scholarly journals IV Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex in Patients Hospitalized Due to Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency

2022 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 107424842110556
Author(s):  
Itay Borreda ◽  
Robert Zukermann ◽  
Danny Epstein ◽  
Erez Marcusohn
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Iron Deficiency ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
High Risk Patient ◽  
Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Ferric Carboxymaltose ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Standard Medical Therapy ◽  
History Of

Background: Patients suffering from heart failure (HF) and iron deficiency (ID) have worse outcomes. Treatment with intra-venous (IV) ferric carboxymaltose has been shown to reduce HF rehospitalizations and to improve functional capacity and symptoms in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, IV ferric carboxymaltose is significantly more expensive than IV sodium ferric gluconate complex (SFGC) limiting its availability to most HF patients around the globe. Methods: A retrospective analysis comparing patients admitted to internal medicine or cardiology departments between January 2013 to December 2018 due to acute decompensated HF (ADHF) and treated with or without IV SFGC on top of standard medical therapy. Results: During the study period, a total of 1863 patients were hospitalized due to ADHF with either HFrEF or HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Among them, 840 patients had laboratory evidence of iron deficiency (absolute or functional) and met the inclusion criteria. One hundred twenty-two of them (14.5%) were treated with IV SFGC during the index hospitalization. Patients treated with IV iron were more likely to have history of ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and chronic kidney disease. The rate of readmissions due to ADHF was similar between the groups at 30 days, 3 months, and 1 year. Conclusion: High risk patient hospitalized to ADHF and treated with IV SFGC showed comparable ADHF readmission rates, compared to those who did not receive iron supplementation.

scholarly journals Iron Deficiency in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Beale ◽  
Davis Carballo ◽  
Jerome Stirnemann ◽  
Nicolas Garin ◽  
Thomas Agoritsas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Iron Deficiency ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Ferritin Level ◽  
Transferrin Saturation ◽  
Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Tertiary Center ◽  
High Prevalence

The aim of this study was to characterize iron deficiency (ID) in acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and identify whether ID is associated with dyspnea class, length of stay (LOS), biomarker levels, and echocardiographic indices of diastolic function in patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Consecutive patients admitted with ADHF at a single tertiary center were included. Demographic information, pathology investigations, and metrics regarding hospital stay and readmission were recorded. Patients were classified as having ‘absolute’ ID if they had a ferritin level <100 ng/mL; or ‘functional’ ID if they had a ferritin 100–200 ng/mL and a transferrin saturation <20%. Of 503 patients that were recruited, 270 (55%) had HFpEF, 160 (33%) had HFREF, and 57 (12%) had heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction. ID was present in 54% of patients with HFrEF and 56% of patients with HFpEF. In the HFpEF group, ID was associated with a LOS of 11 ± 7.7 vs. 9 ± 6 days in iron replete patients, p = 0.036, and remained an independent predictor of increased LOS in a multivariate linear regression incorporating comorbidities, age, and ID status. This study corroborates a high prevalence of ID in both HFrEF and HFpEF, and further shows that in patients with HFpEF there is a prolongation of LOS not seen in HFrEF which may indicate a more prominent role for ID in HFpEF.

scholarly journals SERUM ASYMMETRIC DIMETHYLARGININE AND 1-YEAR MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE DECOMPENSATED HEART FAILURE AND REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION

2011 ◽  
Vol 57 (14) ◽  
pp. E375
Author(s):  
Michael Zairis ◽  
Nikolaos Patsourakos ◽  
Evdokia Adamopoulou ◽  
Anastassios Theodosis Georgilas ◽  
Kyriakos Argyrakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Asymmetric Dimethylarginine ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

scholarly journals Oral Metolazone Versus Intravenous Chlorothiazide as an Adjunct to Loop Diuretics for Diuresis in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 351-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian C. Bohn ◽  
Rim M. Hadgu ◽  
Hannah E. Pope ◽  
Jerrica E. Shuster
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Oral Formulation ◽  
Loop Diuretics ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Total Urine

Background: Thiazide diuretics are often utilized to overcome loop diuretic resistance when treating acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). In addition to a large cost advantage, several pharmacokinetic advantages exist when administering oral metolazone (MTZ) compared with intravenous (IV) chlorothiazide (CTZ), yet many providers are reluctant to utilize an oral formulation to treat ADHF. The purpose of this study was to compare the increase in 24-hour total urine output (UOP) after adding MTZ or CTZ to IV loop diuretics (LD) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and Results: From September 2013 to August 2016, 1002 patients admitted for ADHF received either MTZ or CTZ in addition to LD. Patients were excluded for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n = 469), <24-hour LD or UOP data prior to drug initiation (n = 129), or low dose MTZ/CTZ (n = 91). A total of 168 patients were included with 64% receiving CTZ. No significant difference was observed between the increase in 24-hour total UOP after MTZ or CTZ initiation (1458 [514, 2401] mL vs 1820 [890, 2750] mL, P = .251). Conclusions: Both MTZ and CTZ similarly increased UOP when utilized as an adjunct to IV LD. These results suggest that while thiazide agents can substantially increase UOP in ADHF patients with HFrEF, MTZ and CTZ have comparable effects.

Outcomes of de novo and acute decompensated heart failure patients according to ejection fraction

Heart ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. 525-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ki Hong Choi ◽  
Ga Yeon Lee ◽  
Jin-Oh Choi ◽  
Eun-Seok Jeon ◽  
Hae-Young Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
First Year ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

ObjectiveThere are conflicting results among previous studies regarding the prognosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with de novo acute heart failure (AHF) or acute decompensated HF (ADHF) according to HFpEF (EF≥50%), or HFrEF (EF<40%) and to define the prognosis of patients with HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF, 40≤EF<50%).MethodsBetween March 2011 and February 2014, 5625 consecutive patients with AHF were recruited from 10 university hospitals. A total of 5414 (96.2%) patients with EF data were enrolled, which consisted of 2867 (53.0%) patients with de novo and 2547 (47.0%) with ADHF. Each of the enrolled group was stratified by EF.ResultsIn de novo, all-cause death rates were not significantly different between HFpEF and HFrEF (HFpEF vs HFrEF, 206/744 (27.7%) vs 438/1631 (26.9%), HRadj 1.15, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.38, p=0.14). However, among patients with ADHF, HFrEF had a significantly higher mortality rate compared with HFpEF (HFpEF vs HFrEF, 245/613 (40.0%) vs 694/1551 (44.7%), HRadj 1.25, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.47, p=0.007). Also, in ADHF, HFmrEF was associated with a significantly lower mortality rate within 1 year compared with HFrEF (HFmrEF vs HFrEF, 88/383 (23.0%) vs 430/1551 (27.7%), HRadj 1.31, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.65, p=0.03), but a significantly higher mortality rate after 1 year compared with HFpEF (HFmrEF vs HFpEF, 83/295 (28.1%) vs 101/469 (21.5%), HRadj 0.70, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.96, p=0.02).ConclusionsHFpEF may indicate a better prognosis compared with HFrEF in ADHF, but not in de novo AHF. For patients with ADHF, the prognosis associated with HFmrEF was similar to that of HFpEF within the first year following hospitalisation and similar to HFrEF 1  year after hospitalisation.

scholarly journals Sex differences in clinical characteristics and long-term outcome in acute decompensated heart failure patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction

2016 ◽  
Vol 310 (7) ◽  
pp. H813-H820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuki Nakada ◽  
Rika Kawakami ◽  
Tomoya Nakano ◽  
Akihiro Takitsume ◽  
Hitoshi Nakagawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Sex Differences ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
Male Patients

In patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), sex differences considering clinical and pathophysiologic features are not fully understood. We investigated sex differences in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF), plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, and prognostic factors in patients with ADHF in Japan. We studied 748 consecutive ADHF patients of 821 patients registered in the ADHF registry between January 2007 and December 2014. Patients were divided into four groups based on sex and LVEF [reduced (ejection fraction, or EF, <50%, heart failure with reduced EF, or HFrEF) or preserved (EF ≥50%, heart failure with preserved LVEF, or HFpEF)]. The primary endpoint was the combination of cardiovascular death and heart failure (HF) admission. The present study consisted of 311 female patients (50% HFrEF, 50% HFpEF) and 437 male patients (63% HFrEF, 37% HFpEF). There was significant difference between sexes in the LVEF distribution profile. The ratio of HFpEF patients was significantly higher in female patients than in male patients ( P = 0.0004). Although there were no significant sex differences in median plasma BNP levels, the prognostic value of BNP levels was different between sexes. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the high BNP group had worse prognosis than the low BNP group in male but not in female patients. In multivariate analysis, log transformed BNP at discharge predicted cardiovascular events in male but not in female HF patients (female, hazard ratio: 1.169; 95% confidence interval: 0.981–1.399; P = 0.0806; male, hazard ratio: 1.289; 95% confidence interval: 1.120–1.481; P = 0.0004). In patients with ADHF, the distribution of LV function and the prognostic significance of plasma BNP levels for long-term outcome were different between the sexes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document