Reliability and acceptability of the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-29 questionnaire in an English-speaking cohort

Background: Multiple Sclerosis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-54 (MSQoL-54) is a disease-specific instrument for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Due to the number of items, the time taken to complete it is long. A shorter 29-item version, Multiple Sclerosis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-29 (MSQoL-29) is yet to be evaluated in English. Objective: To assess reliability and acceptability of English version of MSQoL-29. Methods: Among 100 participants with MS who first completed both MSQoL-54 and MSQoL-29, 91 completed MSQoL-29 after 4–8 weeks. We looked for internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha), acceptability, reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs)) and agreement (Bland–Altman plots). Results: ICCs were strongly positive between MSQoL-54 and MSQoL-29 (Physical Health Composite (PHC) –ICC = 0.914, confidence interval (CI) = 0.872–0.942; Mental Health Composite (MHC) – ICC = 0.875, CI = 0.814–0.916) and between the two MSQoL-29 (PHC – ICC = 0.970, CI = 0.955–0.980; MHC – ICC = 0.937, CI = 0.904–0.958). On Bland–Altman plots, the MSQoL-29 scores of 95% of participants during two visits were within the limits of agreement (LOAs). Time taken to complete MSQoL-29 was 7.2 ± 2.9 minutes and MSQoL-54 was 19.79 ± 5.4 minutes ( p = 0.0001). Conclusion: MSQoL-29 has good test–retest reliability in English-speaking population and was quicker to complete.

Download Full-text

Validation of online Asthma Control Questionnaire and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire

ERJ Open Research ◽

10.1183/23120541.00289-2019 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. 00289-2019

Author(s):

Rishi J. Khusial ◽

Persijn J. Honkoop ◽

Victor van der Meer ◽

Jiska B. Snoeck-Stroband ◽

Jacob K. Sont

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Asthma Control ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Correlation Coefficients ◽

Random Order ◽

Life Questionnaire ◽

Asthma Control Questionnaire ◽

Quality Of Life Questionnaire ◽

Intraclass Correlation Coefficients

ObjectiveSeveral newly developed eHealth applications use online questionnaires to monitor asthma control. The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) are two such commonly used questionnaires. These questionnaires are validated for use on paper. This study aims to validate them by assessing the agreement between online and paper versions of the ACQ and AQLQ.MethodsPatients (aged 18 years and older) from the Self-Management in Asthma Supported by Hospitals, ICT, Nurses and General Practitioners (SMASHING)-trial and Davos@home study were included in this study. Patients completed both the paper and online Dutch versions of the ACQ and AQLQ in a random order within a 2-week interval. Agreement between the different versions was assessed with paired t-tests, intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland–Altman plots.ResultsIn total 44 patients were eligible for analysis. The mean difference between the paper and online versions of the ACQ was 0.04 (p=0.40) and for the AQLQ it was 0.08 (p=0.06). The intraclass correlation coefficient scores were 0.94 for the ACQ and 0.95 for the AQLQ.ConclusionThe online versions of the ACQ and AQLQ show high levels of agreement with the paper versions and can therefore be safely used in eHealth applications to respectively monitor asthma control and quality of life.

Download Full-text