Feline blood donation adverse reactions: classification and description of acute and delayed reactions in a donor population

2021 ◽  
pp. 1098612X2110202
Author(s):  
Tiago AM Abreu ◽  
Andreia ST Oliveira ◽  
Rui RF Ferreira ◽  
Sandrina MV Correia ◽  
Mafalda SSQ Morais ◽  
...  

Objectives This article aims to analyse the safety of feline blood donation by describing the frequency and nature of any adverse reactions and their causes, as well as propose measures to decrease the incidence of adverse reactions. Methods In this prospective study, any blood donor adverse reactions detected by the clinical staff during and immediately after donation were recorded. The owners of the cats were also surveyed by a veterinary practitioner or veterinary nurse 5 days after donation, using a predefined questionnaire to assess for any clinical or behavioural changes. Data were collected between January 2019 and March 2020 from blood donors enrolled in an animal blood bank programme. Results Of 3690 blood donations from 1792 feline donors assessed, post-donation reactions were reported in 1.14% (n = 42): 0.22% (n = 8) were acute reactions, which included weakness, pallor, tachypnoea and open-mouth breathing; and 0.92% (n = 34) were delayed post-donation reactions, with 0.16% involving cutaneous (haematomas and skin rashes, n = 6), 0.68% involving behavioural (n = 25) and 0.08% involving digestive (emesis and inappetence, n = 3) signs. Conclusions and relevance The low incidence of post-donation reactions in this study is encouraging, suggesting that a well-established protocol and competent staff can help to ensure a high level of safety in a feline donor programme and, in turn, increase the confidence of cat owners.

Author(s):  
Foluke A. Fasola

The existence and sustenance of the blood bank depends on blood donors. It is imperative that the donation experience is satisfactory for the donors. Therefore this study was carried out to determine the frequency of undesirable events experienced by the blood donor as part of donor haemovigilance. This was a retrospective descriptive study of the events that occurred amongst the blood donors of the blood bank of a tertiary institution. The blood donor incident book was reviewed for the period of six months. Negative undesirable events occurred in 2% of the donor populations, of which 45.8% could not complete the blood donation process while only 16.7% completed the blood donation process. Mild vasovagal attack occurred in 0.2% of the donor population. Undisclosed deferrable risk factors/ behaviours were identified by the phlebotomist in the bleeding room which made donors unfit for donation even though they had passed the donor screening criteria. This accounted for 20.8% of those with negative experience. Guidelines are required to identify donors that are not likely to complete donation to avoid wastage of time, blood, resources and reduce undesirable experiences.


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 663-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Luisa Marenzoni ◽  
Stefania Lauzi ◽  
Arianna Miglio ◽  
Mauro Coletti ◽  
Andrea Arbia ◽  
...  

Objectives The increased demand for animal blood transfusions creates the need for an adequate number of donors. At the same time, a high level of blood safety must be guaranteed and different guidelines (GLs) deal with this topic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of different GLs in preventing transfusion-transmissible infections (TTI) in Italian feline blood donors. Methods Blood samples were collected from 31 cats enrolled as blood donors by the owners’ voluntary choice over a period of approximately 1 year. Possible risk factors for TTI were recorded. Based on Italian, European and American GLs, specific TTI, including haemoplasmas, feline leukaemia virus (FeLV), feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV), Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia species, Bartonella species, Babesia species, Theileria species, Cytauxzoon species, Leishmania donovani sensu lato and feline coronavirus (FCoV), were screened. Rapid antigen and serological tests and biomolecular investigations (PCR) were used. Several PCR protocols for haemoplasma and FeLV DNA were compared. Results The presence of at least one recognised risk factor for TTI was reported in all cats. Results for FIV and FeLV infections were negative using rapid tests, whereas five (16.1%) cats were positive for FCoV antibodies. Four (12.9%) cats were PCR positive for haemoplasma DNA and one (3.2%) for FeLV provirus, the latter being positive only using the most sensitive PCR protocol applied. Other TTI were not detected using PCR. Conclusions and relevance Blood safety increases by combining the recommendations of different GLs. To reduce the risk of TTI, sensitive tests are needed and the choice of the best protocol is a critical step in improving blood safety. The cost and time of the screening procedures may be reduced if appropriate tests are selected. To this end, the GLs should include appropriate recruitment protocols and questionnaire-based risk profiles to identify suitable donors.


Author(s):  
Kajal Khajuria ◽  
Vijay Sawhney ◽  
Raman Sharma ◽  
Sonia Gupta

Background: Plateletpheresis is the process of collecting platelets, a component of blood involved in blood clotting. The term specifically refers to the method of collecting the platelets, which is performed by a device used in blood donation that separate the platelets and return other portion of blood to the donor. Platelet transfusion can be a life-saving procedure in preventing and treating serious complications from bleeding and haemorrhage in patients having disorders manifesting as thrombocytopenia like in dengue patients, ITP, aplastic anemia, and patients undergoing chemotherapy for leukaemia. In this study, our goal was to retrospectively analyse the adverse reactions occurred during and immediately after plateletpheresis donations.Methods: From January 2015 to October 2016, a total of 66 plateletpheresis procedures were performed in department of transfusion medicine, GMC Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India which is a tertiary care hospital.Results: Total 66 procedures were performed during our study period from which, four (6.06%) adverse events were recorded. Out of these four, two (50%) donors suffered from tingling sensation, one (25%) suffered from nausea and vomiting and One (25%) from haematoma formation.Conclusions: In Conclusion, the result of our 22-month study survey document that apheresis procedures performed on cell separators are safe procedures with the low incidence of adverse reactions.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 26-28
Author(s):  
Hamid Ehsan ◽  
Ahsan Wahab ◽  
Muhammad Ammar Shafqat ◽  
Muhammad Khawar Sana ◽  
Farhan Khalid ◽  
...  

Introduction: The blood transfusion (BT) system in Pakistan is fragmented, demand-driven, and depends on weakly regulated transfusion practices. This is primarily a big problem in smaller cities and remote rural areas. Pakistan has one of the highest hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence worldwide, estimated around 5 & 10 million cases, respectively. There is a considerable risk that transfusion-transmissible infections (TTIs) may have contributed to the current epidemic of HBV & HCV, affecting 7.4 % of the general population, and potential risk of HIV transmission in the country. In this systematic review, we aim to identify the prevalence of TTIs among the blood donor population and associated safety challenges. Method & Material: We conducted a systematic literature search to identify studies related to TTIs and transfusion safety in Pakistan from January 1, 2010, to January 31, 2020. A search was conducted using PubMed and PakMedinet.com (largest medical database of Pakistan); initial search retrieved 981 articles, 166 met the inclusion criteria, and after review by two independent reviewers, 33 articles met the final criteria for qualitative synthesis. Results: Analysis of 33 studies showed the seroprevalence of HBV of 2.04 % (0.81% to 4.22%), HCV of 2.44% (1.29 % to 10%), HIV of 0.038% (0% to 0.18%), syphilis of 1.1% (0.11-3.01%) and malaria of 0.11% (0.05-1.20). The rate of coinfections among blood donors varied from 0.0099% to 0.35 %. The highest number of coinfections were HCV & syphilis, followed by HCV & HBV infections. The rate of TTIs was dependent on the number of donors, donor types (replacement vs. voluntary), screening techniques used, number, and type of TTIs tested. There was a lack of universal screening for common TTIs. Syphilis and malaria were tested only 38 % & 46 % of all the blood donations. The studies with a high number of replacement donors (RDs) noted a high prevalence of TTIs of 2.5 % to 12 % compared to the studies with a high number of voluntary non-remunerated donations (VNRDs) reported TTIs rates of 1.57% to 6.2 %. There was a significant difference in the prevalence of HBV & HCV in VNRDs (0.48%) compared to RDs (4.15%). The rate of VNRDs was 0.10 % to 13%. The majority of blood donations were from male donors, representing more than 70 % of all donations. The female donations varied from 0.03% to 15 % in government/public blood banks than 29 % in private sector blood banks. The HBV & HCV infections and anemia were the most common causes of blood donation deferral. The 69.5 % of donors who tested positive for TTIs in a study reported previous blood donations. The educational status of donors noted to have an association with knowledge about the risk of TTIs. Odds of having limited knowledge about TTIs (OR: 4.04, CI: 1.567-10.435, p<0.01) were greater if donors had a secondary level of education compared to those with tertiary education. 48 % of blood donors did not know about the risk of TTIs through blood transfusion. There was notification of only about 54.25 % of all donors, who tested positive for any TTIs. This was mainly due to a lack of standardized reporting and follow up systems. Conclusion: This systemic review shows a high prevalence of TTIs, especially HBV, HCV & syphilis in the blood donor population. There is a high dependency on RDs, with minimal use of healthy voluntary blood donation practices, inadequate screening of high-risk donors, repeated collections of the blood from RDs, poor quality of screening methods, and limited knowledge of donors about their health. There is a lack of widespread standardized testing and follow up of patients who tested positive on initial testing. Large prospective multicenter clinical trials are required for a better understanding of the TTIs by testing and creating a follow-up system for both blood donors and recipients. Disclosures Anwer: Incyte, Seattle Genetics, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Celegene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals.:Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.


2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Feitosa Esplendori

ABSTRACT A theoretical-Reflective study with the objective to reflect on human needs regarding the imbalance of whole blood donors considering adverse reactions to the donation, and the existing nursing diagnoses that best meet the imbalance needs. The following needs were pointed out according to the signs and symptoms of adverse reactions and based on the Theory of Basic Human Needs: skin and tissue integrity, emotional security, pain perception, body mechanics, oxygenation, physical integrity, physical comfort, elimination, neurological, electrolytic and vascular regulation. By observing NANDA International’s Definitions and Classifications, adaptations to the existing nursing diagnoses and suggestions for new headings have been proposed. We conclude that some of the needs are interrelated, such as vascular regulation, oxygenation and physical integrity. Thus, more contextualized nursing diagnoses related to the needs of whole blood donors are needed, given the specific nature of the situation generating imbalances such as: ineffective systemic vascular regulation characterized by self-reported dizziness, cutaneous pallor and arterial hypotension related to vasovagal reaction.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustapha Dibbasey ◽  
Bolarinde Lawal ◽  
Solomon Umukoro ◽  
Peter Mitchel

AbstractObjectiveThe objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of iron deficiency (ID) and iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) as well as general anaemia in male blood donors and their association with ageing process.Methodology and ResultsA total of two hundred and one (201) serum samples were analysed for ferritin in male Gambian blood donors. The ferritin measurement was achieved with COBAS® INTEGRA 400 plus. At the same time, haemoglobin values were retrospectively obtained from the archived haematological full blood count result in the GARIS database. IDA was defined as (Haemoglobin <13.0g/dL+ Ferritin<15ng/ml) whilst ID was defined as (Haemoglobin ≥13.0g/dL+ Ferritin<15ng/ml) and general anaemia was defined as haemoglobin <13.0g/dL in males. The prevalence of anaemia (20%, n=41), ID (22%, n=44) and IDA (10%, n=21), were recorded in male donors. The results show no relationship between ferritin and haemoglobin among the blood donors (collection coefficient (r) = 0.04). Besides, no linear association of having anaemia and ID with ageing was reported among the blood donor population.Conclusion and potential application of findingsID and IDA as well as general anaemia are highly prevalent among blood donors in the Gambia. Besides, no predisposition to ID and anaemia was observed in term of age, thus all blood donors from 18-60 should be considered for blood donation without any age preference.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Anisha Navkudkar ◽  
Priti Desai ◽  
Sunil Rajadhakshaya

Objectives: Blood donation experience by most donors is satisfactory; however, a few may encounter adverse reactions. Healthy, altruistic, voluntary blood donors ensure adequate blood supply despite the potential risk of adverse reactions. Post-donation follow-up is crucial to get information about these adverse reactions. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency and type of adverse donor reactions and their correlation with contributory factors if any among the blood donors in a tertiary care oncology center. Material and Methods: It was a prospective observational study of 1000 consecutive voluntary whole blood donors who consented to participate in the study. Donors were followed up telephonically on two instances (first after 24 h of donation and second after 2 weeks of donation) and were asked a self-structured donor questionnaire to collect information regarding the adverse donor reactions if any. An appropriate statistical tool was used for analysis (IBM, SPSS software). Results: Of the 1000 voluntary whole blood donors, 92.6% (926/1000) responded to telephonic calls on both occasions. Of these 926, 8.5% (79/926) donors experienced adverse reactions. All these donors experienced immediate reactions, that is, within 24 h of donation while none reported fresh adverse reactions beyond 24 h–2 weeks. Of the 79 donors, 60% (49/79) experienced vasovagal reactions (VVR) and 40% (32/79) experienced hematoma including two donors who experienced both. A total of 86% (68/79) of reactions occurred in outdoor blood donation camps while 14% (11/79) occurred in-house (indoor). First time donors, female donors, and donors with weight on the lower side were more prone to immediate VVR (P < 0.05). Of the 49 VVR, 76% (37/49) were mild, 18% (9/49) were moderate, and 6% (3/49) were severe. Most of the hematomas, that is, 90% (29/32) occurred at outdoor blood donation camps while 10% (3/32) occurred indoor. Most hematomas (53%) took more than 7 days to recover. Conclusion: Post-donation interview proves to be an efficient tool to acquire information about adverse donor reactions. This will help in improving donor safety and satisfaction and will have a positive impact on the national blood supply by improving the donor return rate. Blood transfusion services (BTSs) staff must be trained to promptly identify the donor reactions onsite and manage them to enhance the donation experience of voluntary donors. Post-donation follow-up will aid in getting the donation experience and BTS can develop strategies to enhance it. This will also help in donor hemovigilance in the future for the betterment of donor safety.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4664-4664
Author(s):  
Courtney K. Hopkins ◽  
Christian Riley ◽  
Samuel Pepkowitz ◽  
Jean R. Lopategui

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Janus kinase 2 gene (JAK2) encodes for a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase involved in normal hematopoietic growth factor signaling. Point mutations of the JAK2 gene on chromosome 9, specifically V617F, a point mutation at amino acid 617, are associated with myeloproliferative disorders (MPD). The V617F JAK2 mutation has been found in 90% of patients with polycythemia vera, 50–60% of patients with essential thrombocythemia or idiopathic myelofibrosis and 1–5% of patients with other MPD. To our knowledge, previous studies involving the V617F JAK2 mutation were not performed on a control population of normal individuals. Therefore, the prevalence of this mutation has not been established. In this study, we tested volunteer blood donors from a hospital-based blood donation center for the presence of the V617F JAK2 mutation. METHODS: Citrated whole blood was obtained from volunteer blood donors, age 17 and older, who presented to donate whole blood at a hospital-based blood donation center. The donors met all qualifications to donate blood as defined by FDA regulations. DNA was extracted using the QIAagen and QIAamp DNA extraction columns, quantified and diluted to 100ng/ul. DNA was simultaneously amplified and detected using allele specific minor groove binder probes and primers for the V617F JAK2 mutation. The resultant amplification was recorded by real-time, quantitative PCR using an ABI 7500 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). A 1% limit of detection, determined from sensitivity and specificity studies using a known cell line control, was set as the technically reproducible threshold sensitivity of the test. Samples were defined as negative for the V617F JAK2 mutation if only the wild type allele was detected. Samples that had a mutant allele detected above the 1% limit of detection were defined as positive for the V617F JAK2 mutation. Samples that had a mutant allele detected below the 1% limit of detection were defined as negative for the V617F JAK2 mutation. RESULTS: A total of 181 DNA samples from volunteer blood donors were tested for the V617F JAK2 mutation. The test group consisted of 104 males (mean age 44, range 17–77) and 77 females (mean age 42, range 18–71). Of the 181 donors tested, 171 had only wild type allele detected and were considered negative. Ten donors had high background of the mutant allele detected below the 1% limit of detection and were considered negative. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first report documenting the prevalence of the V617F JAK2 mutation in a healthy blood donor population. In this study of 181 volunteer blood donors none had the V617F JAK2 mutation. Although 10 of the 181 donors were found to have mutant allele detected, they were below the 1% technically reproducible sensitivity threshold of the test and were considered negative. We recommend that mutations detected below the technical threshold of 1% of our assay be considered false positives. The results of this study suggest that the V617F JAK2 mutation is not present in a healthy blood donor population and is significant when detected by our method.


Transfusion ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 556-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hany Kamel ◽  
Peter Tomasulo ◽  
Marjorie Bravo ◽  
Thomas Wiltbank ◽  
Robin Cusick ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document