Removing residual cortical material during cataract surgery: Visco polishing and the grindstone effect as a new surgical technique

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110599
Author(s):  
Andreas F Borkenstein ◽  
Eva-Maria Borkenstein ◽  
Boris Malyugin

Purpose To describe a new technique for removing residual cortical material adjacent to posterior lens capsule during cataract surgery with the help of cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical devices. Methods In this technique, if there are still cortical remnants and lens epithelial cells left after the routine irrigation–aspiration and polishing at the final steps of cataract surgery, the capsule is filled to about one-third with a highly viscous cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device. Rinsing is performed from the anterior chamber with the water jet directed tangentially to the ophthalmic viscosurgical device bolus and towards the posterior capsule, which creates a turbulence creating a “grindstone effect”. The ophthalmic viscosurgical device bolus transforms into a ball and starts to rotate very quickly within the capsule, grinding away the cortical remnants. Results In the first series of 62 cases, there were no intra-operative or post-operative complications. At day 1 there was no corneal oedema and no hypertension of intraocular pressure. Visual outcomes were good with a mean best corrected distance visual acuity of −0.01 ± 0.11 logMAR. Conclusion This technique appears to be effective and fast in removing persistent cortical remnants from the surface of the posterior capsule, while minimising risks such as capsule aspiration during irrigation/aspiration. There is limited pressure and mechanical force applied on the capsule; the anterior chamber and the corneal endothelium remain safe since the ophthalmic viscosurgical device stays inside the capsular bag to its high cohesiveness and molecular weight. More data on a larger cohort of patients is planned to confirm these results and evaluate long-term effects on posterior capsule opacification.

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 2007-2011
Author(s):  
Jongyeop Park ◽  
Jinhyun Kim

AIM: To introduce a new surgical technique, air-bubble technique for the management of posterior capsule rupture (PCR) and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the technique. METHODS: A retrospective case series analysis of 24 eyes of 24 patients, in which the air bubble technique was used for the management of PCR, was performed. Once PCR occurred, a dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) was injected into the tear. And small volumes (0.2-0.3 mL) of air bubbles were injected beneath the OVD. The air bubble served as a physical barrier and supported the posterior capsule. RESULTS: After surgery, none of the patients had serious complications during the follow-up period of 1y. Extension of the PCR size occurred in only 2 cases, and additional OVD injection was required only in 3 cases. Air bubbles imparted great stability to the nuclear pieces and the posterior capsule. CONCLUSION: The air-bubble technique may be considered a safe and effective procedure for managing a PCR. It may be of value to the inexperienced cataract surgeon.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxwell S. Stem ◽  
Bozho Todorich ◽  
Maria A. Woodward ◽  
Jason Hsu ◽  
Jeremy D. Wolfe

Intraocular lenses (IOLs) can have inadequate support for placement in the capsular bag as a result of ocular trauma, metabolic or inherited conditions such as Marfan syndrome or pseudoexfoliation, or complicated cataract surgery. Surgical options for patients with inadequate capsular support include alternative placement of the IOL in the anterior chamber, fixation to the iris, or fixation to the sclera. The surgical techniques for each of these approaches have improved considerably over the last several decades resulting in improved visual and ocular outcomes. If no capsular or iris support exists, the surgeon can fixate an IOL to the sclera or the patient can remain aphakic. IOLs can be fixated to the sclera using sutures or by tunneling the IOL haptics into the sclera without sutures. This review summarizes the preoperative considerations, surgical techniques, outcomes, and unique complications associated with implantation of scleral-fixated IOLs.


2021 ◽  
pp. 27-29
Author(s):  
Garima Agrawal

Introduction: Ophthalmic viscosurgical devices have remained an indispensable part of the cataract surgery armamentarium now for decades. Their use has been for forming the anterior chamber and protection of the corneal endothelium. Viscodissection and viscodelineation have been described by authors . We designed a study to evaluate the usefulness of ophthalmic viscosurgical device procedures in our phacoemulsication cases . Aim: The study documents the use of ophthalmic viscosurgical device procedures as an added step to facilitate cataract removal. Methods: Twenty ve consecutive cases of cataract with nuclear sclerosis one or two withor without any grade of posterior subcapsular opacication were enrolled. The cases were performed by a single operator. Phacoemulsication was performed as per protocol. Ophthalmic viscosurgical device procedures were performed as an additional step. Subjective and objective assessments were done post operatively. Results: The use of ophthalmic viscosurgical device procedures reduced the total phaco energy used per case. Discussion: Ophthalmic viscosurgical device procedures are advocated as an adjunct to power modulations to reduce the total phaco energy used per case. Conclusion: In the era of increasing sophistication ophthalmic viscosurgical device procedures represent an exciting paradigm shift towards minimalization and efcacy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 509-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Momoko Yamakawa ◽  
Mami Kusaka ◽  
Shogo Yamada ◽  
Masayuki Akimoto

Purpose To describe a new technique for remnant removal in cases of posterior capsular rupture during cataract surgery and Soemmering ring extraction during intraocular lens (IOL) removal. Methods An IOL injector, inserted into the anterior chamber, provides a new exit for residual lens fragments. Passive fluid flow, supplied by an anterior chamber maintainer or some ocular viscoelastic device (OVD) injection, delivers the residual fragments into a lumen of the injector in assistance with a second device such as a phaco-chopper and vitreous cutter. Results Soemmering rings can be removed safely through small incisions even when under the iris. Nucleus fragments in anterior chamber can be removed safely. Fragments that fall into the vitreous cavity can float up for removal by passive flow. Conclusions This new technique, remnant extraction through lens injector with essential flow, has several practical advantages over existing methods including reduced OVD injection and smaller incision size. It may offer an alternative to existing methods of remnant removal in cases of posterior capsular rupture during cataract surgery and Soemmering ring extraction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document