Commentary: Evolution of Positive Behavior Support and Future Directions

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Knoster

The field of Positive Behavior Support has expanded and evolved significantly since the first issue of Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions (JPBI) was published. This growth is further evidenced through application of Positive Behavior Support across various contexts (home, school, and community settings), populations (young children, school populations including students with disabilities, and adults) as well as, from a research perspective, units of analysis (Positive Behavior Support provided with individuals and entire systems). This commentary highlights both challenges and opportunities associated with the expanded application of Positive Behavior Support.

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelley Clarke ◽  
Brittany N. Zakszeski ◽  
Lee Kern

The field of positive behavior support (PBS) has expanded and evolved significantly since the first issue of Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions ( JPBI) was published. To ascertain how evolution of the field was reflected in the research, we examined trends in empirical studies published in JPBI since its inception. We coded 217 articles published between 1999 and 2016 that included data-based assessment or data-based intervention practices for key variables pertinent to potential trends in PBS. Analyses revealed increases across the publication period in studies that (a) included participants at risk for behavioral difficulties, (b) implemented interventions in general education settings, (c) utilized clinicians/experimenters as intervention agents, and (d) focused on adult skills as the intervention target. Findings are discussed in the context of the expansion of school-wide positive behavior interventions and support.


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. Horner ◽  
George Sugai

Clarke et al. provide a summary of research published in Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions over the past 17 years and identify trends in the type of scholarship guiding the field. We offer this commentary in response to an invitation to suggest directions for the future of research focusing on positive behavior support, and implications for how that research can benefit individuals in school, community, work, and home settings.


2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Hagermoser Sanetti ◽  
Lisa M. Dobey ◽  
Katie L. Gritter

For more than 10 years, the Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions has published, among other types of articles, behavioral intervention outcome studies related to positive behavior support. Operationally defining interventions is important to facilitating replication studies and adoption of intervention in applied settings. Furthermore, treatment integrity data are necessary to make valid claims that changes in outcomes resulted from intervention implementation and are thus essential to the internal validity of intervention outcome research. Reviews of treatment outcome research in related fields (e.g., applied behavior analysis) indicate that although many researchers operationally define interventions, a majority of researchers fail to report treatment integrity data. The purpose of this study was to review the treatment integrity data reported in all experimental intervention studies published in the Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions between 1999 and 2009. Results indicate that in recent years, a majority of published studies include a definition of the independent variable but do not provide quantitative treatment integrity data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document