scholarly journals Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Korean Cancer Patients With Venous Thromboembolism: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 107602962097957
Author(s):  
Soo-Mee Bang ◽  
Jin-Hyoung Kang ◽  
Min Hee Hong ◽  
Jin-Seok Ahn ◽  
So Yeon Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Medical Chart Review ◽  
Deep Vein

This study assessed epidemiologic data and clinical outcomes, including venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and bleeding events, in patients with cancer-associated VTE, and assessed factors associated with clinical outcomes. Data were extracted from retrospective medical-chart review of adult patients diagnosed with cancer-associated deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism who received anticoagulation treatment for ≥3 months. Patients were classified by: low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), and other anticoagulants. First VTE recurrence and bleeding events, and factors associated with their occurrence, were assessed during the initial 6 months of treatment. Overall, 623 patients (age: 63.7 ± 11.3 years, 49.3% male) were included (119, 132, and 372 patients in LMWH, DOACs and other anticoagulants groups, respectively). The cumulative 6-month incidence of VTE recurrence was 16.6% (total), 8.3% (LMWH), 16.7% (DOACs), and 20.7% (other); respective bleeding events were 22.5%, 11.0%, 12.3%, and 30.7%). VTE recurrence and bleeding rates differed only between LMWH and other anticoagulants (HR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.2-5.0 and 3.6, 1.9-6.8, respectively). These results highlight the importance of initial VTE treatment choice for preventing VTE recurrence and bleeding events. LMWH or DOACs for ≥3 months can be considered for effective VTE management in cancer patients.

scholarly journals https://www.cardiologiaambulatoriale.eu/osimertinib-induced-venous-thromboembolism-in-lung-cancer-a-challenging-clinical-case/

2020 ◽  
pp. 276-280
Author(s):  
Tiziana Leopizzi ◽  
Agnese Maria Fioretti
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
T790m Mutation ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Venous thromboembolism is the second leading cause of mortality among cancer patients, with a 20% incidence, after the progression of cancer itself. In the last two years clinical trials have studied direct oral anticoagulants also in the oncological clinical setting with prom-ising results in efficacy and safety. Osimertinib has been approved for the treatment of EGFR T790M mutation-positive non small cell lung cancer resistant to first- and second-generation EGFR tirosin kinase inhibitors. However, little is known about venous thromboem-bolism induced by osimertinib. Here, we report the case of a woman with lung cancer treated by osimertinib who developed deep vein thrombosis of the common femoral right vein, successfully treated wih edoxaban. In conclusion, on one side deep vein thrombosis is a possible side effect of osimertinib, on the other side edoxaban is a new practical, effective and safe therapeutic option also in active cancer patients.

Abstract 10879: Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Patients With Venous Thromboembolism and Active Malignancy - A Single Center Registry

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rayya Saadiq ◽  
Dalene Bott-Kitslaar ◽  
Charles Loprinzi ◽  
Robert McBane ◽  
Waldemar Wysokinski
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Alternative Treatment Option ◽  
Major Bleeding Rate ◽  
Deep Vein

Background: Active malignancy accounts for 20% of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the community and is the second leading cause of death among cancer patients. Rivaroxaban offers a convenient alternative to conventional anticoagulation for VTE in cancer patients but its efficacy and safety for this group of patients is not well documented. Patients and Methods: All patients with cancer-associated deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), enrolled into Mayo Rochester Thrombophilia Clinic Direct Oral Anticoagulants Registry between November 1, 2012 and April 30, 2015, were followed prospectively to provide an estimate of the efficacy and safety of this form of therapy. Follow up was obtained in person or by mailed or telephone survey. Results: Out of the 377 patients in the registry, 118 (31%) patients (51% female, mean age 66±10 years) had active malignancy related VTE (62% DVT, 24% PE, and 14% DVT/PE) treated with rivaroxaban. The most common malignancies in this group were: gastrointestinal (20%), lung (13%) and ovary/uterine (13%). Over the follow up period, the VTE recurrence rate was 3.3% (2 DVT and 2 PE; of these, 2 occurred during periprocedural interruptions of anticoagulation); and the major bleeding rate was 3%. There were 26 deaths (22%), none related to VTE or bleeding. The main reasons for choosing rivaroxaban were lower cost compared to LMWH, no need for injections, and the lack of food/drug interactions. Conclusions: These data support that rivaroxaban may provide a safe, effective, and convenient alternative treatment option to standard therapy for cancer related VTE treatment.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Immunomodulatory Drug Associated Venous Thromboembolism

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4964-4964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary Crowther ◽  
Jamie Doyle ◽  
Stanford Taylor ◽  
Nadia Ali
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Result ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Growing Body

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in multiple myeloma (MM) patients for several reasons; hematologic malignancy itself is a VTE risk factor and standard of care immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) in combination with dexamethasone (Dex) increase the risk further. This combination therapy has a mean VTE incidence of 21.5% in studies that did not use thromboprophylaxis and is recommended for all patients on IMiDs, although the optimal thromboprophylactic regimen remains uncertain. In clinical practice, aspirin (ASA) is commonly prescribed for VTE prophylaxis due to the ease of use. Despite this, the incidence of VTE remains between 7-14%. There is a growing body of literature supporting the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the treatment of VTE in cancer populations. We wanted to assess the incidence of VTE despite ASA prophylaxis at our institution and to further characterize the role of DOACs in the MM population. To do this, we performed a chart review of all MM patients who had been treated with lenalidomide and a DOAC, assessing for VTE development and patient outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with the diagnosis of MM treated with lenalidomide therapy at Fox Chase Cancer Center at Temple University Hospital or Cottman Avenue after Jan 1st, 2015 to July 2019. Eligible patients were identified through electronic medical record data mining for patients that had been diagnosed with MM, had been prescribed lenalidomide, had been taking ASA while on lenalidomide, and switched to rivaroxaban, edoxaban or apixaban. For comparison, the number of patients treated with lenalidomide and ASA who did not switch to a DOAC were also identified. Patient charts were reviewed for VTE development and bleeding complications after DOAC administration. Results: 132 patients were identified who had a diagnosis of MM and had been prescribed lenalidomide between Jan 1, 2015 and July 31, 2019. These patients were also prescribed aspirin except for three who were already on a DOAC prior to starting lenalidomide. Of the total 132 patients, only 17 were prescribed a DOAC. Six of the patients were on DOACs for reasons other than VTE (atrial fibrillation N=4, atrial flutter N=1, marantic endocarditis N=1). Eleven patients were started on DOACs for VTE; incidence of 8.3% in our myeloma population. However three of these VTEs occurred within one month of high dose melphalan chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue. These three patients had been off lenalidomide for over one month prior to VTE. Eight of the 17 patients with VTE developed clots in the setting of active MM and concurrent therapy with IMiD/Dex, independent of hospitalizations or other provoking factors. This is an incidence of 6.0% for VTE directly attributed to therapy. Six patients were on lenalidomide and Dex, while two patients developed VTE while on pomalidomide and Dex. No patients on lenalidomide experienced recurrent VTEs after being switched to therapeutic dose DOAC. One patient on pomalidomide/Dex did experience recurrent VTE. We examined all 17 patients who were on DOACs, 16 of which had been on IMiD and DOACs concurrently. Three had minor bleeding events which all resolved spontaneously. One patient had a major bleeding event, which was a fatal ruptured cerebral aneurysm while on a DOAC and ASA concurrently. Conclusion: The incidence of VTE in our patient population receiving IMiD/Dex while on ASA prophylaxis therapy was similar to what has been previously reported in the literature. We examined the clinical outcomes of 16 patients treated with IMiDs and DOACs concurrently and found few bleeding events. The one major bleed was likely precipitated by malignant hypertension and not a direct result of being on a DOAC. Taken together these results further support the growing body of evidence that DOACs are effective and safe treatments for VTE in cancer patients, including MM. Moving forward, our clinical experience with treatment dose DOACs supports the use of prophylactic dose DOACs to potentially further reduce the incidence of VTE in this high-risk population. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Does aspirin prevent venous thromboembolism?

Hematology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
pp. 634-641
Author(s):  
Robert Diep ◽  
David Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Surgical Patient ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Disease Therapy ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Arterial Vascular Disease

Abstract Venous thromboembolism (VTE; deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism) is a well-established cause of morbidity and mortality in the medical and surgical patient populations. Clinical research in the prevention and treatment of VTE has been a dynamic field of study, with investigations into various treatment modalities ranging from mechanical prophylaxis to the direct oral anticoagulants. Aspirin has long been an inexpensive cornerstone of arterial vascular disease therapy, but its role in the primary or secondary prophylaxis of VTE has been debated. Risk-benefit tradeoffs between aspirin and anticoagulants have changed, in part due to advances in surgical technique and postoperative care, and in part due to the development of safe, easy-to-use oral anticoagulants. We review the proposed mechanisms in which aspirin may act on venous thrombosis, the evidence for aspirin use in the primary and secondary prophylaxis of VTE, and the risk of bleeding with aspirin as compared with anticoagulation.

Heparins and Venous Thromboembolism: Current Practice and Future Directions

2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (07) ◽  
pp. 488-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Prandoni
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Treatment And Prevention ◽  
Major Orthopedic Surgery ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic ◽  
Reduction Of Mortality ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryUnfractionated heparin (UFH) in adjusted doses and low-molecularweight heparins (LMWH) in fixed doses are the chosen therapy for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism. The use of UFH protocols ensures that virtually all patients will promptly achieve the therapeutic range for the activated partial thromboplastin time. However, proper use of UFH requires considerable expertise, can cause inconvenience and has limitations. Unmonitored therapy with subcutaneous LMWH is at least as effective and safe as adjusted-dose UFH, is associated with a considerable reduction of mortality in cancer patients, and permits the treatment of suitable patients in an outpatient setting.LMWH in high prophylactic doses is more effective than UFH and oral anticoagulants for prevention of postoperative venous thrombosis in major orthopedic surgery. Whether thromboprophylaxis should be continued for a few additional weeks after hospital discharge is controversial. LMWH and UFH are equally effective for prevention of postoperative deep-vein thrombosis in cancer patients. In a recent controlled randomized trial, enoxaparin in high prophylactic doses was an effective and safe measure of thromboprophylaxis in ordinary bedridden patients.The efficacy and safety of pentasaccharide (the smallest antithrombin binding sequence of heparin) in the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolic disorders is currently under investigation.

scholarly journals Direct oral anticoagulants and venous thromboembolism

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (141) ◽  
pp. 295-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Franchini ◽  
Pier Mannuccio Mannucci
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Dabigatran Etexilate ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Direct Anticoagulants ◽  
Deep Vein

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), consisting of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a major clinical concern associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The cornerstone of management of VTE is anticoagulation, and traditional anticoagulants include parenteral heparins and oral vitamin K antagonists. Recently, new oral anticoagulant drugs have been developed and licensed, including direct factor Xa inhibitors (e.g. rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) and thrombin inhibitors (e.g. dabigatran etexilate). This narrative review focusses on the characteristics of these direct anticoagulants and the main results of published clinical studies on their use in the prevention and treatment of VTE.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban in cancer patients receiving concomitant active anti-neoplastic therapy at an outpatient cancer setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 1650-1656
Author(s):  
Darin Yassine ◽  
Erika N Brown ◽  
David Putney ◽  
Oyejoke Fasoranti
Keyword(s):  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Minor Bleeding ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism Recurrence ◽  
Drug Drug Interaction

Introduction Venous thromboembolism is a common complication among cancer patients with an estimated risk of 20%. American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend direct oral anticoagulants for long-term anticoagulation but caution the use of direct oral anticoagulants because of drug–drug interactions with antineoplastic therapies. The clinical impact of these drug–drug interactions is yet to be studied in clinical trials. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the drug–drug interactions on venous thromboembolism recurrence and bleeding. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study that included cancer patients with venous thromboembolism receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban with antineoplastic therapy. The impact of the drug–drug interaction was determined by its effect on the rates of venous thromboembolism recurrence and bleeding in patients with a drug–drug interaction compared to patients with no drug–drug interaction. Results The primary composite endpoint of venous thromboembolism recurrence and bleeding events occurred in 65% versus 62% of patients in drug–drug interaction and non-drug–drug interaction groups accordingly. There was a higher rate of venous thromboembolism recurrence and minor bleeding events with anti-mitotic microtubule inhibitors and a higher rate of minor bleeding events with hormonal therapy and alkylating agents. Among the drug–drug interaction group, there were no major bleeding events reported with mild drug–drug interactions when compared to moderate-to-severe drug–drug interactions. There was no difference in time to venous thromboembolism recurrence between rivaroxaban and apixaban. Conclusion Due to small sample size, our study results could not confirm a higher risk of bleeding or venous thromboembolism recurrence with the drug–drug interactions. Further prospective study is warranted, but clinicians should be aware of these drug–drug interactions and identify them using available literature.

Examination of the Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Comparison to Warfarin in an Obese Population

2021 ◽  
pp. 875512252110641
Author(s):  
Rachel M. Watson ◽  
Carmen B. Smith ◽  
Erica F. Crannage ◽  
Laura M. Challen
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Class Iii Obesity ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Deep Vein

Background: While commonly prescribed today, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have historically been avoided in patients with class III obesity or a weight >120 kg due to limited literature regarding the efficacy and safety in this population. Objective: The overall objective was to examine the effectiveness of DOACs compared to warfarin in a population with obesity. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) or atrial fibrillation and a body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2 from August 1, 2015, to August 1, 2020, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients receiving a DOAC were matched in a 1:2 ratio to warfarin. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke or recurrent VTE. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome, hospitalization for bleed, and the primary outcome in patients with a BMI ≥40 kg/m2. Results: A total of 162 patients were included, with 54 and 108 in the DOAC and warfarin groups, respectively. Baseline BMI was similar between groups (45.7 kg/m2 for DOACs vs 43.8 kg/m2 for warfarin), with approximately 70% of patients having a BMI ≥40 kg/m2. The primary outcome occurred in 1 patient (1.9%) in the DOAC group and 2 patients (1.9%) in the warfarin group. The DOAC group had a higher, nonsignificant incidence of bleeding (5.6% vs 0.9%, P = 0.11). There was no difference between groups in incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), or stroke in patients with a BMI ≥40 kg/m2. Conclusion: DOACs may be as efficacious as warfarin in the prevention of stroke or recurrent VTE in patients with a BMI of ≥35 kg/m2. Prospective, randomized trials are warranted to further assess the efficacy and safety of DOACs in this population.

Predicting recurrences or major bleeding in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (09) ◽  
pp. 435-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Trujillo-Santos ◽  
José Nieto ◽  
Gregorio Tiberio ◽  
Andrea Piccioli ◽  
Pierpaolo Micco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Recurrent Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Acute Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryCancer patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) have an increased incidence of recurrences and bleeding complications while on anticoagulant therapy. Methods RIETE is an ongoing registry of consecutive patients with acute VTE. We tried to identify which cancer patients are at a higher risk for recurrent pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or major bleeding. Up to May 2007, 3, 805 cancer patients had been enrolled in RIETE. During the first three months of follow-up after the acute, index VTE event, 90 (2.4%) patients developed recurrent PE, 100 (2.6%) recurrent DVT, 156 (4.1%) had major bleeding. Forty patients (44%) died of the recurrent PE,46 (29%) of bleeding. On multivariate analysis, patients aged <65 years (odds ratio [OR]: 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9–4.9), with PE at entry (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.2–3.1), or with <3 months from cancer diagnosis to VTE (OR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.2–3.2) had an increased incidence of recurrent PE. Those aged <65 years (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.0–2.4) or with <3 months from cancer diagnosis (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.5–3.6) had an increased incidence of recurrent DVT. Finally, patients with immobility (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.2–2.7), metastases (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1–2.3), recent bleeding (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.1–5.1), or with creatinine clearance <30 ml/ min (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.5–3.4), had an increased incidence of major bleeding. With some variables available at entry we may identify those cancer patients withVTE at a higher risk for recurrences or major bleeding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document