercrime. Even more surprising is the sparsity of deterrence research in the cybercrime literature. This study examined the effects of perceived formal and informal sanctions on digital piracy, computer hacking, and online harassment in a large American college sample. Perceived formal sanctions was negatively correlated with software piracy, media piracy, password cracking, accessing accounts, sending mean messages privately online, and posting mean messages. Higher levels of perceived formal sanctions did not significantly predict any form of cybercrime, however, when controlling for informal sanctions and deviant peer associations. The implications of the findings for our ability to deter deviant behavior in cyberspace are explored.

Author(s):  
Farah Focquaert ◽  
Kristof Van Assche ◽  
Sigrid Sterckx

A wide variety of medications and neuromodulation techniques are being investigated to manage risk factors for deviant behavior. If certain neurointerventions can restore impaired moral decision-making and behavior in offenders, should the criminal justice system be permitted to use such neurointerventions and, if so, under which conditions? In this chapter, the authors argue that it can be ethical to offer neurointerventions to offenders as a condition of probation, parole, or sentence reduction, provided that the fulfillment of five minimal ethical conditions is verified on a case-by-case basis. The authors further argue that forcing neurointerventions as part of an offender’s sentence or as a postprison requirement is both ethically and practically problematic, with the possible exception of benign neurointerventions without side effects.


2020 ◽  
pp. 146144482091312
Author(s):  
Sarita Schoenebeck ◽  
Oliver L Haimson ◽  
Lisa Nakamura

Most content moderation approaches in the United States rely on criminal justice models that sanction offenders via content removal or user bans. However, these models write the online harassment targets out of the justice-seeking process. Via an online survey with US participants ( N = 573), this research draws from justice theories to investigate approaches for supporting targets of online harassment. We uncover preferences for banning offenders, removing content, and apologies, but aversion to mediation and adjusting targets’ audiences. Preferences vary by identities (e.g. transgender participants on average find more exposure to be undesirable; American Indian or Alaska Native participants on average find payment to be unfair) and by social media behaviors (e.g. Instagram users report payment as just and fair). Our results suggest that a one-size-fits-all approach will fail some users while privileging others. We propose a broader theoretical and empirical landscape for supporting online harassment targets.


2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (11) ◽  
pp. 1533-1555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Holt ◽  
Jordana N. Navarro ◽  
Shelly Clevenger

Criminological research has demonstrated the significant relationship between deviant peer associations, a lack of self-control, and individual delinquency. These relationships also account for involvement in cybercrime, though these results are based largely on adult samples. There is less research considering juvenile offending online, particularly examining involvement in property-based offenses such as computer hacking. This study utilized an international sample of 48,327 juvenile respondents in the Second International Self-Report of Delinquency (ISRD-2) study to examine the role of gender as a moderating factor in the relationship between deviant peer associations, self-control, opportunity, and self-reported computer hacking behavior. The findings demonstrated different correlates associated with hacking for males and females, as well as differences on the basis of urban and rural residency.


First Monday ◽  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn C. Seigfried-Spellar ◽  
Siddharth S. Chowdhury

Trolling on the Internet is a form of deviant behavior that borderlines cyberharassment. A specific type of trolling behavior involving individuals posting rude/harassing comments on online memorial pages is known as RIP or memorial page trolling. This study compared the personality traits of self-reported RIP trolls to other trolls who did not engage in RIP trolling (non-RIP trolls); 30 respondents were classified as RIP trolls and 119 respondents as non-RIP trolls. Results indicated RIP trolls scored significantly lower on conscientiousness and internal moral values compared to non-RIP trolls. Overall, trolls are not a homogenous group; further supporting the need for future research to explore individual differences within the trolling community. By understanding the personality and morality differences between trolls and non-trolls, we may be able to identify those individuals at risk for engaging in different forms of online harassment.


2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (12) ◽  
pp. 1543-1569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooke Miller ◽  
Robert G. Morris

The current study examines the differential influence of face-to-face and virtual peers in predicting digital and traditional offending among college students through the lens of social learning theory (SLT). SLT components are explored to discern whether the theory holds for virtual peers, as it has for face-to-face peers using a structural equation modeling framework, thus making a substantial contribution to the social learning literature. Findings provide some support for SLT for both virtual only peers and the face-to-face peers model in relation to digital as well as traditional offending. In addition, findings suggest that virtual peer associations may be as important as traditional peer associations in explaining certain types of deviant behavior.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel P. Mears ◽  
Joshua C. Cochran
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick T. Davis
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document