Avoiding Misrepresentation in Forensic Human Factors

2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (9) ◽  
pp. 549-553
Author(s):  
Kenneth Nemire
Keyword(s):  
Human Factors ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Ethical Problems ◽  
Human Factors And Ergonomics ◽  
Forensic Expert

Every aspect of human factors consulting in litigation presents opportunities and challenges for acting in an ethical manner. This article discusses three types of misrepresentation that pose ethical problems: (1) disregarding information, (2) misrepresenting existing research, and (3) misrepresenting facts in a case. These examples are demonstrated in the context of three different lawsuits involving forensic human factors experts. The article concludes with a discussion of the role of the forensic expert to help reveal the truth, and a suggestion to revise the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Code of Ethics.

scholarly journals Symposium: The Role of Human Factors Standards in Advancing Science and Practice: Some Examples from Automotive, Nuclear, Healthcare, and Petrochemical Industries

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 597-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Green
Keyword(s):  
Human Factors ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Strategic Plan ◽  
Motor Vehicles ◽  
Human Factors And Ergonomics ◽  
Supporting Materials ◽  
Petrochemical Industries

The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES) has created a Task Force to help implement Goal D of the HFES Strategic plan ( https://www.hfes.org/about-hfes/strategic-plan ), to “translate the science of HF/E into practice.” One way for that to occur is for HFES publications to cite standards. This symposium will raise awareness of this idea and provide additional supporting materials. The focus is on 4 example applications - automotive (in particular, SAE standards for motor vehicles), healthcare (with a focus on AAMI), nuclear (from both the IEEE and NRC perspectives), and oil and gas. Papers in this symposium will (1) describe organizations and the groups within them that develop human factors standards for each of the 4 applications, (2) describe how to find human factors standards relevant to these applications, (3) summarize some of those standards, and (4) identify where human factors input is needed to improve the standards of each organization.

Embedding Ethical Principles into the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society: Interactive Discussion with the Code of Ethics Task Force

2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 317-320
Author(s):  
S. Camille Peres ◽  
Claudia Ziegler Acemyan ◽  
Ellen J. Bass ◽  
Emily Brunsen ◽  
Rosemarie Figueroa Jacinto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Human Factors ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Ethical Principles ◽  
Operating Rules ◽  
Human Factors And Ergonomics ◽  
Do So

The society’s code of ethics was last updated in 2005 and thus needs to be reviewed and updated. To do so, the previous code of ethics was reviewed as well as other documentation particularly with respect to inclusion. The goal of the Code of Ethics Task Force at the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society is to not only review the society’s artefacts but also to recommend suggestions for their improvement with respect to best practices. Further, this Task Force will explore whether and if so how, operating rules should be established to support the Code of Ethics.

The Role of Hedonomics in the Future of Industry, Service, and Product Design: Panel Overview

2005 ◽  
Vol 49 (18) ◽  
pp. 1701-1704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tal Oron-Gilad ◽  
P.A. Hancock
Keyword(s):  
Human Computer Interaction ◽  
Human Factors ◽  
Product Design ◽  
Rapid Growth ◽  
Work Environments ◽  
User Evaluation ◽  
Human Factors Engineering ◽  
Human Factors And Ergonomics ◽  
Future Work

Hedonomics has been defined as “ the branch of science which facilitates the pleasant or enjoyable aspects of human-technology interaction.” Hedonomics in general is a fairly new area in research and it is evidently new in ergonomics, human factors, usability and human-computer interaction (HCI). During the last ten years there has been a rapid growth in research about affect and pleasure. Considering the lack of interest from the psychological community during much of the 1900's this comes as a surprise. Affective evaluations provide a new and different perspective in Human Factors Engineering. It is not how to evaluate users — it is how the user evaluates. The research on hedonic values and seductive interfaces is in fact a welcome contrast to issues of safety and productivity, which have dominated human factors and ergonomics (HF/E). In order for industry to adopt these user-evaluating principles (as opposed to user-evaluation principles) it has to be convinced of their practical effectiveness in the workplace. This panel will focus on this issue and the role of Hedonomics in future work environments and products.

The Role of Human Factors and Ergonomics Professionals on Sustainable Development

2020 ◽  
pp. 130-138
Author(s):  
Eduardo Ferro dos Santos ◽  
Karine Borges de Oliveira ◽  
Gustavo Aristides Santana Martinez ◽  
Messias Borges Silva
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Human Factors ◽  
Human Factors And Ergonomics

The HFES Diversity Task Force

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 422-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tonya Smith-Jackson ◽  
Richard Pak ◽  
Kayenda Johnson ◽  
Anne McLaughlin ◽  
Ericka Rovira
Keyword(s):  
Human Factors ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Professional Society ◽  
Diversity And Inclusion ◽  
Human Factors And Ergonomics ◽  
Strategic Initiatives ◽  
New Ideas ◽  
Interactive Session ◽  
Education Outreach

Did you know the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society has a Diversity Task Force (DTF)? Did you ever wonder what the Task Force is doing or what it is supposed to be doing? The HFES DTF has been active for many years in various roles in our professional Society. This panel is designed to help the membership understand the role of the DTF in advancing the strategic initiatives of the Society by providing examples of current work and demonstrating objectives of the DTF. Some areas to be discussed include education, outreach, military, and research. The Q&A will be an interactive session to generate new ideas and interests about the future of the DTF. Attendees will be asked to share inputs to address the evolving needs of diversity and inclusion in HFES.

Media and Public Engagement for Societal Impact: Getting the Word Out about Human Factors and Ergonomics

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 555-558
Author(s):  
Rod D. Roscoe ◽  
Claudia Z. Acemyan ◽  
Karen Jacobs ◽  
Michelle M. Robertson ◽  
Angela Yoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Factors ◽  
Public Engagement ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Social Outcomes ◽  
Societal Impact ◽  
Societal Issues ◽  
Human Factors And Ergonomics ◽  
Beneficial Impact ◽  
The Media

Societal impact refers to the influence of research on economic, environmental, cultural, and social outcomes that extend beyond the scientific sphere. In 2018, the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society launched the Societal Impact Committee to mindfully identify societal issues in which HF/E could contribute to beneficial impact while also advancing science and practice. This panel will consider the role of media and public engagement in facilitating this broad endeavor. Panelists will discuss their experiences, strategies, and lessons learned pertaining to connecting with the media and public via outreach, journalism, museums, and more.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document