scholarly journals Impact of Severe Coronary Disease Associated or Not Associated with Diabetes Mellitus on Outcome of Interventional Treatment Using Stents: Results from HERZ (Heart Research Group of Kanazawa) Analyses

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 549-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Uchiyama ◽  
H Ino ◽  
K Hayashi ◽  
K Fujioka ◽  
S Takabatake ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Akritopoulos ◽  
K Akritopoulou ◽  
E Fotiadis ◽  
S Patiakas ◽  
I Kontogiannis ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Von Renteln ◽  
S Hassan ◽  
K Szummer ◽  
R Edfors ◽  
D Venetsanos ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are often aimed at the culprit vessel in acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) followed by revascularisation of other stenoses later in the index hospitalisation or shortly after discharge. PCI delay of non-culprit coronary vessels stenoses is supported by lower contrast fluid use and thrombocyte aggregation. Distinct coronary interventions increase the risk of both non- and coronary artery complications, e.g. acute abdominal and periphery artery bleeding, suggesting undertaking all PCIs at the same time. Purpose To assess the effect on mortality and re-myocardial infarction (MI) of immediate versus staged revascularisation in multivessel coronary disease, with the latter constrained to initial PCI of the culprit coronary vessel. Methods The syntax of “randomised controlled trial (RCT) & acute coronary syndrome & complete revascularisation” was undertaken in PubMed. Clinical characteristics were gathered at the index hospitalisation. The intervention scenario was acute coronary syndrome or not. Meta-analyses calculated relative risk (RR) reductions on outcomes of 1) mortality and 2) re-MI. Meta-regression assessed linear difference between interventional treatment benefits and baseline characteristics. Results A total of 148 studies was found. Of those, 8 was found eligible for further analyses and their baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Comparison of immediate versus staged revascularisation on mortality was nonsignificant (RR, 1.19; 95% CI: 0.78–1.81, p=0.43) (Figure 1). The impact of Immediate vs staged revascularisation on re-MI was also nonsignificant (RR, 0.83; 95% CI: 0.44–1.55, p=0.56). Meta-regression found no associations between the outcomes and study characteristics (not shown). Conclusion The intervention of immediate compared to staged revascularisation assessed on outcomes of all-cause mortality and re-MI were nonsignificant. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 1245-1251
Author(s):  
Iryna A. Holovanova ◽  
Grygori A. Oksak ◽  
Iryna M. Tkachenko ◽  
Maxim V. Khorosh ◽  
Mariia M. Tovstiak ◽  
...  

The aim of our study was to identify the main risk factors for the occurrence of early complications of acute myocardial infarction after cardio-interventional treatment and to evaluate prognostic risk indicators. Materials and methods: Risk factors of myocardial infarction were determined by copying the case history data and calculating on their basis of the odds ratio and ±95% confidence interval. After it, we made a prediction of the risk of early complications of AMI with cardiovascular intervention by using a Cox regression that took into account the patient’s transportation time by ambulance. Results: Thus, the factors that increase the chances of their occurrence were: summer time of year; recurrent myocardial infarction of another specified localization (I122.8); the relevance of the established STEMI diagnosis; diabetes mellitus; renal pathology; smoking; high rate of BMI. Factors that reduce the chances of their occurrence: men gender – in 35%; the age over of 70 – by 50%; the timely arrival of an emergency medical team – by 55%. The factors that increase the chances of their occurrence were: age over 70 years; subsequent myocardial infarction of unspecified site; diabetes mellitus. Using of a Cox regression analysis, it was proved that the cumulative risk of early complications of AMI with cardio-intervention treatment increased from the 10th minute of ambulance arrival at place, when ECG diagnosis (STEMI), presence of diabetes mellitus, smoking and high BMI. Conclusions: As a result of the conducted research, the risk factors for early complications of AIM with cardio-interventional treatment were identified.


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 209
Author(s):  
José F Díaz ◽  
Carlos Sanchez-Gonzalez ◽  
Juan C. Fernandez-Guerrero ◽  
Manuel Jimenez ◽  
Rosa Cardenal ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Nunez Martinez ◽  
N V-Ibarra ◽  
F Marin Ortuno ◽  
V Pernias Escrig ◽  
M Sandin Rollan ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a higher atherothrombotic risk and higher rates of recurrent ischemic events compared with the non-diabetic population. Although current antiplatelet therapy strategies have been shown to be successful in improving outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), patients with DM continue to experience high rates of adverse cardiovascular events. Today, it is known that diabetic patients are characterized by a deregulation in different intracellular signaling pathways, which leads to an inadequate or suboptimal response to antiplatelets agents. The purpose of this study is to analyze the different therapeutic strategies, the use of new antiplatelet drugs and medium-term prognosis in diabetic patients compared with non-diabetic patients who have suffered an ACS. Methods It is an observational, prospective and multicenter registry of patients with ACS. The objective is to analyze the differences in the management of DM patients vs non-DM patients in the acute phase and their evolution during the first year after coronary event. Antiplatelet therapy administered will be evaluated, type of coronary injury and treatment performed, major adverse events as well as cardiovascular complications and mortality at one year of follow-up. Results Of a total of 1717 patients, 38% were diabetic. The diabetic population was older, with a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and higher rate of previous cardiovascular events (cerebrovascular, peripheral arterial disease and coronary disease). Patients with DM received less new antiplatelets drugs at admission (15.5% DM vs 26.5% non DM, p<0.001) and less in-hospital switch to new antiplatelet agents was performed. They were subjected to a lower number of catheterizations and at the time of revascularization, the drug-eluting stent was of choice. During admission, they developed more complications, both ischemic (refractory angina, reinfarction or CVA) and hemorrhagic. Following one year, DM had higher major cardiovascular events (MACE) and higher mortality (7.72% vs 5.14%, p=0.0039). Non-coronary revascularization, renal failure, and reduced ejection fraction were predictive variables of death in diabetic population. Treatment with new antiplatelet drugs was associated with a statistically significant decrease in total mortality an MACE without differences in major bleeding. Conclusion More than a third of patients with ACS are diabetic. These patients present with more severe coronary disease associating a greater number of cardiovascular events and a higher mortality rate after one year of ACS. However, despite this, they undergo less invasive tests and they were undertreated with the new antiplatelets therapies. Acknowledgement/Funding SEC


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document