The short external rotators dissection during the posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty did not change the blood flow

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 718-724
Author(s):  
Daisuke Setoguchi ◽  
Koichi Kinoshita ◽  
Tetsuro Ishimatsu ◽  
Satohiro Ishii ◽  
Takuaki Yamamoto
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Subcutaneous Tissue ◽  
Laser Doppler ◽  
Dislocation Rate ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Blood Flows ◽  
Significant Difference

Objectives: The posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA) often requires dissection of the short external rotators (SERs), which could increase the postoperative dislocation rate. The reattachment of the dissected SERs has been reported to reduce the dislocation rate, while such repair generally causes progression of muscle atrophy. 1 of the suggested causes of atrophy is reduced blood flow to the repaired SERs. The present study aimed to measure the blood flow of the SERs before dissection (pre-tenotomy) and after reattachment (post-reattachment) during the posterior approach in THA. Methods: This prospective study included 26 patients who underwent THA via the posterior approach. A laser-Doppler rheometer was used to measure the blood flow in the following SERs at the time of pre-tenotomy and post-reattachment: the piriformis muscle (PM), superior gemellus (SG), inferior gemellus (IG), obturator internus (OI), and subcutaneous tissue as a control. Results: The average pre-tenotomy and post-reattachment blood flows (mL/minutes/100 g) were: 1.90 ± 0.28 and 1.92 ± 0.40 in the PM, 1.94 ± 0.20 and 1.99 ± 0.39 in the SG, 1.91 ± 0.21 and 1.94 ± 0.30 in the IG, 1.93 ± 0.22 and 1.98 ± 0.36 in the OI, and 1.94 ± 0.24 and 1.87 ± 0.38 in the subcutaneous tissue. The pre-tenotomy and post-reattachment blood flows did not show significant difference in any muscle. Conclusions: Laser-Doppler blood flow measurements showed that the blood flow is preserved, even when the SERs are dissected and reattached in THA via the posterior approach.

scholarly journals Lower Dislocation Rate Following Total Hip Arthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach than via Posterior Approach: Five-Year-Average Follow-Up Results

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachiyuki Tsukada ◽  
Motohiro Wakui
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Direct Anterior Approach ◽  
Dislocation Rate ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Total Hip

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the dislocation rate between total hip arthroplasty (THA) via direct anterior approach (DAA) and via posterior approach (PA). Methods: We compared a consecutive series of 139 THAs via DAA with 177 THAs via PA. All study patients received ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces and similar uncemented prostheses. Dislocation-free survival after THA was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier survival method and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Results: In the DAA group, none of 139 hips experienced dislocations in five-year-average follow-up. In the PA group, seven hips experienced dislocations among 177 hips (4 %). The dislocation was significantly less in the DAA group compared to the PA group (p = 0.033). Conclusion: The dislocation rate of THA via DAA was significantly less than that of THA via PA.

scholarly journals 166 Dual Mobility for Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision Surgery: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Antinolfi ◽  
V Pace ◽  
G Placella ◽  
G Bettinelli ◽  
V Salini
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Risk Ratio ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Dislocation Rate ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Dual Mobility ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Dual Mobility (DM) implants provide greater stability especially in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty (R-THA) when compared to primary THA. Aim: to identify the current evidence regarding outcomes of DM in R-THA when compared to fixed-bearing (FB) implants. Review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Structured electronic searches. Primary outcome measure: dislocation rate following R-THA. Secondary outcome measures: implant survival, aseptic loosening, infection rate. Studies' methodology quality assessed using MINORS criteria. All articles published from 2016 to December 2019 included. 1777 R-THAs were reported (49.9% with DM acetabular component, 50.1% with FB component). Sample size: 67-426 patients. Mean age: 57-73. Mean follow-up period: 12-60 months. Significant risk ratio of 1.08 [1.05, 1.12] (95% CI, I2 = 37%, P < 0.00001) with statistically significant difference between the two groups in favour of DM implant. Statistically significant difference in favour of DM group with respect to dislocation rate (risk ratio 0.22, 95% CI; P < 0.00001) and aseptic loosening (risk ratio 0.51, 95% CI; P < 0.05). No statistical difference between the groups on risk ratio for infection 0.94 (95% CI; P = 0.85). DM implants are beneficial in R-THA when compared to FB implants. However, one needs to balance the benefits of using DM implant considering the patient’s clinical conditions and the costs involved.

Femoral Stem Tip Orientation and Surgical Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 212-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.D. Vaughan ◽  
P.J. Singh ◽  
R. Teare ◽  
R. Kucheria ◽  
G.C. Singer
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Surgical Approach ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Entry Point ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tip Position

Introduction A posterior entry point, a neutral tip position and neutral stem alignment are recommended to avoid a thin cement mantle and ensure an optimal outcome in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Our aim was to highlight any influence of surgical approach in obtaining an optimal stem orientation. Methods We examined the post-operative, digitised radiographs of 100 (50 each group) polished, tapered Exeter THA, inserted via the antero-lateral or posterior approaches. Stem tip position was assessed in both coronal and sagittal planes and stem alignment was assessed in the coronal plane. Results: There was a significant difference between the two approaches in the sagittal stem tip position only (p=0.01). Discussion Our results illustrate that a neutral stem tip position in THA is significantly more difficult to obtain with an antero-lateral approach, when compared to the posterior approach. A posterior approach to the hip avoids the cuff of glutei that can lever the proximal stem anteriorly causing an anterior entry point and a posterior stem tip position. We also illustrate how the anatomy of the proximal femur in the sagittal plane makes a neutral stem alignment difficult to achieve with either approach.

scholarly journals Short-stem total hip arthroplasty is not associated with an earlier return to work compared to a straight-stem design

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg Hauer ◽  
Maria Smolle ◽  
Sabrina Zaussinger ◽  
Joerg Friesenbichler ◽  
Andreas Leithner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Sick Leave ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Short Stem ◽  
Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Stem Design ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Straight Stem ◽  
Significant Difference

AbstractReturn to work (RTW) has been specifically identified as a high priority in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). This investigation sought to assess the effect of the stem design on patients’ RTW. Secondly, the study aimed to identify risk factors that lead to a delayed RTW. Questionnaires inquiring about RTW, employment history, educational level, type of work, physical demands and joint awareness were administered by post. Further data were collected from patients’ hospital records. 176 patients who underwent THA using a short-stem and 97 patients using a straight-stem design were compared. The median return to work time was 10 weeks [IQR 7–14 weeks], with no significant difference between the two groups (short stems vs. straight stems; 10 [IQR 7–14] vs. 11 [7.5–13.5] weeks; p = 0.693). In the multivariate linear regression analysis, self-employment vs. employee (p = 0.001), dimension of preoperative workload (p = 0.001), preoperative sick leave (p < 0.001), and hospital length of stay (LOS) (p < 0.001) independently affected the period until work was resumed. The Forgotten-Joint-Score-12 showed no significant difference between the two groups. The data show that the majority of THA patients can expect to resume work and stem design has no impact on RTW. Employees with preoperative sick leave, prolonged hospital LOS and low workload are at higher risk for a delayed RTW.

Biomechanical analysis of transverse acetabular fracture fixation in the elderly via the posterior versus the anterior approach with and without a total hip arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 234 (9) ◽  
pp. 966-974
Author(s):  
Joel Moktar ◽  
Alan Machin ◽  
Habiba Bougherara ◽  
Emil H Schemitsch ◽  
Radovan Zdero
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Component ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Fracture ◽  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Failure Load ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Total Hip

This study provides the first biomechanical comparison of the fixation constructs that can be created to treat transverse acetabular fractures when using the “gold-standard” posterior versus the anterior approach with and without a total hip arthroplasty in the elderly. Synthetic hemipelvises partially simulating osteoporosis (n = 24) were osteotomized to create a transverse acetabular fracture and then repaired using plates/screws, lag screws, and total hip arthroplasty acetabular components in one of four ways: posterior approach (n = 6), posterior approach plus a total hip arthroplasty acetabular component (n = 6), anterior approach (n = 6), and anterior approach plus a total hip arthroplasty acetabular component (n = 6). All specimens were biomechanically tested. No differences existed between groups for stiffness (range, 324.6–387.3 N/mm, p = 0.629), clinical failure load at 5 mm of femoral head displacement (range, 1630.1–2203.9 N, p = 0.072), or interfragmentary gapping (range, 0.67–1.33 mm, p = 0.359). Adding a total hip arthroplasty acetabular component increased ultimate mechanical failure load for posterior (2904.4 vs. 3652.3 N, p = 0.005) and anterior (3204.9 vs. 4396.0 N, p = 0.000) approaches. Adding a total hip arthroplasty acetabular component also substantially reduced interfragmentary sliding for posterior (3.08 vs. 0.50 mm, p = 0.002) and anterior (2.17 vs. 0.29 mm, p = 0.024) approaches. Consequently, the anterior approach with a total hip arthroplasty may provide the best biomechanical stability for elderly patients, since this fixation group had the highest mechanical failure load and least interfragmentary sliding, while providing equivalent stiffness, clinical failure load, and gapping compared to other surgical options.

A prospective randomised comparison of earlier function after total hip arthroplasty with a mini posterior approach or supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip approach: a gait analysis study

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110184
Author(s):  
Andrey A Korytkin ◽  
Younes M El Moudni ◽  
Yana S Novikova ◽  
Kirill A Kovaldov ◽  
Ekaterina A Morozova
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Gait Analysis ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Gait Velocity ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Kinematic Parameters ◽  
Gait Patterns ◽  
Total Hip

Background: The supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPATH) approach is a muscle sparing surgical technique for total hip arthroplasty (THA). The literature reports good clinical and functional results of the SuperPATH technique in the short term. We aimed to compare early outcomes and gait analysis of THA using the mini posterior approach (MPA) and supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPATH) approach. Methods: 44 patients who underwent THA, were randomly allocated to either MPA or SuperPATH. The data were then collected prospectively (preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 weeks). Plain anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis and instrumental gait analysis were obtained. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS) were used to assess functional and clinical outcomes. Results: No significant difference was found in patients’ surgical outcomes. Patients in the SuperPATH group had less pain according to the VAS score at follow-up than the MPA group ( p < 0.01). There was also a significant improvement in HHS and HOOS scores for all patients ( p < 0.001) with the SuperPATH group showing superior changes. The comparison of mean differences in gait velocity between preoperative and 6 weeks postoperative result, revealed improvement in the SuperPATH group over the MPA group ( p = 0.06). Limping was more persistent in the MPA group. Kinematic parameters demonstrated improved hip joint excursion slightly higher in the MPA group. There was no significant improvement in kinetic and kinematic parameters at different walking moments for all patients at 6 weeks compared to preoperative gait patterns. Conclusions: SuperPATH and MPA both show excellent results. This study reveals that the SuperPATH technique was associated with lower postoperative pain levels, and higher physical function and quality of life. Improved functional outcomes allowed earlier postoperative rehabilitation and faster recovery. Specific improvement in gait patterns were identified with nonsignificant differences between the 2 approaches at 6 weeks follow-up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document