The Effect of Prearrest Acid-Base Status on Response to Sodium Bicarbonate and Achievement of Return of Spontaneous Circulation

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110383
Author(s):  
Heath Mclean ◽  
Lindsey Wells ◽  
Jacob Marler
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Sodium Bicarbonate ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Pulseless Electrical Activity ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Acid Base ◽  
Epinephrine Administration ◽  
Return Of Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Acid Base Status ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background The efficacy of sodium bicarbonate (SB) administration during in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) for treatment of acidosis is not well described. The available literature has only evaluated out-of-hospital arrest events in patients with suspected acidosis caused by prolonged arrest. Objective This study evaluated SB and its effects on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in patients experiencing IHCA, based on presence of acidosis at baseline as determined by prearrest bicarbonate levels. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who all received intravenous SB during IHCA. Patients with prearrest bicarbonate levels >21 mmol/L (nonacidotic group) were compared with those with prearrest bicarbonate levels ≤21 mmol/L (acidotic group) for the primary outcome of ROSC. Results A total of 225 patients (102 acidotic, 123 nonacidotic) were evaluated. Asystole (37.3% vs 34.1%; P = 0.63) and pulseless electrical activity (30.4% vs 29.3%; P = 0.85) were the most common presenting rhythms. There were no differences in ROSC in the overall population (53.9% vs 48.8%; P = 0.44) or between those who had early (within 20 minutes) or delayed (after 20 minutes) ROSC. Secondary outcomes, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration, epinephrine administration, and total SB, were similar between groups. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, administration of SB for IHCA in patients with prearrest acidosis was not associated with increased incidence of ROSC compared with those without prearrest acidosis. Our data suggest that there may be no benefit to the administration of SB in the setting of IHCA, regardless of prearrest acidotic status. Further investigation into the effect of SB for treatment of acidosis in IHCA is warranted.

Abstract 232: Delayed Administration of Epinephrine is Associated with Worse Neurological Outcomes in Patients with Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest and Initial Pulseless Electrical Activity

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Enzan ◽  
Ken-ichi Hiasa ◽  
Kenzo Ichimura ◽  
Masaaki Nishihara ◽  
Takeshi Iyonaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Electrical Activity ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Pulseless Electrical Activity ◽  
Cubic Spline ◽  
Epinephrine Administration ◽  
Neurological Outcomes ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: Delayed administration of epinephrine has been proven to worsen the neurological outcomes of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and initial shockable rhythm. We aimed to investigate whether delayed administration of epinephrine might also worsen the neurological outcomes of patients with witnessed OHCA and initial pulseless electrical activity (PEA). Methods: The Japanese Association for Acute Medicine - out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (JAAM-OHCA) Registry is a multicenter, prospective, observational registry including 34,754 OHCA patients between 2014 and 2017. The present study assessed the impact of the time to epinephrine administration on neurological outcomes in patients with witnessed non-traumatic OHCA with initial rhythm of PEA. The primary outcome was defined as Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) Scale 1-2 at 30 days after OHCA. The association between the odds ratio for the primary outcome and the time from witnessed OHCA to epinephrine administration was assessed with a restricted cubic spline analysis. Results: Out of 34,754 patients with OHCA, 3,050 patients with OHCA and initial PEA who received epinephrine were included in the present study. Mean age was 73.7 years and 1836 (60.2%) was male. After adjusting for potential confounders, the time from witnessed OHCA to epinephrine administration was associated with lower likelihood of favorable neurological outcomes (odds ratio [OR] 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.96; P<0.001). The restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrated that delayed epinephrine administration could decrease the likelihood of a favorable neurological outcome; this was significant within the first 10 minutes. Conclusions: Delayed administration of epinephrine was associated with worse neurological outcomes in patients with witnessed OHCA patients with initial PEA.

scholarly journals Use of sodium bicarbonate in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed S. Alshahrani ◽  
Hassan W. Aldandan
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Sodium Bicarbonate ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Return Of Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Neurological Outcomes ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a common cause of death worldwide (Neumar et al., Circulation 122:S729–S767, 2010), affecting about 300,000 persons in the USA on an annual basis; 92% of them die (Roger et al., Circulation 123:e18–e209, 2011). The existing evidence about the use of sodium bicarbonate (SB) for the treatment of cardiac arrest is controversial. We performed this study to summarize the evidence about the use of SB in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods We searched PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, until June 2019, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that used SB in patients with OHCA. Outcomes of interest were the rate of survival to discharge, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), sustained ROSC, and good neurological outcomes at discharge. Odds ratio (OR) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled in a random or fixed meta-analysis model. Results A total of 14 studies (four RCTs and 10 observational studies) enrolling 28,412 patients were included; of them, eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled estimate did not favor SB or control in terms of survival rate at discharge (OR= 0.66, 95% CI [0.18, 2.44], p=0.53) and ROSC rate (OR= 1.54, 95% CI [0.38, 6.27], p=0.54), while the pooled estimate of two studies showed that SB was associated with less sustained ROSC (OR= 0.27, 95% CI [0.07, 0.98], p=0.045) and good neurological outcomes at discharge (OR= 0.12, 95% CI [0.09, 0.15], p<0.01). Conclusion The current evidence demonstrated that SB was not superior to the control group in terms of survival to discharge and return of spontaneous circulation. Further, SB was associated with lower rates of sustained ROSC and good neurological outcomes.

scholarly journals The effects of cardiac arrest recognition by dispatcher on Smart Advanced Life Support

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 286-292
Author(s):  
Choung Ah Lee ◽  
Gi Woon Kim ◽  
Yu Jin Kim ◽  
Hyung Jun Moon ◽  
Yong Jin Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Advanced Cardiac Life Support ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Good Neurological Outcome ◽  
Epinephrine Administration ◽  
Return Of Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of cardiac arrest recognition by emergency medical dispatch on the pre-hospital advanced cardiac life support and to investigate the outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Method: This study was conducted to evaluate the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients over 18 years of age, excluding trauma and poisoning patients, from 1 August 2015 to 31 July 2016. We investigated whether it was a cardiac-arrest recognition at dispatch. We compared the pre-hospital return of spontaneous circulation, the rate of survival admission and discharge, good neurological outcome, and also analyzed the time of securing vein, time of first epinephrine administration, and arrival time of paramedics. Results: A total of 3695 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients occurred during the study period, and 1468 patients were included in the study. Resuscitation rate by caller was significantly higher in the recognition group. The arrival interval between the first and second emergency service unit was shorter as 5.1 min on average, and the connection rate of paramedics and physicians before the arrival was 32.3%, which was significantly higher than that of the unrecognized group. The mean time required to first epinephrine administration was 13.1 min, which was significantly faster in the recognition group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in patients with good neurological outcome, and rather the rate of return of spontaneous circulation and survival discharge was significantly higher in the non-recognition group. Conclusion: Although the recognition of cardiac arrest at dispatch does not directly affect survival rate and good neurological outcome, the activation of pre-hospital advanced cardiac life support and the shortening the time of epinephrine administration can increase pre-hospital return of spontaneous circulation. Therefore, effort to increase recognition by dispatcher is needed.

Effect of prehospital intraosseous combined with in-hospital intravenous access in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Epinephrine Administration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Epinephrine Dose ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Objective: Obtaining vascular access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is challenging. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of prehospital intraosseous infusion (IO) combined with in-hospital intravenous (IV) (pre-IO + in-IV) access versus the simple IV (pre-IV + in-IV) access in adult OHCA patients who do not achieve prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Methods: This retrospective observational study included adults with OHCA of presumed cardiac etiology between October 1, 2017-October 1, 2020 at an academic emergency department in China. All of the OHCA patients included within the study had Emergency Medical Services cardiopulmonary resuscitation and received prehospital epinephrine administration, but did not achieve prehospital ROSC. The study population were classified as either pre-IO + in-IV or IV (pre-IV + in-IV) based on their epinephrine administration route. The prehospital epinephrine routes were the first and only attempted route. The primary outcome investigated was sustained ROSC following arrival at the emergency department. The secondary outcome considered was the time from dispatch to the first epinephrine dose. Results: Of 193 included adult OHCA subjects who did not have prehospital ROSC, 128 received IV access only. The 65 pre-IO + in-IV-treated patients received epinephrine faster compared to IV-treated patients in terms of the median time from dispatch to the first injection of epinephrine (14.5 vs. 16.0 min, P = 0.001). In the pre-IO + in-IV group, 34 of 65 patients (52.3%) achieved sustained ROSC compared with 65 of 128 (50.8%) patients in the IV group (χ2 = 0.031, P = 0.841). There was no significant difference in sustained ROSC (adjusted OR1.049, 95% CI: 0.425-2.591, P = 0.918) between the two groups. Conclusion: A similar sustained ROSC rate was achieved for both the pre-IO + in-IV access group and the simple IV access group. Our results suggested that an IV route should be established quickly for prehospital IO-treated OHCA patients who do not achieve prehospital ROSC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document