Promoting Access to the General Curriculum Using Peer Support Strategies

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 284-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik W. Carter ◽  
Craig H. Kennedy
Author(s):  
Joseline M. Santos

The conduct of an action research enabled teachers to assess the research capabilities of the students specifically in writing the different parts of the paper. The aim of the study is to improve the learning acquisition of students through peer-mediated support strategies in teaching research. The participants of this study were the Senior High School students taking Research Project as a subject. A pre-writing activity was administered to identify the needs of the students in writing the different parts of the research. A learning plan integrating the use of the Peer-mediated Support Strategies (PMSS) such as classroom-wide peer tutoring, peer support arrangement and lunch bunches as interventions, was developed to improve the performance of the students-participants in writing research. A post-writing activity was given as well to the participants to find out if there were significant improvements in their writing capability. The study used methodological triangulation. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse and compare the results of the pre-writing and post-writing scores. A focus group discussion and teachers’ observation were conducted to support the result of the analysis made. The result was found to be significant proving PMSS to be an effective strategy in improving acquisition of learning. KEYWORDS: Research writing, acquisition of learning, peer-mediated support strategies, peer assisted learning, classroom-wide tutoring, peer-support arrangement, lunch bunches


Author(s):  
Marion Doull ◽  
Annette M. O'Connor ◽  
Vivian Welch ◽  
Peter Tugwell ◽  
George A Wells

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothy Chepkirui ◽  
Jacinta Nzinga ◽  
Julie Jemutai ◽  
Benjamin Tsofa ◽  
Caroline Jones ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The 2013 updated guidelines on management of severe acute malnutrition in infants and children recommends the support of exclusive breastfeeding. These guidelines are inconsistently applied in low and middle income countries (LMICs) due to barriers including unclear implementation guides, technical support and epidemiological factors. Peer support strategies have been used to offer psychological support to families with infants in NICU and improve mental health outcomes. Breastfeeding peer supporters (BFPS) have been shown to be effective in improving breastfeeding outcomes in community settings however, their success within hospital settings in LMICs is unknown. We conducted a scoping review to explore implementation of breastfeeding peer support strategies as have been applied to hospitalized infants globally and highlight their implementation strategies in order to guide future research and practice. Methods A scoping review of the literature was conducted using the Arksey and O’Malley framework. A search was conducted in five online databases (PubMed, Cochrane library, Hinari, Google Scholar and Open Grey library). Data were extracted and charted in data extraction tables to capture general characteristics, modes of peer support delivery, implementation details and evaluation procedures. Results From the online search 276 articles were identified, however only 18 met the inclusion criteria for the study. The majority of these articles were reports on in-patient breastfeeding peer support interventions applied in Europe and the United States of America and only two were from LMICs. The articles described peer supporters’ identification, training (n = 13) and supervision (n = 14). The majority of the BFPS were employed (n = 10) compared to volunteers (n = 3) and support was mainly one-to-one (n = 11) rather than group support. Process and impact evaluation (n = 13) reported positive breastfeeding outcomes associated with breastfeeding peer support. Conclusion Breastfeeding peer support strategies are applied in different hospital settings and can be used to improve breastfeeding outcomes. However, to achieve integration, scalability and comparability of impact and outcomes, there is a need to standardize training, develop consistent implementation and supervision plans of in-patient peer supporters’ strategies. Further research to assess sustainability and evaluate cost-effectiveness of in-patient breastfeeding peer support strategies will improve uptake and scalability of these potentially lifesaving interventions.


2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik W. Carter ◽  
Lisa S. Cushing ◽  
Nitasha M. Clark ◽  
Craig H. Kennedy

Peer support interventions are emerging as an effective alternative to traditional paraprofessional models for assisting students with moderate to severe disabilities to access the general curriculum. To contribute to the refinement of peer support interventions, we evaluated the impact of altering the number of participating peers on the social and academic outcomes of students with and without disabilities. Our findings indicated that changes in the configuration of peer support arrangements differentially affected student outcomes. Specifically, higher levels of social interaction and contact with the general curriculum were observed when students with disabilities worked with two peers relative to one peer. The additive benefits of a second peer provide guidance to educators concerning the implementation of peer support interventions in inclusive classrooms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document