From Adaptation to Transformation: An Extended Research Agenda for Organizational Resilience to Adversity in the Natural Environment

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 346-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viviane Clément ◽  
Jorge Rivera
Keyword(s):  
Natural Environment ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Organizational Resilience

scholarly journals The Green Versus Green Trap and a Way Forward

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 5473
Author(s):  
Haris Doukas ◽  
Alexandros Nikas ◽  
Giorgos Stamtsis ◽  
Ioannis Tsipouridis
Keyword(s):  
Natural Environment ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Local Scale ◽  
Integrative Research ◽  
Participatory Processes

Massive deployment of renewables is considered as a decisive step in most countries’ climate efforts. However, at the local scale, it is also perceived by many as a threat to their rich and diverse natural environment. With this perspective, we argue that this green versus green pseudo-dilemma highlights how crucial a broad societal buy-in is. New, transparent, participatory processes and mechanisms that are oriented toward social licensing can now be employed. A novel, integrative research agenda must orbit around co-creation to enable and promote resource co-management and co-ownership where possible, with increased consensus.

scholarly journals Aligning Organizational Pathologies and Organizational Resilience Indicators

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Morales Allende ◽  
Cristina Ruiz-Martin ◽  
Adolfo Lopez-Paredes ◽  
Jose Manuel Perez Ríos
Keyword(s):  
Research Agenda ◽  
System Model ◽  
Organizational Resilience ◽  
Viable System Model ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Resilience Indicators ◽  
Viable System ◽  
Agreed Definition

<p>Developing resilient individuals, organizations and communities is a hot topic in the research agenda in Management, Ecology, Psychology or Engineering. Despite the number of works that focus on resilience is increasing, there is not completely agreed definition of resilience, neither an entirely formal and accepted framework. The cause may be the spread of research among different fields. In this paper, we focus on the study of organizational resilience with the aim of improving the level of resilience in organizations. We review the relation between viable and resilient organizations and their common properties. Based on these common properties, we defend the application of the Viable System Model (VSM) to design resilient organizations. We also identify the organizational pathologies defined applying the VSM through resilience indicators. We conclude that an organization with any organizational pathology is not likely to be resilient because it does not fulfill the requirements of viable organizations.</p>

Organizational Resilience Capability and Capacity Building

2022 ◽  
pp. 229-250
Author(s):  
José G. Vargas-Hernández
Keyword(s):  
Capacity Building ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Organizational Resilience ◽  
Adverse Conditions ◽  
Design And Implementation ◽  
Theoretical Assumptions ◽  
Development Processes ◽  
Resilience Capabilities

The objective of this chapter is to analyze the implications of organizational resilience capability and capacity building and development processes and the posed challenges to its design and implementation. It is based on the conceptual and theoretical assumptions underpinning the capabilities of resilience that can be learned and designed by organizations to be implemented and applied to adverse conditions. These underlying assumptions affect the organizational resilience capabilities building. It is concluded that building and developing organizational resilience capabilities has increased the research agenda on the theoretical and conceptual literature and the notions, factors, elements, and challenges.

scholarly journals Organizational resilience: proposition for an integrated model and research agenda

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 37-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Chaves Goldschmidt ◽  
◽  
Kely César Martins de Paiva ◽  
Hélio Arthur Reis Irigaray ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Agenda ◽  
Integrated Model ◽  
Organizational Resilience

Random isn't real: How the patchy distribution of ecological rewards may generate “incentive hope”

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurel Symes ◽  
Thalia Wheatley
Keyword(s):  
Natural Environment ◽  
Random Distribution ◽  
Spatiotemporal Distribution ◽  
Patchy Distribution ◽  
Distribution Of Resources

AbstractAnselme & Güntürkün generate exciting new insights by integrating two disparate fields to explain why uncertain rewards produce strong motivational effects. Their conclusions are developed in a framework that assumes a random distribution of resources, uncommon in the natural environment. We argue that, by considering a realistically clumped spatiotemporal distribution of resources, their conclusions will be stronger and more complete.

Extreme self-sacrifice beyond fusion: Moral expansiveness and the special case of allyship

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Crimston ◽  
Matthew J. Hornsey
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Biological Markers ◽  
Natural Environment ◽  
Relevant Dimension ◽  
Special Case

AbstractAs a general theory of extreme self-sacrifice, Whitehouse's article misses one relevant dimension: people's willingness to fight and die in support of entities not bound by biological markers or ancestral kinship (allyship). We discuss research on moral expansiveness, which highlights individuals’ capacity to self-sacrifice for targets that lie outside traditional in-group markers, including racial out-groups, animals, and the natural environment.

From meditation to action – a research agenda for studying informal global rule-making: remarks on ‘Cosmopolitanism, publicity, and the emergence of a “global administrative law”’

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Oliver Westerwinter
Keyword(s):  
Global Governance ◽  
Comparative Research ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Institutional Design ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Democratic Legitimacy ◽  
Institutional Architecture ◽  
Global Law ◽  
Rule Making ◽  
Law Making

Abstract Friedrich Kratochwil engages critically with the emergence of a global administrative law and its consequences for the democratic legitimacy of global governance. While he makes important contributions to our understanding of global governance, he does not sufficiently discuss the differences in the institutional design of new forms of global law-making and their consequences for the effectiveness and legitimacy of global governance. I elaborate on these limitations and outline a comparative research agenda on the emergence, design, and effectiveness of the diverse arrangements that constitute the complex institutional architecture of contemporary global governance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document