Examination of the Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Comparison to Warfarin in an Obese Population

2021 ◽  
pp. 875512252110641
Author(s):  
Rachel M. Watson ◽  
Carmen B. Smith ◽  
Erica F. Crannage ◽  
Laura M. Challen
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Class Iii Obesity ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Deep Vein

Background: While commonly prescribed today, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have historically been avoided in patients with class III obesity or a weight >120 kg due to limited literature regarding the efficacy and safety in this population. Objective: The overall objective was to examine the effectiveness of DOACs compared to warfarin in a population with obesity. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) or atrial fibrillation and a body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2 from August 1, 2015, to August 1, 2020, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients receiving a DOAC were matched in a 1:2 ratio to warfarin. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke or recurrent VTE. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome, hospitalization for bleed, and the primary outcome in patients with a BMI ≥40 kg/m2. Results: A total of 162 patients were included, with 54 and 108 in the DOAC and warfarin groups, respectively. Baseline BMI was similar between groups (45.7 kg/m2 for DOACs vs 43.8 kg/m2 for warfarin), with approximately 70% of patients having a BMI ≥40 kg/m2. The primary outcome occurred in 1 patient (1.9%) in the DOAC group and 2 patients (1.9%) in the warfarin group. The DOAC group had a higher, nonsignificant incidence of bleeding (5.6% vs 0.9%, P = 0.11). There was no difference between groups in incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), or stroke in patients with a BMI ≥40 kg/m2. Conclusion: DOACs may be as efficacious as warfarin in the prevention of stroke or recurrent VTE in patients with a BMI of ≥35 kg/m2. Prospective, randomized trials are warranted to further assess the efficacy and safety of DOACs in this population.

scholarly journals The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 655-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard Naymagon ◽  
Douglas Tremblay ◽  
Nicole Zubizarreta ◽  
Erin Moshier ◽  
Kevin Troy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Portal Vein ◽  
Portal Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Predisposing Factor ◽  
Vein Thrombosis

Abstract Guidelines currently favor vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparins for treatment of noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (ncPVT). Use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in PVT has been met with concern because of the lack of data. We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the efficacy and safety of DOACs for the treatment of ncPVT, and to compare them with standard therapies: 330 patients with ncPVT, followed-up for a mean 41.6 months, received warfarin (n = 108), enoxaparin (n = 70), rivaroxaban (n = 65), apixaban (n = 20), dabigatran (n = 8), fondaparinux (n = 2), or no anticoagulation (n = 57). The primary outcome was complete radiographic resolution (CRR) of PVT. Secondary outcomes included recanalization of occlusive PVT, cavernous transformation of the PV, development of chronic portal hypertensive symptoms (cPHS), and major bleeding. DOACs were associated with the highest CRR rates (dabigatran, 6/8 [75%]; apixaban, 13/20 [65%]; rivaroxaban, 42/65 [65%]). Enoxaparin was associated with a CRR rate similar to that of the DOACs (40/70 = 57%). Warfarin was associated with worse outcomes in this regard (CRR rate, 31% [33/108]; hazard ratio [HR] DOACs:warfarin, 2.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.87-4.52; P < .0001). DOACs were associated with recanalization rates similar to enoxaparin and greater than warfarin (HR DOACs:warfarin, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.93-6.18; P < .0001). DOACs were associated with lower rates of cPHS, although this did not attain significance (DOACs, 8/93 [9%]; enoxaparin, 13/70 [19%]; warfarin, 31/108 [29%]). DOACs were associated with less major bleeding relative to warfarin (HR DOACs:warfarin, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.05-0.86; P = .0307). Patients harboring JAK2V617F, those with no evident predisposing factor for PVT, and those with occlusive thrombus demonstrated worse outcomes. DOACs appear effective and safe for the treatment of ncPVT.

Abstract 10879: Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Patients With Venous Thromboembolism and Active Malignancy - A Single Center Registry

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rayya Saadiq ◽  
Dalene Bott-Kitslaar ◽  
Charles Loprinzi ◽  
Robert McBane ◽  
Waldemar Wysokinski
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Alternative Treatment Option ◽  
Major Bleeding Rate ◽  
Deep Vein

Background: Active malignancy accounts for 20% of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the community and is the second leading cause of death among cancer patients. Rivaroxaban offers a convenient alternative to conventional anticoagulation for VTE in cancer patients but its efficacy and safety for this group of patients is not well documented. Patients and Methods: All patients with cancer-associated deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), enrolled into Mayo Rochester Thrombophilia Clinic Direct Oral Anticoagulants Registry between November 1, 2012 and April 30, 2015, were followed prospectively to provide an estimate of the efficacy and safety of this form of therapy. Follow up was obtained in person or by mailed or telephone survey. Results: Out of the 377 patients in the registry, 118 (31%) patients (51% female, mean age 66±10 years) had active malignancy related VTE (62% DVT, 24% PE, and 14% DVT/PE) treated with rivaroxaban. The most common malignancies in this group were: gastrointestinal (20%), lung (13%) and ovary/uterine (13%). Over the follow up period, the VTE recurrence rate was 3.3% (2 DVT and 2 PE; of these, 2 occurred during periprocedural interruptions of anticoagulation); and the major bleeding rate was 3%. There were 26 deaths (22%), none related to VTE or bleeding. The main reasons for choosing rivaroxaban were lower cost compared to LMWH, no need for injections, and the lack of food/drug interactions. Conclusions: These data support that rivaroxaban may provide a safe, effective, and convenient alternative treatment option to standard therapy for cancer related VTE treatment.

scholarly journals Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Korean Cancer Patients With Venous Thromboembolism: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 107602962097957
Author(s):  
Soo-Mee Bang ◽  
Jin-Hyoung Kang ◽  
Min Hee Hong ◽  
Jin-Seok Ahn ◽  
So Yeon Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Medical Chart Review ◽  
Deep Vein

This study assessed epidemiologic data and clinical outcomes, including venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and bleeding events, in patients with cancer-associated VTE, and assessed factors associated with clinical outcomes. Data were extracted from retrospective medical-chart review of adult patients diagnosed with cancer-associated deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism who received anticoagulation treatment for ≥3 months. Patients were classified by: low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), and other anticoagulants. First VTE recurrence and bleeding events, and factors associated with their occurrence, were assessed during the initial 6 months of treatment. Overall, 623 patients (age: 63.7 ± 11.3 years, 49.3% male) were included (119, 132, and 372 patients in LMWH, DOACs and other anticoagulants groups, respectively). The cumulative 6-month incidence of VTE recurrence was 16.6% (total), 8.3% (LMWH), 16.7% (DOACs), and 20.7% (other); respective bleeding events were 22.5%, 11.0%, 12.3%, and 30.7%). VTE recurrence and bleeding rates differed only between LMWH and other anticoagulants (HR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.2-5.0 and 3.6, 1.9-6.8, respectively). These results highlight the importance of initial VTE treatment choice for preventing VTE recurrence and bleeding events. LMWH or DOACs for ≥3 months can be considered for effective VTE management in cancer patients.

scholarly journals ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS IN THE TREATMENT OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLIC COMPLICATIONS: FOCUS ON APIXABAN

2017 ◽  
pp. 56-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Yu. Gilyarov ◽  
E. V. Konstantinova
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin K ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thromboembolic ◽  
Deep Vein

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a common condition associated with a significant clinical and economic burden. Anticoagulant therapy is the mainstay of treatment for VTE. Current guidelines recommend the use of either low molecular weight heparins or fondaparinux overlapping with and followed by a vitamin K antagonist for the initial treatment of VTE, with the vitamin K antagonist continued when long-term anticoagulation is required. These traditional anticoagulants have practical limitations that have led to the development of direct oral anticoagulants that directly target either Factor Xa or thrombin and are administered at a fixed dose without the need for routine coagulation monitoring. The paper reviews results of the trials of apixaban application for treatment and/or long-term secondary prevention of VTE. The paper analyses effectiveness and safety of apixaban in different groups of patients, as well as features of apixaban application in every day practice.

Risk Factors for Post-Thrombotic Syndrome in Patients With a First Proximal Deep Venous Thrombosis Treated With Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Angiology ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 000331972110708
Author(s):  
Luca Spiezia ◽  
Elena Campello ◽  
Chiara Simion ◽  
Anna Poretto ◽  
Fabio Dalla Valle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Minimum Period ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Post Thrombotic Syndrome ◽  
Age Range ◽  
Deep Vein

The incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remains a matter of debate. Hence, our endeavor to investigate a large cohort of patients with a first episode of proximal DVT treated with DOACs to ascertain the incidence and predisposing risk factors for PTS. All consecutive patients referred to the Thrombotic and Haemorrhagic Diseases Unit of Padova University Hospital (Italy) between January 2014 and January 2018 for a first episode of proximal DVT were considered for enrollment. Participants received DOACs for a minimum period of 3 months. PTS was assessed using the Villalta score up to 36 months after DVT diagnosis. Among 769 enrolled patients (M/F 353/416, age range 26–87 years), 152 (19.8%) developed PTS and 30 (3.9%) developed severe PTS. The adjusted hazard ratio was significant for obesity (1.64, 95% CI 1.28–2.39) and DVT site (femoral and/or iliac veins vs popliteal vein) (1.23, 95% CI 1.15–3.00). The incidence of PTS is not negligible in patients with proximal DVT despite the use of DOACs. We identified obesity and iliofemoral DVT as possible risk factors for PTS. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings and optimize therapeutic strategies.

scholarly journals Variability in the management of line-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 552-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Cires-Drouet ◽  
Jashank Sharma ◽  
Tara McDonald ◽  
John D Sorkin ◽  
Brajesh K Lal
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Medical Specialists ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Question Survey

Objectives Central-venous devices are risk-factors for upper extremity deep vein thrombosis. We surveyed physicians to identify practice-patterns and adherence to American College of Chest Physicians guidelines. Methods The 13-question survey obtained physician-demographics and treatment-choices. Respondents were grouped into surgical and medical specialists. Data were reported as ratios and percentages, and compared using Fisher’s exact test. Results We received 143 responses from physicians; 65% treated one-to-two new cases/month. Most physicians (69.2%) used anticoagulation; 36.4% retained the catheter and 32.9% removed it. Medical-specialists retained catheters more often than surgeons ( p = 0.027). For recurrences, 84% repeated anticoagulation; 50.3% retained the catheter. A majority anticoagulated upper-extremity deep-vein thrombosis in long-term catheters for three months only (55.1%). Direct oral anticoagulants were used frequently (43.6%). Only 10% believed that existing guidelines were appropriate and only 2.8% followed all guidelines. Conclusion There is great variability in treatment-decisions for upper-extremity deep-vein thrombosis. The existing guidelines are considered inadequate and not followed by most physicians.

Upper extremities deep vein thrombosis and DOAC treatment: a prospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M.C Vedovati ◽  
G Tratar ◽  
A Mavri ◽  
L Pierpaoli ◽  
G Agnelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Central Venous Line ◽  
Upper Extremities ◽  
Acute Limb Ischemia ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Background Data on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with upper extremities deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) are limited. Purpose To assess the effectiveness and safety of DOACs in the treatment of UEDVT. Methods Data on patients with an objective diagnosis of acute UEDVT treated with DOACs were merged from prospective cohorts of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Study outcomes were recurrent VTE and major bleeding (MB) occurring during DOAC treatment. Results Overall, 132 patients were included: mean age was 47.7±18.0 years (range 18 to 97), males were 42.4%. Twenty-seven percent of patients had 2 or more risk factors for VTE, 29.5% had UEDVT complicating a central venous line or after pacemaker implantation (Table). Ninety-two patients (70%) were managed as outpatients. Increased age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.0–1.05) and anemia (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.07–1.70) were associated with in-patient management. Among patients treated with apixaban (40) or rivaroxaban (85) loading dose was used in 72%; in patients treated with dabigatran (5) or edoxaban (2) mean heparin pre-treatment was 8 days. DOACs were started after 1 month from UEDVT diagnosis in 12.9% of patients; active cancer was a main predictor for delayed initiation (OR 22.2, 95% CI 5.8–84.4). Mean treatment duration in patients with a scheduled stop was 4.9 months, while mean followup in those who continued DOACs was 9.3 months. No recurrence of VTE nor MBs occurred during DOAC treatment; one patient had acute limb ischemia (1.38% patient-year), 7 clinically relevant non-MBs (3 genital, 2 epistaxis, 1 gingival, 1 genital bleeding plus epistaxis; 10.51% patient-year), 5 deaths (4 cancer, 1 advanced age; 9.69% patient-year). Conclusions Our data support the effectiveness and safety of DOACs for the treatment of acute UEDVT. Further studies are required to confirm these findings. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Does aspirin prevent venous thromboembolism?

Hematology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
pp. 634-641
Author(s):  
Robert Diep ◽  
David Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Surgical Patient ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Disease Therapy ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Arterial Vascular Disease

Abstract Venous thromboembolism (VTE; deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism) is a well-established cause of morbidity and mortality in the medical and surgical patient populations. Clinical research in the prevention and treatment of VTE has been a dynamic field of study, with investigations into various treatment modalities ranging from mechanical prophylaxis to the direct oral anticoagulants. Aspirin has long been an inexpensive cornerstone of arterial vascular disease therapy, but its role in the primary or secondary prophylaxis of VTE has been debated. Risk-benefit tradeoffs between aspirin and anticoagulants have changed, in part due to advances in surgical technique and postoperative care, and in part due to the development of safe, easy-to-use oral anticoagulants. We review the proposed mechanisms in which aspirin may act on venous thrombosis, the evidence for aspirin use in the primary and secondary prophylaxis of VTE, and the risk of bleeding with aspirin as compared with anticoagulation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document